Remember Where YOU Were On 9/11?

Nearly ten years after the events of September 11th, 2001, one can still hear the "official" story being parroted.

Doesn't matter; who cares what cowards think?

Trust me...if you continue to promulgate the biggest lie in the world, you are nothing but a coward.

The document I now present to you has been sourced throughout, mainly from "mainstream" articles and reports. I present to you...Remember Where YOU Were On 9/11? Who Did This?

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident." -- Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher, 1788-1860
OPENING STATEMENT :: THE HISTORY

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the ancient Greek philosopher Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous information in the first place. Not surprisingly, this type of teaching didn't sit well with the ruling elite of Greece.

Many political leaders throughout history have always sought to mislead the thinking of the masses. Socrates was tried for "subversion" and for "corrupting the youth". He was then forced to take his own life by drinking poison. It's never easy being an independent thinker! Today, our ruling government/media complex doesn't kill people for pursuing the truth about the world (at least not yet!) They simply label them as "extremists" or "paranoid", destroying careers and reputations in the process. For many, that's a fate even worse than drinking poison hemlock!

Every news story you are about to review in this comprehensive research paper is true and easily verifiable. This investigation represents 10 months of careful study, research, analysis, source verification and logical deduction. Every event and quote presented here is 100% accurate. There are over 190 detailed footnotes which I encourage, no, urge, readers to explore and verify for themselves. The Internet version of this paper will allow users to obtain instant verification for each and every footnote by clicking on the footnotes/links. Others can obtain easy verification by entering the key search words (provided at the end of the paper) into the Yahoo or Google.com search engines.

Due to the fact that well organized efforts are under way to suppress these facts, some of these news links are mysteriously disappearing even as we speak. Fortunately, this information has all been transcribed by many web users and is has therefore been preserved from the censors. These footnote searches will take you directly to the news sites of many well known established media organizations throughout the world as well as opening up doors to a world of knowledge and information that has been concealed from you. With just a little common sense and a few clicks of a mouse, Google and Yahoo now enable anyone with an ounce of curiosity to become a Sherlock Holmes.

This is no opinion piece. Rather it is a collection of buried, but undeniable facts, events, and quotes which, when assembled in one place, will state their own conclusions. In putting together this research in a logical and sequential format, great care was taken to confirm and double confirm every piece of information. Any and all questionable data which could not be independently verified to this author’s satisfaction was discarded.

Taken individually, each story, quote and event may not amount to a full case. But when taken collectively, this mountain of facts should hammer home the truth to even the most skeptical reader. There are of course those who have fallen under the hypnotic spell of the TV talking-heads and "experts" whom they worship as authority figures. Unaccustomed to thinking for themselves, no amount of truth can sway them from their preconceived prejudices. They will even deny that which they see with their own eyes. They are victims of a psychological affliction known as "the lemming effect". Lemmings are small rodents who have been known to follow each other as they charge to their deaths into raging rivers or off of cliffs. Lemminghood is an innate psychological phenomenon, present in most mammals and observable in common people as well the most sophisticated and educated elites. Lemminghood is not an intellectual phenomenon - it is psychological. As such, no socio-economic class is immune to its strangulating effect. A grant- seeking university scientist can be a lemming just as much as a fashion obsessed teen-age girl. One blindly follows the latest trendy theory while the other blindly follows the latest trendy clothing style. What's the difference? Neither can resist the force of nature.

The power to fit in with one's social peers can be irresistible. To a human lemming, the logic behind an opinion doesn't count as much as the power and popularity behind an opinion. Man, like lemming, behaves collectively. And it could be no other way. Naturally, the individual must be equipped with this trait. Otherwise, the smallest steps toward civilization could never have been made. Lemminghood is a survival trait, an inborn instinct in the majority of people. However, as with all natural phenomena, this tendency can be manipulated and used for harmful purposes.

It is this lemming effect which enables entire segments of a society to lose their sense of judgment all at the same time. This research paper will likely be wasted on many lemmings. For lemmings, denial is a basic psychological defense mechanism used to not only shield themselves from unpleasant realities, but also to reassure themselves that they will still fit within the acceptable range of opinion held by their peer group. Lemmings are absolutely terrified at the thought of being labeled as an "extremist" or a "conspiracy theorist". At all costs, their beliefs must always be on the "right" side of the issue and conform within the boundaries of their lemming peers. Lemmings simply cannot bear the burden of responsibility, or the discomfort, which comes with thinking independently. They'll resist any efforts to change their misguided beliefs with all their mental energy. We can try to open their closed minds and free them from their self-imposed blindness, but it’s not easy fighting the force of human nature. The chains of ideological conformity have too strong of a grip, and breaking them is a difficult task. With the limited resources at our disposal, it is next to impossible to compete with the media lemming-masters. Nevertheless, some of us must make the meager attempt, and thus lay the foundation upon which the truth might one day rise again.

There are those among us who do have the courage and intellectual capacity to break free of the shackles of lemminghood and accept the truth when it is presented in a clear and logical sequence. To those open minded and independent thinkers I wish to state clearly and unequivocally. I intend to set forth in this paper an overwhelming body of evidence which should forever destroy the notion that a Saudi Arabian caveman and his band of half-trained, nerdy Arab flight school attendees, orchestrated the most sophisticated terror operation in world history. The idea is utterly laughable. And yet, due to the blithering barrage of bullshit dished out by the government/media complex, "patriotic" Americans have accepted this ridiculous fairy tale with a religious conviction. As a public service to my fellow Americans, I have published the results of my research in the hopes of liberating as many people as I can from the oppressive yoke of media brainwashing and state sponsored lies. Do you have what it takes to break free? If so, read on!

FEMA Photographer Kurt Sonnenfeld - Complete WTC Photos

Special thanks to AboveTopSecret.

Orwell's Optimism The Deep State, Self-Deception, 9/11, and the Legend of "FBI Maverick" John O'Neill - Essay by Allan Weisbecker

Former FBI Agent and head of security at the WTC Complex John O'Neill was NO HERO. Read this essay - I have only posted the last page:

Orwell's Optimism
The Deep State, Self-Deception, 9/11, and the Legend of
"FBI Maverick" John O'Neill

Essay by Allan Weisbecker

There’s Something About Johnnie (a summation)

As I say at the outset, this essay is meant to do multiple duty. In doing so, however, the practical points made in my deconstruction of the John O’Neill Legend may get lost in the philosophical (might I say 'Orwellian’) shuffle or in my debunking of the false methodologies of inquiry that have led to the dissemination of misinformation. So here is a summation of the evidence/logic presented, and which I believe puts the lie to the misdirection of the John O’Neill Legend:

1. O’Neill’s active participation in the TWA 800 cover up -- the second most horrendous mass murder in U.S. history -- which was likewise second only to the 9/11 cover up in its blatant mendacity and historical implications. Not only is O’Neill’s role prima facie proof positive that he was not 'the real thing’ (however you define it) but it also indicates the degree to which he is ('is’ not 'was’) capable of toeing the deep state line. (I urge the reader to do his/her own research into the TWA 800 affair – a good starting point is Jack Cashill’s film, Silenced. Were it not for 9/11, TWA 800 would still be a deep state misdeeds issue today.)

2. The utter nonsensicalness of the notion that the a non-colluder would be given the opportunity to discover the pre-existing demolition equipment with which the WTC was packed in the three weeks prior to the attacks; it’s also likely that final prep work had to be done and therefore overseen by a colluder. (It’s an oft-made point made by the Truth movement that a Bush sat on the board of the company overseeing WTC security in the years prior to 2001; the idea that the plotters would go from that sort of control – or whatever total control they obviously had -- to the diametric opposite at the last minute is absurd.)

3. The notion that the perpetrators would try to silence O’Neill by assuming he would die in the attacks is equally absurd. A surviving John O’Neill as 'the real thing,’ having witnessed the horror and also obviously having been an intended victim, would have become the first and most fervent 'Truther.’

4. The lack of real intel/information coming from John O’Neill. Unlike true whistleblowers like Cowleen Rowley, Sibel Edmonds, Able Danger’s Anthony Shaffer, and others, in the end O’Neill only dispersed the (non-specific) bin Laden-as-existential-threat misinformation that we now know to be false, and which is an essential tenet of the official story.

5. The lack of evidence that O’Neill carried out the duties he should have on that day, i.e., the evacuation of the complex, helicopter rescue attempts, and so forth.

Murray Weiss, in his kowtow to the Legend, The Man Who Warned America, lists these as the known O’Neill phone calls between the first plane hit and the first tower collapse:

O’Neill called his son J.P. to say that he was okay. According to Weiss,this was the first call O’Neill made from his South Tower office when Flight 11 hit the North Tower.

O’Neill then (at 8:50, likely the next call) took a call from his estranged wife, Christine, assuring her that he was okay. That he took the call and was speaking to her five minutes after the attack had begun tells us that he was not making other calls, or contacting security people, or, for that matter, trying to make a P.A. announcement that everyone should evacuate the WTC complex.

O’Neill called an FBI buddy named Pat Paterson (O’Neill left a message), who figures O’Neill called to say 'I told you so’ – meaning that O’Neill was right in predicting an attack on the WTC. In any event, Paterson could not have helped in O’Neill’s duties that day, so the call was personal.

O’Neill called his girlfriend Valerie James. James says that O’Neill called at 9:17 and expressed concern that he might lose his job. He took the time to describe the carnage he was witnessing

Anna DiBattista, one of O’Neill’s other girlfriends, called O’Neill at 9:29. He took the call and 'could not have sounded calmer’ as he again took the time to describe the carnage he was witnessing. (One can assume that he still wasn’t all that busy.)

O’Neill called an FBI girlfriend named Fran Townsend to tell her he was okay. (That Ms Townsend was still another of O’Neill’s paramours is in subtext in Weiss’s book.

Six calls. All personal. All indicating that O’Neill was not busy doing the things that I would have done, had I been in his circumstances that day.

6. Then there’s good old ex-FBI Agent Mark Rossini (ejected from the Bureau essentially for being a sleazebag), whose words ring in my ear to this day: 'John is a great guy.’

7. A final thought, and this comes under the heading of both instinct and my own experiences with sociopathic personalities: When O’Neill took the WTC security job, he told a good half dozen people words to the effect that bin Laden/al Qaeda would likely strike the towers, and soon.

I believe that John O’Neill was laying groundwork for his status as Legend. As sociopaths are wont to do, he was already reveling in the idea of fooling the world.

It’s our job to set the world straight, and at the very least frustrate that objective . (Hence my anger at the likes of Anti-Iluminati and Jonathon Elinoff, who to this day persist in publicly championing O’Neill misinformation even after I’ve pointed out its nonsensicalness.)

As this essay comes to a close (and assuming you've hung in from the beginning) I try to imagine your state of mind ('you', the personal you)...

Aggravation?

Outrage?

Boredom (God forbid)?

Enlightenment?

My hope is that some percentage of you (the general 'you') will come away with the realization that we are all subject to the same sort of self-deception that Orwell describes as 'doublethink', and that the only defense against it is self-reflection.

ACTIVE SELF-REFLECTION.

Many thanks for your time and attention, the two most valuable things you have to give.

If you found my essay worthwhile, please forward it.

Coincidence...Right

I want to respond to the fucktard who says I need psychotherapy from the Jewish Ritual Murder posting.

Asshole...keep your shitty shock therapy to yourself and your raisin-sized balls. The "Catholic Church" absolves you? Who cares? I see you haven't named any rabbis who decry such evil. What...are they all too busy sucking on bloody baby penis to wave it off? You can eat me, fuckwit. Here's the news: despite over nine years of obfuscation, the truth is coming out, and you fuckers had better start paddling your Neanderthal asses to Israel, or get ready to stretch that neck from the nearest lamppost.

If it was good enough for Mark Madoff...it's good enough for you bastards. By the way...it's clear that he was murdered by one of you bastards. how's this - why not go out on a high note: get some Korans, dressed up as sand niggers, go to some strip clubs, whoop it up...then meet me at Logan Airport. I'll be sure to tell the TSA rapists to leave the K-Y off of the plungers.

We'll have a good old time.

A Moment Of Silence (For Nine Years)

I woke up this morning and turned on 1010WINS. The anchors were having a moment of silence to "commemorate" the "strikes" upon the two buildings that formerly held the title of the tallest building(s).

Why do I have the word "strikes" in quotes? I believe that the so-called airplane impacts "officially" noted as the reason for the collapse to WTC buildings 1 and 2 are absolute MISDIRECTION. My posit is that the buildings were razed by some method of controlled demolition, as noted by Van Romero on the very day (only to be half-heartedly recanted ten days later), and as posited by numerous individuals, such as Dr. Niels Harrit, Danny Jowenko, Kevin Ryan, Kevin Barrett, Richard Gage, and Steven Jones, among others; and if one takes it to the next logical step, and posit that the WHOLE of the "official" theory does not hold water, then one must dismiss EVERY FACET of said theory.

So...NO JET PLANE IMPACTS. That means no unnecessary discussion regarding whether jet fuel fires can, in fact, weaken industrial steel to the point of collapse...or, more to the point, ABSOLUTE DISINTEGRATION. That is what we all saw on the morning of September 11th, 2001, isn't it? That was followed by the inexplicable collapse/disintegration of the Saloman Brothers building, more commonly known as WTC 7. Within that building were two things of note: "America's Asshole" Rudolph Giuliani's command center, complete with its own supply of liquid fuel; and the records for numerous investigations highlighting malfeasance of the highest order - those investigations have come to an end, and the perpetrators are free to enjoy their ill-gotten gains.

Our news agencies were actually doing their jobs as human beings during the beginning of the events of September 11th, 2001; you'll note, if you paid attention to the wording of the initial broadcasts, that the word "explosion" was used to describe the events of the morning; William Rodriguez's and Barry Jennings' accounts make a compelling argument for pre-existing conditions within the WTC complex; yet, as the day went by, the word from up above (and by that, I mean the various heads of CBS, NBC, FOX, ABC, CNN, BBC, etc.) was that the word "explosion" was NOT to be used to describe the events of the day.

We were regaled with the notion that a "former" CIA asset gone wrong, Tim Osman, had adopted "Islam" and is fomenting "Jihad" against the "Satan United States" as Osama bin Laden.

[Sidenote: I want to mention here that we aren't, I suppose, to reflect upon the fact that, as with the attempted "assassination" attempt upon President Ronald Reagan, where Vice-President George Herbert Walker Bush was having dinner with Hinckley's father, that his son, George Walker Bush was a business associate with the bin Laden family et. al. - nothing to see here...just move along...but I digress.]

Herewith, scant minutes after the beginning of the hugest clusterfuck to occur as of yet on our shores, George Tenet is absolutely convinced that this bin Laden guy is the mastermind of this event. Uh, Georgie...we haven't yet investigated this...oh, wait - you have a VIDEOTAPE? But that's a fat guy! I thought he was on dialysis! Trust you? Well, okay...why would you lie to us, right?

There's more? Four planes were hijacked from Logan Airport? All of the "security" was performed by ICTS? Isn't that an Israeli company? Why the heck are we not using an American company for that? All right, let's forget about that for now...WHAT? A WHAT hit the WHAT? The PENTAGON?!? The nerve center of America's defenses?!? Why does that NOT MAKE ANY BLOODY SENSE?!? Now what? You found some Middle Eastern guys in a white van with boxcutters, cash and explosive residue? YEAH!!! Let's hold those motherfuckers - we'll get some info outta th - wait...they're not the right kind of Middle Easterners? They were doing WHAT? High-fiving while the WTC buildings burned? Somebody get that fat-ass Sharon on the line - WHAT NOW? Netanyahu said WHAT?!? The attack was GOOD? Oh...no; he meant that it was good for Israel. WTF does that fucking mean? Oh, well, they are the "only democracy in the Middle East", with their Apartheid Wall and all...WHAT NOW?!?! One of the buildings COLLAPSED?!? Geez. Wait...how come the second one collapsed first? Am I missing something here? Wait...now the second one? Well, at least we won't see any more of that...

...of course, until 5:20 PM.

I have come to the conclusion that our so-called media watchdogs have been naught but propagandists for the fifth columnists propagated within our government, our representatives and our businesses. I have christened them "Distraction Media", as their aim is to distract us with absolute and utter bullshit; case in point - reality TV. The idea that you can take some asshat, shove a camera in their face and make compelling drama has to be the sounding of the death knell of civilization.

The media went along with the obfuscation of the reasons behind World Wars 1 and 2;

didn't bat an eye when "lone nut assassins" went on to murder President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcolm X and Robert Francis Kennedy;

went along with the utter lies involved in the attack upon the crew of the U.S.S. Liberty;

hid the truth of the October Surprise; covered up the Iran-Contra scandal, thereby allowing America's Black communities to be submerged in the CIA's newest invention, crack cocaine;

allowed former CIA Director and former Vice-President George H. W. Bush a term as President of the United States, only the very following day admitting that his son Neil Bush was on the Board of Directors of Silverado S & L, allowing Americans to be fleeced of their life savings;

assisted with the coverup of the deaths of Don Henry and Kevin Ives, who unwittingly discovered the drug running in Mena, Arkansas, which would have blown any chance of Arkansas Governor William Jefferson Clinton of gaining the Presidency;

let the obvious murder of Vincent Foster go unchallenged; gave the FBI a pass when they provided REAL EXPLOSIVES to a bunch of idiots who went on to damage the basements of the WTC in 1993; watched as the Weavers were murdered at Ruby Ridge;

applauded the ATF as they murdered women and children at the WACO massacre;

completely divorced yourselves from reality by going along with the retarded story of how Timothy McVeigh blew up the Murrah Building with a truck bomb, when unexploded devices were removed from the buildings, only to never be heard of again;

made a spectacle of then-President Clinton getting a hummer from a fat chick and blowing in excess of $40 MILLION DOLLARS on a porn shoot by Kenneth Starr, instead of dealing with the more ominous threat of a spy within the confines of the White House;

and enabled the stealing of the Presidency, not once, but TWICE.

And I have to mention the theft of Americans' savings, once again, with that circle-jerk known as the Enron scandal.

Need I go on?

To you utter scumbags: you have engaged in a "moment of silence" that has lasted for over NINE YEARS. You allowed FEMA to duck the question of why they were in New York City on September 10th, 2001; you allowed NIST to submit a report that doesn't even account for how and why WTC 7 collapsed; you allowed "America's Asshole" Rudolph Giuliani to ship the evidence that would have proven conclusively, if scientists had been given access to said materials, what caused the utter destruction of those buildings within the WTC complex; you allowed Larry "Two Sheds" Silverstein to recoup BILLIONS of dollars from an investment that should have lifted eyebrows from here to Timbuktu; you allowed Christie Todd Whitman to get away with stating that "the air was safe to breathe" in Lower Manhattan; in short, you joined in the collective rape of WE THE PEOPLE.

Are you proud of yourselves? Do you not yet understand that you have contributed to your own destruction? Don't you realize that you are losing jobs left and right because you decided to be lapdogs for scumbags, and ceased being the watchdogs for WE THE PEOPLE?

Now, the question remains...will you remain silent?

Samizdat - 11/04/2009

• NIST balks on 9/11 Truth challenge • Dorothy Kilgallen story to hit big screen • Gorbachev calls for American/global perestroika • US income gap world's most extreme • Canadian singer/songwriter killed by coyotes

Twin Towers, Twin Myths?

The NIST vs. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Challenged to conduct its own testing of WTC dust samples for nanothermite, the NIST crawls under a rock

by JAY LEVIN AND TOM MCKENZIE
Santa Barbara Independent News
http://www.independent.com/news/2009/sep/17/twin-towers-twin-myths/

One of the crucial technical disputes in American history, perhaps second only to global warming, is underway. It pits hundreds of government technicians who say the World Trade Center buildings were brought down by airplane impact against hundreds of professional architects and building engineers who insist that the Twin Towers could never have collapsed solely due to the planes and are calling for a new independent investigation. It is a fight that is not going away and is likely to get louder as more building trade professionals sign on to one side or the other.

Stephen Jones said he sent a letter in April 2008 to NIST about his original findings (nanothermite chips found in WTC dust samples), inviting NIST to test its own dust for such chips. In public comments since, NIST has said that Jones’s research is not “scientifically valid” because Jones can’t prove the “chain of custody” of the dust he tested...

Other groups that support NIST’s findings argue that neither the samples nor Jones’s tests are reliable. Jones replied simply: “They don’t need my dust to test. They have plenty of dust of their own where they know the chain of custody. They just won’t test it.”...

To Richard Gage and his allies, NIST’s refusal to test and its questionable conclusions derive from government-dependent employees and defense contractors fearful that evidence of explosives would be too traumatic for the public — and too risky to NIST captains answerable to political superiors. Hence, NIST’s refusal to address fully scientific papers challenging nearly every element of its case, including its theory that pneumatic air pressure mimicked explosives and that tons of nano-thermite (not less-powerful thermite) would be needed...

Inevitably, of course, the gorilla in the room is what if AE911 and the Jones team are correct in their analysis? The dark notion that the hijackers wouldn’t need airplanes if they could plant explosives would raise questions of who did have access and what was their motive? And how would America deal with such an investigation against the backdrop of suppositions that some officials in government were complicit? This idea is virtually unthinkable to most of the public, much less something the American political system can handle. A Democratic Congress wouldn’t cut off funds for a war it opposed nor impeach a president who broke laws; how would it cope with the cataclysmic implications of new 9/11 evidence that disproved the official story?

Results of the Santa Barbara Independent's poll on this story:

Tragic, but no conspiracy. Planes hit them, they went down -- 23%

More than meets the eye; let's investigate -- 22%

Inside job; we MUST investigate -- 53%

__________________________________________________________________

Dorothy Kilgallen story optioned for big screen biopic
October 3rd, 2008 by Scott Marks
http://www.emulsioncompulsion.com/2008/10/03/news/dorothy-kilgallen-story-optioned-for-big-screen-biopic

According to Variety, producer John Davis (Dudley Do-Right, I Robot, Fat Albert, Norbit) has optioned Good Night, Dorothy Kilgallen, a proposal for an expose book by Paul Alexander that ties the columnist’s death to her investigation of the JFK assassination. Kilgallen was an outspoken critic of the Warren Commission. A friend of JFK’s, she began a crusade to single-handedly uncover a conspiracy behind his murder. She conducted an interview with assassin’s assassin Jack Ruby that purported to contain important new information on the murder of President Kennedy. She conceived the interview as a centerpiece for her expose Murder One, Alexander’s book insists that Kilgallen died mysteriously and the notebooks containing the information she was about to publish disappeared.

Wonder why the MSM has steadfastly endorsed the Warren Commission and refused to investigate the triple assassinations of the '60s? Virtually alone among journalists with a national audience (syndicated column and radio show), Dorothy Kilgallen pursued the case. Her sudden death put a chill on the Fourth Estate that's still in effect. While journalists circle the wagons over federal pressure to reveal confidential sources, or the recent White House attacks on Fox News, few have cared to examine this seminal case of lethal intimidation.

1. On July 15, 1959 Kilgallen became the first reporter to imply that the CIA was working with organized crime to knock off Fidel Castro.

2. On Sept. 25, 1964, Kilgallen ran an interview with Acquilla Clemons, one of the witnesses to the shooting of Officer Tippit whom the Warren Commission never questioned. Clemons told Kilgallen that she saw two men running from the scene, neither of whom fit Oswald's description.

3. The same month, she reported in the New York Journal American that Jack Ruby and slain DPD officer J.D. Tippet had a two-hour meeting in Ruby's Carousel Club.

3. One of the biggest scoops of Kilgallen's career came when she obtained the 102-page transcript of Ruby's testimony to the Warren Commission (wherein Ruby begged to be taken from Dallas to Washington, where he could tell the whole truth).

4. Dorothy's last public reference to the JFK assassination appeared on Sept. 3, 1965 when she challenged the authenticity of the famous Life magazine cover of Lee Harvey Oswald

After a trip to New Orleans (anticipating Jim Garrison's investigation), and a private interview with Jack Ruby in his Dallas jail cell, she told several friends and associates that she was "about to blow the JFK case sky high." Shortly afterward, she was found dead in her townhouse, and all of her notes from the Ruby interview and New Orleans trip vanished. Seven days after Kilgallen's loss, Dr. James Luke, a New York City medical examiner, said she died from "acute ethanol and barbiturate intoxication, circumstances undetermined."

A good account of the case here:

WHO KILLED DOROTHY KILGALLEN?

By Sara Jordan
Thursday November 1st 2007

http://www.midtod.com/new/articles/7_14_07_Dorothy.html

____________________________________________________________________

Mikhail Gorbachev calls for global perestroika

Twenty years after that shameful symbol of division was torn down, ultra-liberal capitalism needs its own perestroika

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/oct/30/1989-capitalism-in-crisis-perestroika

http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/06/09/mikhail-gorbachev-calls-for-new-american-revolution/

But it was soon very clear that western capitalism, too, deprived of its old adversary and imagining itself the undisputed victor and incarnation of global progress, is at risk of leading western society and the rest of the world down another historical blind alley.

Today's global economic crisis was needed to reveal the organic defects of the present model of western development that was imposed on the rest of the world as the only one possible; it also revealed that not only bureaucratic socialism but also ultra-liberal capitalism are in need of profound democratic reform – their own kind of perestroika...

“Some have reacted with understanding. Others have objected, sometimes sarcastically, suggesting that I want the United States to experience upheaval, just like the former Soviet Union. In my country, particularly caustic reactions have come from the opponents of perestroika, people with short memories and a deficit of conscience,

“[If] all the proposed solutions and action now come down to a mere rebranding of the old system, we are bound to see another, perhaps even greater upheaval down the road,” he wrote. “The current model does not need adjusting; it needs replacing. I have no ready-made prescriptions. But I am convinced that a new model will emerge, one that will emphasise public needs and public good, such as a cleaner environment, well-functioning infrastructure and public transport, sound education and health systems and affordable housing.”

He continued: “The time has come to strike the right balance between the government and the market, for integrating social and environmental factors and demilitarising the economy.”

______________________________________________________________________________

US Rich-Poor Income Gap World's Most Extreme
Dullophob.com
10-29-9
http://www.rense.com/general88/extreme.htm

Income inequality in the US is now the most extreme of all countries. The 2008 OECD report 'Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries' concludes that the US is the country with the highest inequality and poverty rate across the OECD and that since 2000 nowhere has there been such a stark rise in income inequality as in the US. The OECD finds that in the US the distribution of wealth is even more unequal than the distribution of income.

The increase in US income inequality in the 21st century coincides with the offshoring of US jobs, which enriched executives with 'performance bonuses' while impoverishing the middle class, and with the rapid rise of unregulated OTC derivatives, which enriched Wall Street and the financial sector at the expense of everyone else. Millions of Americans have lost their homes and half of their retirement savings while being loaded up with government debt to bail out the banksters who created the derivative crisis. The financial insiders running the Treasury, White House, and Federal Reserve (Rubin, Greenspan etc.) shifted to taxpayers the cost of the catastrophe that they had created. Goldman Sachs, saved with the public's money, recently announced that it was paying massive six and seven figure bonuses to every employee.
__________________________________________________________________________

Some people think I'm nuts for carrying a small .22 revolver on wilderness hikes. Once I was attacked on a mountain bike by wild dog. It's rare, but these things do happen, and calling 911 on your cell phone will only get the coroner there in time...

Taylor Mitchell, Singer-Songwriter, Killed By Coyotes On Hike In Canadian Park
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/28/taylor-mitchell-singerson_n_337836.html

TORONTO — Two coyotes attacked a promising young musician as she was hiking alone in a national park in eastern Canada, and authorities said she died Wednesday of her injuries. The victim was identified as Taylor Mitchell, 19, a singer-songwriter from Toronto who was touring her new album on the East Coast.

She was hiking solo on a trail in Cape Breton Highlands National Park in Nova Scotia on Tuesday when the attack occurred. She was airlifted to a Halifax hospital in critical condition and died Wednesday morning, authorities said.


Travis Kelly Graphics
http://www.tkellygraphics.com

Editorial & History Cartoons
http://www.traviskelly.com

CafePress:
Cartoons on T-Shirts, Posters, Calendars, Mugs and more
http://www.cafepress.com/traviskelly

The Story Behind "Esta Puta Quiere Pinga"

Did you happen to see this image inserted into subway advertisements the past week? I was on the way home, when I spotted one of these posters inserted in between a subway advertisement and the plastic veneer - admittedly, my Spanish is a tad spotty, but I do know the meaning of the four words surrounding the image therein.

This occurrence coincides with an unrelated (as of this writing) rash of homophobic attacks upon individuals.

I'll just say this: many of these attacks are purported to be from people "asserting their masculinity"; I would posit that these are actually latent homosexuals attempting to prove that they don't have gay tendencies.

Guess what, nitwits - it's not gonna work. Let's hope your cellmates are gentle.

APUESTA, El Blog - The message of this poster, allegedly spotted in New York City, is a violently misogynistic and homophobic. ¿Realmente es tan difícil de reconocer? Is it really that hard to recognize?

Imaginémonos, por un segundo, que el objeto del ataque no es Luis Fortuño. Imagine, for a second, that the object of attack is not Luis Fortuño. Imaginemos que se trata de una mujer, figura pública, y para no complicar la cosa, que es alguien politicamente "neutral". Imagine that this is a woman, a public figure, and not complicate the matter, as someone politically "neutral." Imaginemos que se trata de Maripily. Imagine that this is Maripily.

Imaginemos una persona desconocida, por razones desconocidas, fija carteles con la imagen de Maripily, con la frase "ESTA PUTA QUIERE PINGA". Imagine a stranger, for unknown reasons, fixed with posters of Maripily, with the phrase "THIS SLUT WANTS ping". ¿Qué persona con un mínimo de formación y conciencia social negaría entonces que se trata de un acto misógino, una incitación a la agresión sexual, independientemente de los motivos que pudiera tener la persona para hacerlo? What person with minimal training and then deny that social consciousness is a misogynist act, an incitement to sexual assault, regardless of the reasons the person may have to do?

Volvamos entonces a Fortuño. Let us then Fortuño. ¿Estará nuestra imaginación colectiva realmente tan patéticamente demacrada, que lo PEOR que le podemos desear a ese pichón de fascista es algo que AL MENOS el 50% de la población (presumiendo que las mujeres "biológicas" son el 50%, menos X% de lesbianas y trans-hombres, más igual porcentaje de hombres gay y trans-mujeres) encuentra placentero? Will our collective imagination really so pathetically emaciated, that the worst thing that we want to pigeon fascist that is something that at least 50% of the population (assuming that women "organic" are 50% less than X% lesbian and trans-men, plus an equal percentage of gay men and trans-women) is pleasurable?

Quizás se podría argumentar que para EL es lo peor que le puede pasar, pero (aún suponiendo que conociéramos con certeza su preferencia sexual) con un poco de esfuerzo, no toma más de par de segundos pensar en MUUUCHAS cosas que hasta Fortuño tendría que admitir son menos agradables... Perhaps one could argue that for him is the worst that can happen, but (even if we knew for certain sexual preference) with a little effort, it takes more than two seconds to think many, many things would have to admit to Fortune less pleasing ...

Peor aún, parece ser que la homofobia internalizada es tal, que para algunos compañeros y compañeras, ACUSARLO de QUERER "que le den pinga" (en otras palabras, llamarle gay) es lo peor que se le puede decir a Luis Fortuño . Worse, it appears that internalized homophobia is such that for some colleagues, accused of wanting "to give you prick" (in other words, call it gay) is the worst thing you can say to Luis Fortuño.

Hay veces que nuestra ansiedad por evitar que nos tilden de "Politically Correct" (ansiedad producto del "white liberal guilt" gringo, y bastante ridícula, por cierto) nos convierte en la razón misma por la cual es necesario insistir, a veces, en la corrección política, que no es otra cosa que la verticalidad de nuestros principios. There are times when our anxiety to avoid being labeled as "Politically Correct" (anxiety product of "white liberal guilt" gringo, and quite ridiculous, of course) make us the very reason why it is necessary to insist, sometimes in political correctness, which is not simply the verticality of our principles.

¿O acaso alguien en la izquierda se atrevería a llamarle "negro de mierda" a Obama, por intensificar la ocupación de Afghanistan, o no retirarle la ayuda militar a la dictatdura hondureña? Or perhaps someone on the left would dare call him a "black shit" to Obama, to intensify the occupation of Afghanistan, or not withdraw military aid to the Honduran dictatdura? Es un reto, adelante... It is a challenge ahead ...

Que viva Puerto Rico libre, sí, pero libre de misoginia y homofobia también. Long live free Puerto Rico, yes, but free of misogyny and homophobia as well.

Con "patriotas" así, que viva la estadidad radical... With "patriots" and, living radical statehood ...

Actualización: Justo cuando uno pensaba que la miopía política de la izquierda no podía ser peor, hay quienes encuentran gracioso que "hasta Hitler está contra Fortuño" ... Update: Just when you thought the political myopia of the left could not be worse, some people are funny "to Hitler is against Fortuño" ...

In other news...New York City will soon bear witness to the maiden voyage of the U.S.S. New York, soon to wind it way into the waters of NYC, on its way to Norfolk, Virginia. The incredible fact herein is that the ship contains 7.5 tons of steel from the site of the World Trade Center. Now, I don't believe that there is anything to concern us, dear readers...BUT...if the "official" story of the events of September 11th, 2001 do not hold water, and there is evidence of nano-thermite mixed within this ship's firmament, someone may want to ensure that we aren't allowing a veritable time-bomb within the harbours of New York City.

Mayoral debates tonight - my bet is that we will inaugurate a new mayor in November. I was a supporter of Bloomberg until he usurped the will of WE THE PEOPLE by extending term limits and flouting the will of New Yorkers. That's where you blew it, Mike. And can you stop it with all of the goddamned mailings? I can wallpaper the Sistine Chapel with all of the paper you wasted.

Judicial-Inc Will Probably Wind Down - Don't Let It Go Gently Into That Good Night

What can we do to keep Judicial-Inc. afloat?

Judicial-Inc Will Probably Wind Down

Judicial's goal was to create a forum, that as times became more desperate, a group of sensible people could use it to meet and unite. As the American economy implodes, and Israel commits another 9/11, to shift the blame to the Muslims, you need a catalyst. It appears that Zionists must be getting close to some event, because they are no longer going to let Judicial-Inc exist.



How Real Are The Majority Of 'Alternative News' Websites?

Most of the so-called 'Alternative medias' revolve around the Holocaust, and the 9/11 scam.

The Holocaust: ~~ There are twenty various sites that claim to be holy grail of the Holocaust truth. Most center around the question of whether 3.4 million Jews died, or the higher number of 6,000,000. The truth there is that the Red Cross states there were 272,000 deaths in the camps, and maybe 120,000 were Jews. But arguing the Holocaust is a waste of time. It's not worth the effort. It's like arguing about religion, and most people don't care anyway.

Actually there is a ploy here. By denying that silly fable, you are keeping the conversation active, and drawing attention to it.



The 9/11 Attack:~~ The second big camp for the 'Alternative Media' is the 9/11 movement. Basically, a potpourri of spittling bagel munchers talking about minutiae. Did the CIA plant micro nukes at the WTC., why did building 7 collapse, did the jets really land at Area 51, are the passengers alive, and are they living in a remote CIA desert compound?

The truth there is that Israel orchestrated the entire event. There were no 19 young Arab guys trained on a small Cessna. These were trained Israelis. A Sayret Matkal Capt. led the first operation, a mossad operative was identified on the second jet. The third jet, Fl 77, didn't fly for 62 minutes and amazingly avoided the hundreds of fighters at Norfolk, the Seymour Johnson AB, NORAD, Otis, Andrews, Shaw, Pope, etc. It was actually replaced with a remote-controlled plane that hit the Pentagon. Fl 77. The real Flight 77 jet went out in the Atlantic to ram the USS Washington, and Norad shot it down. The 4th jet was shot down, but not over Shanksville.




The War In Iraq:

That is about Zionism's quest to control the world's oil supply. It's about the Mosul-Haifa Pipeline, and the five permanent American bases there to protect it.


The War In Afghanistan:

The Taliban, a religious group, threw out the Zionist opium traders, and cut 94% of the opium supply. The other factor is that now we have troops flanking Iran on both sides.



The Coming War In Iran:

Iran sits on the Zargos oil belt, the largest untapped field in the world.



So Who Funds These Websites, And Their Authors?

Practically 95% of today's websites are Zionist-controlled. If they were real, they would be focusing on the coming collapse, and the various False Flags being used to point the finger at the Israeli intelligence creation called "Al-Qaeda", or Iran. But you won't find any of these Kosher Clowns discussing the Zionist game plans. You can quickly look at these websites and see their agendas. All they do is try and implicate the CIA for 9/11, Madrid train bombs, London bus bombs, or Mid-East assassinations. Then, there is the constant talk about Black and Hispanic crime. Oddly, they conveniently skip over the Madoffs, or the fleecing of America's banks by Zionists. These website's goal is all about diversions from the real problems, and just helping the fomenting race wars.


So What Are The Costs?

A forum like FreeRepublic.com runs $360,000 annually. Some of the bigger websites are very good sources of solid information, but they have advertisers covering the costs. The large and well-disseminated websites, like Huffington.com, are funded by Venture Capitalists.



Zionists Really Aren't Brilliant, But They Are United

Their leaders have used this holocaust nonsense to create a pack of loyal fanatics. And this has lead to a giant social, educational, and business network.


Judicial-Inc Needs To Receive Funding

The other sites are funded by Zionists. Whereas, with Judicial it is a daily struggle with Zio-Thugs, of which 50% are police. Try calling the police station and saying you have a police detective stalking you. The ADL has retained a private detective who directs the harassment, and he has a free hand.

You need to remember that the ADL has tentacles in every major police force.


Now Is Not The Time To Quit

You are getting a small blimp in the stock market, which will be used to portray a fledgling economic recovery, but it's a diversion from the Madoff anger. The ultimate fall guy has to be Muslim terrorists, and certainly not Zio-Bankers. There will be a False Flag staged by the Zionist that triggers everything, and that will make 9/11 look like a hiccup. The timeline is probably 12 months.

Female Police Officer Tells Of Massive Explosions On 9/11

Another posting that bears reposting:

Female police officer tells of massive explosions on 9/11
From: Gangsta (4847983)

http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html

There are about 230 World Trade Center survivors' stories on the above web page.

You can see this World Trade Center survivor's story in the BLUE section titled "Fire, Police, and Emergency Medical Services", on this web page,

Officer Sue Keane – WTC survivor. Port Authority Police Department. 8 years of service at the time of 9/11. Former Sergeant, U.S. Army. Veteran of Operation Desert Storm. 13-year Army career.

From Women at Ground Zero: Stories of Courage and Compassion
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0028644220/centerforcoop-20:

Officer Keane provided this statement to the authors on 1/26/02. "On September 11, I was at the court building about five blocks away from the World Trade Center. I went outside and got my coffee at the coffee wagon and I heard a plane that sounded like it was flying real low. I looked up and all I could see was this big orange fireball at the Trade Center. I dropped my coffee, ran into the building, called my command and said, 'Something just happened over at the Trade Center. I'm going over there.' ...

I crossed the Plaza and went over to Building One [North Tower]. ... All of a sudden I heard the second plane. It sounded like it was coming full. We were in a stairwell trying to hurry people along, and we heard it hit. ...

A couple minutes later, it sounded like bombs going off. That's when the explosions happened. I could hear it coming and I knew something was going to happen. I braced myself. It started to get dark, then all of a sudden there was this massive explosion. We were on the mezzanine, which is all encased in glass. The windows blew in, everything went black, we all got thrown. ...

There was an incredible rush of air and it literally sucked the breath out of my lungs. ...

I heard that noise again like a railroad train coming. I told everybody, 'Get out of here!' and then the second explosion happened and I got thrown and separated from the other guys.

I don't know if that was when One World Trade started coming down or if another building had come down. ... I'm only assuming that Building One was still up at that time. There were still some people there, and there was a doorway to the outside toward Building Five. We had to look up before we went out because body part and things were falling from above. ... I crossed over to Building Five. ...

Somebody said something about the Pentagon being hit ... We went into Building Five. ...

All of a sudden everything went quiet again. I said to the guy behind me, 'Brace yourself.' and again, another explosion. That sent me and the two firefighters down the stairs. ...

I heard the rumbling again, like a locomotive coming. ... Then the same thing happened again, where the wind sucked the breath out of me.

I can't tell you how many times I got banged around. Each one of those explosions picked me up and threw me ...

There was another explosion, and I got thrown with two firefighters out onto the street. ...

A firefighter grabbed me and said, 'Are you okay?' ... he threw me under this hose, which in a way felt great, because I didn't realize until then that my skin was actually burning.

I had burn marks, not like you'd have from a fire, but my face was all red, my chest was red, and for three or four days there was stuff coming out of my body like you wouldn't believe. It was like shrapnel. It's still coming out. I'll look at a little pinpoint under my skin and it will be bleeding."


Editor's note: The 9/11 Commission was clearly aware of Officer Keane since two short statements from her appeared on a video tape played at the 11th Public Hearing on 5/18/04 http:../../..www...9-..11commission...gov/..archive/..hearing11/..9-..11Commission_..Hearing_..2004-05-18.htm . And her statements about multiple explosions in the Towers (excerpted above) had been published 20 months before the hearing. Yet no mention of Officer Keane appears in the 9/11 Commission Report.


Editor's note: Despite hundreds of eyewitness reports of explosions throughout the Twin Towers by doomed victims, survivors, emergency service personnel, reporters, and bystanders, the 9/11 Commission Report contains virtually no mention of them and entirely ignores them in its conclusions. Graeme MacQueen's analysis of oral histories of 9/11 taken from 503 FDNY survivors http:../../..patriotsquestio..n911...com/..professors...html#MacQueen reveals more than 100 FDNY personnel reported explosions in the Twin Towers.

Nano-Thermite Took Down The WTC Complex? - Russia Today

Could the most audacious terrorist attack in history be a sophisticated masterpiece of demolition? Please view Russia Today's interview with Dr. Niels Harrit.

PrisonPlanet has a nice little posting, and one of the responses directly correlates to the video above:

LRRP 1968 Says:
July 16th, 2009 at 5:56 am

“the World Trade Center buildings collapsed as a result of fires ignited by jet fuel.”

The above is absolutely and physically impossible. Thermodynamics 101.

Weakened steel does not fail explosively. It gradually loses strength along it’s stress-strain curve and then only in the areas that attain the temperatures required to fail. Steel is an excellent heat conductor and will conduct heat away from the point of application. The materials “specific heat” will show you how much it has to absorb in order to get hot. This is measured in BTU’s / mass. You can have flames as hot as you like but if there is not enough heat energy available to heat up the material you will do nothing.

An example of this is your stove at home. A gas range burns propane at 3254 F. An aluminum pan melts at 1220 F. This should make it impossible to cook on a gas range, as the pan would melt or at least soften into putty, but it does not because heating materials is complex and actually pretty difficult. Heat goes away very fast and you have to continue to pour BTUs into it above the rate that it loses the heat. This is not easy.

I just made myself a omelet, the pan miraculously didn’t melt.

There was not enough heat value in the jet fuel to come anywhere close to making the steel hot enough to fail. You will run out fuel long before that happens and the math is straight forward.

You simply take the tons of steel in question, the amount of BTU’s it would take to make the steel hot, including the concrete and the air and you just can’t do it.

In fact it is so far from possible, the fires cannot be a factor, the temperature would not have even come close to the starting of the elastic region.

Anyone who repeats the “jet fuel burns at xxx and steel loses yy% of it strength at xxx temp” is an idiot or a liar or just cannot understand the physics involved here.

That this was an “official” explanation tells me that they are lying. When a suspect lies, ask any cop what that tells him.

– as an aside, jet fuel burns at 1800 degrees all right – IN A JET ENGINE. A jet engine forces air through a compressor to get enough volume and mass of O2 to support the combustion. You cannot get the fuel to burn at anywhere near that temp in open air, there is not enough mass air flow for an optimal stoichiometric ratio.

Even if you could, which you can’t kerosene only yields 18,500 Btu/lb in perfect conditions.

In open air you’d be lucky to get 20% of that efficiency, but even at 100% efficiency there aren’t enough BTU’s to heat up the steel past about 700 degrees.

If you use a full fuel loading with zero gallons burned in the fireball and zero gallons sent down the elevator shaft to blow up the lobby you still only have enough fuel to to get the steel up to 500 degrees or so. That’s with optimal heat transfer into the steel, best case conditions of delta-T and R values, with worst case delta-t for the heat LOSS from the steel. As material heat up they radiate and conduct heat AWAY at a rate governed by the temperature and ambient factors. So the hotter the steel gets the more heat it LOSES. This is why steel mills use crucibles to hold the steel as well as the heat.

The specific heat of steel is 240 btu/ton per degree > to raise the temp from ambient to 1800 degrees would require 432,000 btu/s ton at OPTIMAL efficiency. The concrete requires even more over 800,000 btu’s.

The the air also has to heat up, and air being a poor conductor and all the humidity in the air, the specific heat of water is 8 times higher than steel and 5 times high than concrete.

It’s a rather long equation but not really complex. Bottom line, not enough BTU to make the steel hot enough to fail. Can’t be done. Something else brought the buildings down. If they didn’t fall immediately after the impacts there is now way the fires could have triggered it as the tensile and compressive strength of the steel did not change at all ( reference the stress-strain diagram for structural steel) after the fires did their work. It never exceeded it’s maximum working stress, if it did, the top would have fallen over towards the point of maximum damage. It would have done this slowly as the stress progressed along to top of the curve to the point of maximum or ultimate strength. The metal would be very deformed at this point.

From the the origin to the point called proportional limit, the stress-strain curve is a straight line. This is called Hooke’s Law that within the proportional limit, the stress is directly proportional to strain up to the elastic limit. That is the limit beyond which the material will no longer go back to its original shape when the load is removed, or it is the maximum stress that may be developed such that there is no permanent or residual deformation when the load is entirely removed.

The structural damage by the impact either failed the structure right away or the it brought it past the elastic limit. If it reached a certain point – the curve here is actually longer that the portion from 0-the EL, the steel will start to deform plastically, that is bend like taffy. There was zero evidence of this.

The diagram for the temperatures tells us that the steel would have to attain a consistent temperature across the entire beam of way over 1500-1800 degrees, a point stress is not enough to induce failure, and there is no way to a localized temperature peak this high without the heat conducting to the rest of the beam. This is shown by the transfer equation is governed by the composition and shape of the beam, Shape is vital in that an I-beam or box had a high surface area to volume ratio, This means heat loss radiated away form the source of the heat is going to be very high, also humidity in the air will absorb the heat faster as water can take a lot of heat before raising it’s temperature so initial heat transfer AWAY form the steel will be even higher.

If as they will say that the fireproofing was all blown away by the impact makes it even harder, as the steel can radiate more heat if it is uncovered.

We can also calculate the rate of heat transfer INTO the steel beams. It is a function of the differential temperature, the specific heat of the steel, the surface area of the expose material and the R value of the air or any remaining building materials between the flame and the steel, as well as the airflow ( mass flow rate of hot air).

Al these factors except R can be definitively identified. using the maximum value for R, you’d run out of fuel ( assuming 100% fuel loading on the plane with zero for elevator shaft and fireball) before you got a 700 degree T-rise anywhere.

But the Kean Commission weenies also state that vast amounts of fuel poured down the elevator shafts to account for the damage to the ground floor. So where that that leave us?

You’d be lucky to be able to do a marshmallow roast with what was left after the fireball anyway.

It doesn’t work and there is no way to make it work. the official story is a sham and any one who believes it is an ignorant fool.

I couldn't have said it better.

FAA Memo: Feds Knew NYC Flyover Would Cause Panic - wcbstv.com/Fraudonomics

Found a new blog to add to the list: Fraudonomics.

Their posting can be read here: FAA Memo: Feds Knew NYC Flyover Would Cause Panic

I was listening to 1010WINS yesterday morning, before I had to deal with some personal business. I heard the newscast, and it is nothing more than part of a psychological operation. As I posted at this page, this is what we should have seen on the morning of September 11th, 2001; but instead, we were witness to a prior psy-op; the story of how 19 "Arabs" completely outwitted our military and were able to countermand the fundamental forces of physics and chemistry to disintegrate three buildings with naught but two planes.

Read that again...and think about how ridiculous that notion is...but you have been told that this is what happened.

Fighter jets were dispatched (albeit too late and haphazardly) to catch up to the passenger jets, even though their top speed triple what a passenger jet can achieve.

Jet fuel has a maximum burning temperature that cannot approach the melting point of construction steel, much less the amounts of steel used to construct WTC towers 1 & 2, yet they purportedly were the main force in the "collapse". Of course, the buildings did much more than simply collapse, didn't they?

Whoop...I did say three buildings, didn't I? How in the heck did that third building go? What...you say that NIST never checked for thermite, or any of its derivatives; and yet, peer-reviewed documentation exists that proves the presence of nano-thermite?

Oh, for shame.

9/11 Truth: Rudy Giuliani & the Feds Destroyed the WTC Evidence

9/11 Truth: Rudy Giuliani & the Feds Destroyed the WTC Evidence @ Yahoo! Video

This is in answer to the tools (doops) at Counterknowledge.

What Would It Take?

Michael Rivero has a great list of questions at this link...but there's one question that we need to get on the television screens, newspaper headlines and in the ears of radio listeners...and this is the question:

WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO CONVINCE YOU THAT THE EVENTS OF SEPTEMBER 11TH WERE AIDED AND ABETTED BY ELEMENTS OF THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION?

What can a 9/11 truther say to you to convince you?

Let's try out some samples:

"Well...Osama bin Laden done confess'd to it."

Osama bin Laden? Didn't you see Weekend At Bernie's? The dead guy who is paraded around for the entirety of the movie in a bid to convince everyone HE'S NOT DEAD?

C'mon...what's your next query?

"NIST reported that fire brought down WTC 7...that's an official agency."

Oh...and "official agencies" are immune from LIES?

I could go on all day...but I won't. I want you, dear readers, naysayers and advocates, to weigh in on this question.

What will it take...?

Witness To WTC Explosions On 9/11 Kills Himself

Before I begin...I'd like to thank the three German girls for their beautiful smiles, the nice rackage and the mini-"peep-show" the other day on the train - Danke, frauleins!

Let's get back to the message. Today's message is that someone who should be living the life of Reilly (or at least, some modicum of comfort), has instead been driven to suicide.

From: Rebels of America Blogspot
Date: Sep 5, 2008 3:20 PM

Witness To WTC Explosions On 9/11 Kills Himself

Suicide of hero WTC janitor raises suspicions among truth groups

A janitor who worked in one of the World Trade Center towers and helped save lives on 9/11, in addition to witnessing what he described as “explosions” in the tower basement, has committed suicide.

The New York Daily News reported yesterday that Kenny Johannemann shot himself in the head last Sunday, August 31, 2008.

Here is the entire text of the note, a picture of which can be found here, as reported in the Daily News:

“The reason I killed myself was ’cause I was getting evicted and can’t handle homelessness. I was also very depressed since I was in 9/11. I’ve been drinking way too much and it’s ruined my life. I’ve lost friends and family over drinking and I’m very lonely. There is nothing left for me to be happy about other than my cat. Sounds weird, but it’s true. I just wanted to say I’m sorry 2 any people I ever hurt in my life. I really was a good person when I wasn’t drinking. I hope people remember that.


Goodbye!!!

Kenny Johannemann”



According to the Daily News report, relatives found another letter next to his suicide note. The second letter (right), dated October 31 2001 and type written on White House stationery featuring the president’s signature, was an acknowledgement of Johannemann’s bravery on 9/11.


The letter refers to Johannemann's actions of pulling a burning survivor to safety, thus saving his life.


In the aftermath of the attacks, Johannemann appeared on the "Jenny Jones Show" to relate this story.

Johannemann’s employer at the time, ABM Industries featured him on the front cover of their 2002 magazine which recounted employee accounts of the events of 9/11.

The Daily News article features quotes from a Joseph Maya, described as a cousin of Johannemann. Maya reportedly stated that during this time after 9/11 Johannemann became reclusive and stopped associating with his family, something he had previously "delighted in".


It must be stressed that in such a delicate situation it is not our place to theorize on the tragic death of a someone who was clearly a very private person and whom those outside his own family know very little about.


However, it is our duty as a primary source of information for questions and repressed information surrounding the attacks of 9/11 to point out that Mr Johannemann was a key witness to what he described as "explosions" in the basement of the north tower of the WTC, and that his suicide has raised suspicions amongst some 9/11 researchers.

Like William Rodriguez, Kenny Johannemann was working as a janitor at the World Trade Center towers on September 11th.
He appeared on live TV on the morning of 9/11, a clip that later became viral on the internet and has been used in several 9/11 truth documentaries, including William Rodriguez’s Last Man Out.

In the clip (featured below) Johannemann states that a second "explosion" occurred in the north tower 10 minutes after an "explosion" in the south tower. The footage shows the two burning towers in the background before they were demolished.

Johannemann describes how he was in the basement and witnessed the elevator "blow up" and how he dragged a man out whose "skin was hanging off". This is identical to the story that William Rodriguez has related, the only difference being that he continues to tell it in the spotlight in public venues across the world.

Infowars.net

Bill Maher - You SUCK

Update: Here's a sentiment I believe that Bill "I'll Suck You Dry For Two Bits" Maher would espouse: NSA Security Officer: We Should Just Kill Troublesome Bloggers

Where do these guys come up with these nicknames? Crazy bunch of neoCONs...

Alrighty now...

Yes...someone actually landed in the frying pan after making up this Flash animation to advertise a party.

Oh, dear.

In other news...

What is AIPAC?


Jessica Wilson Attacked For Asking About C.F.R. in Houston, TX by FOX News Shill



From the old gray lady...Blurry Peek at Questioning of a Guantánamo Inmate

The image at the top is by Mike Flugennock - nice work!

And yes...I almost forgot...have you heard the nonsense about TWA Flight 800, and the so-called "measures" taken to ensure that there are no more "fuel explosions" on future flights...how stupid are WE THE PEOPLE supposed to be?!?

A missile hit that flight, and the attempts at a cover-up have all but failed in the minds of critical thinkers.

An interesting page: 9/11 Photos by Russian Pilot

Repost (edited)

You will learn what the New World Order is, WHAT THEY HAVE PLANNED, and how AT THIS MOMENT THEY ARE CARRYING IT OUT! It's all about DEPOPULATION.

Now do you get it about vaccines?

Alex Jones is on a 24/7 refeed [Windows] [Macintosh] so you can hear a new show everyday during the 24 hours.

It is chilling, it's riveting, it will pound you to your core...BUT IT WILL SHAKE YOU AND WAKE YOU UP.

WAKING UP IS THE ONLY CHANCE YOU AND YOUR FAMILY HAVE!


QUESTION YOUR REALITY--ALEX JONES!


This woman was thrown in jail after calling the judge an asshole...watch the video to see why...

How the HELL did this idiot judge get appointed to the bench?

How much penis does this guy inhale to make such screwed-up decisions?

How did the foreigner indicate that they didn't speak ENGLISH - by telling them in ENGLISH?

"No prob...you can go...but you, with the heart condition...I'm going to grip my peanut-sized member and show you who's the BOSS here!"

Jerkoff.

Time To Get Serious

With the attack on prize-winning journalist Mohammed Omer, it's time for those of us who have elected to wrest control of the world back from the scumbags to begin to kick it into high gear.

I was speaking with some co-workers in regards to the idea that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a MADMAN.

I immediately cautioned my colleagues to actually research the quote attributed to him, and that they would find that he NEVER SAID THE WORDS ATTRIBUTED TO HIM.

He never said he wanted to wipe Israel off of the map. Conversely, Zionists and Israeli settlers are doing their best to push Palestinians, oft referred to as "crocodiles", off of the aforementioned map.

Got a little quiet in the office...but that's not my problem if people don't want to deal with the TRUTH.

Same with an old bud of mine. He sent to me an email complaining about Barack Obama. I wrote back (and copied all he'd sent this missive to) an explanation of why NO ONE should vote for John "Songbird" McCain, who made propaganda videos for the Viet Cong, and who may not even qualify as an AMERICAN, thereby VOIDING him as a Presidential candidate.

I received back some whining crap about how they didn't want to receive emails on their personal device from people they don't know.

In other words:

"I wanna stay in my stupid, insular world, where John McCain is a wonderful man who was a POW and suffered TERRIBLY; and I wanna make him my Commander-In-Chief! President Bush didn't do nuthin' wrong...and all youse who think the gubbermint has ANYTHING to do with 9/11 should be ashamed...here's yer borscht and yer vodka...'cause you GOTTA be a stinkin' COMMIE or sumthin'..."

To all "youse" who believe in this rhetoric - YOU are welcome to eat my sphincter cheese.

You are an enabler of the highest degree.

You have allowed the freedoms hard-fought for by our ancestors to be ERODED.

To HELL WITH ALL OF YOU!

DAMN ALL OF YOU.

I will NO LONGER hold my tongue...so please...if you are within earshot, and you spout ANY of this garbage, be ready for the ONSLAUGHT.

I'LL TEAR YOU A NEW ONE, and smile the entire time. Trust me...it's more painful than it sounds.

Last, but not least...I was checking David McGowan's page to see if there were any updates on his Inside the LC series: The Strange but Mostly True Story of Laurel Canyon and the Birth of the Hippie Generation; it is up to number 7 in a series of 12 postings. At any rate, he had a number of pieces pertaining to the events of September 11th, 2001, and this posting is titled, "On Courage And Patriotism".

The tool who commented on this article had posted a link to a column by Charlie Brooker - well, here's a link to the Comments section - enjoy!

Rosie O'Donnell 9/11 Conspiracy Comments: Popular Mechanics Responds

Click here to listen to Charles Goyette

Recently, Rosie O’Donnell, a co-host of ABC talk show The View, made comments on the show that renewed controversy over the collapse of World Trade Center 7.

While saying she didn’t know what to believe about the U.S. government’s involvement in the attacks of Sept. 11, she said, “I do believe that it’s the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel. I do believe that it defies physics that World Trade Center tower 7—building 7, which collapsed in on itself—it is impossible for a building to fall the way it fell without explosives being involved. World Trade Center 7. World Trade [Center] 1 and 2 got hit by planes—7, miraculously, the first time in history, steel was melted by fire. It is physically impossible.”

She continued: “To say that we don’t know that it imploded, that it was an implosion and a demolition, is beyond ignorant. Look at the films, get a physics expert here [on the show] from Yale, from Harvard, pick the school—[the collapse] defies reason.” (Watch the clip here)

For those interested in what physics and demolition experts have said regarding WTC 7’s collapse, as detailed in our book Debunking 9/11 Myths, Popular Mechanics offers these notes:

1. Initial reports from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) misunderstood the amount of damage the 47-floor WTC7 sustained from the debris of the falling North Tower—because in early photographs, WTC7 was obscured by smoke and debris.

Towers 1 and 7 were approximately 300 ft. apart, and pictures like the ones here and here offer a clear visual of how small that distance is for structures that large. After further studies, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) told Popular Mechanics that debris from the 110-floor North Tower hit WTC7 with the force of a volcanic eruption. Nearly a quarter of the building was carved away over the bottom 10 stories on its south face, and significant damage was visible up to the 18th floor (see p. 24 of this report, and the screengrab below of an image of WTC7's damaged south face).



The unusual design of WTC7 is also crucial to the discussion, in that key columns supported extreme loads—as much as 2000 sq. ft. of floor area for each floor—as the building straddled an electrical substation. “What our preliminary analysis has shown is that if you take out just one column on one of the lower floors,” NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder told Popular Mechanics, “it could cause a vertical progression of collapse so that the entire section comes down.” The tower wasn’t hit by a plane, but it was severely wounded by the collapse of the North Tower. Which is when the fires started.

2. The North and South Towers of the World Trade Center weren’t knocked down by planes—they both stood for more than a half-hour after the impacts. But the crashes destroyed support columns and ignited infernos that ultimately weakened—not melted—the steel structures until the towers could no longer support their own weights (NIST offers a primer here). Ms. O’Donnell fundamentally misstates the case with her use of the word “melted”: Evidence currently points to WTC7 also collapsing because fires weakened its ravaged steel structure.

Tower 7 housed the city’s emergency command center, so there were a number of fuel tanks located throughout the building—including two 6000-gal. tanks in the basement that fed some generators in the building by pressurized lines. “Our working hypothesis is that this pressurized line was supplying fuel [to the fire] for a long period of time,” according to Sunder. Steel melts at about 2,750 degrees Fahrenheit—but it loses strength at temperatures as low as 400 F. When temperatures break 1000 degrees F, steel loses nearly 50 percent of its strength. It is unknown what temperatures were reached inside WTC7, but fires in the building raged for seven hours before the collapse.

3. Demolition experts tell Popular Mechanics that wiring a building the size of WTC7 for clandestine demolition would present insurmountable logistical challenges. That issue aside, there’s a clear-cut engineering explanation for why the building fell the way it did. Trusses on the fifth and seventh floors of the building were designed to transfer loads from one set of columns to another; with the south face heavily damaged, the other columns were likely overtaxed. In engineering terms, the “progressive collapse” began on the eastern side, when weakened columns failed from the damage and fire. The entire building fell in on itself as the slumping east side dragged down the west side in a diagonal pattern. Still, damage to the Verizon Building (see p. 21 of this report), directly west of WTC7, and to Fiterman Hall (see here) directly north, show that it was hardly an orderly collapse.

NIST is currently preparing its final report on the collapse of WTC7, which is expected to be released this spring. In order to address concerns of conspiracy theorists, the organization added “Hypothetical Blast Analysis” to its research, according to a December 2006 progress report. The report also points out that “NIST has found no evidence of a blast or controlled demolition.”

"Yup...just move along...nothing to see here..."

I WON'T MOVE ALONG...

Please watch this video...it's just over an hour long: Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime: Crisis In America

9/11 Coincidences (Part Eight) UPDATE

Oh, dear...it looks as if the dam is fit to burst, eh, dear readers?

The scuttlebutt on this video is that it's being removed faster than Jenna Bush's underwear at a frat house (I was gonna say Lindsey Lohan, but I LOVE that girl...and I don't like our scumbag lapdog media trying to portray her in a similar light as our recently-married cum-dumpster...oh...THAT'S gonna leave a mark!); but this should convince even the retarded among us that the three buildings that "failed", "blew up", "came down", whatever bloody euphemism one wishes to use, WERE BROUGHT DOWN BY CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

PERIOD.

In case the video is "Orwellized" as in the Bill O'Reilly Inside Edition Rant, please find it here - 9-11 Coincidences (Part Eight) UPDATE.

From a previous rant:

As far as the buildings...how does one reconcile the actual physics and chemistry involved? And those are my weakest science subjects!

I wonder if people realize that they paid to hear Rudolph Giuliani lie to them for over six years? Maybe that's why his campaign went into the shitter! Ha ha, scumbag!

You see, for me, it's a matter of these fucking retards lying to my face about what occurred - the whole story is a farce from beginning to end.

Some idiot ex-CIA guy is actually the leader of some rebel force that is so fearsome, they named themselves after a toilet - this guy is also on a dialysis machine, yet is able to elude any and all forces sent to detain him! Wow! Colonel Kurtz's got nothing on this guy!

Now...he informs the Israelis, and they are able to send out a warning...how nice.

Meanwhile, back in NYC, it's a crystal-clear day...four planes take off from Logan Airport...security managed by an Israeli firm...hey...did they get that warning, too?

Willie Brown knows not to fly.

The Senate is on Cipro.

Salman Rushdie is barred from flying.

First plane impacts with WTC2 - The Monkey King states that he saw the first impact as it occurred...imagine that.

There are Israelis doing the frickin' Riverdance all over the city. Some are so excited, they left their businesses in the WTC buildings! Some, days earlier.

White vans with "non-Arab Middle Easterners" pop up like Sir Charge in that not-so-great Whack-A-Octogenarian commercial (the first Sir Charge commercial was genius...but they "jumped the shark" on the concept already). Ooohh...the bomb-sniffing dogs are going wild! Too bad that they had been removed from the WTC complex in the weeks before the infamous "event".

Binyamin Netanyahu realizes, "Hey - this is frickin' great - now the whole damn world will stop criticizing us on our "appropriation" of Palestine...eh...what? No, schmuck, I meant Jerusalem!"

Another plane...er...where's our air defense?

Richard B. "Skeletor" Cheney: "Hey...just for laughs, let's have a commercial plane totally violate the air space of the NERVE CENTER OF THE UNITED STATES' DEFENSE DEPARTMENT!!! Then let's hide all of the video! The CT's will be eating their own feces trying to figure out what happened!"

Oh, crap! You mean the frickin' passengers got into the cockpit and saw that NO ONE'S FLYING THE DAMN PLANE?!? Shite! SHOOT THAT FUCKER DOWN! And get Ted Olson's wife to do a reading for us...you have that voice-morphing software ready to go? Let's start with this Mark Bingham guy..."

Hey...bonanza! Not only did we happen to pop the trunk of the guy who took the terrorists to the airport; we got two, count 'em, TWO, passports! Geez, I need a suit made out of this stuff.

Folks...I could rant on and on...but it's annoying, I'm sure, to constantly listen to someone sound so bloody self-righteous all the time, yes? I believe that this is the main problem facing the various September 11th Truth Factions. You see...right-wing radio shows conduct what they call "drive-by" broadcasts, saying whatever crap they can make up at the time, then having sycophants to cement said issue in the "minds" of the dittoheads/Factor fans, etc; while left-wing broadcasters heap boring-ass fact after boring-ass fact onerously one after another, until even the most die-hard truth-seeker is dulled into a coma.

Well...my case is a bit different than most.

I DON'T LIKE BEING LIED TO BY IDIOTS.

And understand this: anyone who thought that after watching those damned buildings come down in the fashion that they did, that they were felled by AIRPLANES...ahh...you really are a complete dullard. You DESERVE to be euthanized, sterilized, and relegated to being a "useless eater", and you should consider yourself a complete waste of oxygen.

That's all for now.

UPDATE: Senator Ted Kennedy is relaxing in a hospital after reports that he was suffering from seizures...so, I'm watching CNN, and of course, the candidates are taking this opportunity to give their well wishes to their fellow senator...but I was INCENSED to see Shillary STANDING IN FRONT OF MAKER'S MARK WHISKEY BARRELS AS SHE GAVE HER "BEST WISHES"!

One might think that it was a nice thing to do, considering if one knows anything about Senator Edward Kennedy, he likes his booze (much as a certain political upstart does, as well), but I consider it a subconscious dig at her fellow senator. If anyone has a screenshot, please send it my way...I need a new wallpaper for my iBook.

Senator Kennedy, I hope to see you in a new man-tailored shirt soon, er ah...