German POW's Diary Reveals More Of Ike's Holocaust

German POW's Diary Reveals More Of Ike's Holocaust

12-29-3

 

Note - The following diary extract has been provided by the nephew of the author under the conditions we honor his request for anonymity. -ed

 

A transcript of my Uncle's words...from my Mother's diary:

 

"Suddenly an American Jeep moved towards us and several American Soldiers surrounded us. There was no officer in charge, and the first thing the 'Amis' did - they liberated us, I mean, from our few valuables, mainly rings and watches........ We were now prisoners of war- no doubt about it!

 

The first night we were herded into a barn, where we met about 100 men who shared the same fate. To make my story short, we were finally transported to Fuerstenfeldbruck near Munich. Here we, who were gathered around Hermann, interrupted him and gasped in dismay.

 

Fuerstenfeldbruck had become known to us as one of the most cruel POW camps in the American zone.

 

Then my brother continued:

 

Again we were searched and had to surrender everything, even our field utensils, except a spoon. Here, in freezing temperature, 20,000 of us were squeezed together on the naked ground, without blanket or cover, exposed day and night to the winter weather.

 

For six days we received neither food nor water! We used our spoons to catch drops of rain.

 

We were surrounded by heavy tanks. During the night bright searchlights blinded us, so that sleep was impossible. We napped from time to time, standing up and leaning against each other. It was keeping us warmer that sitting on the frozen ground.

 

Many of us were near collapse. One of our comrades went mad, he jumped around wildly, wailing and whimpering. he was shot at once. His body was lying on the ground, and we were not allowed to come near him. He was not he only one. Each suspicious movement caused the guards to shoot into the crowd, and a few were always hit.

 

German civilians, mainly women of the surrounding villages, tried to approach the camp to bring food and water for us prisoners. they were chased away.

 

Our German officers could finally succeed to submit an official protest, particularly because of the deprivation of water. As a response, a fire hose was thrown into the midst of the densely crowded prisoners and then turned on. Because of the high water pressure the hose moved violently to and fro. Prisoners tumbled, fell, got up and ran again to catch a bit of water. In that confusion the water went to waste, and the ground under us turned into slippery mud. All the while the 'Amis' watched that spectacle, finding it very funny and most entertaining. They laughed at our predicament as hard as they could. Then suddenly, they turned the water off again.

 

We had not expected that the Americans would behave in such a manner. We could hardly believe it. War brutalizes human beings.

 

One day later we were organized into groups of 400 men .... We were to receive two cans of food for each man. This is how it was to be done: The prisoners had to run through he slippery mud, and each one had to grab his two cans quickly, at the moment he passed the guards. One of my comrades slipped and could not run fast enough, He was shot at once ....

 

On May 10th , several truckloads of us were transported the the garrison of Ulm by the Danube..... As each man jumped into the truck, a guard kicked him in the backbone with his rifle butt.

 

We arrived in the city of Heilbronn by the Neckar, In the end we counted 240,000 men, who lived on the naked ground and without cover.

 

Spring and summer were mild this year, but we were starving. At 6;00 am we received coffee, at noon about a pint of soup and 100 grams of bread a day........

 

The 'Amis' gave us newspapers in German language, describing the terrors of the concentration camps. We did not believe any of it. We figured the Americans only wanted to demoralize us further.

 

The fields on which we lived belonged to the farmers of the area...soon nothing of the clover and other sprouting greens were left, and the trees were barren. We had eaten each blade of grass.....

 

In some camps there were Hungarian POW's. 15,000 of them. Mutiny against their officers broke out twice amongst them. After the second mutiny the Americans decided to use German prisoners to govern the Hungarians. Since the Hungarians were used as workers they were well fed. There was more food than they could eat. But when the Germans asked the Americans for permission to bring the Hungarians' leftovers into the camps of the starving Germans, it was denied. The Americans rather destroyed surplus food, than giving it to the Germans.

 

Sometimes it happened that groups of our own men were gathered and transported away. We presumed they were discharged to go home, and naturally, we wished to be among them. Much later we heard they were sent to labor camps! My mother's cousin, feared that he would be drafted into the Hitler Youth SS, he volunteered to the marines, in 1945 his unit was in Denmark. On April 20th they were captured by the Americans. his experience in the POW camp was identical that of my brother's. They lived in open fields, did not receive and food and water the first six days, and starved nearly to death. German wives and mothers who wanted to throw loaves of bread over the fence, were chased off. The prisoners, just to have something to chew, scraped the bark from young trees. my cousins job was to report each morning how many had died during the night. "and these were not just a few!" he adds to his report he wrote me.

 

It became known, that the conditions in the POW camps in the American Zone were identical everywhere. We could therefore safely conclude, that it was by intent and by orders from higher ups to starve the German POW's and we blamed General Eisenhower for it. He, who was of German descent could not discern the evildoers during the Nazi time from our decent people. We held that neglect of knowledge and understanding severely against him.

 

I wish to quote the inscription on the grave stones of those of my German compatriots who have already passed away:

 

"We had to pass through fire and through water. But now you have loosened our bonds."

Predictably, YouTube censors Alan Lawson's video on the 'Holocaust', hate speech and 'stupid' Germans - Vineyard Of The Saker

Predictably, YouTube censors Alan Lawson's video on the 'Holocaust', hate speech and 'stupid' Germans

Dear Sirs,

Re: Spurious Copyright Claim
YouTube Account: http://www.youtube.com/user/alawson911

I have just received the following notice:

We have disabled the following material as a result of a third-party notification from James Allan Khan claiming that this material is infringing:

Holocaust, Hate Speech & Were the Germans so Stupid?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gycNMf0xAc

I think that this is a spurious action; an attempt to infringe my right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 20 of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights.

While making the video in question I was careful to ensure that any material noted as being the subject of a copyright notice was not used. Furthermore, I have been unable to find any reference to a person named James Allan Khan on the Internet, using Google's search engine.

As with all of my videos, this one was made for educational purposes; I will not derive any financial benefit from uploading it, and I sincerely think that the material I've used is in the public interest and, therefore, comes under the protection of Fair Use in the copyright law (title 17, U. S. Code) as follows:

Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair:

1. The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
2. The nature of the copyrighted work
3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work

http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html

If the accuser, James Allan Khan can demonstrate otherwise, I will remove the material in question and re-upload the edited video. If not, I think that it is incumbent on the owners of YouTube to try and prevent Mr. Kahn and others like him from stifling a free exchange of ideas on its otherwise excellent website.

One of the main issues I have with being accused of a copyright infringement, and having one of my videos suspended, more accurately suppressed, is that my accuser was not, apparently, required to make any specific charge as to what image or images or quoted text he has based his claim on (the only musical content in the video is my own work: a single chord).

Accusers should be bound to give YouTube's legal department a reasonable amount of detail regarding the alleged infringement—at the very least the item that has been allegedly infringed—and this should be passed on to the alleged culprit, who should be given a reasonable amount of time to dispute such a claim, before any action is taken.

Shortly, I will be uploading a video regarding this notice, giving others the benefit of what I have learned from what I think is a spurious attack on my right to freedom of expression as well as my time in having to respond to what I regard as a nuisance accusation.

Sincerely,

Anthony Lawson
-------
Addendum by The Saker

Here is the "offending" video:

Holocaust, Hate Speech & Were the Germans so Stupid? from SomberImperil on Vimeo.

If Blogger also removes this video, I will make it available for download from Rapidshare, Megaupload, Mediafire, The Pirate Bay, Demonoid, Torrent411, Rutor, Rutracker, OneBigTorrent, Wawa-Mania, Quebec-team, TorrentSpain and whatever number of file hosting sites needed to keep it available to those who care about the truth.

The Saker

It's gone, by the way...he did offer a download link to the video - get it while you can:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=JMYGT6PP

http://rapidshare.com/files/455170203/Holocaust_-_Hate_Speech_-_Were_the_Germans_so_Stupid.mp4

http://www.mediafire.com/?or4dxxg32o8bu1r

http://vimeo.com/21508099

Ernst Zundel Free!

To all:

It's now been 28 hours since that first phone call from Lady Renouf that Ernst was safely in her car and being whisked away - and I have yet to receive even one negative comment via e-mail from our heckling enemies! Overwhelmingly, people all over the world are congratulating Ernst for having stood the course and having stuck to his own principles for Truth in History.

Markus Haverkamp, well-known to many, who reported from inside the Zundel Heresy Trial in Mannheim in 2007, did a brief write-up for alternative media:

This Monday morning, March 1st 2010, Ernst Zundel was released from Mannheim prison after a total of seven years in jail. Prior to his release the state prosecutor Grossmann had informed the tabloid Bild Zeitung of his release details, whether to proliferate himself, or whether to tempt left-wingers [to cause] trouble - who knows. [Ernst Zundel's] release details had also been made public by the nationalist news magazine Zuerst.

We thus had no idea what was going to be in store for us when we arrived outside the prison shortly before 08.00. In all ca. 30 people arrived to greet Ernst back to public life, amongst them his heroic lawyer Dr. Herbert Schaller who, though in his mid-eighties, made the arduous trip from Vienna, one of [Ernst's] sisters, Richard Edmonds, Michile Renouf, a few friends from France, Gunter Deckert and others. Had he been released on a Friday afternoon, there would have been a far greater turn-out, that's certain. There was only one journalist present, a chap from AP press.

[After we] waited in the chilly weather for over twenty minutes, Ernst was released at 08.15. He looked well, physically stout and strong, and very well fed indeed, wearing a lumberjack shirt and jeans. Ernst proceeded to greet each of us in person. To my shame I must admit that I greeted Ernst with the words: "Herr Zundel, it's great to have you back in freedom" to which he replied, visibly shocked: "You must be joking!" i.e. what freedom?

Next Ernst gave the AP chap a brief interview, the contents of which I was unable to make out.

After half an hour we proceeded to a restaurant that had opened this day specifically for us. Here people sat down, enjoyed a coffee and had a chat, the only person unable to get a rest being Ernst who everybody wanted to speak with. Many of us (Germans) had hoped that Ernst would be willing to give lectures on ecological farming some time in the future, and we were thrilled to find that Ernst is excited about this idea (after all there is more to be rectified in the western world than merely the Holocaust story).

After the lunch that followed, the party began to disperse. We all wish Ernst and Ingrid the best of luck and good fortune, and look forward to meeting up with Ernst soon.

Perhaps I should explain that there was a reason why so few people appeared at the prison gate. The word had been put out that the Antifa - the German counterpart to the violent leftist ARA hoodlums who are so often unleashed on dissident gatherings - was threatening to cause trouble; in fact, Ernst had alerted the Mannheim police of this possibility. Therefore, it seemed prudent stay away so as not to give the Mannheim judiciary cause to arrest Ernst all over again. Luckily, Antifa scum were nowhere to be seen, and a few plain-clothes policemen were courteous and inconspicuous.

Meanwhile, I was half a world away, monitoring my e-mail, wishing I could be in Germany at this historic moment. Globally, it's been a veritable media storm - that much was gratifying. I did a quick Google search on two words, "Zundel released" - Canada listed 121 mainstream media sources; a world-wide count gave a total of 189,000 hits! The favored title for most Poodle Media articles was a snide "Convicted Holocaust Denier" etc. - which told the world that people get imprisoned in Europe and, especially, in Germany, for Thought Crimes! Donnerwetter! comes to mind. It always leaves me speechless how our enemies do our work for us - to spread the word that censorship in Western countries is tied to the world's Numero Uno taboo! Remember not all that long ago when the opposition website, Nizkor, claimed that "Ernst Zundel's supporters couldn't fill a phone booth"? One of my webmasters wrote that Zundelsite counts "have gone through the roof!"

I have since talked to Ernst again - a call from his relatives' home where a private welcome party had meanwhile been arranged. He is well and in good spirits, but, in his own words, "suffering from culture shock." Ernst's immediate plans are to restore the homestead that has been in the Zundel family for 400+ years. Ernst himself was born there in 1939 and lived in that old house in abject poverty for the first 19 years of his life. It stood vacant for the past 20 years, and I shudder at the task of restoring it. But his heart has never left the place, and now it looks like he might have his chance to at least make a dent with the help of younger comrades who have already volunteered.

Here he is, hours after he was released, hammer already in hand:

The words on the banner, translated: "Finally! Ernst Zundel - heartily welcome at home!"

The interlaced questions on many people's mind is: "What's next?" and "How can we reach him - and help?" The number one priority for Ernst is to get a German passport so he can travel, and we can meet somewhere. Secondly, he needs to get his driver's license and buy himself a car. As you know, I cannot go to Germany without risking arrest for my Zundelsite work, and he can't leave the EU countries without a passport and a visa. I will keep you updated as we proceed. But my guess is that definite plans cannot be made unless we meet somewhere and strategize.

As to how he can be reached and assisted, it would make sense, for Europeans especially, to assist him with contributions directly so he can take care of whatever financial obligations will come his way. In the Soviet Union in olden days, a family was sent a bill for the bullet used for a loved one's execution. In the so-called "democratic" Bundesrepublik, Ernst has been assessed for the costs of his own trial and incarceration - a hefty 59,000+ Euros (close to US$ 100,000) which he is already paying off in small rates! And there are going to be other challenges. For now, he does not even have a table and a chair to send his thank you notes, and he does not yet have a computer - or, more importantly, a person to run it for him. I run a seamless operation here and have for seven years. I sent him already a credit card in my name, and we hold joint bank accounts that he can access as easily as I. Both Ernst and I are frugal people, and we have never argued about money. It could well be that, as he settles down, we'll split our financial supporters, but for now, let's leave things as they are. Please keep on sending your support to me. My mailing address is:

Ingrid Zundel
3152 Parkway, 13-109
Pigeon Forge, TN 37863
USA

Finally, two small but telling developments that have nothing to do with Ernst directly but may be indicative of political changes in Europe:

First, the Italian Revisionist, Carlo Mattagno, an impeccable researcher, has compiled an interesting paper that, summarized in his own words, comes to a sensational, documented conclusion that "Elie Wiesel was never imprisoned either at Birkenau or Auschwitz or Monowitz or Buchenwald". (I will send out that research paper and post it on the Zundelsite as soon as I can get my bearings) Imagine the political earthquake if that man would be officially outed as a mega-fraudster we always assumed he might be!

Secondly, a very small notice was sent to me that a German judge has committed suicide by hanging himself on the steps of the Nuremberg Courthouse where the infamous Auschwitz trials soon after Germany's defeat took place! For a giddy moment, I actually thought it might be a judge whom we know who had a hand in railroading Ernst for seven years - but no! This man who decided to suicide himself was only 47 years old, his name and background yet unknown - and this symbolic deed, so far, is still a mystery. I'd appreciate details such as the man's name - and if there exists a suicide note. Who knows what he wanted to say?! That's it for now. I am glued to my computer.

Thank you so much for caring!

Ingrid Zundel

Game Over: Top German State Attorney Backs Mike James (repost)

I found this article yesterday...it moved me so much, and I feel I would be remiss in my duty if I did not share it with you.

Game Over: Top German State Attorney Backs Mike James, Jews Silent
By Mike James in Germany – 20 July 2008

----------
A victory for justice --- Letter from Michael James to the Oberstaatsanwalt (Senior State Attorney) --- Letter from the Senior State Attorney confirming prior refusal to prosecute at request of the Jews --- Philosophical objections to historical narratives --- Jews reject Rachel Corrie donation --- Acknowledgements and the current situation.
----------

Herrn Claude
Oberstaatsanwalt
Konrad-Adenauer-Str. 20
60313 Frankfurt am Main

Geschäftszeichen: 6111 Js 228014/08
Bearbeiter: OSta Claude

20. Juli 2008

Dear Senior State Attorney, Herrn Claude

I thank you most kindly for your considered and edifying reply, following that of State Attorney Frau Niesen, in regard to a polite theological question I asked the ZJD (Central Council of Jews in Germany) some months ago, and for this I am most appreciative.

However, I still take umbrage at the ZJD’s claim that my question was motivated by “Volksverhetzung” -- “Incitement of the masses (ostensibly against other races or ethnic groups)” -- and I ask myself why they have not apologised to me.

I know that you are sufficiently conversant with these matters, but I still feel impelled to set the record straight. I simply posited an enquiry regarding biblical interpretation and mentioned a number of genealogical facts that are permissible to utter, even in Germany. The well-known truism that the six million number is based on a Kabbalistic numerological interpretation of Leviticus, Chapter 25, Verse 10 was confirmed and established by learned Rabbis throughout the centuries, including Rabbi Moshe ben Maimon (Maimonides) and, most recently, by the religious Israel historian and Haaretz journalist Tom Segev.

“And thou shalt sanctify the fiftieth year, and shalt proclaim remission to all the inhabitants of thy land: for it is the year of jubilee. Every man shall return to his possession, and every one shall go back to his former family.” -- Lev. 25:10

The Hebrew version: www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0325.htm

Please note that the Hebrew rendition is not accurately transcribed in European translations, nor is it is published as such in the form given in the Torah of the laity and would rarely be written as such even in the Priestly Torah. Other renditions can be found in various versions of the Remez and the Sod, both works of which deal with hidden and esoteric meanings. However, notice the markings above and below each letter.

To the casual reader who does not understand Hebrew beyond its fundamentals, or the way in which reversals and simple annotations by Rabbis on just one single letter can change the entire structure and meaning of a sentence, this verse in the Remez or Sod makes very little sense. However, the symbolic calibration of this line in many Kabbalistic versions of the Torah written in Hebrew does in fact change the entire sense of the sentence to one that states: “The return to the land will not occur until the Lord has been offered a holocaust [burnt offering] of six million”. (The wording differs in some versions of the Remez and Sod, although not in the Midrash.) It is, of course a contrivance by deft of hand.

Every Jew who has had an intensive education in the Torah, Talmud and Kabbalah knows this. My Jewish friends at school knew this. My religious teacher knew this (and, by the way, I was top of my class in Religious Instruction). However, neither Frau Knobloch nor Herr Kramer of the ZJD seem to be in any way aware of this well-known theological fact, which concerns me deeply because, being Jews, they should be in a position to know. Why didn’t they simply write to me and say, “Sorry, Mike. We just have no idea. Why not teach us?”

When I humbly ask someone a straightforward question, I do not expect him or her to call out the National Guard and convene a meeting of the United Nations Security Council. I simply expect a reply. That is the English way; and contempt for my English education, English cultural mores, English sceptical empiricism, and English sense of fair play is something that can be construed as a form of racism. Perhaps Frau Knobloch and Herr Kramer bear some kind of animosity toward English people. What other reason could there be?

To have originally accused me of the same (incitement toward hatred of a particular race or ethnic group) appears to be premised on their belief that I despise every member of their race, the Kazaks.

Not only is this not true on the face of it -- I have friends from all ethnic and racial commonalities -- it is intellectually impossible to hate an entire race or ethnic group. The concept of “group hatred” does not exist in traditional western jurisprudence, which has always sought remedies for violation of personal rights by treating plaintiffs and defendants as individuals. In most pre-EU nations (and still today in the United States) this was the basis of tort (civil) and non-tort (private) law. (I was also second in my class in Law, by the way).

The reason for this was, sensibly, quite simple. It is philosophically and psychologically impossible for a human being to hate an entire kindred. One may be given to articulate such sentiments, whether jokingly, in a moment of peer-group camaraderie, or as a generalisation intended to make a simple point, but the human psyche is so neurologically configured that it can only hold feelings of detestation against an individual, and, even here, not against the individual as a whole, but only an aspect or a trait of that individual’s personality. This was ably demonstrated by the psychologist Wilhelm Reich, famous for his prize-winning study “The Mass Psychology of Fascism”. No modern psychologist would ever testify that it is within the scope of the human psyche to bear unremittingly the emotional burden of hatred for an entire race.

It is quite common these days to hear people say, “I hate Turks,” yet most, if not all, of them have Turkish friends and dine with them in Turkish cafes. I, for instance, dislike fruit, vegetables and grains because I have a digestive intolerance to cellulose, lactose and gluten, but I love strawberries, which I can eat on occasion. Therefore, it cannot really be said that I ‘hate’ all fruit, and I am certainly not given to verbally insulting apples and oranges or physically abusing cartons of milk whenever I visit the supermarket.

The concept of Volksverhetzung was introduced into Soviet law by Lenin in the early stages of the Bolshevik-Zionist revolution owing to widespread resentment among the Russian people of the large number of Zionist-Jews who ran the Politburo and headed the dreaded secret police, the Cheka. It is therefore born of a communist mindset and is completely alien to the idea of a modern “Rechtsstaat” (a state governed by the Rule of Law). I was also the top of my class in history, incidentally.

Laws against ‘incitement and group or race hatred’ are therefore laws premised on the Bolshevik organisation of the state on the basis of a hive mentality and have no place in a modern, liberal democracy, or even our current "Scheindemokratie" (illusory democracy).

These laws, as you know, were designed to reinforce a particular narrative which requires the support of statutes (statutorily enforced history), which must be seen in the perspective of solicitation to perjury for those born after these events were reported to have taken place.

-----

No policeman would ever ask someone born in 1959 to stand in the dock before a judge and swear on the Bible that he had witnessed a crime that allegedly took place twenty years before he was born. Such a policemen would surely find himself charged with corruption and the witness would be incarcerated for perjury.
-----

Indeed, anyone who forces another person to affirm an alleged crime he has not personally witnessed is guilty of incitement to bear false witness, which is a felonious violation of both German law, the law of Moses and the Law of God Almighty, Jesus Christ. (Aufwiegelung zur Meineid, Aufwiegelung zur Gotteslästerung.)

One of my earliest memories was as a child watching the ceremonial funeral of the war criminal Winston Churchill on black and white television. I’m almost sure I can say that he did indeed live and die, but I cannot prove it, for I never met the man, nor did I attend his last rites at his bedside. In my mind he is simply a story, a picture book narrative of a man who played (or may have played) a role in the affairs of the world. I’m inclined to believe that Churchill existed because the laws of cause and effect indicate that he is one of the many dots that connect us to our present time.

I was born on 20 December 1959, but probably only became intellectually aware of the world around me in a way I could commit to memory and analytical comprehension at some point between 1961 and 1962. Therefore, everything that “happened” in the world before 1962 is not true for me. It didn’t “happen”. It represents nothing more than second-hand or third-party information transmitted by other people whom I am told to “trust” or by the electronic media, history books and newspapers fashioned by those who may sometimes try to be objective, but either make mistakes or are subject to controllers whose aim is to propagate a slanted version of reported “events”.

However, I can prove that I was the 1973 and 1974 champion in the 800 and 1600-metre inter-school South Fylde Olympics, because I was a witness to my own victory, have personal experiential memories of the event and the gold medals to prove it. It may not be true for you and you don’t have to believe me (I won’t sue you or send you to prison), but I was there, crossed the line and wrote an additional line in my own personal history book.

Ever since the dawn of Sumerian civilisation, history books have been re-written countless times to include new information or exclude details that were proven false and based on fantastically colourful myths. My Grammar School history teacher was an honorary professor of Oxford University who taught me that, in contrast to mathematics, history is a ‘moveable feast’, meaning that it is always subject to review depending upon the emergence of new data that comes to light. History is a work in progress, and it is a book that will remain eternally under the editor’s lamp.

We now know that Christopher Columbus was not the first European to set foot on North American soil. We know that William Wallace never personally met Robert the Bruce. We now know, by the CIA’s own recent admission, that the ‘Bay of Tonkin’ incident never happened. We now know that Marie Antoinette was falsely attributed by Rousseau to have said, “Let them eat cake.” She never said it.

We now know that Sir Walter Raleigh did not introduce potatoes to England (they originated in Italy). We now know that Nero did not play the fiddle as Rome burned, for the fiddle was invented 1,600 years later. We now know that the Dutchman Abel Tasman discovered Australia, not Captain Cook. We now know that America gained her independence on 3 September 1783, not on 4 July 1776. We now know that Peyton Randolph was the first president of the United States, not George Washington. We now know that the ancient Gaels of Ireland developed Sanskrit and a prototype of the Hebrew language.

We now know, thanks to DNA scientists, that the Palestinians were the original Children of Israel and never left the Land of their Fathers. We now know that, for all but a minority of the Palestinian Sephardim, the “Diaspora” is largely a myth created by a people who originated north of Kazakhstan, converted to Judaism centuries later and then migrated to Eastern Europe.

We now know that the world is not flat.

Why do we now know all these things? Because men and women asked questions. Incredible, isn’t it?

In England, children are taught: Believe nothing you hear, only half of what you read and question everything. This is life-saving, good old fashioned British advice, and I observe it daily. It is an integral part of my cultural upbringing and is as essential to my being as the very heart that pumps blood through my veins.

To recapitulate: No matter what “happened” before the development of my intellectual facilities in 1962, it didn’t happen. The “world” for me did not exist before 20 December 1959, and it did not become “real” to me until some point in 1962. From my perspective, all events prior to 1962 do not constitute history, simply stories told to me by strangers with unknown motives. Novels and poetry. A fantasy matrix of moving pictures and scripted political drama. The Twilight Zone of a world in which video killed the radio star. Bubbles in my bathtub.

In a society where intellectual and historical enquiry is punishable by law, it cannot be said that we are living in either a democracy or a Rechtsstaat. It is a selective oligarchy that ring-fences individuals into preferential and non-preferential groups by means of social engineering and is therefore, as was the case with the USSR and other Bolshevik regimes, a dysfunctional administrative entity that will eventually implode under the pressure of its own internal contradictions.

As you are aware:
-----

“It remains the case that the German Reich [established in 1871] survived the collapse of 1945 and did not cease to exist, neither through capitulation nor the exercise of foreign power in Germany on the part of the allies; it possesses today, as it always has, legal and judicial sovereignty. The BRD (Federal Republic of Germany) is not the legal successor of the German Reich.”

- Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court), 31 July 1973 (Urteile 2 Bvl.6/56; 2 BvF 1/73; 2 BvR 373/83; BVGE 2,266 (277); 3, 288 (319ff; 5.85) 126; 6, 309, 336 und 363).
-----

I understand that jurists are under enormous pressure to square this impossible circle so that it does not become known that the European Union, by virtue of every treaty signed by the unconstitutional BRD, is an illegal political construct. When the people of Germany, Britain, Ireland, Austria, Poland, Italy, France and all other members of the European Soviet of Zionist States became fully conversant with the truth, there will follow a period of upheaval in Europe and a return to natural nation-state democracy. I guarantee it. Because I'm the messenger.

However, following the reinstitution of the German Reich in the coming years, whereupon civil servants will be required to reapply for their positions, please be assured, that since you and State Attorney Niesen have handled my case with a measurable degree of equanimity, I shall ensure that the newly-empowered authorities will receive from me personal letters of commendation that speak very highly of you.

In addition to my work as a creative writer and editor, I work very hard for Germany by helping to promote the export of German goods by means of brochure journalism. Sadly, although you have rejected the Jews' charges against me and left me free to explore this beautiful country at will, I am now giving some thought to leaving Germany once I can afford resettlement outside of the European Soviet Union because I cannot live in a state that tells me what I can and cannot think and say, for such prohibitions actually make me feel physically sick to the bottom of my stomach.

You cannot imagine how sad this makes me feel, for I truly love this country and the German people, all of whom have been betrayed by oafishly incompetent, self-serving politicians who should be stacking shelves in supermarkets and greedy, money-grubbing lobbyists in Berlin.

It also angers and grieves me that the ZJD, in common with the Israeli government and their other sister agencies, have refused to meet the donation for personal damages amounting to 10,000 euros to the Rachel Corrie Fund. I encourage you to learn more about this heroic, beautiful and intelligent young American woman, whose life was wilfully and maliciously crushed out of her by an Israeli bulldozer as she attempted to prevent the destruction of the homes and lives of Palestinian farmers (the genetic descendants of the Children of Israel).

www.rachelcorrie.org/
www.rachelcorriefoundation.org/site/
www.criticalconcern.com/rachelcorrie.html

Despite all the contention of the past few months, I thank you and State Attorney Frau Niesen for your intuitive understanding of equitable justice and sense of fair play.

May you walk in peace with God Almighty, Jesus Christ.

Yours faithfully

Michael James

----------

Letter from the Senior State Attorney to Michael James

Staatsanwaltschaft b. d. LG – 60256 Frankfurt am Main
Geschäftszeichen: 6111 Js 228014/08
Bearbeiter: OSta Claude
Durchwahl: 60 78
Fax: 6285

Konrad-Adenauer- Str. 20
60313 Frankfurt am Main
Telefon: (069) 1367 – 01
Telefax: (069) 1367 – 2100
www.sta-frankfurt.justiz.hessen.de

Auf die Strafanazeige

des Michael James in Friedrichsdorf vom 13.6.2008

gegen Verantwortliche des Zentralrats der Juden in Deutschland

wegen Vorwurfs der Volksverhetzung pp

wird die Einleitung eines Ermittlungsverfahrens abgelehnt (§ 152 Absatz 2 i. V. m. § 170 Absatz 2 der Strafprozessordnung).

Grunde:

Aus der Strafanzeige ergeben sich keine zureichenden tatsächlichen Anhaltspunkte für eine Straftat.

Die Angezeigten haben den Anzeigeerstatter -- völlig zu recht -- wegen Verdachts der Volksverhetzung angezeigt (6111 Js 222524/08). Seine offenbar damit zusammenhängende Strafanzeige enthält nichts, was einen Anfangsverdacht für ein strafbares Verhalten der Angezeigten begründen könnte,

Claude

Oberstaatsanwalt


GESTEMPELT / Beglaubigt / Laudage / Justizangestellte

----------

Acknowledgements and the current situation:

Let me first apologise to all my readers who have sent me heaps of supportive e-mail and letters by permission of my online editors. I have spent the best part of the last three weeks immersed in German law books and am concurrently suffering from a form of gastric influenza in addition to a prolonged bout of CFS. I have not forgotten you. You are MY PEOPLE.

My very special thanks go out to Ingrid Zundel who not only sent me a very generous “Nachschub” with which to nourish my ailing constitution, but also Ernst’s latest book recounting his ordeal in Mannheim (“Setting the Record Straight”) and an excellent DVD (“The Ernst Zundel Saga”), both of which I must eventually stow away in a safe place lest the authorities decide to raid my apartment for forbidden literature. Ingrid was also kind enough to give me a special write-up in her newsletters. I would also like to take this opportunity to tell Ingrid that I shall complete the assignment given to me once I have cleared my present backlog and regained a modicum of health, although some special ‘advice’ will follow per e-mail (the @bellsouth address bounces my mails, by the way). Please be patient, Ingrid. I love you.

Ronnie Lambert, a fellow Geordie and superb musician and singer for the band “Busker”, was also kind enough to send me a CD of his latest album “Geordieland”. This is what I call real music, straight from the heart, real and raw like you’ve never heard before. Ronnie suffers from crippling pain owing to his past work as a man who made a real contribution to society by helping to build homes. Please visit his website www.geordiesongs.com and order the best music you’ll ever hear this side of the Great Wall of China. I’ll be writing to you shortly, Ronnie. May God bless you.

I must also extend my appreciation to Fredrick Töben from the Adelaide Institute in Australia, who phoned me twice with messages of support and e-mailed me some extra courage. I am also the lucky recipient of a wealth of newsletters and updates he sent me, kindly mentioning my efforts and mobilising moral support.

As ever, my soul brother, Holger Haffke, of http://gnosticliberationfront.com was there as the Good Samaritan to carry some of the weight of my heaviest downers, and my Christian Orthodox friend Brother Nathanael Kapner took a massive hit on his phone bill by phoning me thrice from New York to tell me that he was praying for me and that we would defeat Satanic Zionism with the power of the Cross.

So where do I go from here? First I must rest a while and clear my desk to pay the bills. Then I will pick another fight with the Dark Powers of International Zionism, perhaps more wisely and with a better game plan in mind.

As for leaving Germany, I have agonized over this option for the best part of two years. But there is something that keeps me here.

Over the last 16 years I have seen the German people slowly lose their sense of purpose, their courage, their pride and their dignity. I have watched these descendants of the fearsome Teutonic warriors who once scattered entire legions of the Roman Empire and defended the gates of Europe against a formidable Mongol invasion shrug their shoulders in nonchalant resignation with the passage of every nation-destroying statute and anti-German ordinance handed down by the parasitic Zionist elites in Berlin.

Most of them have lost the will to fight. But I haven’t, and I never will. I shall show them once more how to fight, and how to win. For I am reminded of an old paraphrased Jewish proverb:

"If not me, then who? If not now, then when?"

---------------
Michael James, an Englishman, is a former freelance journalist resident in Germany since 1992 with additional long-haul stays in East Africa, Poland and Switzerland.
---------------

So...I can't stand green beans and peas...but I love green-leaf lettuce, zucchini, spinach, broccoli...so does my not liking green beans and peas make me a GREEN VEGETABLE HATER?

I think not.

This posting by Michael James has led me to proclaim that the label of ANTISEMITE should not be used, as the label cannot possibly exist in reality.

I'm willing to discuss this...but at this point, I hereby OUTLAW the use of this term.

Here's some more info on the illustrious Michael James.