RESPONSIBILITY IS THE KEY TO POWER - J.B. Campbell

JB Campbell: Responsibility is the Key to Power

December 28, 2010 posted by J. Bruce Campbell · 47 Comments

By JB Campbell STAFF WRITER
We are ruled by parasites. We are ruled by people who not only don’t work but expect us to work for them. This is totally irresponsible on our part. And we have been carefully trained to be irresponsible because responsibility is the key to power. We can gain total power over our lives but not without accepting full responsibility for everything.

Billions of dollars are spent to make us irresponsible. They are spent by us, that is, it’s our money that’s being spent. Churches, schools, unions, Hollywood, advertising, sports but mostly the government spend our money in ways to make us irresponsible. We spend away our power on meaningless things and harmful things. So much so that our money itself has become almost worthless, because the most important harmful things we buy are government bonds that are then given to the owners of the Federal Reserve Corporation as collateral on the paper they sell us that we call “dollars.” The FRC calls them “notes,” or IOUs. They’re not dollars, they’re not notes – they’re just paper that we either accept in trade or we don’t trade.

Just about every bad thing that’s happened to us can be traced back to bad money. Bad money makes bad things happen. When we allow loan sharks to be our only suppliers of currency, our culture rots. We can easily trace the rot. It began in 1913, when the Federal Reserve Act was enacted by our elected representatives. I have written that the Masonic US Constitution is a masterpiece of deception without any redeeming features, which had to be tamed by the Bill of Rights. Patrick Henry called it a design for empire, which is what we have had ever since Lincoln invaded the Southern States. The closest the framers got to redemption was the rule they made that the Congress would mint coins and regulate the value thereof. The dollar was strong and worth something until 1913, when the Warburgs seized control of our currency on behalf of the Rothschild Group. A Colt Six-Shooter, for example, cost about twelve dollars. Today the same gun (made by US Fire Arms) costs a hundred times that. A Ford truck cost three hundred dollars. Today one costs more than thirty thousand dollars and even that isn’t enough to keep the company afloat because our currency is rotting.

Within four years we were in the first of many international wars. No coincidence. The loan sharks, at no cost to themselves, make war loans to governments that can never be repaid. They’re not supposed to be repaid, but only to put us all in permanent debt to them. Our debts to them from WWI still haven’t been repaid and can’t be repaid, due to the little add-on percentage thing they call “interest.” Interest wrecks everything for us, including our rotting money. If everyone has to pay back more than he borrowed – and everyone does – then the only way to have enough extra is to inflate the currency supply. And if you have to pay the loan sharks a percentage on top of that, and “taxes” on top of that, well, the whole thing spirals out of control pretty quickly. Which is where we are today.

Out of control.

How do we get control back? There’s only one way. We men must assume total responsibility for everything.

One of the most irresponsible things we do is vote. Another is to pay taxes. Allowing policemen “to protect and serve” us. Putting our children in “public schools.” Listening to preachers, priests and ministers about anything. Might as well listen to a rabbi. All totally irresponsible. But that’s how we’re trained to live and that’s how we are controlled. We have to break out of this trap and start thinking as men, not slaves. And we are slaves, make no mistake. Heavily armed slaves.

Never in human history has a people been in our unique position: Americans are some of the most well-armed people in the world, maybe the most well-armed. People think this is a result of the 2nd Amendment in the Bill of Rights and that is partly true. But the actual, modern, massive arming of the American population was done by the CIA.

A CIA agent by the name of Sam Cummings “resigned” from the agency and started a company called Interarms, based in Virginia, back in the 1950s. Cummings had toured European battlefields as a young man and scavenged discarded machine guns, rifles and anti-tank weapons. He simply put them in his car and made his way to England where he started storing them in a warehouse in Manchester. When he joined CIA he told the director, Allen Dulles, about all the guns over there. Dulles was surprised and gave him the assignment to go back and get a tally and buy them up. Cummings did so and then soon left the agency to start his massive surplus firearms importing and distribution company, based in both Manchester and Virginia. All machine guns, submachine guns, rifles and pistols entering this country came through Interarms to be distributed through various jobbers and retailers. There are probably more guns in this country than there are cars, and unlike cars, guns generally don’t wear out.

Allen Dulles and his brother were founding members of the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921. The CIA has always been staffed, like the State Department, with CFR members at the top. That’s why it’s known as the Rockefeller Secret Police.

So why would the CFR want Americans to be so heavily armed? For the same reason it wanted Hitler’s Germany to be heavily armed and able to put up a convincing fight. There has to be a credible threat, as we learn in The Report From Iron Mountain. The people must believe it’s real. If another civil war is planned, then both sides have to be armed. And the designated loser can always be disarmed later if there’s no food. No food is the specialty of the Jews. Also, Americans have never demonstrated a propensity for attacking their oppressors, as we see below. We might defend ourselves a little, but we let ourselves be pushed around by cops, attorneys and judges. It hasn’t occurred to us to get even with the ones who sent us to Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan or Iraq. We just take it, like good little boys. That has to stop.

America was literally flooded with cheap surplus military weapons and Cummings had a CIA-granted monopoly on this importation and distribution. Then he began to arm other countries and became the most infamous gun runner in the world. But Cummings always said, as he repeats in his biography, that he never sold or supplied weapons without the direct okay from the CIA, that is, from his patron, Allen Dulles, or John McCone or Richard Helms or George Bush.

Any questions?

On the other side of the coin, we have the anti-gun groups Handgun Control, Inc and the National Coalition to Ban Handguns. Both organizations were funded and founded by an active CIA agent named Edwin O. Welles. Both organizations admit that handguns are just the camel’s nose in the tent. They want all the guns, or so they say. All they managed to do was to disarm us mentally. I suspect that that was all they meant to do.

The result of this CIA activity is that we are at once heavily armed but mentally disarmed. We have the guns and the idea that we are armed and free but mysteriously we have no will to use them as they were meant to be used. I’m sure this is an interesting phenomenon to the CIA and Mossad psychiatrists who study us so carefully. Yes, our rulers are uneasy that we have all these great guns but time has shown that it hasn’t occurred to us to use them to liquidate our sadistic oppressors, the greedy loan sharks.

It occurred to me, which was why I started the militia movement in the 1980s. It seemed to me that American men were in a downhill slide into national cowardice, thanks to all the public education and religion and anti-heroic Hollywood movies, plus the outrageous prosecutions of gun owners and those few who did use guns to defend themselves and their loved ones. It all added up to making American men into cowards. Obviously a lot of us didn’t want to be cowards and millions of us came to consider ourselves members of the militia just as soon as I suggested it. The militia was really just a state of mind. But it was not the state of mind that I was trying to create. I wanted to create revolutionaries to help overthrow our renegade gangsters headquartered in Manhattan. I wanted to create a state of mind that would treat Gun Police as rats to be exterminated. Ultimately, we would have to exterminate the head gangsters. No doubt the gangsters understood the implications and, as former CIA director William Colby wrote to John DeCamp, the militia had to be dealt with, justly or otherwise, not because militiamen had guns and practiced with them, but because there were so many of them and because they were made up of “society’s ordinary, successful citizens.” It was definitely a trend and it had to be stopped. As I have written many times, it was stopped by the atrocity at Oklahoma City. Colby himself was stopped soon after some of his admissions were made public.

Ironically, what undoubtedly frightened Colby and the others more than the militia was the ’93 shootout in Waco. I don’t think anyone will claim that the followers of “David Koresh” were typical Christians, considering they made money for the cult by dealing in guns. I wouldn’t try to say that they were militia people, either. They were unusual, quiet fanatics. But they had the grit that we all need when the chips are down. They defended themselves and killed homicidal Yankee aggressors, just as the Afghans are doing today. The Mt. Carmel gunfight, siege and massacre amounted to the modern-day but even more ghastly Alamo. The psychological effect of the deaths of four with many other casualties on the swaggering Gun Police was devastating and orders went out to avoid such a catastrophe in the future. The psychological effect of the mass murder fifty-one days later certainly helped me in my efforts to grow the militia movement, which was suddenly taken much more seriously thanks to those great Waco martyrs.

But I still couldn’t sell my plan for the actual overthrow of the Manhattan gangsters. The militia became a defensive state of mind, not offensive. It was gaining momentum and strength of numbers right up through April 19, 1995, when explosives were detonated inside the Murrah Building, killing around 168 federal employees and their children. Then it was all over, overnight.
There was no depth to the militia movement, which name I used only because some men need the authority, or permission, to be men. The old word, “militia,” gave them that authority. The Militia Act of 1792 stated that one function of the militia was “to suppress combinations too powerful for the ordinary course of judicial proceedings.” That seemed to fit my needs exactly, because I was trying to suppress the Council on Foreign Relations and its co-conspiracies which were definitely too powerful for the ordinary course of judicial proceedings.

There was no training to provide the needed depth and heart for withstanding the psychological assault of the OKC massacre. American men had had no training for such an atrocity. American vets were not reliable because of their massive brainwashing and conditioning to follow orders and their reliance on rank. The militia idea was too radical to ex-soldiers and marines who tended to fall back on their military ways. The militia was paramilitary with no rank, no leadership, no cults of personality. It was pretty much the same as the Leaderless Resistance advocated by Louis Beam, who renewed the concept developed by Col. U.L. Amoss. The constant threat was infiltration and false leadership by police and federal agents. And there was just no action, but rather a lot of talk and running around and stockpiling guns and ammo. And so, it fell apart when the chips were down.

We don’t need the authority of “the militia” now. We have everything we need. Any guns and ammo we don’t already have are down at the armory, waiting for us to pick them up. All we need is action against the gangsters. But to get the action, there still is something lacking and that is our acceptance of responsibility.

In an essay called Jewish Rule, I wrote that American men have to accept responsibility for what the Jews have maneuvered our government to do to the rest of the world. One reader thought this was an outrageous idea and that it was in conflict with my accusation of the Jews for all their crimes against humanity. Yes, the Jews are responsible for all the death and destruction, but we are responsible for allowing them to have it done by our government, in our name. Either we are men or we are slaves to the Jews. Which one would you say we are?

What that reader didn’t understand is that the path to power is our acceptance of total responsibility for everything our government has done. This is not a gag, because we actually are responsible. Billions are spent to keep us from realizing that, as mentioned. But now there’s less and less excuse not to know. For example, there’s a huge wall the Jews built around what’s left of Palestine. A big prison wall. That’s the symbol of Jewish Rule. They are deliberately starving an entire people to death and a few months ago they slaughtered humanitarians who were trying to bring food and supplies to those people. We know and everyone knows that America approves of Jewish sadism against humans. We are responsible for all that suffering, whether we admit it or not. When we admit it, we take responsibility.

The Jews destroyed Lebanon again, just a few years ago. That’s what the Jews do. The Jews stole over two trillion dollars from the Pentagon. That’s also what they do. The Jews knocked down the World Trade Center because they didn’t want to pay to demolish it legally. That sort of insurance fraud is known as “Jewish lightning.” They just took it to a new level and parlayed it into a couple of anti-Moslem wars with one more about to break. But now a whole lot of us, thanks to the Internet, know a hell of a lot about these things. That puts us under a certain obligation to do something. Especially now that we know the following… the Jews want Iran destroyed by nuclear annihilation.

It’s their bomb, after all. They invented it and built it and dropped it on hundreds of thousands of civilians. And gave it to Stalin and made a few hundred for themselves. It’s their scientific claim to fame, the only important invention they can brag about. As we know, they keep quiet on that subject. But I digress. This is about responsibility.

The most responsible man in the world right now is an Iranian engineer named Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. That makes him the most powerful man in the world. He is the role model, the man we need to emulate. Not only is he the president of Iran, but he has been accused for years of being one of the revolutionaries who took the 52 American embassy personnel hostage and held them for 444 days.

All American diplomats are spies whose jobs are to subvert and undermine the countries in which they work, and to place paid stooges in power. What our government did to the Iranians was so outrageous, but it took them about twenty-five years to get even a little.

The Iranians had a very popular prime minister in the early ‘50s named Mohammad Mossadegh. The British government’s oil company, BP, had been hogging all the profits taken out of Iran and Mossadegh had asked for an equal share, the way Aramco did with the Saudis. The Brits refused and Mossadegh nationalized Iranian oil, offering the greedy Brits twenty-five percent. The British answer, after obtaining a UN starvation blockade identical to that against Iraq in the ‘90s, was to get Alan Dulles’ CIA to overthrow Mossadegh for them in 1953. Our CIA put Mossadegh in prison (solitary confinement) for three years and then permanent house arrest until his death. Dulles put the corrupt and Israel-friendly Shah in dictatorial power over the people for the next quarter-century, which only ended when their smoldering rage ignited into anti-American riots in ’79.

If Ahmadinejad did in fact take part in the hostage action, that makes him a man of action, not just a great theoretician, as he proved in his appearance at the United Nations. But what placed Mr. Ahmadinejad in the Hall of Fame was his courageous descent into the belly of the beast. He was, for some demented reason, invited a few years ago to address the Council on Foreign Relations after his tour d’force at the United Nations. He didn’t do this at their actual headquarters at 58 E. 68th Street, but at the Intercontinental Hotel on 48th Street. They probably didn’t want him to see their actual headquarters.

Might give him ideas.

This, to me, was the most profound moment in modern history. The one important man in the world who understands exactly what the Council on Foreign Relations is and how it has destroyed our world was invited to speak and defend his past statements – to them.

He defended nothing but rather went on the attack. He continued to belittle the Jewish fairy tale of the Six Million and asked again why the Palestinians should pay the price for something that has never been established? He asked them if the Council on Foreign Relations had one voice of support for the Palestinians? Silence was their answer. The man knew that Israel is the CFR’s little monster. He was playing with them.

Brent Scowcroft, GHW Bush’s consiglieri, was left shaking his head. “He’s a master of counterpunch, deception and circumlocution.”

Translation: We couldn’t handle him.

Some of them might have been a little uneasy at the thought of this clear-thinking, straight-talking man having captured and held State Department employees for over a year. After all, the Council on Foreign Relations was organized to run the US State Department. That’s what the word “Foreign” refers to, with the ultimate goal of merging our country with foreign countries. The CFR’s maiden effort toward this end was scheduled for this year, at which time we were to be merged with Mexico and Canada. Obviously this isn’t going to happen this year, but it’s still their plan – if we do not burn down the building known as Harold Pratt House before then. It will also have to be bulldozed because it’s made of stone. Again, the address of this den of iniquity is 58 E. 68th Street in Manhattan, which is actually on the corner of Park Avenue and 68th. Harold Pratt was a director of Standard Oil and a Rockefeller relative.

Many Jews were upset at the invitation to Ahmadinejad and claimed they considered resigning from the CFR! Sure. So the affair was billed as a “meeting,” rather than the customary dinner. The Jews said they would not eat with him. Hors d’oeuvres were offered but the president wouldn’t touch them.

Touche.

“And as he left, it was with a jab to his hosts. ‘At the beginning of the session, you said you were an independent group,’ he said. ‘But almost everything that I was asked came from a government position.’ Then he smiled, thanked everyone and left the room with a light step.” [NY Times, 21 Sept 06]

Mr. Ahmadinejad knows that the Council on Foreign Relations is the de facto government of the United States. He knows that the nuclear attack that is planned for his country was designed by the members of this iniquitous club of Rothschild/Rockefeller. But he still went there and messed their minds up. He so enraged those pampered, perfumed pimps that one of them said later:
“‘If this man represents the prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are heading for a massive confrontation with Iran,’ he said.” [ibid]

We know what that meant. It meant that the Iranians are going to be irradiated. The question is, are we going to allow our Manhattan gangsters to get away with it? They are certainly our responsibility. And of course, the CFR disclaims all responsibility while claiming all power. “We’re just a think-tank – a private study group.” But the fact is that you can’t have power without responsibility, once honest men figure out what you’ve been doing. They have to answer for their actions, and for their crimes against humanity. They have to answer to us. If they don’t answer to us, they’ll have to answer to some angry foreigners. You just can’t keep mass murdering for ninety years and building the empire and ruining other countries without someone stopping you. Not in this day and age. It has to be American men stopping them. If someone else came over and wiped out the CFR, we would be in permanent disgrace. Our manhood would be irretrievably lost.

The Iranians are perfectly within their rights to attack the United States based on the many reports of our and Israel’s plan to attack them. The fact is, though, that Moslems do not engage in unprovoked action. They generally don’t engage in very drastic action even when they are provoked, although they have flexed their muscles in Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon, purely in self-defense. But we have driven them into a corner, and even a rabbit will bite you if you give it no way out of a corner. If Moslems were as murderous as the Jews claim, Israel would no longer exist as a Zionist entity. It is the Jews and Judaized Americans and Englishmen who attack without provocation, as they continue to prove. Jews are the masters of murder, as they proved with the USS Liberty, 9/11, in Lebanon, not to mention their genocide of Palestinians, of Russians and Ukrainians – and Germans.

The CFR is funded with Rothschild/Rockefeller money laundered at the tax-exempt foundations, money from the Federal Reserve Corporation, the energy corporations and the narcotics corporations. They have all the money in the world. They have all of our money but it’s still not enough. A CFR member named Dov Zakheim couldn’t account for over two trillion dollars from the Pentagon. Imagine that! Its members are Jews, Freemasons and those sexual perverts from the Brotherhood of Death at Yale University, often combinations of all three. There are virtually no normal people in the Council on Foreign Relations; they are mainly psychopaths who must be stopped before they destroy us all. There was one guy who may have been in there by mistake, Matt Simmons, but he died suddenly this year following his denunciation of the BP destruction of the Gulf of Mexico.

We should have a little background on the world’s most homicidal organization, the Council on Foreign Relations… An interesting history of the CFR can be found on their own website, of all things:

www.cfr.org/about/history/

It’s not how I would have told it, but it reveals a narcissistic self-fascination and is an admission that they have run this government for almost a hundred years. The 20th Century was a mountain, an Everest, of dead bodies, only because of Them. And they’re not done. The first generation’s dead, the second’s dying but the third’s just getting warmed up. We normal people may wonder why these ghouls would want to preside over a graveyard. Don’t bother. It’ll never make sense. Just deal with what they’ve already done. These guys have a depopulation program that will boggle your mind. They plan to kill about 90% of the world’s people – maybe more. That’s not why I want to kill them all, for I doubt that they can pull this off. Mainly I want to get even for the ones they’ve already killed.

Everyone dies. It’s how someone died that counts when it comes to getting even. The Council on Foreign Relations caused millions of people to die in the most horrific ways imaginable. Problem is, they died in our name. Our presidents, our congress, our military. Our State Department killed more than any of them by setting up and supporting every Communist government in the world, ever since the first one in 1917. That’s where the big killing was done, by our Communists. And the State Department is run by the Council on Foreign Relations. Don’t ever forget that.

And now Israel is guiding us into a nuclear holocaust. “Holocaust” means “burnt whole.”

Israel was created by the CFR, which has subsidized it with our money since 1948. Israel earns all those stolen billions by destabilizing the Middle East and inflating the price of oil, because the CFR represents oil and banking, which are pretty much the same thing. Oil is real wealth and banking is fake wealth, but we don’t get one without the other.

They don’t want any more oil. There’s too damn much oil. They want less oil. They want us to pay more for less oil. They don’t need any more money because there’s too much money and it’s not worth much anyway. They just don’t want us to have any money. If we have money then we can afford to go after them. If we’re broke, then we can’t. It’s that simple. Who is in charge of our currency supply? Ben Shalom Bernanke. And if we’re sick with man-made diseases with no cures, then we can’t go after them. Poisoning through medicine was perfected by Jews centuries ago. If there’s a food shortage then we can’t go after them. Remember what Joseph did to the Egyptians? Same as Kaganovich did to the Ukrainians, and Eisenhower to the Germans. So we have to go after them before we go broke, get sick or starve. It’s going to be a race.

Their oil war in Iraq is being fought to keep most Iraqi oil in the ground. A nuclear attack on Iran will keep Iranian oil in the ground. If they could have kept Chavez in jail after their coup, he wouldn’t have been giving Venezuelan oil away to our poor people, or offering to lower the price to a permanent level that would still make his huge heavy oil reserves viable. If the CFR kills Chavez then that heavy oil will stay in the ground. The oil price is intended to skyrocket again, which should throw our already crippled economy into total chaos again. And this will take our minds off the CFR’s planned merger of America with Mexico and Canada.

The path to power is our acceptance of total responsibility. That means, as Americans, we accept responsibility for what our government has done in the past – all the way back to the beginning – and for what it’s doing now. Wrongs have to be righted, not immediately but they must begin to be righted. Some wrongs can’t be righted all the way because we’ve killed a lot of people. We can’t right that. But we can acknowledge the wrong we’ve done to others as a first step. And we’ve done the wrongs, by proxy, at least. Our parents and their parents let them be done just as we have.

For starters, we ought to learn the truth about the great American family holiday called Thanksgiving. Learn about that and see how America has treated others, even before it was called America. Our government exterminated the Indians, starting with Thanksgiving. What was done to the Indians was done to the Germans. Our government waged total war on other Americans from 1861 to 1865. Our government’s Jewish agents did it to the Russians and then the Chinese and so many others, recently the Palestinians and now the Iraqis. But the whole thing started with the American genocide of the American Indians. Those we didn’t exterminate we exiled to barren “reservations” and gave rotten diets and bad medicine. They’re dying out, as they’re supposed to do. How do we right that? The first step is to own up to it. Then we very humbly go to the tribes and ask them how they want to proceed from here? (The casinos are as destructive as alcohol and are often controlled by the professional money-changers.)

The Indians were the ones who had true personal liberty. When our European ancestors got here, they were a bunch of repressed religious fanatics, self-righteous and holy. They were also control-freaks with minds totally warped by their insane Christianity, especially the Old Testament believers in the Chosen People. Of course, they thought they were the Chosen People, same as the Jews do. They soon found a people who were generous and what we now call “democratic.” Study for yourself the truth about the Native Americans which is easily available on the Internet. Those sanctimonious, psalm-singing sons of bitches began to kill the natives who kept them from starving because they showed a good way to live which threatened the control of the holy Joes in charge of the Europeans. This bunch of faithful killers became what today we call Yankees. The grasping, self-righteous Yankee mentality would become the scourge of America, eventually wiping out the natives and, in 1865, the idea of secession found in the Declaration of Independence. Don’t bring up Slavery because the Yankees wanted that Southern cotton at the cheapest price they could get, and you know what that meant. They just didn’t want the Southerners to keep buying goods from England and Europe instead of from them.

The Old Testament would prove to be the undoing of Russia, too. The Russian Jews who wandered over here first lived in Russia’s Pale of Settlement. That’s where the Russians let them live after they were run out of Khazaria by the Golden Horde. They were a bunch of converts to Judaism and were so hard-core that they eventually asked the Russian government if they could have the judicial power to execute those among them who were unbelievers in Yahweh. The Russians said, Hell no, you can’t do that! This prohibition on the rabbis to execute heretics and backsliders was the gravest of crimes, in “Orthodox” eyes, and led to what became the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, although many attempts at revolution were made by the Jews before that.

So we have this combination of Old Testament-guided people in the Council on Foreign Relations, a combination of Jews and Yankees – estimated at 70% Jews. That doesn’t make the CFR a religious organization, obviously. But its roots are in the totalitarian dictatorship of Deuteronomy and Leviticus. Zionism means that the Russian Jews must emigrate from Russia to Palestine, seize it from the Palestinians and change the name to Israel, or Zion. And from there they would make the Law go forth. The Law is Deuteronomy. At this point you should actually read Deuteronomy, just to see what the Palestinians, the Iraqis and the Iranians are up against. It’s what the Russians were up against when all those Trotsky Jews were shipped over to St. Petersburg from New York. What the Germans were up against when Eisenhower gave all those Morgenthau Jews the green light in 1945 to slaughter POWs and civilians, in accord with Theodore Kaufman’s manual, Germany Must Perish!. We’re going to be up against it, too.

The Council on Foreign Relations created the United Nations in 1945. The UN eventually set up shop on prime Manhattan real estate donated by the Rockefellers, themselves a strange combination of Yankees and Jews. Yankee CFR member and Soviet spy Alger Hiss was the UN’s first Secretary General! The first new nation that the United Nations created was “Israel” in 1948. It is a fake nation, a fake nation of parasites that does not deserve to exist, as it is sitting on a foundation of lies.

So, we are responsible. For one thing, the UN is in America. Israel is supported by American tax money and our unpayable debt. We must repudiate this debt because it was incurred by fraud. Israel is the greatest fraud in history, and the most vicious. The UN is just a fraud, but it is the framework for what the CFR has in mind for us. The first step is the North American Union in which we will degenerate into another Third World dump and answer to the US, Mexican and Canadian armies.

We are responsible for everything we’ve done except for the debt. The debt to the Federal Reserve Corporation and to the Wall Street lenders and the bonds we trade for their counterfeit cash are based on fraud. Fraud nullifies all contracts, with no statute of limitations. We must repudiate the debt by nationalizing it. The Federal Reserve Corp would cease to exist because most of its directors are CFR. The rest would get the message and quit.

The Council on Foreign Relations has had a great ride since 1921. Its founding members had seized control of the US government ten years earlier through their control of Woodrow Wilson. They created the Federal Reserve and its collection agency, the IRS. They got us to invade Mexico. They started World War I. They created the Communist dictatorship in Russia. They almost got us in the League of Nations. When that failed, they formed the Council on Foreign Relations to design a real world war and a new, improved League of Nations. That only took them twenty years. After ninety years of mass murder, with much more in store, however, it is time to call a halt to their crimes against humanity. This cannot be done politely or by civil suit or by filing charges against them. What federal agency would prosecute them?

No federal or state or county or local agency will prosecute them. It will be up to us.
This essay amounts to a warrant for the entire membership, regardless of ethnicity, of the Council on Foreign Relations. It is also my personal opinion. You can figure just what kind of warrant it should be. This will be up to the reader and it will eventually be up to the millions of men who never read this but who will demand to know who is responsible for the coming national suicide of America. The word will get out that engine of our destruction is this malignant, toxic, private ministry of war known as the CFR.

Maybe this man has put into words what some readers are thinking:
“Supposing that in fact, you indeed, stand by all of your claims; that is, you are indeed, a ‘true blue’ defender of all that is good and true, and even, beautiful, then I have a question: Given your suppositions about the alleged omnipotence of your adversaries: Would it not seem a little odd that you are allowed to make your claims so freely — given the Power you ascribe to Them? Might it be possible, if not likely, that what I see as ‘your work’ (I know you – not) on the Internet is in fact, a service to Them who would like to identify potential ‘terrorists’ and would-be troublemakers

If so, you are, so far, only serving those that you so wildly denounce because you and the website[s] on which your work is posted are the most heavily surveilled on the planet.”

The answer to these questions is, regardless of who is writing something, does it sound true or not? If something’s true, then it doesn’t matter if the one saying it has one motive or another. Even if Netanyahu said something that’s true, it’s still true. If something doesn’t sound true, then ignore it. Find the truth your own way. But if something is true and you ignore it, then watch out because the truth’s going to get you eventually. Maybe sooner than eventually.

I never said that our adversaries are omnipotent. I just said they’re mass murderers. If I thought they were omnipotent I wouldn’t write anything about them. As a matter of fact, I think they are extremely vulnerable once their little magic spell they’ve got on us breaks. This is how you break it, by speaking truth to power. I think our power is far greater than theirs, in terms of both numbers and truth. Do your homework and speak the truth.

The answer to the question about maybe making things worse for us by speaking the truth is: most of us, if we have any sense, are afraid of danger. The idea is to get past the fear and learn to defeat the aggressor rather than fear him. I mean, guys ride bulls, don’t they? Race cars, climb mountains? They learn how to deal with the threat with new skills and techniques and become, if they survive the learning process, professionals or at least skilled amateurs. This just happens to be more meaningful than racing motorcycles or the other blood sports.

And, if some guys have the guts and skill to master the blood sports, why is it that they chicken out when it comes to bloody politics? They’re both life and death. One’s fun and the other is not so fun. You can make a lot of money as a bull rider or racing driver. Bloody politics will bankrupt you, so that’s a good reason. It can also get you arrested and/or killed.

The questioner asks why this writer hasn’t been arrested or killed so far, if what I write about them is true? They’ve thought about it. Two FBIs told me that in Montana in ’96. The Secret Service threatened to kill me in ’91 if I got near Bush’s old man. Maybe they don’t want another Waco. Maybe they need a bogeyman, a home-grown Osama. I won’t indulge them in what they think they need. I’ll just keep saying what I think they need, which is a real ass-whipping.
Maybe they’ve tried. I was attacked three times in 2003. Attacked by poison on my steering wheel. I developed severe kidney problems two times and was permanently disfigured. If I hadn’t been married to a great doctor/healer, I might have croaked. The third time I found it on the wheel in time. Typical Jewish MO, but it could have been the feds.

Let’s start accepting our responsibility. All of it. Taking responsibility for our government’s past crimes will give us total power over our future. We will change America’s role in the world from a colonizing, war criminal superpower to a responsible and respectful and independent nation. Our first responsibility is to give the Council on Foreign Relations and anyone who works for the CFR a real ass-whipping.

A Quarter Of A Billion Dollars Well Spent, I Guess

Michael R. Bloomberg has won a third term as Mayor of New York City, barely surviving a challenge from former City Comptroller William Thompson.

Looks to me that the endorsement from President Barack Hussein Obama was the kiss of death...just ask former New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine.

Anywho...let's see what a third term as mayor holds for Mike and for New York City.

In other news...Harper's has a great article I'd like to alert you all to peruse, dear readers, titled The Intelligence Factory: How America Makes its Enemies Disappear, by Petra Bartosiewicz.

Here are a couple of articles you should have read - had a busy week, so I didn't get to post this information earlier:

The Best and the Brightest Have Led America Off a Cliff

The Hard Evidence - a conference (I'd like to see if they will add my very extensive research to the repository)

"Wiped Off The Map" - The Rumor Of The Century

Let's see the Yankees possibly take the World Series tonight.

USA And The World: At The Crossroads Or In The Crosshairs?‏ - Travis Kelly

A correction to my last Samizdat posting about Ahmadinejad -- the Daily Telegraph seems to have pulled this out of their ass, without any due diligence:

Ahmadinejad has no Jewish roots
Rumours that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's family converted to Islam from Judaism are false. In fact, they are proud Shias
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/oct/05/mahmoud-ahmadinejad-jewish-family

One recently published claim about his background comes from an article in the Daily Telegraph. Entitled "Mahmoud Ahmadinejad revealed to have Jewish past", it claims that his family converted to Islam after his birth. The claim is based on a number of arguments, a key one being that his previous surname was Sabourjian which "derives from weaver of the sabour, the name for the Jewish tallit shawl in Persia".

Professor David Yeroshalmi, author of The Jews of Iran in the 19th Century and an expert on Iranian Jewish communities, disputes the validity of this argument. "There is no such meaning for the word 'sabour' in any of the Persian Jewish dialects, nor does it mean Jewish prayer shawl in Persian...

_______________________________________________________________________________________

This is a long but particularly cogent essay on the state of the world, and our nation's role in the future:


USA and the World: At the crossroads or in the crosshairs?
Come Carpentier de Gourdon
08 Oct 2009
http://www.vijayvaani.com/FrmPublicDisplayArticle.aspx?id=857

History is being written every day but there is little doubt that the years from 2008 to 2010 will be remembered in the future as the period during which the global system transitioned from almost unchallenged unipolar western dominance to a much more complex and uncharted chaotic state.

The after-effects of the financial meltdown in the USA brought about the rapid decline of the NATO-centered western security structure, already challenged by the tragic wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, while Israel, a pillar of the global US-led alliance, was put on the strategic defensive by its botched attack on Lebanon and on the moral defensive by its brutal assault on Gaza, which exposed the Jewish state to the charges of war crimes and even crimes against humanity, earlier levied against its American mentor in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Conversely, while the “metaphorical” West is being buffeted by economic and political storms, many of its own making, China, India, Brazil and other leading nations of Asia, Latin America and Africa are experiencing a new spring of hope as they see the centres of gravity of the old “order” shifting rapidly towards them. Indeed the problems that those developing countries are experiencing are often caused by their interactions with the poles of worldwide finance (New York, London) and by the contamination of America’s multiple woes to its neighbours and partners.

The perception of this situation has led to a number of rather predictable consequences. The socialist or nationalist anti-Wall Street (a fairer description than “anti-American” or “anti-globalization”) governments of Venezuela, Bolivia, Argentina, Ecuador, Iran and Belarus were reinforced and vindicated in their resolve to create an alternative order, while the “good students” of global liberalism such as Mexico, South Africa, Nigeria and even the United Arab Emirates were severely hurt and saw their socio-political stability challenged. Russia was provided with further reasons to review its commitment to capitalism and forced to increase Government intervention in the economy.

China likewise used its command and control structures to inject several hundred billion dollars worth of stimulus to support threatened companies and fight mounting unemployment. Japan elected to power, with an overwhelming majority, a party committed to reorganize the social dispensation, reshape its foreign policy, distance itself from the USA, and strike a closer collaboration with China and other Asian neighbours.

The Atlantic Alliance thus finds itself in a rapidly worsening predicament. Faced by formidable competition in all areas by the rising powers of Asia and South America, increasingly dependent upon Russia and other less-than-friendly countries for its energy, threatened with eviction from its traditional African backyard by China, India, Brazil and other new entrants on the continent, mined by social unrest as a result of the economic and unemployment crisis, weakened by ill-fated colonial wars in the Middle East, bled by the thousand pricks of Islam-inspired terrorism, demoralised by the fast spreading perception of a looming climatic and environmental Armageddon and deeply divided within, the “West” is less homogenous than ever perhaps since World War II, and is fighting to retain control over an international architecture it can no longer afford to support.

Hence the repeated appeals to Russia, China and India to become part of this system and take their share of responsibility in it. However those attempts to co-opt the three most significant “non western” states are inspired by the hope that they can be kept apart from each other and possibly on unfriendly terms, in order to avoid a coordination that would be ominous for the US-ruled alliance.

While sharp divisions emerged between the USA and Continental Western Europe with regard to the Iraq war and are widening on the Afghan theatre, even greater disagreements have been recorded on the subject of the economy and specifically on how to respond to the crisis.

Those divisions are also to be found within most countries in the Atlantic alliance, including the US, where President Barack Obama is torn between two bitterly opposed camps, i.e. those who elected him to carry out radical reforms in domestic and foreign policies on one side, and those who opposed or grudgingly supported him in order to prevent him from carrying out those very reforms on the other. That division is less obvious but much more real than the supposed cleavage between the Democratic and Republican parties which have long been rival but complementary interest groups in the service of the same system.

The division, in simple terms, manifests most visibly on four critical issues: the economy, the Israel-Palestine situation (which includes the policy towards Iran), the Russia-China conundrum and the Afghan situation. Iraq, at least temporarily ceased to be a major item of disagreement in the USA as a result of the relative but fragile status quo that has prevailed there since 2007. The only differences regard the pace of repatriation of US troops and the amount of forces that should be maintained there permanently or at least for the foreseeable future. However the four other issues have all appearances of being intractable.

The Economy

The Obama administration has disappointed the reformers of various persuasions as he gave every sign of being both unable and unwilling to challenge the power of the entrenched Wall Street lobbies and business interests. The massive and rabid opposition he faced on the issue of healthcare reform, especially with regard to any notion of public healthcare that is seen as “communistic” by too many Americans under the influence of the propaganda broadcast by insurance companies and pharmaceutical consortia, is symptomatic of a deadlocked system, controlled by its beneficiaries who refuse to concede their privileges under any circumstances.

This obduracy is indeed the major factor for the increasingly likely collapse of the United States, in spite of its being still an immensely wealthy country. On a smaller scale, California, the richest state of the Union is also rapidly declining under the weight of its own political-fiscal deadlock which has condemned it to bankruptcy. Though American military might cannot be matched by any other nation in the foreseeable future, it is unlikely that this power can remain effective when the underlying socio-political structures crumble and when the defence machinery itself cannot be properly oiled with the vast financial outlays it requires. At present the USA is gradually keeling over under the burden created by the 8 trillion Dollar real estate bubble when it burst.

Israel-Palestine

All American policies in the Near and Middle East are influenced, when not determined by, its equation with Israel. The Zionist lobby (both Jewish and Christian) propounds as an article of faith that Israel is a divinely ordained state which the US is duty-bound, according to its founding religious creed, to support and protect in all circumstances. Obama seems to have dual loyalties on this issue. He is a member of the African-American community, has Muslim origins in his father’s family, was like his wife Michelle long involved with black social action networks, and must respond in some way to the growing irritation felt in many domestic quarters against Israel’s foreign policies and the very high diplomatic, financial, human and image costs they entail for the United States.

Obama must also try to assuage a majority of public opinion abroad that sees the American government as a virtual hostage of Zionist interests, but he cannot afford to antagonize too much the Jewish elite in the country which has already shown its ability to jeopardize his presidency. For instance, the vociferous campaign of the so-called “Birthers” who claim that the first African-American President was not born in the territory of the USA and is in fact a Kenyan, hence not eligible to hold the highest office, gives every indication of having being inspired by Israeli agents, including the leader of the “Birthers”, Orly Taitz, who was reported to have both American and Israeli citizenships and rumoured to be close to Prime Minister Netanyahu.

In the same vein, the Israeli administration deliberately evinced its disdain for its counterpart in Washington, when the latter attempted to restart stalled negotiations with the Palestinian authority in August 2009, by announcing the construction of new settlements in occupied territories in spite of Obama’s requests.

On the larger theatre, Israel has been relentlessly pushing the US and its NATO allies to bomb Iran’s nuclear research facilities because of the suspicion that they may be used to develop a nuclear weapon. It is edifying that both Israel and the USA, which never seriously objected when Pakistan became a nuclear weapons state, with the not-so-covert help of the USA, are fixated on Iran’s alleged military nuclear capabilities. Why the dread of a “Shiite Islamic bomb” when the “Sunni bomb” was taken in stride?

For one, Pakistan is a client state of the United States and Britain, which is not expected to turn against them or their protégés, but Iran’s nuclear programme is also used as a bogey by Tel Aviv, just as when the Jewish state promoted the now discarded belief that Iraq was amassing weapons of mass destruction to call for the invasion of the country and Saddam Hussein’s overthrow.

It is in Israel’s interest to bring as much of the region as possible under US military and political control, or at least under the superpower’s attacks, so as to leave no potential enemy or challenger to its East or South. The calculus in Israel is that disarming Iran would ipso facto weaken Syria and the Hezbollah which could be subsequently defanged. In pursuit of this objective, Israel refuses now to seriously pursue negotiations with the Palestinians as long as the US does not “take care” of Tehran.

The implications of the Israeli government’s brinkmanship can of course be tragic for the Middle East and for the world. If Tel Aviv and Washington do not stop at covert destabilizing operations inside Iran and launch air attacks against the Islamic Republic, retaliations can be expected in all areas where Iran has the ability to strike at US and Jewish interests and a new wave of anti-western anger is sure to arise in many parts of the world.


Muslims populations may not be the only ones to express their outrage through violence. Too many disenfranchised and angry victims of the ongoing economic crisis are likely to find in this new “war for Zionism and oil” a channel to manifest their hostility to their rulers and their resolve to overthrow the global oligarchy. For Israel to press for a “final (military) solution” in the Middle East, though it will certainly not be final unless nuclear holocaust occurs, shows a state of desperation among some right-wing Zionists, or at least a worrisome recklessness of the type evinced by the Wall Street gamblers who brought about the multi-trillion dollar losses of 2008.

An indication of the acute tension reached in the Iran-Israel conflict could be found in a mysterious incident involving the Russian cargo ship Arctic Sea, which was bizarrely hijacked twice on its journey to Algeria in July 2009, by “pirates” on a speedboat posing as Swedish policemen, who took it to the Cape Verde islands, before the Russian navy was able to trace the vessel and take control of it on August 17, after deploying considerable resources in coordination with various other European states and the USA. The pirates, according to some intelligence sources hailed from Russia and the Baltic countries, but were rumoured to have acted on behalf of the Israeli Mossad. Russian Defence Minister Anatoly Serdyukov called them “CIA terrorists”, suggesting that they might have been rogue agents.

Not long after they were arrested and taken back to Russia to be tried, Prime Minister Netanyahu flew secretly to the Kubinka Air Force base on September 7, “in breach of all protocol,” to meet President Medvedev. He was accompanied by Meir Kalifi, his military adviser and Uzi Arad, his national security adviser. Though not much was learnt about the discussions, it was reported that apart from angrily demanding the release of his agents “Bibi the American” as he is nicknamed in Israel, tried to secure Russian non-intervention in the event of Israelis staging bombing raids over Iran.

The meeting appears to have been stormy. Medvedev later said in an interview with Fareed Zakaria on CNN, after news had leaked about the clandestine visit, that he had only agreed to the secrecy in response to Netanyahu’s request, though he did not see the need for it and would have preferred that the visit be official. The reason for the hijacking of MV Arctic Sea remains a mystery, but it appears that major strategic interests were at stake if one looks at the massive resources Russia deployed to recover the ship and defeat what was almost certainly a covert operation conducted for undisclosed reasons on a vessel whose real cargo was not ascertained.

Shortly afterwards, Russia sought assurances from Israeli President Shimon Peres that there would be no attack on Iran; Prime Minister Putin pointedly highlighted the Russian warning on the anniversary of September 11, 2001. It appears that the Russian Government sought to prevent a unilateral military move from the Netanyahu government by getting not only the Israeli head of state to commit that there would be no attack on Iran, but also the American administration.

Indeed, President Obama himself issued a veiled but stern warning to the bellicose Jewish premier through his informal but very influential adviser, Zbignew Brzezinski, who in an interview to the Daily Beast on 22nd, openly invoked the prospect of the US Air Force shooting down any Israeli planes heading to Iran. Brzezinski even recalled, -horribile dictu- the 1967 Israeli deadly bombing of the electronic spying ship USS Liberty to suggest that Americans might not be averse to getting even with Tsahal, thus breaking a taboo enforced from the White House since the day of that incident. This series of events reflect the fact that the wind is turning. An insolvent and deeply divided America is constrained to rethink its policies in the Middle East as they have become unsustainable and detrimental.

A number of strange and disturbing events, apparently caused by terrorism, took place in the territory of the Russian Federation during the month of September. On August 17, the very day when Russian special forces took control of the Arctic Sea from the hijackers, a massive explosion destroyed the Sayano Shusenskaya hydro-electrical power plant in Siberia, causing a large number of casualties, and on September 13 the Directorate of Military Intelligence situated on an Air Base at Tambov was the target of a commando who managed to penetrate it, killing various security personnel and setting fire to an archive reported to contain a number of sensitive government files.

Were those attacks related to the Arctic Sea incident and the stormy meeting between the Russian President and the Israeli Prime Minister? The verdict of various experts is that somebody was trying to apply intense pressure on the Kremlin, possibly to dissuade it from obstructing western designs against Iran.

On September 16, a trilateral meeting took place in Washington between President Obama, Prime Minister Putin and Prime Minister Harper of Canada, during which the US and Russia agreed on a number of surprisingly conciliatory moves. It has been reported that one of the points of agreement was the need to contain Israeli bellicosity and prevent the situation in the Middle East from getting out of hand, in line with the warnings recently issued by some eminent analysts, including Professor Immanuel Wallerstein, predicting a “firestorm” for US interests and forces in the region, if the worsening situation involving Israel, Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan was not quickly brought under control.

Russia-China

Though the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation have very different situations vis-à-vis the United States, the fact that since the beginning of the twenty-first century they coordinate their foreign policies to some extent and especially their responses to the US, has forced Washington to take them into account in tandem on a number of sensitive issues, in the Middle East, Europe and Latin America, as in North Korea.

The economic power of the Middle Kingdom and the strategic-nuclear might of Russia combined with the latter’s energy and mineral resources make the world’s two largest nations, by population and land area respectively, indispensable or inevitable as the case may be. There is no assurance that the alliance of convenience struck between Beijing and Moscow will survive the likely divergence of some of their respective interests, but in the present context they need each other to defend themselves effectively against western hegemonic designs.

Evidently the colossal US debt to China and Europe’s dependence on Russian oil and gas give the two Eastern states decisive leverage over the Atlantic Alliance, and as of 2009 there are increasing signs that the US is caught in an economic vice by China, which is able to exercise informal vetting rights over American financial and foreign policies, while Russia wields its refurbished conventional and nuclear arsenal to restore and extend its influence in many regions, from the Mediterranean to the South Atlantic and from Venezuela to the Arctic Ocean, while its nuclear submarines and its long-range strategic bombers surround mainland America. Those may be theatrical moves but they convey a message clearer than words.

The situation of the USA vis-à-vis China may offer some grounds for comparison with the state of the United Kingdom and its empire in the years leading up to and during the Second World War when London became dependent on the United States, then the world’s largest factory and credit provider. That dependence was increased and made manifest by the lend lease programme which effectively gave the White House a right of veto over all of White Hall’s decisions.

Today, the USA must practically get China’s agreement before it can carry out any major domestic or foreign initiative. Many have said that the dependence is mutual and that a full-fledged collapse of the US would be disastrous for China’s economy, but this is cold comfort to clear-sighted American policy-makers, who see Beijing taking a number of measures to rapidly reduce its excessive reliance on the US export market.

Indeed, after the aforesaid 16 September meeting, the White House announced its intention to abandon the missile shield project in Eastern Europe and is so far resisting the obsessive Israeli calls for launching a war against Iran. More American concession are likely to follow, involving the tacit recognition of Russia’s preponderance in its traditional sphere of influence by shelving plans to induct Ukraine and Georgia into NATO and stopping the US moves to build a military presence in Central Asia.

In return, it appears that President Putin renounced the legal action pursued by the Russian state against the Bank of New York, seeking 22 billion Dollars in damages in exchange for a token 14 million Dollars in legal costs. More importantly, apart from confirming its willingness to allow American supplies passage through Russia on the way to Afghanistan, Russia toned down its call for replacing the US greenback with a new global reserve currency, endorsing instead the Chinese proposal for a basket of currencies including the Dollar.

Afghanistan

The so-called graveyard of empires is living up to its reputation by conjuring a nightmare of defeat and humiliation for NATO strategists. Both during his presidential campaign and after his election, Barack Obama had, like many other politicians, presented the Afghan war as a righteous and necessary conflict, as opposed to the invasion of Iraq which was illegal and staged under false pretenses. He thereby sought to reassure a majority of Americans who prefer to be seen as strong even if wrong, as opposed to being morally right but appearing weak.

Its perpetual insecurity, perhaps rooted in a lingering inferiority complex vis-à-vis older imperial nations, leads the world’s “sole superpower” to assume that it must prove itself by using overwhelming force whenever the occasion arises. Hence Afghanistan was to provide proof to doubters and naysayers that “America was not running away” and that the rather inglorious outcome in Iraq could be balanced by a successful pacification of the lands abutting the Hindu Kush, that in turn would facilitate the annexation of sprawling and energy-rich Central Asia into the Western fold. Perhaps unknowingly, modern day American strategists are echoing the views of British Prime Minister Disraeli, who claimed that the safety of the Empire hinged on those very Afghan mountains.

In September 2009 Obama, well aware that the USA had already spent 38 billion Dollars in economic assistance alone with little to show for it in the war-torn country, had second thoughts on the strategy to expand the war and increase the number of troops in Afghanistan until final victory. He could not fail to notice that many of his advisers were not sure of what victory meant in the local context and how durable or real it could be. The paradox is that both Russia and China, not to mention several other nations not directly involved, are vicariously satisfied to see the US bleed slowly, while exhausting itself in a seemingly endless campaign against resourceful and adamant guerillas.

They don’t want it to leave, abandoning the terrain to victorious Taliban, but neither do they want it to achieve full control of Afghanistan and use it as a base to interfere in adjacent countries in furtherance of its interests. Brzezinski pointed out in the above cited interview that the Kremlin might not be too sorry either if the USA opened another Pandora’s box by attacking Iran and having to live with the consequences which, though always uncertain, were likely to be dreadful not only for the Middle East but also for Washington and for Western Europe.

The Afghan question, like all others, brings into the open the divisions between the opposite sides within the USA and its main Atlantic allies. On one side are the “conservatives” who remain aligned with the Zionist Right Wing lobby and who believe that the West cannot afford to show weakness and must pursue the war effort at any cost while carrying on a policy of encirclement and intimidation towards Russia and even China; a policy inherited from the Bush administration. On the other are the centrist and leftist reformers who enjoy some support within the Euro-American Jewish liberal lobby in their attempt to bring about a radical change by mending fences with Russia and China and building a new global system that can take care of some of the major threats facing mankind.

There is little doubt that Obama personally belongs to the second faction, though he needs must appease the opposite camp. The moves made by his administration to enforce tighter sanctions on Iran may be part of that strategy, but are unlikely to satisfy the hawks who know that sanctions have rarely if ever brought a state to surrender or even negotiate, and that they are not expected to have all the desired effects on Iran because too many countries have an interest in bypassing them in order to do business with the energy-rich and strategically located Islamic republic. China and Russia in particular may be coaxed into paying lip service to the demands of the US, but are much less likely to gravely harm their own long term investments and interests in Iran by surrendering to “Atlantic” pressures, thereby losing credibility among all the states eager to shake the Western yoke.

What is being played in Iran, as is almost always the case in international politics, is “high stakes poker” as defined by Mehbod Seraji in a Truthout article of September 29, 2009. As George Friedman puts it in an article dated October 1, entitled “The BMD decision and the Global System” : “Ultimately the question of Iran is secondary. The question of US-Russian relations is paramount”, at least to the Americans and Russians, not to mention the world at large. The obsession with Iran, induced largely by Israeli interests in US foreign policy, may eventually take second place in the priorities of the White House and the State Department, signalling a major shift in the American position towards the Jewish state.

The two factions struggling to have their respective ways in both the USA and Europe are also found within NATO, where they have been called the “Europe Firsters” (who want to reduce the Alliance to a security pact mainly dedicated to protecting the continent from external threats) and the “globalists” (who would like to carry on the dream of using it as a world policeman to expand Western hegemony).

The courses advocated by those opposite groups would lead to very different outcomes. The former may bring about a form of effective international governance by facilitating coordination between the USA, the European Union, Russia, China and emerging power centres such as India and Brazil-centric Latin America. The conservatives would like to pursue the imperial outreach project that remained almost a constant of Anglo-Saxon powers since Britain achieved far-flung preponderance in the eighteenth century.

As Parag Khanna described it at the 2009 TED conference in London, the reformers effectively want to build “silk roads,” while the imperialists wish to play the Great Game. While the first course seems vastly more appealing to all peace loving people, it is difficult to ignore the fact that, as Khanna has convincingly shown, Beijing has created and is expanding day by day a Chinese co-prosperity sphere in East and Central Asia with which it will be increasingly difficult for any other power to compete in economic terms. He noted that modern nations are not effectively conquered by force, they are bought. China effectively leased out eastern Siberia from Russia and is rapidly drowning out the scant Slavic and indigenous population of that sprawling area under a torrent of Han immigrants.

By making most countries from Australia to North Korea, and from Japan to Kazakhstan increasingly dependent, the PRC has formed a commercial empire of unsurpassed size endowed with immense resources. Against that new Athens of trade, wielding soft power with growing skill, the over-armed but insolvent and internally conflicted USA looks a bit like the Sparta of the Peloponnesian wars: a militaristic, declining oligarchic state, constantly harking back to the halcyon days of its supremacy, while becoming steadily poorer and less socially stable.

If indeed the USA follows the trumpet calls of its hawks and heeds Israeli persuasion to wage a “decisive” battle in Iran, then its decline will become precipitous, while most other states in the world will keep distance with the crumbling giant in their search for new economic and strategic agreements. Russia and China will be among the greatest beneficiaries of that suicidal move, provided anyone benefits in the end.

Alternatively, Washington rebuffs the war-mongering party and gradually abandons its colonial military ventures in Afghanistan and Iraq in order to form a new global governance compact with other great powers. The USA will still lose its predominance as the ‘sole superpower,’ but it can at least hope to remain a member of the elite group of leading nations, especially if it knows how to exploit the inevitable divergences between Russia and China, in view of the fact that Russia seriously fears losing its oriental provinces and its Central Asian sphere of influence to its Eastern neighbour. The Kremlin is therefore understandably keen to join as an equal the potential partnership between the worlds’ leading powers.

Will the USA and the other great nations follow Montesquieu’s wise advice to “ride the waves of events,” or will the American ruling elite dig in its heels and try to resist them? Historical precedents are not encouraging, but hope should never be forsaken.

The author is Convener, Editorial Board, World Affairs Journal

Travis Kelly Graphics
http://www.tkellygraphics.com

Editorial & History Cartoons
http://www.traviskelly.com

CafePress:
Cartoons on T-Shirts, Posters, Calendars, Mugs and more
http://www.cafepress.com/traviskelly

Oh, The Irony

Xymphora has done a posting in regards to the UN speeches given by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Libyan President Moammar Qaddafi - read it here.

My comment follows:

The best part is that the UN is insisting on doing an inspection on a signatory to the NNTP, insisted upon by a NON-signatory, who just happens to possess nuclear weapons.

Oh, the irony...

Seriously...what kind of Mickey Mouse operation is this?!? Let's put this in perspective: you're a judge; a plaintiff has entered your courtroom with a case against a defendant. Plaintiff states that defendant has the will to make bombs in his apartment, and you're scared, and you wish to halt said activity. You hear the facts of the case; but an interesting exhibit is entered into evidence; namely, that THE PLAINTIFF HAS BOMBS IN THEIR APARTMENT! Would your decision be to attack the entity without the bombs, to the detriment of the entity that DOES possess them?

Back to the main focus of my blog - David Martin has related a tale by Hugh Turley which paints quite a different picture of the fate of United Airlines Flight 93.

Reprinting - Outfoxing the 9/11 Coverup

Gordon Duff - Salem-News.com

With the 9/11 Commission rescinding their own report, 9/11 debunking machine is now our "smoking gun".

(CINCINNATTI, Ohio) - When 9/11 Commission Chief Counsel, John Farmer, released his book, The Ground Truth, debunking his own 9/11 commission report and was supported by Chairman Thomas Kean and commission member Senator Bob Kerrey with no dissent, the cover story of 9/11 died.

This leaves us with these inescapable facts:

* We no longer have an official answer to questions about 9/11.

* Perjured testimony and falsified information given to the original commission is a criminal act and demands a Grand Jury investigation and Special Prosecutor.

* Hundreds of respected leaders of the military, law enforcement, intelligence and scientific communities question the credibility of an investigation now proven beyond a doubt a conspiracy in itself.

* The institutions of government, including all 3 branches, Executive, Judicial and Legislative have combined in an unexplainable way in their failure to respond to circumstances that legally require action.

* The press has continued a pattern of distortion of facts, suppression of news and has engaged in a systematic campaign of deception.

Years have passed and soon 10,000 Americans will have died. Taking into account the epidemic of veterans suicides, we may have already passed that figure now. The cascade of events, financial collapse, government spying, oil price fixing, massive military corruption and a dozen more issues as serious have been able to move beyond our ability of everyday citizens to influence.

In fact, the most corrupt and debased groups involved in the 9/11 cover-up are being actively recruited by the press as a patriotic resistance.

The tone for the coverup is being set by Australian media mogul, Rupert Murdoch, who controls much of the press in the US and United Kingdom. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see Murdoch's role in covering up 9/11. His networks created the "9/12ers" who are continuing the coverup and Murdoch employees like Fox funnyman, Glenn Beck, are still a major part of the effort to protect those in government who lied to the commission and may have aided the conspirators.

Murdoch's media has held to "party line" on 9/11 and the Iraq/Afghanistan war since day one, suppressing facts any time they threatened an agenda of broad regional war or supported limiting government power to operate above the law.

Conspiracy theorists, largely proven correct thus far, refer to Murdoch's position as leader of the Israeli ultra-right wing Zionist movement as a rationale for his continued involvement in the cover up. No proof of Israeli involvement in the planning and execution of 9/11 has been offered except for Murdoch's relentless disinformation campaign.

Geopolitical theorists accuse Murdoch of orchestrating a plan for Israel to draw America into a wide set of conflicts in the Middle East, tying down forces for many years, while Israel extends broad economic influence into Georgia, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. The massive oil and gas reserves of the area, formerly the Jewish Kazhak empire, represent one of the greatest economic prizes in the world.

Only Iran threatens Israel's goals in this area

Over 40 years ago, the US and Israel engaged in a false flag operation against an American warship called the USS Liberty. The plan was for Israel to attack and sink an American ship, kill the crew and the US would blame Egypt, invade and oust Soviets from the Middle East and control the worlds oil supply.

A Russian spy ship observed and filmed the attack. The Israeli pilots went public. American naval officers reported White House involvement in the plot and it failed.

We only know that 9/11 was not what we were told it was and that it is being covered up by propagandists tied to Israeli extremists. Can we make assumptions from this? I say no but we can and should ask questions.

However, anyone asking a question or advocating an investigation is subjected to vicious personal attacks not limited to attempts to influence violence. The 400% increase in threats against the current president can easily be traced to their source in the media industry.

Was the Bush administration trying to repeat the Middle Eastern takeover tried by Lyndon Johnson long ago? Exposure of their plans to invade Iraq, made long before 9/11 need to be added into the equation.

9/11 could be a massive American intelligence failure with NORAD and the DOD melting down for lack of leadership. The lies told afterward could have been the result of embarrassment at total incompetence.

Nothing points to solid proof that 9/11 was staged by the US, with or without Israel. A long string of odd coincidences and a few violations of the laws of physics don't prove a massive conspiracy, not in themselves. They only raise a need for impartial investigation.

One thing can't be explained. Why are lies, known lies, still being broadcast daily, lies orchestrated from one source, meant to suppress an honest accounting of what may have been a series of mistakes?

Why go so far to cover up mistakes if they were only mistakes? With no 9/11 Commission standing behind the report that was meant to clear the Bush administration of responsibility, why is the Murdoch propaganda machine, the Wall Street Journal, Fox, Hannity, Beck and gang so busy burying something that doesn't exist?

To read more of Gordon's work, you can visit: veteranstoday.com

================================================

Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran and a regular contributor to Veterans Today. He specializes in political and social issues. You can see a large collection of Gordon's published articles at this link: VeteransToday.com.

He is an outspoken advocate for veterans and his powerful words have brought about change. Gordon is a lifelong PTSD sufferer from his war experiences and he is empathetic to the plight of today's veterans also suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. We greatly appreciate the opportunity to feature Gordon's timely and critical reports on Salem-News.com, a news organization staffed by a number of veterans, particularly former U.S. Marines.

You can send Gordon Duff an email at this address: Gpduf@aol.com

And They Wonder Why Readership And Advertising Revenue Are Dwindling

This story came live a couple of days ago, but I don't believe enough attention has been paid to said story, considering that both New York City free dailies Metro NY and AMNY devoted their second pages to hyping this so-called terror alert.

The FBI on 9/10 alerts the NYPD to an upcoming "terrorist attack." But they went too far with their hype. They tell the NYPD that they are on the trail of something really big, "on the scale of September 11th" or something to that effect. They describe to the NYPD a Denver-based al Qaeda terrorist cell of Afghanis and Pashtuns in the employ of Osama bin Laden who are about to strike, providing some details about the men but little in the way of what they are planning. The important element is the timing and the hype. BIG BIG TERROR ATTACK BY OSAMA BIN LADEN AND AL QAEDA ON 9/11 ANNIVERSARY!!!

The purpose of this false-flag was to stampede public opinion in favor of the disastrous war in Afghanistan, which now requires 40,000 more troops according to General McChrystal. This is why all of the patsies are reported as being Afghanis and Pashtuns.

The NYPD naturally becomes very alarmed by the FBI's information and tells the FBI "we're gonna move on these guys", but the FBI says it wants to wait and gather more evidence, telling the NYPD they know where the men are and have them under around-the-clock surveillance. Here we want to be mindful of the terms "mole", "patsy" and "false-flag," intelligence parlance for an operative burrowed within a law enforcement agency, an innocent dupe, and an intelligence operation masqueradring itself as a terrorist event, respectively. The FBI moles instruct the NYPD to wait because they are protecting their patsies. If the patsies are in jail they can't be scapegoated after the false-flag is carried out.

NYC Police Commissioner Ray Kelly decides to ignore the FBI and gives an order, raiding three apartments in Queens on 9/14, but they don't find anything and no arrests are made. Probably worth mentioning that the President of the United States is in town on this day.

The FBI is stunned and enraged that Commissioner Kelly ignored their authority and ruined their big false-flag operation. FBI goes ballistic. The tension between the two law enforcement agencies shoots through the roof.

Shortly afterward, the New York Daily News reports some kind of conflict between the NYPD and the FBI because of Commissioner Kelly's decision. Deputy Police Commissioner Paul Browne says "It is an utter fabrication that the FBI is furious with Kelly or that Kelly fought to shut down the action early", denying that there is any problem. Pay close attention to Browne's words, the truth always surfaces....

The FBI becomes frantic. Their false-flag operation has been blown after they ran all of this BIG HYPE. They have to come up with something and THEY ARE FURIOUS WITH COMMISSIONER KELLY AND THE NYPD...

Amazingly, as these developments are unfolding the New York Daily News somehow became aware of a "confidential five-page FBI document on police corruption" allegedly based upon statements made by John Alite, a Mafia turncoat who is cooperating with the government in it's prosecution of John Gotti Jr. Alite is said by the FBI to have named some very high profile NY police detectives - including the well-known and highly decorated Bo Dietl, whose storied career was made into the film "One Tough Cop" - as corrupt cops who fed information to the NY Mafia. A driver for Manhattan DA Robert Morgenthau was also accused, along with Suffolk County police officer Nicholas Tobia, was once honored as "cop-of-the-month" for busting a rapist and another well-known NYPD Detective named Joe Coffey.

So who told the New York Daily News about this "confidential" FBI report?

What the FBI has done to the NYPD here is something similar to what Karl Rove did to John Kerry during the 2004 US presidential race. Rove attacks Kerry's military background, right, his most formidable quality as a candidate. The FBI is doing the same thing in slandering these highly decorated and high-profile NYC/Suffolk County cops.

The FBI moles must have had a bout of temporary insanity or suffered some kind of emotional breakdown. Should we now expect Bo Dietl and all of these other accused gentlemen to face some kind of federal prosecution? Wow.

As of now the FBI is scrambling to produce something, anything for the sake of salvaging their blown operation.

You didn't read this in any newspaper...and you should've; instead, you were presented with a rambling diatribe of maybes, might-haves and non-events.

Speaking of "rambling diatribes", is this really the message America wishes to send abroad - if we cannot enlist you in our coterie of tin-pot dictator, a la Pinochet, Noriega, etc., we will simply denigrate your efforts at mediation as "an address that lasted 96 rambling minutes"? Even worse, before Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadenijad began, the U.S. delegation walks out on his speech?

What the hell is this shite? "It's my ball, and you don't play by my rules, I'm taking it and going home?"

I thought the U.N. was a place for adult dialogue, not hissy fits.

I understand that from listening to broadcasts from 1010WINS that some still consider the elections in Iran to have been gamed; yet, there is no word in regards to the elections in Afghanistan, where it was widely reported; albeit, not in "mainstream media"; that not only were ballots pre-marked for Hamid Karzai, but that ballots from precinct known to not have turned out votes for the puppet dictator were helicoptered into a ravine!

You can't make this crap up!

So...having said all that, I want to impress upon the news organizations - your role is NOT as lapdogs for the government; your role is as watchdogs AGAINST government wrongdoing and watching out for WE THE PEOPLE.

When you retake your proper role, you will see your readership return.

Maybe.

Almost forgot - Subverted Nation posted the Good Ole Boy Podcast #2 yesterday! I listened to it last night - hoo boy, are you in for a treat.

Report: Israel Planned To Strike Iran During Riots

Good day, dear readers!

When all of the brouhaha came about during the elections in Iran, I could smell the cooks congregating around their cauldron in Israel. The whole mess smelled of a bad re-enactment of the puppet shows we have all been witness to in too many nations.

Here, from Ynet News, is the whole shitefest:

Kuwaiti paper quotes 'US diplomat in Jerusalem' as saying Israel asked Obama administration for green light to attack Islamic Republic's nuclear facilities during country's post-election riots. US reportedly ignored request, causing Israel to back down

Story by Roee Nahmias

Israel last month asked the United State for permission to attack Iran's nuclear facilities, Kuwaiti newspaper al-Jarida reported on Friday.


The paper quoted a "US diplomatic source located in Jerusalem", but the report's credibility was not confirmed.


According to the sources, after the opposition riots broke out in Iran following June's presidential election results, Israel asked the US government for a green light to strike the country's nuclear facilities, along with other vital facilities in Iran.


The source added that the Obama administration ignored the Israeli request, that was sent by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with President Shimon Peres's signature as well.


According to the source, Israel was serious about its intentions to attack Iran and hit it hard, but the US's lack of response to the request left Israel frustrated and the operation was called off.


The source also said explained White House's decision to withdraw its recognition of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's re-election, saying, "We were under Israel and Arab pressure to take back our recognition of him.


"There are moderate Arab countries that do not want us to recognize Ahmadinejad."

Hey...how about that botched coup in Honduras? But I digress.

Now, I realize that because of the fact that one cannot post anonymously at this blog lessens the amount of discourse here, but I really would like to have someone second me in my analysis of the following gibberish left by someone who went by the name of "zionist forever" (spelling left intact):

proof why we cant wait for US permission just do the job now

If Iran had launched a nuke at Israel and we phoned Obama for permission to shoot the thing down whilst its in flight Obama would probably say dont you dare we will use diplomacy here and shooting down that missle before it hits you will be bad for the peace process.

Assuming there is any truth in this report then it shows that the government cannot ask the US for permission in advance and if there is a plan in place do what must be done tell the US later and accept the politcal fallout when Obama thorws a temper tantrum later at least that way we can let Obama play his diplomatic games without the same urgency.

In 1981 the world US included who were not informed in advance condemned Israel at the UN and drafeted a General Assembly resolution.
Ten years later when they went to war in Iraq and their soldiers lives were at risk they were saying to themselves its a good thing for us Israel stopped Saddam getting nukes in 1981 otherwise this war might nuclear.

Considering Obama wants to cancel the US missile defense system then they have even more reason to want to stop Iran gettiong nukes especially because Irans missile program is getting better and having longer ranges so one day the US will be in range of those missiles with nuclear warheads.
I wonder how that would affect Obamas legacy that he is so desperate to create?

Let's start with the notion of Iran nuking ANYONE. They have not attacked any of their neighbors for at least TWO HUNDRED YEARS.

We can't say the same for the other nation referred to by this maniac, can we?

How many resolutions has Israel ignored? That number's in the double digits, approaching triple digits...but apparently, that irony is lost on this nitwit.

The U.S. ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie, assured former asset Saddam Hussein that he would not suffer repercussions from attacking puppet state Kuwait from slant-drilling their oil resources - this was the Iraqi "Gulf of Tonkin" moment that cost our great nation the lives of those unfortunate young men in 1991. David McGowan did a great posting on his site ages ago - take a look.

I could rant on and on regarding the projection of responsibility, mis-truths, omissions, prevarications, and outright lies in this bit of propaganda, but let's go right to the penultimate piece of garbage - the idea that Iran could get a missile that could hit the U.S. from the other side of the hemisphere.

No way that it could possibly be detected and blown out of the sky right over Iran, irradiating them for countless generations to come. Sure. By the way, the check's in the mail. And I won't do that thing with your mouth...I promise...yes, I'll warn you first...oops!

The scumbags in Israel (along with the sayanim, quislings and fifth columnists within our nation and abroad) are doing themselves a disservice by keeping their noses shoved in their Talmud, and not realizing that WE THE PEOPLE are onto their game. Guess what, schmendricks? We know all about how we are "less than human beings"; we know all about how we are "useless eaters"; we know all about how we are not subject to the same respect as the "chosen people"; but do you know what WE THE PEOPLE are just now coming to realize?

You have no SOULS.

No bloody way in HELL do you evil spawns of devils have anything whatsoever resembling SOULS.

I will tell you this: there isn't any chance that hANOVER fIST will ever allow you hegemony over his person.

As long as WE THE PEOPLE come back to the realization that we are sovereign over ourselves, and WE THE PEOPLE have the power, YOU CANNOT WIN.

Own all of the newspapers, television and radio stations you want; recruit all of the Megaphonies you can; YOU CANNOT WIN.

Oh...congratulations to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for your landslide victory.

Could The Election System In Iran Be Worse Than Ours; James von Brunn, Patriot?

Happy Monday!

So...let's begin with the Fed Caper by James von Brunn. Special thanks goes to Cryptome for the preservation of the page.

So...in reading this document, we are privy to some of the formative experiences in Jim's life. We go from those experiences to the idea of saving Americans from the usury of the Federal Reserve, and his abortive attempt to perform a citizen's arrest upon the board of the Federal Reserve.

The so-called "attack" upon the Holocaust Museum seems to me, as I stated in an earlier posting, a complete "psy-op" from beginning to end. What we do not know, however, is how Jim was motivated to appear at the museum with outdated firearms in hand; nor, how the demise of the security guard was actually effected. It was reported that he succumbed to "friendly fire"; I am waiting to hear more.

As far as the elections in Iran go...I don't know if, after our elections in 2000 and 2004, we should be the ones to fault anyone else's electoral system. In 2000, Jeb Bush, Katherine Harris and ChoicePoint DBT, along with the Supreme Court, decided who would be President of the United States. It was later determined that Albert "Global Warming's Gonna Make Me Rich!" Gore actually won the election.

Well, screw 'im. Obviously, his heart is more into snookering us with his "Global Warming" fooferah than putting up a decent fight. It's just too bad that he couldn't have decided this back before the election, so that we could've had a candidate worth voting and fighting for...I know pieces of plywood with more personality than this tool.

In 2004, we had "Uncle Ken" Blackwell to thank for his scumbaggery in rigging the election in Ohio.

Here's the thing - the exit polling seems to have followed the voting projections; so where's the vote fraud?

No...wait...here we go.

Thanks, Mike.

Update (6/17/2009): Please peruse this posting at Pak Alert Press - they have an excellent analysis of the scumbaggery ensuing in Iran.

Ahmadinejad says Holocaust a 'big deception' - Yahoo

Does Yahoo wish to go the way of the newspapers, telling lies and expect We The People to continue perusing them? I think not.

How's this - I won't even resort to telling you, dear readers, once more, that The president of Iran did not mention anything about "wiping Israel off the map". Just do a search on any search engine with the quoted words.

Anywho...read this tripe:

Ahmadinejad says Holocaust a 'big deception'

TEHRAN (AFP) - Iran's hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who is seeking a second term in office, reiterated on Wednesday his anti-Israel stance by calling the Holocaust a "big deception".

Ahmadinejad also said liberal democracies of the world have degraded "human values," the Iranian state television news website quoted him as saying.

"The identity of the liberal democracy has been exposed to the world by its protection of the most criminal regime in the history of humanity, the Zionist regime, by using the big deception of the Holocaust."

"There is no doubt that the only way to replace the liberal thought is to go back to the teachings of the divine prophets," Ahmadinejad said.

"The thoughts and the system of liberal regimes have lowered the benchmarks for human perfection ... The liberal regimes cannot solve the simplest of the political issues in the world," he said.

Ahmadinejad was speaking to a gathering of 600 international scholars who have arrived in Tehran to mark the 20th anniversary of the death of the founder of the Islamic republic, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, which falls on Thursday.

He hopes to win another four-year term in the June 12 election.

Ahmadinejad's presidency has been marred by anti-Israel tirades.

Soon after he took office in 2005, he said Israel was "doomed to be wiped off the map," a statement that enraged global powers that was followed by another diatribe saying the Holocaust was a "myth."

The Middle East, RAID (The S.E. Johnson Product), Highlander and the Occupation of Gaza

I was conducting a morning conference when an odd sequence of events was brought to my attention. I have the radio tuned into 1010WINS, as I do every morning. There are commercials, of course, that "pay" for the news being presented, and often for products being advertised. There is a new commercial for RAID that touts its best new feature as being completely odorless. Well, since I'm certain that bug spray is inherently bad for humans, I'd prefer to know that an area has been prepared using said product...but I digress. The commercial affords the pesky insects anthropomorphous personalities, and makes allusions to "bugs not going to Heaven". Now, before the commercial ended, I mused, "Now, if my Distraction Media" claim has any validity at all, this commercial will be followed up by some item regarding the Middle East.

Why do I say this? It may not be common knowledge, but the religious texts of Judaism refer to two sets of people: Jews and goyim. Many Israeli officials have referred to the populations of the Middle East as less than human:

:evil: Jewish Talmudic Doctrine: Non-Jews are Not Humans

The Talmud specifically defines all who are not Jews as non-human animals, and specifically dehumanizes Gentiles as not being descendants of Adam. We will now list some of the Talmud passages which relate to this topic.

Menahoth 43b-44a. A Jewish man is obligated to say the following prayer every day: Thank you God :evil: for not making me a Gentile, a woman or a slave.

Kehuboth 6b. [Now] does it not mean that if he had yet no intercourse [with his wife] he may have intercourse [with her] even on Sabbath? Said Raba: No, except Sabbath. Said Abaye to him: But it says, `until the night following the Sabbath [one gives her] four nights'? Only, said Raba, when he already had intercourse [with her]. If [it were, as you say,] after he already had intercourse, what does he let us hear? He lets us hear that it is allowed to have intercourse on Sabbath, as that [statement] of Samuel [teaches], for Samuel said: One may enter into a narrow opening on Sabbath, although he causes pebbles to break loose.

Uses of Oil of Annointing. Our Rabbis have taught: He who pours the oil of anointing over cattle or vessels is not guilty; if over gentiles [Hebrew: goyim] or the dead, he is not guilty. The law relating to cattle and vessels is right, for it is written: "Upon the flesh of man [Hebrew: adam] shall it not be poured [Exodus 30:32]"; and cattle and vessels are not man [adam]. Also with regard to the dead, [it is plausible] that he is exempt, since after death one is called corpse and not a man [adam]. But why is one exempt in the case of gentiles [goyim]; are they not in the category of man [adam]?--No, it is written: "And ye my sheep, the sheep of my pasture, are man [adam] [Ezekiel 34:31]": Ye are called man [adam] but gentiles [goyim] are not called man [adam]. (Ed. but by implication, Cain),

In the above passage, the Rabbis are discussing the Mosaic law which forbids applying holy oil to men. In the discussion, the Rabbis state that it is not a sin to apply the holy oil to gentiles, since gentiles are not human beings (literally, Adam, and are by implication, Cain).

Yebamoth 61a: It was taught: And so did R. Simeon ben Yohai state [61a] that the graves of gentiles [goyim] do not impart levitical uncleanness by an ohel [standing or bending over a grave], for it is said, "And ye my sheep the sheep of my pasture, are men [adam]" [Ezekiel 34:31]; you are called men [adam] but the idolaters are not called men [adam].

The Mosaic law states that touching a human corpse or grave imparts uncleanness to those who touch it. But the Talmud here teaches that if a Jew touches the grave of a gentile, it does not make him unclean, since gentiles are not human (literally, Adam).

Baba Mezia 114b: Said he [Rabbah] to him: Art thou not a priest: why then dost thou stand in a cemetery? - He replied: Has the Master not studied the laws of purity? For it has been taught: R. Simeon ben Yohai said: The graves of gentiles [goyim] do not defile, for it is written, "And ye my flock, the flock of my pastures, are men [adam]" [Ezekiel 34:31]; only ye are designated men [Adam].

A Jewish priest was standing in a graveyard. When asked why he was standing there in apparent violation of the Mosaic law, he replied that it was permissible, since the law only prohibits Jews from coming into contact with the graves of humans [adam], and he was standing in a gentile graveyard.

Since the so-called Scriptural proof text (Ezekiel 34:31) repeatedly cited in the above three Talmud passages in reality does not prove that only Jews are human, it is self-evident that the Talmudic sages who asserted the preceding absurdities about Gentiles were already anti-Gentile racists or ideologues who, in desperate search of some proof of their position, distorted an Old Testament passage in order to justify their bigotry. Their ideology came first, their "proof" second.

Berakoth 58a R. Shila administered lashes to a man who had intercourse with an Egyptian woman. The man went and informed against him to the Government, saying: There is a man among the Jews who passes judgment without the permission of the Government. An official was sent to [summon] him. When he came he was asked: Why did you flog that man? He replied: Because he had intercourse with a she-ass.

They said to him: Have you witnesses? He replied: I have. Elijah thereupon came in the form of a man and gave evidence. They said to him: If that is the case he ought to be put to death! He replied: Since we have been exiled from our land, we have no authority to put to death; do with him what you please.

While they were considering his case, R. Shila exclaimed, "Thine, Oh Lord, is the greatness and the power" [1 Chronicles 29:11] What are you saying? they asked him. He replied: What I am saying is this: Blessed is the All-Merciful who has made the earthly royalty on the model of the heavenly, and has invested you with dominion, and made you lovers of justice.

They said to him: Are you so solicitous for the honor of the Government? They handed him a staff and said to him: You may act as judge. When he went out that man said to him: Does the All-Merciful perform miracles for liars?

He replied: Wretch! Are they not called asses? For it is written: "Whose flesh is as the flesh of asses" [Ezekiel 23:20]. He noticed that the man was about to inform them that he had called them asses. He said: This man is a persecutor, and the Torah has said: If a man comes to kill you, rise early and kill him first. So he struck him with the staff and killed him. He then said: Since a miracle has been wrought for me through this verse, I will expound it."

Our apologies for subjecting our readers to the preceding lengthy Talmudic drivel, but it is best to include all of it to demonstrate its depravity.

In addition to having Elijah float down from heaven to deceive the Gentile court, the Talmud teaches that Gentiles are in reality animals, hence Rabbi Shila (and Elijah) did not really lie at all. It also teaches that anyone (even a Jewish man) who reveals this Talmud truth about non-Jews deserves execution, since revealing it makes Gentiles angry and causes persecution of the Jews.

We can only rejoice that the majority of Jews today do not follow such heinous teachings; only a few openly espouse the Talmud as divinely inspired, although unfortunately these few are sometimes to be found in influential leadership positions.

(Parenthetically, the above Scripture proof-text cited by the rabbis, does not prove that Gentiles are not human, being animals. The passage from Ezekiel in the Bible only says that some Egyptians had large sex organs and copious emissions. This does not in any way prove or even connote that the Egyptians being referred to in the Bible were considered animals).

Having sufficiently proven our point from the Talmud, namely that the Talmud teaches that Gentiles are not human [Hebrew: Adam], and are really animals, we will list a few other passages which expound on the Ezekiel 23:20 "proof text", allowing our readers to research them on their own: Arakin 19b, Berakoth 25b, Niddah 45a, Shabbath 150a, Yebamoth 98a.

The original text of Sanhedrin 37a applies God's approval only to the saving of Jewish lives. This is demonstrable by referring to Jewish books such as the Hesronot Ha-shas.

I may add direct quotations to this posting, if requested.

That being said...would you believe that 1010WINS played a bumper, complete with the sounds of warfare in the background, of their "effectiveness" of reporting the situation in the Middle East?

This was the 7:00 hour from this morning's broadcast. I may look for a recording of that moment. In my opinion, this was a clever segue into the events occurring in the Middle East, and how the land should be "wiped clean" of the perceived insects, the Palestinians.

Okay...so what does Highlander have to do with all of this?

Highlander, directed by Ridley Scott, starring Christopher Lambert, Sean Connery, Clancy Brown and Roxanne Hart, is one of the most fantastic movies ever created. Now here, for the purposes of purity, forget about the sequels, especially that tripe recoded on film called Highlander 2; let's deal solely with the original product. This is your classic struggle of good versus evil, except that this one is for all the marbles. The idea of the movie is that these men, chosen to fight for the fate of the universe, can only be killed by cutting off their heads; their accumulated skills and power of will then taken on by their dispatcher. It is made clear that when there are but a few of them left, they will all feel a compulsion to meet in a faraway land, where they will engage in final battle, for the Prize.

It's not 1900, by any stretch of the imagination...but then again, how many of you have actually even seen 1900, much less sat through the five hours required?

One of the rules is that their are sanctuaries where one cannot attack another. At a later point in the movie, Conner MacLeod (Christopher Lambert) and the Kurgan (Clancy Brown) meet in a church. They goad each other verbally, but they both know that this rule must be observed.

At this point, I wish to interject with a clip from Edwin M. Wright's The Great Zionist Cover-Up (physically page 61 of the PDF, labeled page 52 of the document):

A post card signed "J C Stern" and addressed to Edwin M. Wright, Advisor to Dulles, Washington D.C. and postmarked Los Angeles May 21, 1956, states

"We know you well and class you with Hitler. As long as there is a world there will be Israel and the Jews. Spit your hate and see how far you get."

Lest you get some brickbats intended for me - I'm sending this explanation. Harry Howard is responsible! His wife arranged for the briefing of the AAUW. I gave a 53 "global survey" in which discussions of NE problems were very brief. I doubt if I spent over 10 minutes on the whole NEA area. Evidently the Bible is a dangerous book to quote. In the wrong hands, it can be alleged to show that when the Jews repeatedly reoccupied Palestine, they were not very kind to the older and local inhabitants.

I have always been fascinated with historical geography. During the four years with G-2 U.S. Armed Forces in the Middle East (U.S.A.F.I.M.E.), I teamed up with a friend - Rabbi Nelson Glueck, one of the foremost Reform Jewish Rabbis and an outstanding scholar. He was operating under "cover" for the O.S.S., where I first met him as a colleague in 1941-42. In Palestine I toured with him weekends and put history and geography together. In 1956, I organized a Training Tour of three months for 30 U.S. government officers who worked on Middle Eastern affairs. We visited each state in the area for a week or more where we interviewed leaders in government, the press, business, etc., and I was "Lecturer" in visiting historic spots. We spent eight to ten days in Israel.

The first trip in 1956 brought me into close contact with the Orthodox Rabbinate. Rabbi Yacov Herzog, the son of the former Rabbi Herzog (from Ireland), Chief Rabbi of the Ashkenazi Jews, was in charge of the American section of the Israeli Foreign Office. He was in charge of the two days we spent in Jerusalem. He was so Orthodox he would not shake hands with a woman (and we had several), he would not write on the Sabbath, nor would he answer the telephone on the Sabbath. He appointed Rabbi Pinhas Eliav as our Escort Officer for touring Israel. We hired a bus and went to Beersheba, Galilee, Haifa, and other regions where we visited Kibbutzim, factories, schools, 54 etc., so as to get the "feel" of Israel. At all times Rabbi Pinhas, also an Orthodox Rabbi, was with us.

As a result of my studies and experience, I came to be highly suspicious of the word "Orthodox" which means "Right-thought." It assumes that any difference of opinion is "Wrong-thought." While in Iraq, in 1921-23, I had visited Sir Leonard Woolley's excavations at Ur, one of the ancient city States of the Sumerians. Professor James B. Pritchard's two books Archaeology and the Old Testament and The Ancient Near East place side by side passages from Sumerian literature - with other passages from the Old Testament - indicating how the writers of the latter borrowed from the former. The story of Noah is a paraphrase of parts of the Gilgamesh Epic, and the birth of Moses is an almost exact duplicate of the myth of the birth of Sargon of Akkad who lived about 2150 B.C. The Orthodox Rabbinate in Israel insist that the Torah and Taanach are of Divine Origin, inerrant, infallible, and immutable, and any one who disagrees is an enemy trying to destroy the Will of God. This makes communication between the Orthodox and anyone not Orthodox almost impossible.

Having an Orthodox Rabbi listening to every word I said was both awkward and embarrassing. His responsibility was to indoctrinate us in the Orthodox tradition; mine was to try to describe what I believed had actually happened in history. We often came to embarrassing confrontations on many occasions. For instance, in riding down from Jerusalem to Beersheba, we went down the Valley of Sorek. The bus had a loud-speaker which I used to explain the story of Samson and Delilah in the book of Judges. I pointed out the name Samson is the Hebrew-Arabic name for Sun, and Delilah means, "She 55 of the Night" - that this story belonged to the early folk-hero legends of Israel which corresponded to the folk-hero tales of all cultures - the Iliad and Odyssey of the Greeks, the Prometheus myth, the Heracles-Hercules myth, the Osiris-Usus-Set myth in Egypt, the Tammuz Sumerian-Babylonian myth, and the Rustam hero tales of early Iran. These myths are personifications of the forces of nature. Among the most popular such myths was that of the Sun God rising in power in the morning, but in the evening dying in the west, lured to its death by the Goddess of the Night. I made reference to Joseph Campbell's book The Hero of a Thousand Faces and his four volume The Masks of God and urged them to read these books. Rabbi Pinhas was furious.

But the showdown came when we were in Carmiel (above Haifa). It is now a purely Jewish town, and non-Jews are prohibited renting, owning or working in the area, though previous to 1948, there were three Arab villages there, whose lands had been confiscated and turned over to the Jewish National Fund. Fouzi el Asmar in his book To Be An Arab In Israel (page 44:107-8) describes how he was shunned when he was invited by a friend to visit in this purely Jewish town - as it is now.

I felt it was important our group understand Israeli land laws. After lunch, I took the group to a lookout point and gave a talk on the history of the northwest Galilee. Pointing to the east, there lies the small stream and plain where the fold-heroine Jael pounded a tent peg through the head of the Philistine Sisera while he was asleep in her tent. (Judges 4.) We were standing on the spot where Elijah slew 2,000 priests of Baal after his divine miracle. To the north we could see the mountains of Lebanon - at the time of Solomon 56 the source of the timber for building the Temple in Jerusalem. To get that timber, Solomon, among his thousand wives, probably married a pagan daughter of Hiram, King of Tyre, and ceded several villages to Tyre. He then intensified corvee (forced) labor upon the Hebrews to cut and transport the timber to Jerusalem. It was this forced labor which brought on a revolt of the northern tribes against the son of Solomon - Jereboam - and forever destroyed Hebrew unity.

Rabbi Pinhas could not contain his anger and said my story was not true. That evening we were at the U.S. Consulate in Haifa for an outdoor dinner, and I asked for a Bible. I read from I Kings 5 to substantiate my story. This was humiliating to Rabbi Pinhas, and he was later to get his revenge. It had another effect. The 30 officers in the course became very suspicious about everything they were told by Israelis and would ask me afterwards, "What's the truth?" Rabbi Pinhas's revenge was to go to Rabbi Herzog and Teddy Kolleck. He complained that I had insulted him and Israel and made it impossible for him to get the Israeli point of view across. The result was a visit to the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv by a delegation of two, who asked the Ambassador to inform the State Department I was persona non grata in Israel. The Ambassador recommended that I should not be sent to Israel in the future. Fortunately for me, the Ambassador left after 1957 and Ogden Reed of New York was the new Ambassador. There was also a new Deputy - my former Chief in the office of Greek, Turkish and Iranian affairs - William Baxter. Bill knew Turkish and had taught at Robert College, Istanbul. He well knew me and the whole 57 story, so in 1958 and following years, I was again allowed to enter Israel - but cautioned not to irritate the Rabbis!!

Rabbi Yacov Herzog later appeared in the Israeli Embassy in Washington. As a concession to the Gentile practice of shaking hands with women, he decided he would do so for public relations purposes. But the attack on me from the Orthodox Rabbinate in the U.S. entered high gear.

The pretext for the next attack upon me developed out of a talk I gave at the National Presbyterian Church. I had recently returned from a three months study tour of the Middle East, and my friend Reverend Ed Elson, the Pastor, also President Eisenhower's Pastor, asked me to give a report on my visit. It was a tense time. By a conspiracy, Israel, France and Great Britain had launched an attack upon Egypt two weeks before, and the headlines were focused on the Suez Canal. I spoke for an hour reporting my findings on Turkey, Iran, and Israel, as well as four Arab states. In the audience was Mrs. Lillian Levy, a Jewish reporter. My talk was factual, and I tried to avoid controversial statements - and succeeded. Then came the question and answer period. A Presbyterian minister in the audience asked me, "What part is religion playing in the modern Middle East?" In my reply I said that the Middle East had never had a Renaissance like Europe in the 15th-17th Centuries. Therefore to understand religious passions, it was necessary to recall what happened in Europe. The shift from religious wars to secular national wars came in the Thirty Years War 1618-1648. The Middle East was in that same shift now. Turkey had only become a national secular state under Kemal Ataturk during 1923-1928. Lebanon was in form secular but in fact a balance of 58 religious minorities. All other states were in the throes of religious change which had produced violent internal movements of three kinds - (1) Reactionary, (2) Evolutionary, and (3) Revolutionary. The Reactionary were interested in the preservation of theocratic traditions and institutions and are afraid of secular, scientific, and national forces. In Europe, it was the clash of the Papacy vs. Copernicus, Galileo, and the Reformers. Judaism in Spain had witnessed the same phenomenon earlier. The Arab schools had introduced Greek rationalism especially in Cordova. The greatest of Jewish scholars, Moses Maimonides, had been attacked because he had followed the rational theories of Ibn Rushd, and an extreme Orthodox sect had ex-communicated him. These reactionary groups were now represented in the Islamic world by such groups as the Ikhwan - el Muslimeen, the Mollah Kashani Fidayeen in Iran and the Orthodox Rabbinate in Israel.

But I expressed the opinion that the Middle East would repeat the European mode. The future of the Middle East depended upon its mastery of technology and the scientific world view. In this, the various orthodoxies, which emphasized a static and nostalgic effort to preserve the past - rituals and social customs - had little to contribute to what was an explosive situation. The Middle East was trying to move from centuries- old stagnation to a new dynamic form of society in one generation.

Mrs. Lillian Levy is a creative journalist. By selecting a few phrases and adding some statements I did not make, she published a pseudo-report of my talk. Her report was like the hunters' trumpet for the Zionists and Orthodox to unleash their bloodhounds and track the victim. Mrs. Levy appointed herself 59 a one woman inquisition and tried to get interviews with everyone in my office. There were some young Jewish Foreign Service officers in the orientation course, where I lectured on the Middle East. She got their names and invited them out to lunch to quiz them about me. I was living then in McLain, Virginia. Odd characters claiming they were investigating me as an insurance applicant asked my neighbors about my habits - what did I do over weekends? Did I get drunk? Did I have a wild sex life? My neighbors asked me what was going on. Unfortunately for Mrs. Levy's bloodhounds, my sex life is very dull, and I am almost, but not quite, a teetotaler in relation to alcohol. But the Jewish Telegraph Agency - with Milton Friedman to the fore - took up the hue and cry as shown on the following pages.

An anonymous correspondent living in Los Angeles sent me a clipping from the California Jewish Voice of December 7, 1956. He had liberally decorated it with interpolations such as "Aw Nuts," "Jewish Insolence" and sent it without any return address - a kind of mail I began to anticipate. It was as follows:
U.S. JEWISH GROUPS ASK STATE DEPARTMENT TO OUST ITS ANTI- SEMITIC LECTURER.

New York (J.T.A.) Protesting the "warped and bigoted" anti-Semitic speech delivered recently by Edwin Wright, a high official of the State Department, the American Jewish Congress appealed this week, to the department, "publicly to repudiate his statements." The A.C.J. also called for the removal of Mr. Wright from any position of influence or authority within the State Department. A similar demand was made earlier by the Agudas Israel of America in letters addressed to President Eisenhower and to Secretary of State John Foster Dulles.

In a letter to Herbert Hoover, the Acting Secretary of State, Judge Justine A. Polier, Chairman of the American Jewish Congress Executive Committee deplored the "incredible" anti-Jewish remarks made by Mr. Wright, Assistant Dean of the Foreign Service Institute of the State Department, in a 60 speech delivered at the National Presbyterian Church in Washington on November 1 (1956).

The Department of State, Judge Polier said, is under an obligation to rectify the wrong that has been done and not only to dis-associate itself from Mr. Wright's remarks but publicly to repudiate his statements in a manner that will make it unmistakable they have no place in American public life and play no role in the determination of American public policy. This should be followed by the removal of Mr. Wright from a position of influence or authority within the State Department.

The Agudas Israel letter stated, "It is unthinkable that a government official should permit himself to so callously malign the millions of Agudas Israel citizens of the Orthodox Jewish faith who have made their productive contribution to every phase of American life. The glorious service to mankind rendered by American citizens who observe their faith and proved their loyalty to our beloved country is a matter of public record. Their religious faith had often been the source of inspiration that enables the American Jews to develop their manifold contributions for the betterment of society.

I had no idea who Judge Polier was, but it interested me that a U.S. Judge had condemned me on the basis of hearsay evidence- especially when Milton Friedman was working for the Jewish Telegraph Agency. So I tried to discover who this irate lady was - and was told she was the daughter of Rabbi Stephen Wise. If so, that explained everything. It was the Father who threatened Truman that unless he supported the Zionist program, "Truman would be run out of town." Now it was the daughter, ignoring all rules of a Law Court, using her position to run me out of the State Department. I decided the emotional quality of the Father was inherited by the daughter - "Like Father - Like Daughter."

I am most grateful that I live as a citizen in a society which developed its Law from the Graeco-Roman model - no the Jewish one. As an example, Numbers 5:11 starts with the phrase "And the Lord spoke unto Moses saying." Then follows a passage about how a jealous husband deals with a wife of whom he is suspicious. The procedure is pure Voodoo-Magic found in all primitive 61 peoples - yet here it is specifically attributed to God. Because "western law" is largely Graeco-Roman, the State of Israel has never adopted the principle "God is no respecter of persons" a thesis which appears in Acts 10:34. This is the absolute opposite of the belief in a Chosen People. So in Israel today - Goyim are administered by the British Emergency Regulations of 1945, as applied by the Police or the Military. When Judge Polier took for granted my guilt, being accused by Milton Friedman, she was acting like a Judge in Israel.

But in the U.S.A. I had a chance to give my side of the story. So I went to five who were in the audience that night, showed them the Milton Friedman article and asked them to give their reactions. The accusation fell apart. (The correspondence on this case is in the Appendix #6.)

I was fortunate in my friends. The Reverend Ed Elson went directly to the White House, spoke to President Eisenhower and Maxwell Rabb, and gave the whole story. In the Foreign Service Institute, my Director was Harold L. Hoskins. His father was a missionary doctor in Lebanon. He was born in Syria. In 1942-45 he had served as a Special Representative of President Roosevelt. He spoke fluent Arabic, and while he was in Egypt in 1943-45, in charge of Lend Lease, we had enjoyed close personal relationships. He had come under attack because of his "Arabic" background, so he well knew Zionist tactics. He refused to give Mrs. Levy an interview and told other members of the staff to avoid her. He finally got out a statement which was issued by Public Relations if anyone inquired about me. After some two months, the effort to remove me from the State Department died down. It was fortunate this incident occurred during the Eisenhower Presidency. Eisenhower was greatly irritated 62 by the Israeli-U.K.- French aggression against Egypt and ordered Israel out of the Sinai with the threat of economic sanctions if they did not withdraw. Both Eisenhower and Dulles came under Zionist attack, and possibly Eisenhower recollected I had been his briefing officer in the Pentagon when he became Chief of Staff in 1946. I had also been Escort Officer and Interpreter between President Eisenhower and President Bayar of Turkey.

Whatever the facts may be, I was not fired! In fact, quite the opposite. Many people, unsolicited, came to my defense, and in 1964, I was granted a Superior Merit Award by the Department. One of my close colleagues was somewhat jealous. His complaint was he said practically what I said, but the Zionists never attacked him. He felt he must not be of sufficient importance to be attacked. I told him to take comfort. The difference between us was that I quoted the Bible and that stung the Zionists to the quick. Gentiles are not supposed to know the Bible. They are to believe it as God's Holy Word - but not know what it contained. This colleague is Harry N. Howard, a distinguished scholar and author of several books, and a fellow worker with me in the Department of State for over 20 years. (10)

The type of Zionist attack on State Department officers received great impetus when President Truman himself joined in the attack. He diverted the Zionist threats against him by turning them against his own Departmental officers. And it worked. Truman was elected by a narrow majority. He Also the author of The King-Crane Report and The Partition of Turkey. (10) 63 got Jewish funds, 80 per cent of the Jewish vote, and great praise. The Zionists had smelled blood in the case of Loy Henderson and were now out after others of his staff.

Now consider the actions of the Israelis as they have once again occupied Palestine. To gain occupancy of the territory by use of the Balfour Declaration, they entered into and then broke a treaty to Britian. Now, the Kurgan, who proves himself to be the most evil, reprehensible individual ever created, won't violate such a milquetoast rule, and could've run through MacLeod from behind as he entered, and he doesn't...what does that say for a people who willfully break their word at the drop of a hat?

Okay...you may think that I'm oversimplifying things here...but let's try this from another tack.

Everyone here in favor of being against APARTHEID? No argument, right? It's still a bad thing to take over someone's land and make them slaves on their own property, right?

Why doesn't this apply to the Middle East situation?

Oh...now it's complicated, right?

So...I began thinking of other things, like the prediction of December 21, 2012, as the last day of the Mayan calendar, and, according to cognoscenti, the last day we will experience on Earth. I was also thinking about the massive amounts of malfeasance being performed against the American middle-class worker, and I thought, "...you know...if the Federal Reserve were nationalized, we could erase the 'debt' Americans have incurred, escape the fate that befell Russia, and once again be the America of our forefathers."

We may want to do all sorts of "irresponsible" things, like maybe providing a nuclear missile to Iranian President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. If the world's gonna go poof before 2013, maybe we all ought to have a big burn-off to commemorate it. Remember, Iran hasn't attacked anyone in over two hundred years. I just believe that we can engender a better situation in the Middle East with some parity established.

If these are our last moments, I certainly don't intend on wasting my remaining moments toiling for scumbags.