It's been over fifteen years since the events of September 11, 2001; yet, we haven't yet seen any possibility of bringing those whom perpetrated the event to justice...at least, until NOW.
That's a hell of a claim to make.
I can back it up.
I was going to do this in video form, but as a one-man operation, it could be messy, and not look at all professional. Feel free to take this information and make a goo video out of it - just be sure to credit hANOVER fIST when you do.
So...here we go.
Not many people were aware of the "collapse" of the Salomon Brothers Building n that day; some people are still only aware of the WTC Buildings 1 and 2, even to this day.
The Salomon Brothers Building is more popularly known as WTC Building Seven, or WTC7. This building housed former NYC Mayor Rudolph "America's Asshole" Giuliani's Emergency Preparedness Center, recommended by Jerome Hauer.
It IS the smoking gun of the events of September 11.
Here's why:
The script followed every mass casualty event since: the event begins; seeds are planted as to whom the perps are; the event continues; crisis actors establish pre-planned storylines; the event concludes; perps are identified/caught/murdered.
Have I missed anything?
So far, I haven't said anything that you haven't read on any site worth its pixels.
Here's the thinking that went outside the box.
The planners weren't American, because of Greenwich Mean Time.
What the hell is that supposed to mean?
The appearance of Flight 93 at the site of WTC7 fell through, but the planners quickly regained their wits, and set up their back-up plan. WTC7 was ALWAYS meant to go belly-up, consdering the hardware that had to be removed from sight. Barry Jennings was also a loose cannon who had to be liquidated.
So, plans were set to "pull" WTC7 later in the day, after everything seemed to be at its end.
So the script set forward, "WTC7 to go at 4:20 PM".
I thought about this for a while. 4:20 is a reference to marijuana, and being able to align the reference to arijuana to a catastrophic event such as a building collapse would fuck with the brains of stoners from here until time immemorial.
Sheer luck screwed that up for them; that, and someone whom couldn't correctly translate GMT into Eastern without using two hands, their feet and a calculator.
Witness, first, Jane Standley from BBC:
Next, Aaron Bron from CNN:
Just think about this for a second.
If they weren't on auto-pilot, how could they have possibly made the mistake in TWO NEWS ORGANIZATIONS OCEANS APART?
This is where the investigaton needs to start, and this is where we can finally obtain justice for the Americans murdered, and for the hapless Middle Eastern people whose lives were wasted in a masquerade of a NEW PEARL HARBOR.
You can thank PNAC for that.
Showing posts with label WTC 1. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WTC 1. Show all posts
Thursday, October 6, 2016
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
A Direct Challenge To The WaterHeads At CounterKnowledge And Any Dishonest Intellectuals
I had an epiphany this morning.
This was courtesy of, indirectly, David McGowan. Thanks, pal.
A fellow by the name of Lyle Burkhead has made the breakthrough I should have had ages ago...but sometimes one just needs to come at things from a different perspective.
So...what exactly is it that has me in such a lather? It is this: As of this day, Wednesday, December 15th, 2010, there stands NO PROOF WHATSOEVER that there were ever gas chambers in existence during World War 2 for the express purpose of murder.
NONE.
Do we have here just another dull-witted "denial" of the Holocaust?
My answer here will be an emphatic NO. If you've ever read my past material on this blog, you will see that I dispute the facts of the Holocaust; indeed, many aspects of the "official" story have been disproven - for example, Anne Frank's diary; the shrunken heads, the lampshades and soap made from Jews; Benjamin Wilkorminski's story; Misha DeFonseca/Monique van der Wal's tale of being raised by wolves, Herman Rosenblat's tale of the "girl with an orange"; I could go on and on...but the biggest aspect of this tale involves the presence and/or feasibility of the "gas chambers", in which the majority of the "six million" Jews purportedly lost their lives.
A number of researchers have been to these facilities, and their various researches have determined that the edifices could in no way serve as homicidal gas chambers. the buildings were not airtight; the doors were not secure; and, most importantly, they did not test positive for the presence of residues that would be present if the rooms were used as gas chambers. Just perform a search, and this information will become apparent.
The paper discusses the chicanery involved in convincing you and I of the "certainty" of this aspect of the Holocaust story. Where I failed to notice the flim-flammery of the story was because of the skill in which Michael Shermer, editor of Skeptic Magazine, works his semantics. he goes on and on about proving the science of the story, and then proceeds to present NOT ONE WHIT OF PROOF.
As a September 11th scholar, this should have made itself apparent, and here's my correlation: how does one account for this aspect of the Holocaust not being required to adhere to the normal standard of proof, much like how on September 11th, 2001, we were fed a tale in which standard practices were ignored, obfuscated and outright dismissed?
We were told that "jet fuel" and "the impacts of the planes" contributed to the destruction of WTC Buildings 1 & 2. Of course, no explanation is given as to why WTC Building 7 collapsed in much the same fashion as the others, where no plane impact was committed. Intercept practices were not performed as they had multiple times previously; other procedures were changed without justification; and, most glaring to my perception, none of these failures were punished; rather, whistleblowers were not afforded protection from reprisals; ridiculous cover stories were offered to explain away inconsistencies; yet those "explanations" served to discredit other established "aspects" of the events of September 11th, 2001.
The burden of proof is usually upon proving that some event did in fact occur; the fact remains that one cannot prove a negative. So, when a revisionist opines that the gas chamber story doesn't hold water, he is not bound to prove that the whole of the Holocaust did not occur; rather, that burden of proof is upon those who insist on going along with the story that these facilities did indeed exist, at the specific time period, for that express purpose. For some reason, we have been blinded into going along with this logical fallacy.
I have seen the light...will you?
This was courtesy of, indirectly, David McGowan. Thanks, pal.
A fellow by the name of Lyle Burkhead has made the breakthrough I should have had ages ago...but sometimes one just needs to come at things from a different perspective.
So...what exactly is it that has me in such a lather? It is this: As of this day, Wednesday, December 15th, 2010, there stands NO PROOF WHATSOEVER that there were ever gas chambers in existence during World War 2 for the express purpose of murder.
NONE.
Do we have here just another dull-witted "denial" of the Holocaust?
My answer here will be an emphatic NO. If you've ever read my past material on this blog, you will see that I dispute the facts of the Holocaust; indeed, many aspects of the "official" story have been disproven - for example, Anne Frank's diary; the shrunken heads, the lampshades and soap made from Jews; Benjamin Wilkorminski's story; Misha DeFonseca/Monique van der Wal's tale of being raised by wolves, Herman Rosenblat's tale of the "girl with an orange"; I could go on and on...but the biggest aspect of this tale involves the presence and/or feasibility of the "gas chambers", in which the majority of the "six million" Jews purportedly lost their lives.
A number of researchers have been to these facilities, and their various researches have determined that the edifices could in no way serve as homicidal gas chambers. the buildings were not airtight; the doors were not secure; and, most importantly, they did not test positive for the presence of residues that would be present if the rooms were used as gas chambers. Just perform a search, and this information will become apparent.
The paper discusses the chicanery involved in convincing you and I of the "certainty" of this aspect of the Holocaust story. Where I failed to notice the flim-flammery of the story was because of the skill in which Michael Shermer, editor of Skeptic Magazine, works his semantics. he goes on and on about proving the science of the story, and then proceeds to present NOT ONE WHIT OF PROOF.
As a September 11th scholar, this should have made itself apparent, and here's my correlation: how does one account for this aspect of the Holocaust not being required to adhere to the normal standard of proof, much like how on September 11th, 2001, we were fed a tale in which standard practices were ignored, obfuscated and outright dismissed?
We were told that "jet fuel" and "the impacts of the planes" contributed to the destruction of WTC Buildings 1 & 2. Of course, no explanation is given as to why WTC Building 7 collapsed in much the same fashion as the others, where no plane impact was committed. Intercept practices were not performed as they had multiple times previously; other procedures were changed without justification; and, most glaring to my perception, none of these failures were punished; rather, whistleblowers were not afforded protection from reprisals; ridiculous cover stories were offered to explain away inconsistencies; yet those "explanations" served to discredit other established "aspects" of the events of September 11th, 2001.
The burden of proof is usually upon proving that some event did in fact occur; the fact remains that one cannot prove a negative. So, when a revisionist opines that the gas chamber story doesn't hold water, he is not bound to prove that the whole of the Holocaust did not occur; rather, that burden of proof is upon those who insist on going along with the story that these facilities did indeed exist, at the specific time period, for that express purpose. For some reason, we have been blinded into going along with this logical fallacy.
I have seen the light...will you?
Saturday, September 11, 2010
A Moment Of Silence (For Nine Years)
I woke up this morning and turned on 1010WINS. The anchors were having a moment of silence to "commemorate" the "strikes" upon the two buildings that formerly held the title of the tallest building(s).
Why do I have the word "strikes" in quotes? I believe that the so-called airplane impacts "officially" noted as the reason for the collapse to WTC buildings 1 and 2 are absolute MISDIRECTION. My posit is that the buildings were razed by some method of controlled demolition, as noted by Van Romero on the very day (only to be half-heartedly recanted ten days later), and as posited by numerous individuals, such as Dr. Niels Harrit, Danny Jowenko, Kevin Ryan, Kevin Barrett, Richard Gage, and Steven Jones, among others; and if one takes it to the next logical step, and posit that the WHOLE of the "official" theory does not hold water, then one must dismiss EVERY FACET of said theory.
So...NO JET PLANE IMPACTS. That means no unnecessary discussion regarding whether jet fuel fires can, in fact, weaken industrial steel to the point of collapse...or, more to the point, ABSOLUTE DISINTEGRATION. That is what we all saw on the morning of September 11th, 2001, isn't it? That was followed by the inexplicable collapse/disintegration of the Saloman Brothers building, more commonly known as WTC 7. Within that building were two things of note: "America's Asshole" Rudolph Giuliani's command center, complete with its own supply of liquid fuel; and the records for numerous investigations highlighting malfeasance of the highest order - those investigations have come to an end, and the perpetrators are free to enjoy their ill-gotten gains.
Our news agencies were actually doing their jobs as human beings during the beginning of the events of September 11th, 2001; you'll note, if you paid attention to the wording of the initial broadcasts, that the word "explosion" was used to describe the events of the morning; William Rodriguez's and Barry Jennings' accounts make a compelling argument for pre-existing conditions within the WTC complex; yet, as the day went by, the word from up above (and by that, I mean the various heads of CBS, NBC, FOX, ABC, CNN, BBC, etc.) was that the word "explosion" was NOT to be used to describe the events of the day.
We were regaled with the notion that a "former" CIA asset gone wrong, Tim Osman, had adopted "Islam" and is fomenting "Jihad" against the "Satan United States" as Osama bin Laden.
[Sidenote: I want to mention here that we aren't, I suppose, to reflect upon the fact that, as with the attempted "assassination" attempt upon President Ronald Reagan, where Vice-President George Herbert Walker Bush was having dinner with Hinckley's father, that his son, George Walker Bush was a business associate with the bin Laden family et. al. - nothing to see here...just move along...but I digress.]
Herewith, scant minutes after the beginning of the hugest clusterfuck to occur as of yet on our shores, George Tenet is absolutely convinced that this bin Laden guy is the mastermind of this event. Uh, Georgie...we haven't yet investigated this...oh, wait - you have a VIDEOTAPE? But that's a fat guy! I thought he was on dialysis! Trust you? Well, okay...why would you lie to us, right?
There's more? Four planes were hijacked from Logan Airport? All of the "security" was performed by ICTS? Isn't that an Israeli company? Why the heck are we not using an American company for that? All right, let's forget about that for now...WHAT? A WHAT hit the WHAT? The PENTAGON?!? The nerve center of America's defenses?!? Why does that NOT MAKE ANY BLOODY SENSE?!? Now what? You found some Middle Eastern guys in a white van with boxcutters, cash and explosive residue? YEAH!!! Let's hold those motherfuckers - we'll get some info outta th - wait...they're not the right kind of Middle Easterners? They were doing WHAT? High-fiving while the WTC buildings burned? Somebody get that fat-ass Sharon on the line - WHAT NOW? Netanyahu said WHAT?!? The attack was GOOD? Oh...no; he meant that it was good for Israel. WTF does that fucking mean? Oh, well, they are the "only democracy in the Middle East", with their Apartheid Wall and all...WHAT NOW?!?! One of the buildings COLLAPSED?!? Geez. Wait...how come the second one collapsed first? Am I missing something here? Wait...now the second one? Well, at least we won't see any more of that...
...of course, until 5:20 PM.
I have come to the conclusion that our so-called media watchdogs have been naught but propagandists for the fifth columnists propagated within our government, our representatives and our businesses. I have christened them "Distraction Media", as their aim is to distract us with absolute and utter bullshit; case in point - reality TV. The idea that you can take some asshat, shove a camera in their face and make compelling drama has to be the sounding of the death knell of civilization.
The media went along with the obfuscation of the reasons behind World Wars 1 and 2;
didn't bat an eye when "lone nut assassins" went on to murder President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcolm X and Robert Francis Kennedy;
went along with the utter lies involved in the attack upon the crew of the U.S.S. Liberty;
hid the truth of the October Surprise; covered up the Iran-Contra scandal, thereby allowing America's Black communities to be submerged in the CIA's newest invention, crack cocaine;
allowed former CIA Director and former Vice-President George H. W. Bush a term as President of the United States, only the very following day admitting that his son Neil Bush was on the Board of Directors of Silverado S & L, allowing Americans to be fleeced of their life savings;
assisted with the coverup of the deaths of Don Henry and Kevin Ives, who unwittingly discovered the drug running in Mena, Arkansas, which would have blown any chance of Arkansas Governor William Jefferson Clinton of gaining the Presidency;
let the obvious murder of Vincent Foster go unchallenged; gave the FBI a pass when they provided REAL EXPLOSIVES to a bunch of idiots who went on to damage the basements of the WTC in 1993; watched as the Weavers were murdered at Ruby Ridge;
applauded the ATF as they murdered women and children at the WACO massacre;
completely divorced yourselves from reality by going along with the retarded story of how Timothy McVeigh blew up the Murrah Building with a truck bomb, when unexploded devices were removed from the buildings, only to never be heard of again;
made a spectacle of then-President Clinton getting a hummer from a fat chick and blowing in excess of $40 MILLION DOLLARS on a porn shoot by Kenneth Starr, instead of dealing with the more ominous threat of a spy within the confines of the White House;
and enabled the stealing of the Presidency, not once, but TWICE.
And I have to mention the theft of Americans' savings, once again, with that circle-jerk known as the Enron scandal.
Need I go on?
To you utter scumbags: you have engaged in a "moment of silence" that has lasted for over NINE YEARS. You allowed FEMA to duck the question of why they were in New York City on September 10th, 2001; you allowed NIST to submit a report that doesn't even account for how and why WTC 7 collapsed; you allowed "America's Asshole" Rudolph Giuliani to ship the evidence that would have proven conclusively, if scientists had been given access to said materials, what caused the utter destruction of those buildings within the WTC complex; you allowed Larry "Two Sheds" Silverstein to recoup BILLIONS of dollars from an investment that should have lifted eyebrows from here to Timbuktu; you allowed Christie Todd Whitman to get away with stating that "the air was safe to breathe" in Lower Manhattan; in short, you joined in the collective rape of WE THE PEOPLE.
Are you proud of yourselves? Do you not yet understand that you have contributed to your own destruction? Don't you realize that you are losing jobs left and right because you decided to be lapdogs for scumbags, and ceased being the watchdogs for WE THE PEOPLE?
Now, the question remains...will you remain silent?
Why do I have the word "strikes" in quotes? I believe that the so-called airplane impacts "officially" noted as the reason for the collapse to WTC buildings 1 and 2 are absolute MISDIRECTION. My posit is that the buildings were razed by some method of controlled demolition, as noted by Van Romero on the very day (only to be half-heartedly recanted ten days later), and as posited by numerous individuals, such as Dr. Niels Harrit, Danny Jowenko, Kevin Ryan, Kevin Barrett, Richard Gage, and Steven Jones, among others; and if one takes it to the next logical step, and posit that the WHOLE of the "official" theory does not hold water, then one must dismiss EVERY FACET of said theory.
So...NO JET PLANE IMPACTS. That means no unnecessary discussion regarding whether jet fuel fires can, in fact, weaken industrial steel to the point of collapse...or, more to the point, ABSOLUTE DISINTEGRATION. That is what we all saw on the morning of September 11th, 2001, isn't it? That was followed by the inexplicable collapse/disintegration of the Saloman Brothers building, more commonly known as WTC 7. Within that building were two things of note: "America's Asshole" Rudolph Giuliani's command center, complete with its own supply of liquid fuel; and the records for numerous investigations highlighting malfeasance of the highest order - those investigations have come to an end, and the perpetrators are free to enjoy their ill-gotten gains.
Our news agencies were actually doing their jobs as human beings during the beginning of the events of September 11th, 2001; you'll note, if you paid attention to the wording of the initial broadcasts, that the word "explosion" was used to describe the events of the morning; William Rodriguez's and Barry Jennings' accounts make a compelling argument for pre-existing conditions within the WTC complex; yet, as the day went by, the word from up above (and by that, I mean the various heads of CBS, NBC, FOX, ABC, CNN, BBC, etc.) was that the word "explosion" was NOT to be used to describe the events of the day.
We were regaled with the notion that a "former" CIA asset gone wrong, Tim Osman, had adopted "Islam" and is fomenting "Jihad" against the "Satan United States" as Osama bin Laden.
[Sidenote: I want to mention here that we aren't, I suppose, to reflect upon the fact that, as with the attempted "assassination" attempt upon President Ronald Reagan, where Vice-President George Herbert Walker Bush was having dinner with Hinckley's father, that his son, George Walker Bush was a business associate with the bin Laden family et. al. - nothing to see here...just move along...but I digress.]
Herewith, scant minutes after the beginning of the hugest clusterfuck to occur as of yet on our shores, George Tenet is absolutely convinced that this bin Laden guy is the mastermind of this event. Uh, Georgie...we haven't yet investigated this...oh, wait - you have a VIDEOTAPE? But that's a fat guy! I thought he was on dialysis! Trust you? Well, okay...why would you lie to us, right?
There's more? Four planes were hijacked from Logan Airport? All of the "security" was performed by ICTS? Isn't that an Israeli company? Why the heck are we not using an American company for that? All right, let's forget about that for now...WHAT? A WHAT hit the WHAT? The PENTAGON?!? The nerve center of America's defenses?!? Why does that NOT MAKE ANY BLOODY SENSE?!? Now what? You found some Middle Eastern guys in a white van with boxcutters, cash and explosive residue? YEAH!!! Let's hold those motherfuckers - we'll get some info outta th - wait...they're not the right kind of Middle Easterners? They were doing WHAT? High-fiving while the WTC buildings burned? Somebody get that fat-ass Sharon on the line - WHAT NOW? Netanyahu said WHAT?!? The attack was GOOD? Oh...no; he meant that it was good for Israel. WTF does that fucking mean? Oh, well, they are the "only democracy in the Middle East", with their Apartheid Wall and all...WHAT NOW?!?! One of the buildings COLLAPSED?!? Geez. Wait...how come the second one collapsed first? Am I missing something here? Wait...now the second one? Well, at least we won't see any more of that...
...of course, until 5:20 PM.
I have come to the conclusion that our so-called media watchdogs have been naught but propagandists for the fifth columnists propagated within our government, our representatives and our businesses. I have christened them "Distraction Media", as their aim is to distract us with absolute and utter bullshit; case in point - reality TV. The idea that you can take some asshat, shove a camera in their face and make compelling drama has to be the sounding of the death knell of civilization.
The media went along with the obfuscation of the reasons behind World Wars 1 and 2;
didn't bat an eye when "lone nut assassins" went on to murder President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcolm X and Robert Francis Kennedy;
went along with the utter lies involved in the attack upon the crew of the U.S.S. Liberty;
hid the truth of the October Surprise; covered up the Iran-Contra scandal, thereby allowing America's Black communities to be submerged in the CIA's newest invention, crack cocaine;
allowed former CIA Director and former Vice-President George H. W. Bush a term as President of the United States, only the very following day admitting that his son Neil Bush was on the Board of Directors of Silverado S & L, allowing Americans to be fleeced of their life savings;
assisted with the coverup of the deaths of Don Henry and Kevin Ives, who unwittingly discovered the drug running in Mena, Arkansas, which would have blown any chance of Arkansas Governor William Jefferson Clinton of gaining the Presidency;
let the obvious murder of Vincent Foster go unchallenged; gave the FBI a pass when they provided REAL EXPLOSIVES to a bunch of idiots who went on to damage the basements of the WTC in 1993; watched as the Weavers were murdered at Ruby Ridge;
applauded the ATF as they murdered women and children at the WACO massacre;
completely divorced yourselves from reality by going along with the retarded story of how Timothy McVeigh blew up the Murrah Building with a truck bomb, when unexploded devices were removed from the buildings, only to never be heard of again;
made a spectacle of then-President Clinton getting a hummer from a fat chick and blowing in excess of $40 MILLION DOLLARS on a porn shoot by Kenneth Starr, instead of dealing with the more ominous threat of a spy within the confines of the White House;
and enabled the stealing of the Presidency, not once, but TWICE.
And I have to mention the theft of Americans' savings, once again, with that circle-jerk known as the Enron scandal.
Need I go on?
To you utter scumbags: you have engaged in a "moment of silence" that has lasted for over NINE YEARS. You allowed FEMA to duck the question of why they were in New York City on September 10th, 2001; you allowed NIST to submit a report that doesn't even account for how and why WTC 7 collapsed; you allowed "America's Asshole" Rudolph Giuliani to ship the evidence that would have proven conclusively, if scientists had been given access to said materials, what caused the utter destruction of those buildings within the WTC complex; you allowed Larry "Two Sheds" Silverstein to recoup BILLIONS of dollars from an investment that should have lifted eyebrows from here to Timbuktu; you allowed Christie Todd Whitman to get away with stating that "the air was safe to breathe" in Lower Manhattan; in short, you joined in the collective rape of WE THE PEOPLE.
Are you proud of yourselves? Do you not yet understand that you have contributed to your own destruction? Don't you realize that you are losing jobs left and right because you decided to be lapdogs for scumbags, and ceased being the watchdogs for WE THE PEOPLE?
Now, the question remains...will you remain silent?
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
An Appeal to Firefighters, Present and Past from a retired FDNY Lieutenant - Fire Fighters For 9/11 Truth
I've been waiting for a firefighter to finally get their dander up and write this...so, without further ado...I present to you, dear readers, Fire Fighters For 9/11 Truth:
Please go to the site to donate, to sign the petition or to assist with unearthing the truth behind the events of September 11th, 2001.
An Appeal to Firefighters, Present and Past from a retired FDNY Lieutenant
Fellow Firefighters, A great tragedy befell our community on September 11, 2001, an unprecedented 343 deaths in the line of duty. As horrible as that toll is, if there were a rational explanation for it, we could accept it and mourn. We all understood the risk we accepted when we took the oath of office, that chance might cut short our lives when we placed ourselves in harm’s way in the public’s service. This is what we are paid for and it is our honor. However, in short, the official explanation of the events of that day are not only insufficient, they are fantastic and cannot bear rational examination. We are asked to believe that on that day three structural steel buildings, which have never before in history collapsed because of fire, fell neatly into their basements at the speed of gravity, their concrete reduced to dust. We are asked to believe that jet fuel (kerosene) can melt steel. We are asked to believe that the most sophisticated air defense system in the world, that responded to sixty-eight emergencies in the year prior to 9-11 in less than twenty minutes allowed aircraft to wander about for up to an hour and a half. We are asked to believe that the steel and titanium components of an aircraft that supposedly hit the Pentagon “evaporated”. There is much, much more if anyone cares to look into it. Trade Tower #7 by itself is the “smoking gun”. Not hit by an aircraft, with only a few relatively small fires, it came down in a classic crimp and implosion, going straight into its basement, something only very precise demolition can accomplish, which takes days if not weeks to prepare. The 9-11 Commission didn’t even mention it, and F.E.M.A. actually stated they DIDN’T KNOW WHY IT COLLAPSED AND LEFT IT AT THAT. Brothers, I know that the implications of the above are hard, almost unthinkable, but the official explanation is utter nonsense, and three hundred and forty three murdered brothers are crying out for justice. Demand a genuine investigation into the events of September 11!
-Anton Vodvarka, Lt. FDNY (ret)
Lt. Vodvarka served on FDNY Ladder Co 26, Rescue Co. 3, Rescue Co. 1, Engine Co. 92, Ladder 82 and Ladder 101. He was awarded the Merit Class 1 award, the Prentice Medal.
Please go to the site to donate, to sign the petition or to assist with unearthing the truth behind the events of September 11th, 2001.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
