You see...here's the main problem with the mutually-exclusive excuses for going along with the "official" interpretation of events...
...IT DOESN'T WORK!
As indicated in a prior posting on PrisonPlanet, Larry "Two Sheds" Silverstein cannot have it both ways - when he uses the term "pull it", he attempts to explain that he was not using the widely-recognized controlled demolition term as it is commonly used; rather, he states that he was referring to the removal of firefighters from the Salomon Brothers Building, also known as World Trade Center Building 7.
But that turns out to be a bold-faced LIE. There were NO FIREFIGHTERS in WTC 7! There seemed to be an issue with getting proper irrigation with which to douse the relatively localized fires with WTC 7; and so, firefighters were forbidden to perform actions within the building.
The BBC hit piece that attempts to debunk the assertions that the Salomon Brothers Buiding was removed by controlled demolition engaged in some selective editing of the statement made by Larry in a 2002 documentary - the original statement is thus:
Do you see the last line of his statement? It was REMOVED in the piece. That alters the entire context of his statement, allowing the BBC hit piece to falsely assert that Larry did not refer to the collapse of WTC 7 using widely-accepted controlled demolition terminology.
I have reprinted my posting at PrisonPlanet in regards to this latest bit of crap by the BBC - of course, it is partly in response to some stupid-ass posters:
I think that Brad is Brad Davis of the despicable smear attempt on Alex Jones - the same one he pulled on Michael Jackson.
Lokis...you were the result of someone not pulling out quite in time...I'm sure that you parents look askance at you every once in awhile...knowing that you weren't a planned birth.
Why am I so incensed? Because it's pieces of afterbirth like YOU that allow for atrocities and false-flag attacks like September 11th to occur.
You indulge in your shared delusion with your fellow 9/11 Official Staters, and implore all of us to do the same...but you seem to be missing one very important aspect of accepting that nonsense and your shared delusion - WHO BENEFITS?
According to your shared delusion, we are less than human and don't need to be afforded human rights. We can be lied to with impunity. In fact, we have NO RIGHTS that you need to observe or respect.
Do you understand why we REJECT your bullshit lies and prevarications?
I was, until yesterday, engaged in a battle with a completely morally-compromised individual - we kept going back and forth about NONSENSE...he ended up admitting thatthe attack on the U.S.S. Liberty was an attempt to hide/obscure ILLEGAL ACTIONS taken by the Israeli Air Force, that if successfull, would have laid the blame squarely on Egypt. Luckily, our AMERICAN-BUILT intelligence ship was tougher than their shitty little air force.
Here's the thing...I was listening to that very show last night on my walkman - Alex was discussing how he BUSTED Brad Davis on his ensuing hit piece against 9/11 Truthers, and the tactics understaken to do so. The ONE THING that these tools NEVER do is ADDRESS THE FACTS.
The Drug War...let me guess...you love those bloody pharmaceuticals, don't you? You are nothing but a REAL useless eater...you will suck on any diseased teat that is offered to you, and you will toe the line like a good little useless eater, won't you?
Esctasy - good!
Marijuana - bad!
Do you know that there are only three reasons marijuana is made illegal here in the U.S.?
1. Marijuana can cure most ills, including CANCER.
2. Marijuana aids in the INDEPENDENT THOUGHT PROCESS.
3. Most importantly, marijuana cannot be GENETICALLY MODIFIED!
Otherwise, Monsanto and all of those other purveyors of FrankenFoods would be at the forefront making RoundUp-Ready weed and they would ELIMINATE EVERY OTHER MARIJUANA CROP AROUND THE WORLD.
So...Brad, lokis, and any others...you can take your shared delusions of grandeur, your lies to start a war, and you can shove them up your diseased tuchises.
The term medical marijuana took on dramatic new meaning in February, 2000 when researchers in Madrid announced they had destroyed incurable brain tumors in rats by injecting them with THC, the active ingredient in cannabis-
The Madrid study marks only the second time that THC has been administered to tumor-bearing animals; the first was a Virginia investigation 26 years ago- In both studies, the THC shrank or destroyed tumors in a majority of the test subjects-
Most Americans don't know anything about the Madrid discovery- Virtually no major U-S- newspapers carried the story, which ran only once on the AP and UPI news wires, on Feb- 29, 2000-
The ominous part is that this isn't the first time scientists have discovered that THC shrinks tumors- In 1974 researchers at the Medical College of Virginia, who had been funded by the National Institute of Health to find evidence that marijuana damages the immune system, found instead that THC slowed the growth of three kinds of cancer in mice -- lung and breast cancer, and a virus-induced leukemia-
The DEA quickly shut down the Virginia study and all further cannabis/tumor research, according to Jack Herer, who reports on the events in his book, "The Emperor Wears No Clothes-" In 1976 President Gerald Ford put an end to all public cannabis research and granted exclusive research rights to major pharmaceutical companies, who set out -- unsuccessfully -- to develop synthetic forms of THC that would deliver all the medical benefits without the "high-"
The Madrid researchers reported in the March issue of "Nature Medicine" that they injected the brains of 45 rats with cancer cells, producing tumors whose presence they confirmed through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)- On the 12th day they injected 15 of the rats with THC and 15 with Win-55,212-2 a synthetic compound similar to THC- "All the rats left untreated uniformly died 12-18 days after glioma (brain cancer) cell inoculation --- Cannabinoid (THC)-treated rats survived significantly longer than control rats- THC administration was ineffective in three rats, which died by days 16-18- Nine of the THC-treated rats surpassed the time of death of untreated rats, and survived up to 19-35 days- Moreover, the tumor was completely eradicated in three of the treated rats-" The rats treated with Win-55,212-2 showed similar results-
The Spanish researchers, led by Dr- Manuel Guzman of Complutense University, also irrigated healthy rats' brains with large doses of THC for seven days, to test for harmful biochemical or neurological effects- They found none-
"Careful MRI analysis of all those tumor-free rats showed no sign of damage related to necrosis, edema, infection or trauma --- We also examined other potential side effects of cannabinoid administration- In both tumor-free and tumor-bearing rats, cannabinoid administration induced no substantial change in behavioral parameters such as motor coordination or physical activity- Food and water intake as well as body weight gain were unaffected during and after cannabinoid delivery- Likewise, the general hematological profiles of cannabinoid-treated rats were normal- Thus, neither biochemical parameters nor markers of tissue damage changed substantially during the 7-day delivery period or for at least 2 months after cannabinoid treatment ended-"
Guzman's investigation is the only time since the 1974 Virginia study that THC has been administered to live tumor-bearing animals- (The Spanish researchers cite a 1998 study in which cannabinoids inhibited breast cancer cell proliferation, but that was a "petri dish" experiment that didn't involve live subjects-)
In an email interview for this story, the Madrid researcher said he had heard of the Virginia study, but had never been able to locate literature on it- Hence, the Nature Medicine article characterizes the new study as the first on tumor-laden animals and doesn't cite the 1974 Virginia investigation-
"I am aware of the existence of that research- In fact I have attempted many times to obtain the journal article on the original investigation by these people, but it has proven impossible-" Guzman said-
In 1983 the Reagan/Bush Administration tried to persuade American universities and researchers to destroy all 1966-76 cannabis research work, including compendiums in libraries, reports Jack Herer, who states, "We know that large amounts of information have since disappeared-"
Guzman provided the title of the work -- "Antineoplastic activity of cannabinoids," an article in a 1975 Journal of the National Cancer Institute -- and this writer obtained a copy at the University of California medical school library in Davis and faxed it to Madrid-
The summary of the Virginia study begins, "Lewis lung adenocarcinoma growth was retarded by the oral administration of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabinol (CBN)" -- two types of cannabinoids, a family of active components in marijuana- "Mice treated for 20 consecutive days with THC and CBN had reduced primary tumor size-"
The 1975 journal article doesn't mention breast cancer tumors, which featured in the only newspaper story ever to appear about the 1974 study -- in the Local section of the Washington Post on August 18, 1974-
Under the headline, "Cancer Curb Is Studied," it read in part:
"The active chemical agent in marijuana curbs the growth of three kinds of cancer in mice and may also suppress the immunity reaction that causes rejection of organ transplants, a Medical College of Virginia team has discovered-" The researchers "found that THC slowed the growth of lung cancers, breast cancers and a virus-induced leukemia in laboratory mice, and prolonged their lives by as much as 36 percent-"
Guzman, writing from Madrid, was eloquent in his response after this writer faxed him the clipping from the Washington Post of a quarter century ago-
In translation, he wrote:
"It is extremely interesting to me, the hope that the project seemed to awaken at that moment, and the sad evolution of events during the years following the discovery, until now we once again draw back the veil‚ over the anti-tumoral power of THC, twenty-five years later- Unfortunately, the world bumps along between such moments of hope and long periods of intellectual castration-"
News coverage of the Madrid discovery has been virtually nonexistent in this country- The news broke quietly on Feb- 29, 2000 with a story that ran once on the UPI wire about the Nature Medicine article- This writer stumbled on it through a link that appeared briefly on the Drudge Report web page- The New York Times, Washington Post and Los Angeles Times all ignored the story, even though its newsworthiness is indisputable: a benign substance occurring in nature destroys deadly brain tumors-
Raymond Cushingis a journalist, musician and filmmaker- This article was named by Project Censored as a "Top Censored Story of 2000-"
Okay...a video that is pretty much right to the point (be warned - language is QUITE direct):
My bud convinced me that this video isn't over the edge...but if you want something more elegant, H.L. Mencken said it best:
"It is one of my firmest and most sacred beliefs... that the government of the United States, in both its legislative and its executive arm, is ignorant, incompetent, corrupt, and disgusting... that the administration of justice in the Republic is stupid, dishonest, and against all reason and equity... that the foreign policy of the United States, its habitual manner of dealing with other nations, whether friend or foe, is hypocritical, disingenuous, knavish, and dishonorable... that the American people, taking one with another, constitute the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages."
Lou Pearlman, creator (?) of boy bands The Backstreet Boys and N'Sync Sentenced to 25 Years for Scam - yeah...the scam not withstanding...he should be put in the stocks for unleashing that crapfest upon our senses.
1. Getting the Black population addicted to the new wonder drug, CRACK - this was created by the CIA, FBI and other agencies (I'd appreciate some verification - any takers?); in order to destabilize the Black communities who were coming to awareness of the similarities with every other community coming of age in America. The agencies were successful with the Black Panther Coloring Book and smears against celebrities such as Jean Seberg; the next step was to divide and conquer...but how to do so? Cocaine was entirely too expensive, and freebasing was considered too industrious...so a cheap, addicting smokable form was created, and introduced into the Black communities - goodbye, Black Panthers! Who has money for causes when they're chasing that "hit"?
2. The "War On Drugs" is a complete oxymoron, like "military intelligence". Kevin Ives and Don Henry were murdered by the operators of the Mena Drug Ring, overseen at one point by the then-governor of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton. When the operation was discovered, the boys were murdered, and their murders were covered up by coroners and officials stating that the kids were playing on train tracks and had gone to sleep, which led to them being run over by a train. The operation was then moved to Afghanistan, where our soldiers are putting their lives on the line for the next crop of opium and heroin.
The War On Drugs is actually the War Against AMERICANS.
I am going to destroy you bloody neoCONS! I think that about sums it up.
If I am ever "suicided", please KNOW THAT I WAS MURDERED by the BCFCE (Bush/Clinton Family Crime Empire)!
Other "sucides" include Deborah Jeane Palfrey, Danny Casolaro, John F. Kennedy, Jr., Dorothy Kilgallen, James Hatfield, Gary Webb, Don Wiley, James Forrestal, David Kelly, Paul Wellstone, J. Clifford Baxter, David Kellermann, Benazir Bhutto and Vincent Foster, to name a few.
Posts
