Showing posts with label The Original Thirteenth Amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Original Thirteenth Amendment. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

1010WINS PsyOp; Where Is The Law That States WE THE PEOPLE Must Pay Taxes?

This morning, 1010WINS ran a story regarding the individual who piloted a Cessna over the US today...they made a huge point of indicating that the individual's nationality was Turkish.

This followed a story about the fellow who purportedly threatened the life of President Obama while on his World Tour...whoa! Not only did he have a fraudulent press pass from Al-Jazeera (thereby invoking a non-status upon its journalistic efforts), he was from TURKEY!

So...not so much, right? Well...this was then followed by an AIRLINE COMMERCIAL...shades of 9/11!

Let's face it...America's currency, the dollar, is in dire straits, and our administration (and more importantly, the scumbags behind the scenes) needs a distraction; Bill Clinton getting hummers just won't do anymore.

In other news...it's tax time! Here's a posting regarding that subject:

From: Wake up America !
To:
Date: Apr 7, 2009 12:39 PM
Subject: $50,000 for you, Just show the law that you must pay taxes...


For the last 2 months I have been trying to make one of my friends happy with $50,000, most people don't make that much in a year. The money is still available.



No shit - $50.000 dollar can be yours just for showing in the constitution, tax code or anywhere else, where it is written that citizens MUST pay taxes. Watch the video and she will tell how. First you must know this reward has been available for years and not one person has been able to prove it. Seems a relatively simple task to make a quick 50K ,doesn't it? Well, what the hell you waiting for? People are murdered these days over a 100 dollars, so imagine what the average person would do for 50k. What does this say for the fact the money has never been claimed?



I challenge you to go get the money!
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

show any law that makes the average American liable for the income tax, and the IRS cannot show us any law allowing it to take the fruits of our hard labor!!

FOR YEARS we’ve sat meekly by watching the IRS, its DOJ, cronies and sock-puppet courts and federal bureaucrats thumb their noses and chop away at our numbers, punishing any who dare to ask and gagging any who dare to tell the truth about the strict limitations!!


FOR YEARS We’ve seen the IRS grow more arrogant, aggressive and abusive while our elected representatives ignore our demands for true accountability of these public servants!!

FOR YEARS WE’VE TALKED THE TALK! BUT NOW IT’S TIME TO WALK THE WALK!!!

Today, hundreds of thousands of patriotic Americans have been asking and waiting for the answer and now it’s time for every American to demand that our public servants admit the TRUTH…

TruthAttack.org


Of course, everyone knows there is an income tax, but now it’s time for us to let everyone know the TRUTH:

THERE IS NO LAW!!!
Making the average American liable for the income tax!

It’s time to stop asking and waiting and START TELLING every American the TRUTH!! America has the right to know it is being mugged by a ruthless and amoral band of lawless bureaucrats while those we have elected and those we have placed on our court benches to protect us merely look away.






It’s time to stop talking about it and START DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT!!

It’s time to stop fearing our own government servants and to RESTORE THE RULE OF LAW!!

For the first time ever, the many groups of Patriots across the country are united into one huge force and for the first time ever their message is the same, ringing out the TRUTH:

THERE IS NO LAW!!!

Alone we are easy prey for the rogue federal government, but together we are INVINCIBLE and we can and will overwhelm and expose the IRS’s BIG LIE!

IT’S TIME FOR YOU TO RAISE YOUR VOICE AND JOIN ALL THE OTHER PATRIOTIC AND FREEDOM-LOVING TRUTH TROOPERS ACROSS THIS GREAT NATION TO RESTORE THE RULE OF LAW, OUR CONSTITUTION AND OUR REPUBLIC!!

YOUR TRUTH-TROOPER KOMBAT KIT WILL GIVE YOU EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO
BRING AN END TO THE WORLD’S BIGGEST RIP-OFF!!

ENLIST TODAY!! BEGIN TO FIGHT TODAY!! NO MORE WAITING!!

IT IS TIME TO GIVE THE IRS HOODLUMS A

TRUTH ATTACK!!







see more videos @ www.myspace.com/opnurisc4u


This was too good not to repost...

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Obama: Enough Of This Crap - The Market Ticker

The site doesn't require comments without registration, and I've enough account passwords to keep track of, thank you - I certainly hope the poster doesn't mind [I have clearly delineated this text as not being my own].

This is FOUR people who you've appointed that can't pay their damn taxes, including your Treasury Secretary?

The latest is that Daschle has withdrawn, of course
.

CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN?

I'll tell you what would be change. Since it appears that a huge percentage of the current and former Congressional delegation has cheated on its taxes - after all, what are the odds you only picked the tax cheats, if you want me to believe in your idea of CHANGE you will immediately order all member of Congress in both Houses to undergo full IRS audits all the way back to the Statute of Limitations (three years), along with all of their staff.

You and I know know it won't happen, but I'll tell you what - I keep hearing people say they're going to file absolute crap this year. Utter garbage. "The Dog ate my Schedule C."

If The American People do this, Mr. President, government funding will collapse. The IRS can't possibly audit everyone and we all know it.

Your administration is dangerously close to creating a full-on tax revolt among Americans. You would not believe how often I have heard this among people both online and off in the last couple of weeks. The anger, especially when the people who are cheating are folks like Daschle and Geithner, is VISCERAL - these are the people who both wrote the tax code and were involved in the bailouts and handouts which you expect we the people - ordinary Americans - to pay for.

Here is what Daschle said previously:

"Make no mistake, tax cheaters cheat us all, and the IRS should enforce our laws to the letter. " Sen. Tom Daschle, Congressional Record, May 7, 1998, p. S4507.

But you, Mr. President, expect Americans to file truthful tax returns and pay their taxes as due?

I file and pay every year exactly what I owe. No cheating, no games, no BS. I spend upwards of a full week preparing and checking my tax return to make sure that I pay every dollar that is due (but not one more!) But now we discover that every day another one of your appointees in your "new day" for Washington DC has cheated on their taxes and in the case of Daschle and Geithner they knew they owed the money and didn't pay until you tapped them?

Against this backdrop you expect ordinary Americans to file and pay for bankster bailouts to cover the fraudulent actions of the banking and securitization industry?

You might want to rethink this one, and I can come up with only two ways to do it:

* Audit EVERY Congressperson and EVERY staffer in your administration, including yourself. Everyone, all the way back to the statute of limitations, with the results of those audits made public.
* Ditch the IRS and the current tax system entirely (mooting the question) and move the nation to The Fair Tax, thereby firing all the tax lobbyists and game-players in DC and elsewhere.

Frankly I prefer #2 but #1 is acceptable.

"Do nothing", on the other hand, may well NOT be accepted by The American people.

If what I hear in my day-to-day the patience of "The People" is about done.


Alright! Time for your good buddy to get into a tax rant:

Before 1913, Americans were NOT taxed. America was a nation where one could come from nothing, yet gain a chance to gain anything one desired.

Ever since 1913, that America has been buried under a number of occurrences...those being:

The Federal Reserve Act;
The original Thirteenth Amendment (known also as the "Titles of Nobility" Amendment;
The anti-American Fourteenth Amendment (it actually relegates U.S. citizens (read: Citizens) to subordinate status under our elected officials);
Corporations being given the "rights" of a "person"

Let's get into a tad more detail:

The Federal Reserve Act was enacted under a recess Congress, and against the will of WE THE PEOPLE. There were two instances of central banks earlier in America's history, and they were both refused by the American people...because of USURY. Amazingly, this iteration of the same crime against WE THE PEOPLE has been allowed to stand for nearly one hundred years.

Take a look at my blogroll - there are a couple of sites which discuss the Thirteenth Amendment - just in case you've no experience at all with this concept, here's the cogent part of the amendment:

"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." [Journal of the Senate]


In other words, anyone who acts as an agent of a foreign nation, or against the United States of America, CANNOT HOLD A POSITION IN GOVERNMENT.

During the war of 1812, this amendment was passed, but traitors against WE THE PEOPLE understood its true meaning, and went about to subvert our lawful protections against said traitors.

In 1865, the true, original 13th Amendment was "disappeared" and replaced with the sham that exists to this day, an amendment composed of naught but damning to this nation. Read it for yourself:

Later in 1861, another proposed amendment, also numbered thirteen, was signed by President Lincoln. This was the only proposed amendment that was ever signed by a president. That resolve to amend read: "ARTICLE THIRTEEN, No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State." (In other words, President Lincoln had signed a resolve that would have permitted slavery, and upheld states' rights.) Only one State, Illinois, ratified this proposed amendment before the Civil War broke out in 1861.


Michael Badnarik made a set of videos regarding the mis-reading of our Constitution called Constitution Class 101 - I highly recommend it to you. He discusses the difference between being a citizen of a state, and being a "Citizen of the United States". Watch the videos...you'll learn a huge amount for something you probably take for granted.

But...here's the biggest part of the scumbaggery - the tax burden originally belonged to CORPORATIONS. After all, a corporation uses more resources than a "person" could possibly use. Yet, a corporation has at its disposal many more options available.

Ever try to stage a work stoppage with couple of co-workers? The corporation will have scabs at your desk faster than you can say, "My chair cushion!"

I believe that the corporations, the quislings in our government and the bankers colluded to transfer the tax burden from the corporations to WE THE PEOPLE. Just think...Halliburton had a FIVE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLAR TAX DEBT FORGIVEN? Meanwhile, Bob Lewis gets a garnishment on his salary, because of a lousy thousand bucks?

Where has America's soul gone?

If that isn't enough, remember this: Congress had no power of taxation before 1913...and no amendments granted this power...so, how is it that WE THE PEOPLE are the recipients of an unlawful tax burden?

Wages are what we earn in exchange for labor.

Income is wealth not derived from labor (prizes, lotteries, etc.) - so think about that a little bit, dear readers.

Now...go back and read the preceding article, and ask yourself - how many more of our privileged class (i.e. our elected officials) DON'T PAY TAXES?!?

I anxiously await your responses.

Oh, yes...this has nothing directly to do with the taxation issue at hand...but do these activities bear the mark of a friendly nation?

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Anti-tax author banned from selling his advice

"The Internal Revenue Service and Justice Department have strong civil and criminal enforcement tools available to stop tax defiers who promote fraudulent schemes", Justice Department lawyer Nathan Hochman said in a statement following George's Oct. 14 order.

Emphasis mine in the statement by Justice Dept. lawyer Hochman.

The tax burden does not lawfully reside on WE THE PEOPLE...the burden belongs to corporations.

The corporations and quisling lawmakers colluded to place this burden upon us all, to keep us in a state of slavery that, up until now, has been intangible.

Have any money in a TDA? You now have HALF.


Know anything about the Amero? Plans are afoot to BANKRUPT all Americans with savings in dollars. $800 BILLION in Amero currency was shipped to China.


The know-nothings of the world are still attempting to place blame upon debt-ridden Americans for the current financial collapse
...I added my two cents (wheatbacks!) to the discussion.

Back to the issue of taxation - here's something to consider. If corporations were paying their fair share, they would be actively contributing to the well-being of the United States as a whole, but instead, corporations can, at will, "donate to charity", which is simply a legalized bribe to what efforts they deem worthy of support; understood is the idea that said recipient will be "forever grateful" to the corporation.

Consider this, also...if corporations were paying their taxes, as they should, and our government was as vigilant in their retrieval of said tax burdens as they are with WE THE PEOPLE, they could not exist in the state of collusion that currently exists (do you recall that Halliburton Corp. was relieved of a $500 MILLION tax debt?). Corporations and government would be engaged in a never-ending battle, and WE THE PEOPLE would not be involved in any regard...because we would have extended the prosperity that Americans lived with since 1789, and up until 1913, when the Federal Reserve Act was passed during a secret session of Congress; Woodrow Wilson bequeathed to corporations the "rights of a person"; and speaking of fraudulent arguments, the Sixteenth Amendment was passed.

Americans were not taxed before 1913; so since no new laws of taxation were passed, how is it that after 1913, Americans can now be taxed?

Irwin Schiff is providing the information that the IRS will NOT provide; namely, that AMERICANS SHOULD NOT BE PAYING TAXES; TAXES ARE THE RIGHTFUL BURDEN OF CORPORATIONS.

Once again, I must invoke the Titles Of Nobility Amendment, present not only in the Constitution, but also in the Articles of Confederation. The one mistake the founders made was not to account for quislings...individuals who would work to destabilize their own country for payment.

They should have been hung by their genitals.

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

$400 MILLION In Tax Liabilities?!? Is It Even Possible?



Good morning, dear readers...I awoke this morning to an avalanche (fellow neighbors, fear not - nothing is broken!); so I've been awake ever since 3:45 this full moon day.

I tackled the mess, and after enjoying most of Lovedrive by the Scorpions and a little bit of Michael Schenker Group, I turned on 1010WINS, and had gravy and mashed potatoes for breakfast (the hanger steak to be consumed later in the day...), whereupon I heard about this poor bastard owing over $400,000,000 in unpaid taxes.

Did that number not quite compute? Let me spell it out.

FOUR HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS.

The fellow is 26 years of age...he states that he's been working since 18 or so...he computed that he would've have had to earn over $5,000,000,000 to owe such a tax burden...but let's address some side issues here.

First, there's the bloody legality of the tax burden as is. I posit that WE THE PEOPLE were betrayed by quisling elected officials beholden to a foreign power in 1913.

This is the crux of all that has gone wrong with the United States of America.

You know...it really wouldn't take much effort on the part of Those-Supposedly-In-Power to actually make things GOOD for all Americans.

Think about it.

Really think about it.

You see how the servile will bend to their will? What if "their will" were to "SPREAD GOOD CHEER AMONGST YOUR FELLOW MAN"...don't you think that will would be enacted?

Ah...but therein lies the rub.

Those-Supposedly-In-Power are all a bunch of greedy fucking scumbags.

So...no, we're not all gonna have a good time here in America, while TSIP are living the fallacy that they are running things. And no - I don't agree that they're the best persons for the job, since we aren't all spying on each other, or knifing one another at Starbucks, so their efforts at having us all degenerate into animals have all been for NAUGHT.

The burden of paying taxes does NOT belong to WE THE PEOPLE - this burden belongs to the CORPORATIONS.

The corporations conspired with the bankers and the quisling elected officials and prepared to make slaves of Americans...so far, the plan has worked in their favor.

How much longer will you play the one-armed bandit?

Just take a look at this document...where does it explicitly state that WE THE PEOPLE must pay taxes?

Go ahead...I'll wait. While you're waiting...peruse this:

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS HELP NEEDED - A CALL TO ARMS

16th Amendment - The Sixteenth Amendment Bill Benson Litigation

SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS HELP NEEDED
A CALL TO ARMS

In this historic 16th Amendment litigation, the Government has sued Bill Benson seeking an injunction prohibiting him from "falsely" telling people the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was not ratified and therefore people are not required to file an income tax return. The Government contends it is entitled to an injunction because Benson is promoting an abusive tax shelter, conduct made subject to a penalty per 26 U.S.C. Section 6700. All of the pleadings filed in the case can be found here (quotations around the word falsely added by hANOVER fIST; the only thing being "falsely mentioned" is that the tax burden weighs on WE THE PEOPLE - Bill Benson's research has verified that the fraudulent 16th Amendment was NOT ratified; conversely, the original 13th Amendment was ratified, but was removed in 1860 and replaced with an amendment that places WE THE PEOPLE as slaves to the elected offficials who are OUR representatives).

In 1894 Congress passed an income tax act very similar to the current income tax law. That law was challenged on the basis that a tax on income is a direct tax, the United States Constitution requires direct taxes to be apportioned, and the act passed by Congress was not apportioned. The United States Supreme Court agreed and held the income tax act was unconstitutional in Pollock v. Farmer's Loan & Trust Co., 157 U.S. 429, aff. reh., 158 U.S. 601 (1895).

In 1909 President Taft called a special session of Congress. Taft asked Congress to propose a constitutional amendment to overcome the Supreme Court's Pollock decision. Congress proposed the Sixteenth Amendment, which was then sent to the states for ratification by Secretary of State Knox. Certificates of Ratification were sent back to Knox, but the language on the certificates differed from the 16th Amendment language passed by Congress. Knox sent the certificates to the Solicitor of the United States and asked for a legal opinion as to whether the states had ratified the proposed Sixteenth Amendment.

The Solicitor noted the differences between what Congress proposed and the states ratified, and presumed, that because states do not have the authority to alter a proposed Constitutional amendment, that none did. He concluded, therefore, that the differences in language were nothing more than minor clerical errors in the preparation of the Certificates of Ratification. Knox then declared the 16th Amendment had been ratified.

The legislative journals conclusively establish, that despite not having the power to do so, several states intentionally modified the language of the proposed amendment. The presumption relied upon by the Solicitor was wrong! Benson discovered other discrepancies too. He wrote and published a book on what he discovered, The Law That Never Was, available on his web site at www.TheLawThatNeverWas.com. Benson contends that less than thirty-six states actually ratified the proposed Sixteenth Amendment.

In the absence of the 16th Amendment, the current income tax is an unapportioned direct tax, and is just as unconstitutional today as it was in 1894. Since 1985 Benson tells everyone who will listen about what he found, and urges people to exercise their First Amendment rights to rectify the situation. Benson's message is gaining acceptance in the marketplace of ideas. The Government now seeks to silence him.

Many people ask why, if the 16th Amendment created no new taxing power, as stated by the Supreme Court in Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), it is necessary to litigate whether the Sixteenth Amendment was ratified? The Supreme Court ruled in Pollock that the income tax enacted by Congress in 1894 was a direct tax, the act passed by congress wasn't apportioned, and therefore the tax was unconstitutional. The decision wasn't unanimous. The court was split five to four. Those in the minority believed a tax on income was not a direct tax, but an indirect, excise tax. One of the dissenters was associate justice White. Notwithstanding the decision was split five to four, the result was that the constitutional requirement that direct taxes be apportioned was upheld. To overcome the holding of Pollock, Congress proposed the 16th Amendment. It was allegedly ratified in 1913.

Subsequent to the alleged ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court does not agree on exactly what the 16th Amendment did:

* According to the Supreme Court in Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920), the Sixteenth Amendment removed the requirement of apportionment for the direct income tax. That is, direct taxes still had to be apportioned except the direct tax on income.

* According to Brushaber, written by Justice White who by that time had become the chief justice, the 16th Amendment prevented courts from doing what he claimed the Pollock court did--consider the source of the income to take the tax on that income out of the class of excises, to which he claimed it belonged, and placing it in the class of direct taxes. That is, a tax on income, regardless of the source, is an indirect tax; because the tax is not a direct tax, it does not have to be apportioned.

Whether you agree with Brushaber that the tax is an excise tax that doesn't have to be apportioned, or agree with Eisner that the tax is a direct tax that doesn't have to be apportioned, without the 16th Amendment, the law reverts back to Pollock. The serious student will find my book, Judicial Tyranny and Your Income Tax, an in depth study of the history of the income tax, with two chapters devoted to the issue of direct and indirect taxes, and an extensive analysis of the Pollock and Brushaber cases. If you would like a copy, click here.

The issues in Bill Benson's case, however, transcend whether or not the 16th Amendment was ratified. More important is the issue that the government believes it can take a position and punish someone who disagrees with that position, without affording the person any opportunity to prove the government's position is wrong. The government, unable to refute Bill Benson's facts conclusively establishing less than three-fourths of the states voted to ratify the proposed amendment, objected to the facts on the grounds they were irrelevant, immaterial and scandalous. The court agreed, and issued an order that Bill Benson is not to be allowed to defend based upon the truth. If this posture is allowed to stand, every semblance of justice in America will be trashed. It is inconceivable that the Star Chamber becomes again the type of court justice to be utilized to resolve disputes between the people and the government.

Equally disturbing is the position of the federal government that it has the unfettered right to obtain the names and addresses of any person who so much as ordered Benson's material, read it or possesses it. The pleadings, filed by the government, make it perfectly clear the government intends to obtain the names and investigate any person whose name they obtain.

The issue of taxation and the Sixteenth Amendment is a political question. We, as Americans, supposedly have an inalienable right to the free debate of these issues without government interference. We, as Americans, supposedly have the right to require the government to answer our questions. We, as Americans, supposedly have the right to require the government to prove its allegations against us in Court. We, as Americans, supposedly have the right, when charged with a crime, to present a defense.

To counter the government's efforts to destroy our First Amendment rights, three people have intervened in the Benson litigation. They intervened as John Doe I, John Doe II and Jane Roe to protect their names from the government. They are demanding a protective order preventing the government from obtaining their names, as well as, the names of anyone else involved in this important political debate on the Sixteenth Amendment.

If we don't take a stand, together, we lose. It's that simple. The Bill Benson litigation is, perhaps, the single most important litigation in the court today. The issues affect YOU, just as much as they affect Bill Benson.

I am representing Bill Benson and the three interveners for free. They do not have funds to prosecute and defend their rights in this 16th Amendment litigation. I am asking for your donations to keep me in housing and with food and supplies while this litigation is pending.

Whether you agree with Bill Benson or not, this litigation is not about one of us being right or wrong. This litigation is about preserving YOUR freedom. It is about your right to even have an opinion and express it without fear of government retaliation. Our country is in serious distress, as we now have East German like checkpoints at our airports, and wholesale government disrespect of, and contempt for, our Constitution.

Ben Franklin said during another time of intolerable governmental action: "We must all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately." Please support this litigation and make a donation to support those who have taken a front line position to defend liberty for all of us. Click here to Make a Donation. Also, please pass along the link to this case to your family and friends.

http://jeffdickstein.com/

SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS HELP NEEDED

A CALL TO ARMS

The Bill Benson case is now before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Bill has filed his Opening Brief, the government has filed its Reply and Brief on Cross-Appeal seeking the names of those in association with Bill. Bill has filed his Response and Reply Brief to the Cross-Appeal. The government has filed its Response to Bill's Reply on the Cross-appeal.

The next step is for the Seventh Circuit to set the case for oral argument. Oral argument will be held at the Federal Courthouse, 219 S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL 60604. Oral argument will probably be scheduled three to six months from now.

● The critical issues are that the courts are covering up the fact that it has allowed the constitution to be amended by a presumption of the executive rather than actual ratification by the necessary number of states.

● The courts and the executive are attempting to stop the dissemination of public records showing governmental fraud, thereby thrashing the First Amendment right to Freedom of Speech.

● The courts are taking the position that one accused of making false statements regarding government misconduct cannot present evidence in court that his statements are absolutely true, thereby thrashing the Fifth Amendment right to Due Process and the people's right to defend themselves in court.

This conduct will shock the conscious of every American if only it is brought to their attention.

My Call to Arms is to work together to put as much political pressure on the 7th Cir as is humanly possible. To that end, I request your help to accomplish the following:

✓ Distribute Bill's Response and Reply Brief as widely as possible, sending it to everyone you know and publishing it on the Internet on web sites and blogs

✓ Produce and publish YouTube videos

✓ Disseminate the Response and Reply Brief to as many attorneys and CPA as possible

✓ Disseminate the Response and Reply Brief to as many defense bars and First Amendment Groups as possible

✓ Help organize, and attend, a huge protest outside of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals the day before and the day of the oral argument hearing

✓ Make the date of the hearing before the 7th Circuit known and present the issues to radio stations and newspapers and press releases

✓ Call the television stations and urge them to cover the protest

✓ Set up opinion polls where people text their opinion or call them in to a toll number so we can generate funds

✓ Set up on the Internet a service where for a fee, a letter will be faxed to a person's senators and congressman

✓ E-mail this Call to Arms and Bill's Response and Reply Brief to all of the Ron Paul groups

✓ Help finance a newspaper ad in USA Today a week before the oral argument before the 7th Circuit. Donations may be made on line here

This case represents the best shot we will ever have at ridding ourselves, once and for all, the dreaded federal income tax. It is time to take political action and make our voices heard if we are going to continue to have FREEDOM OF SPEECH and the RIGHT TO DEFEND OURSELVES IN COURTS.

PLEASE HELP.

Yours in Freedom,

JEFFREY A. DICKSTEIN

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Massachusetts Proposal Would Repeal Income Tax

Great headline - Massachusetts Proposal Would Repeal Income Tax.

Let's get into it...many of the opponents begin with the usual caveats..."oh, we would have to cut services to the elderly and for the poor...", or, "school funding will be disrupted"...to which I say, not if the CORPORATIONS do their bloody job!

The so-called "income tax" that you and I have been paying was not our burden...this tax was rightfully the burden of corporations.

But in 1913, something wicked occurred...in 1913, treasonous legislators went behind the backs of Americans for their thirty pieces of silver, and passed the Federal Reserve Act, the treasonous 16th Amendment, and Woodrow Wilson gave corporations the rights of a "person".

The Federal Reserve Act was the third iteration of a central banking system; the first two were run out of town by Americans - from 1787 to 1913, the United States of America knew unbounded prosperity.

That all changed with the advent of the Federal Reserve.

In 1934, Major Smedley Darlington Butler caught wind of a plan to take over the United States; he turned on those treasonous scumbags and saved America.

Do we not make patriots of that stripe anymore?

The 16th Amendment did NOT provide for any new laws of taxation to the government...so, if the government was NOT able to tax individuals before 1913, why were they then able to tax individuals AFTER 1913?

One word - COLLUSION.

The bankers colluded with the corporate heads and lawyers to remove the tax burden from their shoulders, and then to place that burden upon WE THE PEOPLE.

One thing that would have forestalled this was the Original 13th Amendment, also referred to as the Titles Of Nobility Amendment.

The gist of this amendment is that no one with loyalties other than to the United States of America would be allowed to take employment within the United States Government.

Pretty sound idea, yes?

Obviously, the scumbags who wished to ruin our way of life didn't think so...and so the 13th Amendment was replaced in 1860...though there are researches that state that the original 13th Amendment was ratified, and this would therefore nullify the current 13th Amendment, which, if you read carefully, relegates WE THE PEOPLE to being SERVANTS of our elected officials.

If you don't believe this information, ask yourselves:

Why do our elected officials have FULL HEALTH CARE?

Why are practically all of our elected officials MILLIONAIRES?

Why would one need to contact their elected officials to notify them of the job they were elected to perform? When you shook their hands on the street as they pandered for your vote, you expressed your desires to them...did they WRITE THEM DOWN? Why would you believe that after speaking to hundreds of people a day, that they will remember ANYTHING you said? Hand them a note, or a flyer, make sure that they put it in their coat, or their briefcase, and ask that those issues be addressed...or they can look forward to your vote going to their opponents next election cycle.

There are many more questions that one can come upon, but the point here is...THEY LIVE...WE SLEEP.

They SPEND...We TOIL.

I was listening to Earl Caldwell on Friday's Caldwell Chronicle - he had a number of guest speakers on the show, and one of the topics discussed was that of the financial status of Americans. According to the information presented, the average American's standard of living stagnated at 1970, then began to reverse. Employers were able to get more out of employees, without having to increase compensation.

Of course...this does not account for outrageous golden parachutes offered to corporate heads...wouldn't you love a gig that provided you thirteen billion dollars after three weeks?

Yes...it's true
.

I can go on all day...but you get the point. Once this is realized, some action can be taken; until then - ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO THEM.

Sunday, August 24, 2008

BUSH PUSHING WORLD TOWARD ARMAGEDDON


BUSH PUSHING WORLD TOWARD ARMAGEDDON

Russia refuses to become part of neo-con New World Order; sleeping bear now roused


By Paul Craig Roberts

THE NEO-CONNED BUSH REGIME and the Israeli-occupied American media are heading the innocent world toward nuclear war. Back in the Reagan years, the National Endowment for Democracy was created as a Cold War tool.

Today, the NED is a neo-con-controlled agent for U.S. world hegemony. Its main function is to pour U.S. money and election-rigging into former parts of the USSR in order to ring Russia with U.S. puppet states.

The neo-conservative Bush regime used the NED to intervene in Ukrainian and Georgian internal affairs in keeping with the neo-conservative plan to establish U.S.-friendly and Russia-hostile political regimes in these two former constituent parts of Russia and the Soviet Union.

The NED was also used to dismember the former Yugoslavia with its interventions in Slovakia, Serbia and Montenegro.

According to Wikipedia, Allen Weinstein, who helped draft the legislation establishing NED, told The Washington Post in 1991 that much of what the NED does “today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.”

The Bush regime, having established a puppet, Mikheil Saakashvili, as president of Georgia, tried to bring Georgia into NATO.

(For readers too young to know, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was a military alliance between the United States and Western European countries to resist any Soviet move into Western Europe. There has been no reason for NATO since the Soviet Union’s internal political collapse almost two decades ago. The neo-cons turned NATO into another tool, like the NED, for U.S. world hegemony. Subsequent U.S. administrations violated the understandings that President Reagan had reached with Mikhail Gorbachev, the last Soviet leader, and have incorporated former parts of the Soviet empire into NATO. The neo-con goal of ringing Russia with a hostile military alliance has been proclaimed many times.)

Western European members of NATO balked at the admission of Georgia, as they understood it as a provocative affront to Russia, on whom Western Europe is dependent for natural gas. Western Europeans are also disturbed at the Bush regime’s intentions to install ballistic missile defenses in Poland and the Czech Republic, as the consequence will be Russian nuclear cruise missiles targeted on European capitals.

Europeans don’t see the advantage of helping the U.S. block Russian nuclear retaliation against America at the expense of their own existence. Ballistic missile defenses are not useful against cruise missiles.

Every country is tired of war except for the United States. War, including nuclear war, is the neo-conservative strategy for world hegemony.

The entire world, except for Americans, knows that the outbreak of armed conflict between Russian and Georgian forces in South Ossetia was entirely due to the United States and its Georgia puppet, Saakashvili.

Americans, alone in the world, are unaware that the hostilities were initiated by Saakashvili, because Bush, Cheney and the Israeli-occupied American media have again lied to them. Everyone else in the world knows that the unstable and corrupt Saakashvili, who proclaims democracy and runs a police state, would not have taken on Russia by attacking South Ossetia unless given the go-ahead by Washington.

The purpose of the Georgian attack on the Russian population of South Ossetia is twofold:

� To convince Europeans that their action in delaying Georgia’s NATO membership is the cause of “the Russian aggression” and that to save Georgia from conquest Georgia must be given NATO membership.

� To ethnically cleanse South Ossetia of its Russian population. Two thousand Russian civilians were targeted and killed by the U.S.-equipped and trained Georgian army, and tens of thousands fled into Russia. The hope is that the Russian population will be afraid to return or can be prevented from returning, thus removing the secessionist threat.

No doubt the Bush regime can con the insouciant American population, just as it did with Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, Iranian nukes and 9-11 itself, but the rest of the world is not buying it, least of all Moscow and
the Asia Times, and not even America’s bought-and-paid for European allies.

Writing in the Asia Times, Ambassador M.K. Bhadrakumar, a former career diplomat in the Indian Foreign Service, notes the disinformation that is being peddled by the Bush regime and the U.S. media and reports that “at the outbreak of violence, Russia had tried to have the United Nations Security Council issue a statement calling on Georgia and South Ossetia to immediately lay down weapons. However, Washington was uninterested.”

Bhadrakumar notes that the American and Georgian resort to violence and propaganda has brought an end to the Russian government’s belief that diplomacy and good will can bring about a settlement of the South Ossetia issue. If Russia wished, Russia could terminate Georgia’s existence as a separate country at will, and there is nothing the United States could do about it.

It is certain that the Georgian invasion of South Ossetia was a Bush regime orchestrated event. The U.S. media and the neo-con think tanks were ready with their propaganda blitzes. Neo-cons had ready a Wall Street Journal editorial page article for Saakashvili that declares “the war in Georgia is a war for the West.”

Faced with the collapse of his army when Russia sent in troops to protect South Ossetians from the Georgian troops, Saakashvili declared:

“This is not about Georgia anymore. It is about America, its values.”

The neo-con Heritage Foundation in Washington quickly called a conference hosted by warmonger Ariel Cohen, “Urgent! Event: Russian-Georgian War: a Challenge for the U.S. and theWorld.”

The Washington Post breathlessly promoted neo-con Robert Kagen’s war drums, “Putin Makes His Move.”

Only a fool like Kagen could think that if Putin intended to invade Georgia he would do so from Beijing, or that after sending the American-trained Georgian army in flight, he would not continue and conquer all of Georgia in order to put an end to American machinations on Russia’s most sensitive border—machinations that are likely to eventually end in nuclear war.

That despicable rag, The New York Times, printed Billy Kristol’s rant, “Will Russia Get Away With It?” Kristol thunders against “dictatorial and aggressive and fanatical regimes” that “seem happy to work together to weaken the influence of the United States and its democratic allies.”

Kristol presents a new axis of evil—Russia, China, North Korea and Iran—and warns against “delay and irresolution” that “simply invite future threats and graver dangers.”

In other words, “attack Russia now.”

What must be the effect on U.S. Intelligence services and the U.S. military of Vice President Dick Cheney’s propagandistic and irresponsible statement of U.S. support for Georgia’s war crimes? Does anyone really believe that the CIA or any U.S. intelligence service told the vice president that Russia opened the conflict with an invasion? Russian troops arrived in South Ossetia after thousands of Ossetians had been killed by the Georgian attack and after tens of thousands of Ossetians had fled into Russia to escape the Georgian attack.

According to news reports, Russian forces have captured Americans who were with the Georgian troops directing their attack on civilians.

The U.S. military certainly has no resources for a war against Russia on top of lost wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and a planned war with Iran.

With its Georgian venture, the Bush regime is guilty of a new round of war crimes. What will be the consequence? Many will reply that having got away with 9-11, Afghanistan and Iraq, and with its preparations for attacking Iran, the Bush regime will get away with its Georgian venture, as well.

Possibly, however, this time the Bush regime has overreached. Certainly Russia now recognizes that the U.S. is determined to exert hegemony over
Russia and is Russia’s worst enemy. China realizes the U.S. threat to its own energy supply and, thereby, economy. Even America’s European allies, chafing under their role of supplying troops for America’s empire, must now realize that being an American ally is dangerous and has no benefits.

If Georgia becomes a NATO member and renews its attack on South Ossetia, it must drag Europe into a war with Russia, a main supplier of energy to Europe.

Moreover, if Russian troops are sent across European frontiers, there is nothing to stop them. What does America offer Europe, aside from the millions of dollars it pays to buy off Europe’s political leaders to ensure that they betray their own peoples?

Nothing whatsoever. The only military threat that Europe faces comes from being dragged into America’s wars for American hegemony.

The United States is financially bankrupt, with budget and trade deficits that exceed the combined deficits of the rest of the world together. The dollar has wilted. The American consumer market is dying from the offshoring of American jobs and, thereby, incomes, and from the wealth effect of the real estate and derivatives collapses. The United States has nothing to offer Europe. Indeed, American economic decline is killing European exports by driving up the value of the euro. America long ago lost the moral high ground.

Hypocrisy has become America’s best known hallmark. Bush, the invader of Afghanistan and Iraq on the basis of lies and deception, thunders at Russia for coming to the defense of its peacekeepers and Russian citizens in South Ossetia. Bush, the vampire who ripped Kosovo out of Serbia’s heart and handed it to the Albanians, has taken an adamant stand against other separatist movements, especially the South Ossetians who wish to be part of the Russian Federation.

The neo-conned Bush regime is furious that the Russian bear was not intimidated by the United States supported aggression of the American puppet state, Georgia. Instead of accepting the act of American hegemony
that the neo-con script called for, Russia sent the Americanized Georgian army fleeing in fear.

Moreover, do the morons who comprise the Bush regime really not understand that short of a surprise nuclear attack on Russia there is nothing whatsoever the United States can do to Moscow?

The Bush regime owns no Russian currency that it can dump. The Russians own U.S. dollars. The Bush regime owns no Russian bonds that it can dump. The Russians own U.S. bonds. The U.S. can cut Russia off from no energy supplies. Russia can cut America’s European allies off from energy.

President Reagan negotiated the end of the Cold War with Soviet President Gorbachev. The neo-cons, whom Reagan fired and drove from his administration, were furious. The neo-conservatives had hoped to win the Cold War, thereby establishing American hegemony.

The Republican establishment re-established its hegemony under Bush the First that it had lost to Ronald Reagan. With this feat, intelligence was driven from the Republican Party.

The neo-cons engineered their comeback with the First Gulf War and their propaganda, pure lies, that Iraqi troops bayoneted Kuwait babies in hospitals.

The neo-cons made a further comeback with President Clinton, whom they convinced to bomb Serbia in order to permit separatist movements to become independent states dependent on America.

With Bush the Second, the neo-cons took over. Their agenda, American world hegemony, includes Israeli hegemony in the Middle East.

So far the schemes of these dangerous ideologues have come a cropper. Iraq, formerly in the hands of secular Sunnis who were a check on Iran, is, after the American invasion and occupation, in the hands of religious Shiites allied with Iran. In Afghanistan, the Taliban are resurgent, and a large NATO-U.S. army there is unable to control the situation.

Those Americans stupid enough to think that America’s “super power” ensures its citizens from danger need to read the total contempt shown for President Bush in an editorial published in Russia’s “state” newspaper, Pravda (see below).

Nationally syndicated columnist, Paul Craig Roberts, Ph.D., a former editor at The Wall Street Journal, is the author of several books. He has been associated with the Hoover Institution, and the Institute for Political Economy and from 1981 to 1982 served as assistant secretary of the treasury for economic policy.

(Issue # 35, September 1, 2008)


Please make a donation to American Free Press


Not Copyrighted. Readers can reprint and are free to redistribute - as long as full credit is given to American Free Press - 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20003


EMAIL A FRIEND ABOUT THIS PAGE


Russian Media Outlet Ridicules Dubya’s Hegemony, Hypocrisy

“President Bush, “Why don’t you shut up? began the open letter to George W. Bush in Pravda, Russia’s “official” newspaper.

“In your statement . . . regarding the legitimate actions of the Russian Federation in Georgia, you failed to mention the war crimes perpetrated by Georgian military forces, which American advisors support, against Russian and Ossetian civilians.

“President Bush, “Why don’t you shut up? Your faithful ally, Mikhail Saakashvili, was announcing a ceasefire deal while his troops, with your advisors, were massing on Ossetia’s border, which they crossed under cover of night and destroyed Tskhinvali, targeting civilian structures just like your forces did in Iraq.

“President Bush, “Why don’t you shut up? Your American transport aircraft gave a ride home to thousands of Georgian soldiers from Iraq directly into the combat zone.

“President Bush, “Why don’t you shut up? How do you account for the fact that among the Georgian soldiers fleeing the fighting yesterday you could clearly hear officers using American English giving orders to ‘Get back inside,’ and how do you account for the fact that there are reports of American soldiers among the Georgian casualties?

“President Bush, “Why don’t you shut up? Do you really think anyone gives any importance whatsoever to your words after eight years of your criminal and murderous regime and policies? Do you really believe you have any moral ground whatsoever, and do you really imagine there is a single human being anywhere on this planet who does not stick up his middle finger every time you appear on a TV screen?

“Do you really believe you have the right to give any opinion or advice after Abu Ghraib? After Guantanamo? After the massacre of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi citizens? After the torture by CIA operatives?

“Do you really believe you have any right to make a statement on any point of international law after your trumped-up charges against Iraq and the subsequent criminal invasion?

“President Bush, “Why don’t you shut up? Suppose Russia, for instance, declares that Georgia has weapons of mass destruction? And that Russia knows where these WMD are, namely in Tbilisi and Poti and north, south, east and west of there? And that it must be true because there is ‘magnificent foreign intelligence,’ such as satellite photos of milk powder factories and baby cereals producing chemical weapons and which are currently being ‘driven around the country in vehicles’? Suppose Russia declares for instance that ‘Saakashvili stiffed the world’ and it is ‘time for regime change’?

“Nice and simple, isn’t it, President Bush?

“So, why don’t you shut up? Oh, and by the way, send some more of your military advisors to Georgia. They are doing a sterling job. And they look all funny in the night sight [vision], all green.”

--

Speaking of armageddon...

Found this on Michael Rivero's WRH Letters page:

This is a link to an IRS auction of someone's 2.5 million dollar (minimum bid) estate in Greenwich, Connecticut.

It seems all too clear by the pictures of the inside of this 2.5 million dollar estate in Connecticut (toward the bottom of the page in this link), showing the personal effects of a family including a child's rocking horse and some other toys, a brief case, a man's pair of pants hung over a chair, and some unpacked shopping bags, the owner of this property was literally "disappeared" by the IRS.

It just goes to show you, regardless your station in life, someone who thinks he is god can crush you in the palm of his hand.

http://www.treas.gov/auctions/irs/grct_real_3123.htm

You might ask your readers, if anyone can identify the victim of this IRS "disappearing".


I've posted links to sites such as DownsizeDC, Get Out Of Our House, and others...but I believe all of this amount to NAUGHT in the eyes of our so-called "elected" officials. They have made it clear the the will of WE THE PEOPLE means NOTHING to them.

I believe that there are necessary steps that must be made to enforece the will of WE THE PEOPLE against them.

One is the repealing of the fraudulent Fourteenth Amendment, which relegates WE THE PEOPLE to being vassals of our elected officials.

The second step would be the observance of the original Thirteenth Amendment, which would effectively REMOVE many of our elected officials, who are currently fattening their pockets on OUR dime, from being allowed to serve in public office, BY LAW.

The third step would be to remove the Federal Reserve from any role in our finances - the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was only allowed after the financial scare on 1907. This was done against the will of WE THE PEOPLE, and, as you can see, the Depression of the 1930s was made to occur by the machinations of the Federal Reserve and the quisling officials who stood to gain from the thirty pieces of silver they receive in exchange for selling out our great nation.

Watch the videos on Michael Badnarik's Constitutional Class - he covers many of the points I've stated, plus many more. You'll learn a terrible amount of information that you never learned in school - information that would have allowed for you to make REAL decisions regarding your future.

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

More Fun with the Titles Of Nobility Amendment!

Let's begin with the conclusion offered by J.A. Silversmith:

CONCLUSION
The Titles of Nobility Amendment does not have an illustrious history. The reasons for its proposal are obscure; what we know of them suggests partisan politics or xenophobia, neither an admirable nor worthy motive for amending the Constitution. The amendment's history is likewise obscure; scholars have almost universally failed to portray it accurately, amplifying the confusion about the amendment. Today, it is virtually forgotten, meriting at most a few lines in even the most detailed tomes on the Constitution.

If the amendment had remained a footnote to history, its obscurity might not be of great significance. But even before the 1990s, the amendment carried two important messages: that concern about divisions in society in the United States is a historic problem, and that the legal community, both in the nineteenth and the twentieth centuries, has not invested sufficient effort into accurately communicating the law to the profession, as well as to the public. Further, these messages now have manifested themselves in a new, disturbing guise: that of extremists who have taken advantage of the amendment's obscure history to mislead the public as to its validity and purpose, driven by their anti-lawyer agenda and alienation.(203)

These misrepresentations should be taken seriously and countered, both for the good of the profession and of the public. Too often, legal scholarship has been and continues to be guilty of "scholarly defects of the most elementary kind."(204) Law cannot have--and does not deserve--the public trust if the law is itself untrustworthy.(205) But past failures should not lead lawyers to withdraw from the field and leave it to extremists. One should remember that the oft-misquoted line from Shakespeare, "[t]he first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers,"(206) actually speaks to the vital role that lawyers historically have played in society; only if all of the King's learned advisors were vanquished would rebels be able to install a tyrant.(207) If there is any nobility in being a lawyer, it is because of the role and responsibility of protecting society from those who seek to create and exploit divisions within it.


He begins his "conclusion with: "The reasons for its proposal are obscure; what we know of them suggests partisan politics or xenophobia, neither an admirable nor worthy motive for amending the Constitution."

Maybe he failed basic reading comprehension...but it seems clear to me why the amendment was proposed...to forestall any clandestine attempts to take over the government away from the watch of WE THE PEOPLE...which is EXACTLY WHAT OCCURRED. He is really being disingenuous with us here.

Then, there follows this amazing statement: "One should remember that the oft-misquoted line from Shakespeare, "[t]he first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers,"(206) actually speaks to the vital role that lawyers historically have played in society; only if all of the King's learned advisors were vanquished would rebels be able to install a tyrant."

What was he thinking? This fellow is obviously not a student of history...rebels installing TYRANTS?!? Oh...they must be many cases of that occurring, like...er...um...NEVER. The monied interests install tyrants to ensure that there are no uprisings - J.A. Silversmith deals in CONJECTURE, not FACT, to prove his flawed hypotheses. It's readily apparent to anyone who isn't either a lawyer or a monied interest who gamed the system to achieve said funds, that America is suffering under the non-application of the Titles of Nobility Amendment. Our forefathers only failed us in regards to not adding an immediate penalty to Article I, Section IX...but it probably didn't occur to them that any REAL AMERICAN would take advantage of the non-punitive nature of the amendment, as it was first realized, so soon after the United States first declared their independence from the British colonies and the King.

Let's reiterate the actual proposed amendment, and the reason for its existence:


"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."

In the margin, you will note text that states: "In what cases persons forfeit their citizenship".

Sounds pretty bloody clear to me.

In fact...here's a clear example of why you don't let the fox attend to the henhouse...


Update: It seems that the 14th Amendment is part of this chicanery foisted upon our nation - read more here:

CDR Note: In view of the evidence available, the fact of the invalidity of the 14th Amendment is blatant and irrefutable. In view of the fact that — never mind the obvious corruption in the courts at the time the invalid amendment was challenged — the courts today appear to operate under the invalid 14th Amendment, it would hardly be presumable that a court challenge, regardless the aroused public sentiment, would be successful. However, this is not a matter for courts to decide. It is a matter for the people to take into hand; to instruct the legislatures of their respective states to declare its (14th Amendment) invalidity, while also declaring the unalienable rights of all legal residents in the State, regardless race, color or creed.

Monday, August 18, 2008

The Titles of Nobility Amedment (The Original Thirteenth Amendment) And Its Importance

I won't stop mentioning that we had (and possibly may HAVE) an amendment crafted to protect WE THE PEOPLE from dual-loyalists, scumbags and enablers of treason.

Let's start with some links:

Legal Theory Blog: Larson on "Titles of Nobility"

The Real Thirteenth Amendment


Supreme Law Library: 28 U.S.C. 372(c) COMPLAINT AGAINST WILLIAM D. BROWNING

The Original 13th Amendment & Why Our Politicians Get Away With Treason

The Missing Thirteenth Amendment - The Lawful Path

Let's begin by referencing the other side of the argument - ThirdAmendment.com: The "Real" Titles Of Nobility Amendment FAQ [quotes added by hANOVER fIST].

So...have you read the page yet? Do the explanations presented by Jol A. Silversmith hold water?

I'll tell you why they do NOT.

This "FAQ", in its entirety, is a hodge-podge of suppositions, prevarications, and "reasons" for why the proposed amendment couldn't POSSIBLY mean what it says.

But... IN NO WAY does it disprove the MOTIVE for the amendment...its reason for being.

That reason is stated in Article I, Section IX of our Constitution - quoted as thus:

Section. 9.
Clause 1: The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

Clause 2: The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

Clause 3: No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

Clause 4: No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken. (See Note 7)

Clause 5: No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.

Clause 6: No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.

Clause 7: No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.

Clause 8: No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.


Do you see? This was a clear and present danger in the eyes of our forefathers - J. A. Silversmith's prevarications notwithstanding, the Titles Of Nobility Amendment strengthened the wording present in Article I, Section IX, to add a PENALTY to those who would commit TREASON against WE THE PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Do you see how simple the Constitution and the Bill Of Rights are to read?

Now...try reading any Internal Revenue Service document.

This was done on purpose; to obfuscate the law in such a way that LAWYERS would be required to disentangle the legalese presented therein.

Don't believe any of this?

Ask yourself, then...why did the British make such an effort to DESTROY EVERY KNOWN COPY of our Constitution during the Revolutionary War (well, I consider it the Revolutionary War, Part the Second, but this is the War of 1812)?

Think on that, dear readers...