Thursday, July 31, 2008

The Gun Grabbers (Prothink); They Live (We Sleep)

I just watched They Live for the first time this morning. They Live is an awesome film that happens to be weirdly appropriate for our time. The movie was produced and written by John Carpenter, who optioned both a comic book and a novel for the screenplay.

I'd like to commend John Carpenter for his almost prescient vision of the future. This could be a number of scenarios; the razing of the compound could be a corollary to what occurs in Palestine, with houses demolished by caterpillar bulldozers driven by heartless agents of the IDF; the jobless situation mirrors the state of our economy here in the U.S.; the media hypnotism is easily conflated with our current Distraction Media; and the revolution can fairly be aligned with the various September 11th Truth Movements.

Like John Nada, Frank Armitage and the rest of the rebellion, we can see the obvious truths that the general public seems to be blinded to; this, of course, is due partially to the obfuscation performed by our Distraction Media, and partially due to the "Lemming Effect", best described in Albert D. Pastore's Stranger Than Fiction.

You're welcome to view the movie, below, but just be sure to take the time to note all of the intricacies John Carpenter has placed into the movie - it couldn't have been done better than if he produced it last year.

So, with further ado, dear readers...I present to you - John Carpenter's They Live:

Just posted the following rant on Prison Planet:


If I had my way...or if our legislators and representatives weren't all pieces of mierda (espanol for SH!T), I would frog-march George Walker "Monkey King" Bush, Richard Bruce "Skeletor" Cheney, Condoleezza "House Negress" Rice, Colin "We sick, boss?" Powell, Richard "What NORAD standown" Myers, Douglas "Human Feces" Feith, Paul "Had To Pay For A Piece" Wolfowitz, Irving Scooter "Scumbag" Libby, Andrew "You know...if anyone actually timed how long it was for me to say what I told AMERICA I said to Der Fuhrer...they'd string me up by my ball hairs" Card, and EVERYONE ELSE involved in the operation called the September 11th terrorist attack, and slingshot them into the hole that was once our proud World Trade Center, after having them pied in the stocks.

I'm not totally sure if your comment was meant to be facetious or this point, I would venture to say that anyone who understands that the "official" narrative is a pile of steaming dung is imbued with anger that has seethed for over seven years.

We are rapidly approaching the seventh year of NOT RECEIVING ANSWERS...answers like:

Why did you get rid of the steel?
Why were the Pentagon impact videos all classified?
Why can no one explain WTC7's collapse?
Why isn't a controlled demolition scenario being considered?
Why did Christie Todd Whitman lie and say that the air was safe to breathe?
Why is she immune to lawsuits from rescue workers?
Why was FEMA in town the evening of September 10th, 2001?
Why are WE THE PEOPLE supposed to believe that two...count 'em...TWO PASSPORTS survive conflagarations that destroyed "indestructible" black boxes?
Why did "experts" lie about the composition of WTC building 1 & 2? They were composed of thousands of tons of steel, not bloody trusses!

You see...using common can actually get answers to many of these queries...but the thinking person can''t stand being lied to by IDIOTS...and that is what these scumbags are...F*CKING IDIOTS.

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Jesse "Mind And Body" Ventura Talks 9/11 Truth

Jesse Ventura Talks 9/11 Truth On Howard Stern

Howard Stern has Jesse Ventura back on the show and he lets rip his views on the Vietnam war, the Gulf of Tonkin false flag event, the PNAC documents, and the new "Pearl Harbor" that was September 11th, 2001.

Ventura also appeared on Fox News throughout the day yesterday:

Rebels of America Blogspot

Let me just add to this posting Albert Pastore's Stranger Than Fiction

More Gestapo Tactics...


You can read the story at the above's the video:

Just in case that doesn't move about being TASERED NINETEEN TIMES while your back and foot are BROKEN?


Ozark City - Non Emergency Police Department
201 East Brick Street, Ozark, MO 65721

(417) 581-6600

Ozark City Police Department
201 E Brick Street, Ozark, MO 65721

(417) 581-6600
(417) 581-8804 (fax)

Cell Phones and Popcorn

Why bother with a microwave?

But seriously, dear readers...think about what this is doing to YOU.

WIRED has come out with an article debunking this.

A bud of mine posted this - make your own toothpaste!

How To Make Organic Toothpaste

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Dopey-Ass Cop Loses Badge Over Blatant Brutality at Critical Mass Rally

Screw it...let's go for broke!


Scumbag! You got your just desserts...your fellow GESTAPO to follow...

Oh...this is BEAUTIFUL. Alex Jones is right now, as I write, tearing you scumbags a new hole.

Did you REALLY think that you could get away with such a thing? The Monkey King couldn't keep all cell phones off when he declared that "Wall Street was DRUNK"...maybe the one subject he could actually lecture the way...did you know that there's a movie about the Head Chimp?


Dear readers...I present to you: W the Movie, by Oliver Stone (trailer):

Actually...the above clip was someone's idea of a joke...

Send A Rope to a SCUMBAG; Ron Paul Speaks

As indicated...DON'T put a bloody return address. One would think this to be obvious...but considering the woman who successfully sued McDonald's for spilling HOT COFFEE on her crotch...I think it's safer to actually SPELL THIS OUT.

The REAL Reason for Gas prices being What They Are

Now from someone who tells it like it is...


Ron Paul is the Brain.. WE are the Brawn!

Date: Jul 30, 2008 3:43 PM

Ron Paul mentions "Waco :Rules of Engagement", which shows the government machine gunning its citizens on FLIR.. He was attacked for this.

If you have never seen it...and then you know what to expect.

Read his latest letter...and watch the movie at the bottom.



"The other day, I made a huge "gaffe" on national TV: I told the truth about the crimes of the U.S. government.

As you can imagine, the ceiling fell in, and a couple of walls too. Congressmen are supposed to support the government, I was told, "Oh, it's okay to criticize around the edges, but there are certain subjects a member of the House of Representatives is not supposed to bring up." But I touched the real "third-rail" of American politics, and the sparks sure flew! I was interviewed on C-SPAN's morning "Washington Journal," and I used the opportunity, as I do all such media appearances, to point out how many of our liberties have been stolen by the federal government. We must take them back. The Constitution, after all, has a very limited role for Washington, D.C. If we stuck to the Constitution as written, we would have:

No federal meddling in our schools;
No Federal Reserve; no U.S. membership in the UN; no gun control;
No foreign aid.
No welfare for big corporations, or the "poor";
No American troops in 100 foreign countries;
No NAFTA, GATT, or "fast-track";
No arrogant federal judges usurping states rights;
No attacks on private property;
And no income tax.

We could get rid of most of the cabinet departments, most of the agencies, and most of the budget. The government would be small, frugal, and limited. That system is called liberty. It's what the Founding Fathers gave us. Under liberty, we built the greatest, freest, most prosperous, most decent country on earth. It's no coincidence that the monstrous growth of the federal government has been accompanied by a sickening decline in living standards and moral standards. The feds want us to be hamsters on a treadmill--working hard, all day long, to pay high taxes, but otherwise entirely docile and controlled. The huge, expensive, and out-of-control leviathan that we call the federal government wants to run every single aspect of our lives.

Well, I'm sorry, but that's not America. It's not what the Founders gave us. It's not the country you believe in. It's not the country I believe in. So, on that TV interview, I emphasized not only the attacks on our property, but also the decline of our civil liberties, at the hands of the federal police. There are not supposed to be any federal police, according to the Constitution. Then I really went over the line. I talked about the Waco massacre. Bill Clinton and Janet Reno claim those 81 church members, including 19 children, burned down their own church and killed themselves, and good riddance. So they put few survivors on trial, and threw them in prison for 40 years. We're not supposed to remember that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms--talk about an unconstitutional agency--rather than arrest David Koresh on his regular morning jog, called in the TV stations for big publicity bonanza, and sent a swat team in black masks and black uniforms to break down his front door, guns blazing. They also sent in a helicopter gunship, to shoot at the roof of a church full of innocents. The Branch Davidians resisted, and after a heartless siege of almost two months, and after cutting off food, water, and electricity, and playing horrible rock and roll through huge speakers 24 hours a day, the feds sent in the tanks to crush the walls of the church, and inject poisonous CS gas. Now, CS gas is banned under the Paris Convention on Chemical Warfare. The U.S. could not use it in a war. But it could and did use it against American civilians. After the tanks did their work on the church, the place burst into flame, and all 81 people--men, women, children, and babies - were incinerated in a screaming horror. Did some feds set the fire? Did the flammable CS gas ignite, since without electricity, the parishioners were using lanterns? Did a tank knock over a lantern, striking one of the bales of hay being used against the thin walls as a "defense" against bullets? Or did the Davidians, as Clinton and Reno claim, kill themselves? A new documentary - Waco: The Rules of Engagement- may show, through FLIR infrared photography, FBI snipers killing the Davidians by shooting through the back of the church, where no media cameras were allowed. This film won a prize at the famed Sundance Film Festival. It was made by people who took the government's side, until they investigated. Whatever the truth, there's no question that an irresponsible federal government has innocent blood on its hands, and not only from Waco. And the refusal of corrupt and perverse liberals to admit it means nothing. In my r~interview, in answer to a caller's question, I pointed out that Waco, and the federal murders at Ruby Ridge - especially the FBI sniper's shot that blasted apart the head of a young mother holding her baby - caused many Americans to live in fear of federal power. Then I uttered the sentiment that caused the media hysteria: I said that a lot of Americans fear that they too might be attacked by federal swat teams for exercising their constitutional rights, or merely for wanting to be left alone.


You've never seen anything like it. For days, in an all-out assault, I was attacked by Democrats, unions, big business, establishment Republicans, and - of course - the media, in Washington and my home state of Texas. Newspapers foamed at the mouth, calling me a "right-wing extremist." (Say, isn't that what George III called Thomas Jefferson?) I was even blamed for the Oklahoma City bombing! And by the way, I don't believe we've gotten the full truth on that either. All my many opponents were outraged that a Congressman would criticize big government. "If you don't like Washington, resign!" said a typical big-city newspaper editorial. But the media, as usual, were all wet. (Do they ever get anything right?) The average Congressman may go to Washington to wallow in power, and line his pockets with a big lobbying job for a special interest (so he can keep ripping-off the taxpayers). But that's not why I'm in Congress. It's not why I left my medical practice as a physician. It's not why I put up with all the abuse. It's not why I refuse a plush Congressional pension.

I'm in this fight for a reason. I want to hand on to my children and grandchildren, and to you and your family, a great and free America, an America true to her Constitution, an America worthy of her history. I will not let the crooks and clowns and criminals have their way.

I'm in Congress to represent the ideas of liberty, the ideas that you and I share, for the people of my district, for the people of Texas, for the people of America. That's why I'm working to stop federal abuses, and to cut the government: its taxes, its bureaucrats, its paramilitary police, its spending, its meddling overseas, and every single unconstitutional action it takes. And not with a pair of nail scissors, but with a hammer and chisel. Won't you help me do this work?

Not much of the federal leviathan would be left, if I had my way. But you'd be able to keep the money you earn, your privacy would be secure, your dollar would be sound, your local school would be tops, and your kids wouldn't be sent off to some useless or vicious foreign war to fight for the UN. But Jefferson and the other Founders would recognize our government, and our descendants would bless us. By the way, when I say cut taxes, I don't mean fiddle with the code; I mean abolish the income tax and the IRS, and replace them with nothing. Recently, I asked a famous Republican committee chairman - who's always talking about getting rid of IRS - why he engineered a secret $580 million raise for the tax collectors. "They need it for their computers," this guy told me. So the IRS can't extract enough from us as it is! The National Taxpayers Union says I have the highest pro-taxpayer rating in Congressional history, that I am the top "Taxpayer's Best Friend." You know I won't play the Capitol Hill games with the Capitol Hill gang, denouncing the IRS while giving the Gestapo more of your money. Or figuring out some other federal tax for them to squeeze out of you. I also want to abolish the Federal Reserve, and send Alan Greenspan out to get a job. The value of our dollar and the level of our interest rates are not supposed to be manipulated by a few members of the power elite meeting secretly in a marble palace. The Federal Reserve is unconstitutional, pure and simple. The only Constitutional money is gold and silver, not notes redeemable in them. Not fed funny money. Without the Federal Reserve, our money could not be inflated at the behest of big government or big banks. Your income and savings would not lose their value. Just as important, we wouldn't have this endless string of booms and busts, recessions and depressions, with each bust getting worse. They aren't natural to the free market; they're caused by the schemers at the Fed. President Andrew Jackson called the 19th-century Fed "The Monster" because it was a vehicle for inflation and all sorts of special-interest corruption. Let me tell you, things haven't changed a bit.

I also work to save our schools from D.C. interference. Thanks to the feds, new curriculums not only smear the Founders as "racist, slave-owning elitists," they seek to dumb down our students so they will all be equal. "Look-say" reading and the abolition of phonics has the same purpose, and so does the new "fuzzy" math, in which there are no right and no wrong answers. That must be what they use in the U.S. Treasury! It's certainly what they use in the U.S. Congress. But ever since the beginning of federal aid to education and accelerating with the establishment of the rotten Department of Education, SAT scores have been dropping. Schools, with few exceptions, are getting worse every year. To save our kids, we must get the sticky fingers of the feds off our local schools, and let parents rule. That's what the Constitution says, and the Bible too.

And then there's my least favorite topic, the United Nations. World government is obviously unconstitutional. It undermines our country's sovereignty in the worst way possible. That's why I want us out of the UN, and the UN itself taking a hike. After all, the UN is socialist and corrupt (many votes can be bought with a "blonde and a case of scotch," one UN ambassador once said). It costs many billions, and it puts our soldiers in UN uniforms under foreign commanders, and sends them off to unconstitutional, undeclared wars. When Michael New, one of the finest young men I've ever met, objected to wearing UN blue, he was kicked out of the American Army. What an outrage! Not one dime for the UN, and not one American soldier! Not in Haiti, not in Bosnia, not in Somalia, not in Rwanda. I know its radical, but how about devoting American military efforts to defending America, and only America? Such ideas, said one newspaper reporter, make me a maverick who will never go far because he won't go along to get along.. Darn right! What does "go far" mean? Get a big government job? To heck with that!

And I won't sell my vote for pork either. When I walked through the U.S. Capitol this morning, I got angry. The building is filled with statues and painting of Jefferson, Madison, and the other Founders. Those great men sacrificed everything to give us a free country, and a Constitution to keep it that way. When I was first elected, I placed my hand on the Bible and swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. That's exactly what I'm fighting for. But such ideas drive the liberals crazy. That's why I badly need your help. I've been targeted nationally for defeat. The Democrats, the AFL-CIO, the teachers union, big business PACs, the trial lawyers, the big bankers, the foreign-aid lobbyists, the big media, and the establishment Republicans want to dance on my political grave. The Fed, the Education Department, and the UN are anxious to join in. They can't stand even one person telling the truth. And they're terrified when that truth gains the people's support. Right now, four well-funded Democrats are competing to try to beat me, and a Republican is rumored to have been offered money at a secret meeting in Mexico(!) if he would try to knock me off in a primary.

Join this fight for the Constitution, and stop those who want to rip it up, and throw it in the Potomac

Together, we can join the Founders' fight. We can make history.

Sincerely, Ron Paul U. S. Congressman
203 Cannon, Washington DC 20515
Committee to Re-elect Ron Paul - 837 W Plantation - Clute, Texas 77531

Who is Chuck Baldwin?

Will we see Chuck Baldwin engaged in the primary debates? I'd bet against sounds like he would upset the balancing trick the Distraction Media has in the faces of WE THE PEOPLE.

Cops Tase Barely Conscious Boy With Broken Back 19 Times For Non-Compliance heard it right!

Cops Tase Barely Conscious Boy With Broken Back 19 Times For Non-Compliance

Now...what can you say about this?

The boy "deserved it" for NOT COMPLYING?!?

If the boy dies...will they state that cause of death was due to...NON-COMPLIANCE?


In other news...

Here's Dennis Kucinich's Articles of Impeachment listing; here is a summary of crimes against WE THE PEOPLE.

Have you had enough yet?

Have you yet realized that the oil companies are gaming the system to reap unforetold profits?

Do you know that when heretofore "unknown" oil fields are revealed, that oil prices will "re-stabilize" to around $50 a barrel?

Don't you realize that the auto manufacturers were aware of this? Did you really think that they would take a loss, just to sell off a new car, to pay for your gas?

Yeah...just sit back and watch another season of American Idol..."just move on...nothing to see here..."

Argh...let me find something else...

Oh, yeah...this tool: US church 'killer' wrote of hate

Jim Adkisson is accused of opening fire with a 12-gauge shotgun

A man accused of shooting dead two people in a Tennessee church was motivated by hatred of liberals and anger at being jobless, US police say.

Knoxville Police Chief Sterling Owen said they had found a letter in Jim Adkisson's car in which he described his feelings.

There were about 200 people in the church, which is known for its liberal stance, at the time of Sunday's attack.

Mr. Adkisson, 58, has been charged with first-degree murder.

Children were putting on a play at the Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church when a gunman entered with a 12-gauge shotgun and opened fire on the congregation.

People dived for cover under pews but several adults were hit, two of them fatally, before a group managed to overpower Mr Adkisson.

Police Chief Owen said Mr. Adkisson had brought the gun into the church in a guitar case.

Police guard the entrance to the Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church (27 July 2008)
The church's congregation had been watching a performance by 25 children

Officers also found a four-page letter in the suspect's car.

"It appears that what brought him to this horrible event was his lack of being able to obtain a job, his frustration over that, and his stated hatred for the liberal movement," Chief Owen said.

"It appears that the church had received some publicity in the recent past regarding its liberal stance on things and that is at least one of the issues we believe caused that church to be selected."

The Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church describes itself on its website as working for social change since the 1950s, including desegregation, racial harmony, fair wages, women's rights and gay rights.

Police say it appears Mr. Adkisson was acting alone.

The two people who were killed were Greg McKendry, a 60-year-old usher at the church, and Linda Kreager, who died of her injuries at a nearby hospital a few hours after the shooting.

Church member Barbara Kemper said that Mr. McKendry had "stood in front of the gunman and took the blast to protect the rest of us".


Hatred of liberals...well, that's a GREAT REASON to shoot people, eh? What a TOOL. I hate dumb, brainless nitwits, but you don't see me mowing down schmendricks like chaff, do you?

All he did was to prove what a useless human being he was...TAKE SOME RESPONSIBILITY, idiot.

I got a job for you...why don't you SECURE OUR BORDER? That way, you can ensure that other Americans' jobs aren't lost...except, you obviously don't give a tinker's damn about anyone else, do you?

Monday, July 28, 2008

An End Run Around The Constitution? NOT!

Read this article...

This asshat wants to outlaw the right to assembly.

Considering that he's in Oklahoma City...his time would be better spent explaining to the parents of the 168 children who were MURDERED in the Murrah Building just how IMPOSSIBLE it was for a truck bomb to do the damage it was purported to have done, considering the distance from the building - there should have been a crater equidistant from the facade of the building to under the truck...and I'll bet that there was NO SUCH THING.

There were, however, multiple media accounts of ADDITIONAL UNEXPLODED BOMBS being removed from the building...of course, when those reports indicated that Timothy McVeigh was UNABLE to have placed said bombs in the buildings, those reports were ceased.

Please write back and/or call this nitwit, and inform him that lawful assembly is a right that WE THE PEOPLE will not abrogate for ANY BLOODY REASON.

Contact: State Rep. Paul Wesselhoft
Capitol: (405) 557-7343
Moore: (405) 794-9464

One last note: gotta love the "Peak Oil" crap...we have been gamed by RETARDS.

Sunday, July 27, 2008

I have a question for the Internal Revenue Service...

"Are you willing to reinstate the tax debt of Halliburton to assist with the economy of the United States of America?"

I received a garnishment order from the Internal Revenue Service the other day.

Now...I am a man of principle. It's a matter of a couple of thousand dollars; not really something that will break me in any regard...but after seeing HALLIBURTON forgiven for their tax burden of $500 MILLION DOLLARS...The Federal Reserve and the Internal Revenue Service can go KISS MY ASS.

Did I not state that loud enough for you cock-smokers to hear?

KISS MY ASS - I will fight you tooth and nail...and you know why?

The POWER OF RIGHT is on my side.

WE THE PEOPLE were betrayed in 1913; once, when the Federal Reserve was brought in - we had two usurious banks that were kicked out by WE THE PEOPLE, and this will be a third, once the bottom line of ALL AMERICANS becomes apparent; second, corporations were given the rights of a "person", an inequitable proposition if you put you mind to it.

The tax burdens of the corporations was passed on to WE THE PEOPLE.

THAT is the big secret.

Taxes, by LAW, are applied to INCOME. Income means monies obtained through PROFIT, such as stock earnings, lottery winnings, etc. WAGES are what you and I, the middle and upper class, EARN through an equal exchange of our blood, sweat, tears and TIME.

This is why your health insurance was once the province of your employer. If you were working for yourself, you'd have to obtain your own health insurance...but while you're employed by someone else, your welfare is their concern. This is why many of the transit workers in the TWU feel as though some of their brothers betrayed them all for thirty pieces of silver - they received a thousand dollars back for their agreeing to cover their own health care costs at 1.5%.

Guess what the next contract will stipulate? 2%? 3%?

Assholes! You never get those worms back into that can.

If I recall correctly...they added that thousand to YOUR REGULAR PAYCHECK, and you were TAXED ON IT!!!

You put your lives in danger every bloody day, breathing in the fumes in the subway tunnels; manuevering the multi-ton machinery at the yards, driving the buses while braving traffic, rude customers and the occasional retard who thinks it's cool to assault drivers while vehicles are in motion...YOU are the guys who should have free passes, not the bloody fat cats who find a new way every day to cheap out on your WAGES.

But I'm going to attempt to appeal to their better natures...and when that fails, well, I'm going to bleed their bottom line.

Congress was never given new rights of if WE THE PEOPLE were NOT paying taxes before 1913...WE THE PEOPLE should NOT be paying taxes AFTER 1913!


Our laws should not be unfathomable to all but lawyers; would you all not agree, dear readers? Why is it that one requires lawyers to decipher what should be something as simple as a tax code?

It was designed to be indecipherable. If you would do some research into the Original Thirteenth Amendment, the "Titles Of Nobility Amendment", BARRED LAWYERS from taking government positions. This amendment was rewritten in 1860 to obscure this information. There is a website which purports that there is just a whole lotta hoopla regarding this amendment, explaining all of the reasons why this amendment would be bad...but not explaining at all the efforts made to ratify this amendment - in fact, I believe it would take a simple vote by Virginia to ratify this amendment, and we could rid our government of its malcontents in one fell swoop.

Back to the issue of my "taxes"...

My taxes were done by a third party. What they had done was so confusing to me, that I declined to use their services again. I did my own taxes, as I had done before, and the lovely IRS decided to abscond with my taxes that year, and the next.

You're not getting another bloody penny from me - and if you persist in this "garnishment"...I WILL DESTROY YOU.

You have been duly warned.

In other news...

John Conyers is a piece of human garbage - he SINGLEHANDEDLY derailed the impeachment hearings that were to occur last Friday.

I would submit that it was a mistake to hold them on Friday...NO ONE CARES AT THAT POINT...the weekend's coming up! Time to go to the beach! It's getaway time! Who cares about some dopey-ass impeachment...he didn't get a hummer from a zoftig intern did he?

What crap.

John Conyers...ever since you admitted in Fahrenheit 9/11, that you and your many colleagues DO NOT EVEN READ MANY OF THE BILLS YOU PASS, AND WORSE, ADD YOUR PORK PROJECTS AT THE LAST MINUTE...any words I have fail to describe you and your ilk.

You should RESIGN, and forego your retirement nest-egg...after all...YOU DIDN'T EARN IT, DID YOU?

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Are we going to attack the courier here?

I found this communication and wished to gauge some response to the content - I do not necessarily endorse the views herein, but I do wish to ascertain if anyone feels there is any information that is either sorely lacking or right there in your face, as they say.

So without further ado...I present to you, dear readers, the rant:

I'm seeing a comprehensive attempt to re-foment BLACK / WHITE racial tensions on the part of Jews.

They have tried this before and FAILED miserably, that is why the Jew puppet Martin Luther King was assassinated - he was put in unbeknownst to himself to foment racial tensions. Unfortunately for Jews, and fortunately for everyone else, he was a UNITER, not a divider...and thus the Jews killed him off to get rid of him.

However, they are recycling the 1960's clips everywhere they can from small crypto-jew fake patriots to large media outlets.

LOOK VERY CAREFULLY into whoever is utilizing these old clips and the bulletins attempting flare up racial tensions.

More often than not you'll find an outright JEW or crypto-JEW behind the scenes.

Here are some of the latest JEW propaganda in this widespread effort:

CNN - JUST FROM TODAY ALONE!!!! 07/23/2008

Black and single: Is marriage really for white people?

Behind the Scenes: Black and shopping in America obrien/index.html?iref=mpstoryview

Child molester hasn't served single day of 43-year prison term
http://www. cnn. com/2008/CRIME/07/23/sex.offender.teacher/index.html?iref=mpstoryview
(jew judge letting the black child molestor to walk free for years while he exhausts all appeals)

CNN Top Video: "Whoopi says other word than N-word""
(btw Whoopi GOLDBERG is half-jewish and they just love to use their own as the pawns for things they do)

http://www. cnn. com/SPECIALS/2008/black. in. america/

Hip-hop artist Nas protests Fox coverage of Obama
http://www. usatoday. com/life/people/2008-07-23-nas-fox_N. htm
(Nas, an excellent black rapper who has of recently come out with tracks blasting FOX News, amongst other things, the JEWS have zeroed in on one little lyric and reframed him to state that his music is specifically designed to be a "protest of the FOX coverage of Obama" - TOTALLY LUDICROUS, THESE JEWS ARE OUTRAGEOUS!!)

But don't take it from me, listen to the track they are referring to for yourself!

Now, FIRST OFF, OBAMA is *NOT* any more BLACK than he is WHITE!!!!

HAVE YOU EVER SEEN THE PICS of OBAMA's mother?? Probably not, and why not??


Here is Obama's mother:











Have I opened a veritable can of worms? I await your comments...

You Are a F*UCKING MORON If You Plan To Vote For John "Songbird" McCain!

In other news...

Disgraced ex-lobbyist Jack Abramoff's ex-partner Adam Kidan gets prison sentence halved

In this article, we have proof, obtained in the trial, that Abramoff and Kidan had a direct role in the murder of Constantinos "Gus" Boulis, the original owner of SunCruz Casinos - I believe that he was "made an offer that he could not refuse". Not long after that offer, he was gunned down, much as in the film "The Usual Suspects", where the officer playing gem courier is boxed in and then gunned down - if you haven't seen it recently, take a couple of hours and relax - don't worry...Keyser Soze only kills the EVIL PEOPLE...his family notwithstanding.

Let's end with a quote: "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who remain neutral in times of moral crisis." ~ Dante

Adding some disturbing info:

.. ....
..Caterpillar Inc. does not manufacture a military version of the D9 per se, but the same attributes that make the D9 popular for major construction projects make it desirable for military applications as well, and it has been found to be of particular utility by the Israeli Defence Force (IDF).. ..

Armored bulldozers are a standard tool of Combat engineering battalions, and the IDF has gained some notoriety for their use of armored tractors in the Al-Aqsa Intifada , Operation Defensive Shield, and their involvement in the demolition of orchards and residences and the consequential death of Rachel Corrie..

The armored D9, as developed and modified by the IDF, provides armor protection to the external hydraulics and operator cabin. The operator is protected by bulletproof glass to protect against sniper fire. The fitted armor package adds roughly 10 additional tons to the weight to a so-equipped D9. Like many customized packages, individually modified D9s may be found with disparate features, such as crew-operated machine guns, smoke projectors, or grenade launchers..

The Israeli Combat Engineering Corps have used the D9 for digging moats, clearing terrain obstacles and engineering tasks. The D9’s have also been used to clear landmine fields and booby-trapped areas. The heavy armour installed by the IDF allows the D9’s to work under heavy fire in dangerous battle-zones. The Israeli armor kit proved itself well, as no D9 operator was killed during the 3-year long al-Aqsa Intifada..

The Israeli armored D9, a.k.a Duby (lit. bear) has been used in standoff situations with armed Palestinians barricaded in buildings and rigged them with explosives and booby-traps. In order not to risk Israeli soldiers, the D9 shook the house until the occupants surrendered and then razed the structure in order to detonate and bury any explosives inside. This method was largly employed (with great success) in Jenin after 13 Israeli soldiers were killed by a combined ambush. This method was also used in Hebron: the IDF used the armored D9 to stop the local Hamas leader, Bassal Qawasameh; the later was killed by the collapsing house after shooting on the D9 (see photo from this incident)..

The United States Army has purchased several armor kits from the IDF and used them to produce similarly equipped D9s. These have been used to clear destroyed vehicles from roads, to dig moats, erect earthen-barriers and construct field fortifications. It was also used to destroy a house which hosted snipers who shot at an American base (similar to the Israeli usage).

There were some reports about the use of large bulldozers against Iraqi trenches during the first Gulf War..

.. ....

D9 with anti-mine System.

.. ....
.. ......
..The IDF operates different types of Caterpillar machines.

Among these are the modified D9/D10 Dozers and different types of Wheel Loaders.


This is an American D9 and D10 bulldozers that was armored by IDF for the Israeli Combat Engineer Corps. Engineered for demanding work. The D9 durable construction is made for tough working conditions. It keeps material moving with the reliability and low operating costs you expect from Cat tractors. The 3408E engine, when matched with the torque divider and field proven powershift transmission, will provide years of dependable service..

Some modified Caterpillar Dozers of the IDF have received two different types of smoke dischargers (one of them is TAAS CI-3030). The installation of the smoke-dischargers also differs in the number of smoke dischargers used. Some vehicles carry two (one pointing forward, the other one backward - is the case with both types of smoke dischargers), while others seem to carry only one or even none at all.

They also got a roof hatch on the left side of the vehicle roof.. Possibly this is the Urdan-cupola at least on some dozers. One some cupolas there vision-blocks. Furthermore on some of the cupolas can be seen a M240 MG mounted.

Different types of armour-kits are used on this Dozer but it is also possible that these armour-kit types are an indication that there are different dozers (D9/D10)..

.. ....
.. ....
..The Caterpillar D9 is a large track-type tractor (commonly referred to as a bulldozer) designed and manufactured by Caterpillar Inc. The D9, with 410hp of gross power and an operating weight of 53.8 tons, is in the upper end of Caterpillar’s track-type tractors, which range in size from the D3 (70hp, 8.1 tons), to the D11 (850hp, 124.3 tons). The size, durability, reliability, and low operating costs has made the D9 one of the most popular large track-type tractors in the world, with the Komatsu D275A as one of its most direct competitors.. ..

The D9’s primary working tools are the blade, affixed to the front and controled by 4 hydraulic arms, and the optional ripper, which can be attached to the back. The blade is mainly intended for earthmoving and bulk material handling: pushing up sand, dirt and rubble. It also can be used to push other heavy equipment such as earthmoving scraper pans, and in military applications, main battle tanks. The rear ripper is intended for use in loosening rockey ground and ripping out larger stones. It can also break frozen ground..

The D9 has undergone several generations of engineering enhancements. The current version is the D9R but the older models such as the D9N and D9L are still common. The L, N and R models of the D9 are visually very similar, differing primarily in the design of their internal systems..

The size and weight of the larger track-type tractors dictate that they are used primarily for major projects. The D9 is most commonly found in use in construction, forestry, mining, waste, and quarry operations..


Occupation 101-FULL MOVIE BELOW

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Game Over: Top German State Attorney Backs Mike James (repost)

I found this article moved me so much, and I feel I would be remiss in my duty if I did not share it with you.

Game Over: Top German State Attorney Backs Mike James, Jews Silent
By Mike James in Germany – 20 July 2008

A victory for justice --- Letter from Michael James to the Oberstaatsanwalt (Senior State Attorney) --- Letter from the Senior State Attorney confirming prior refusal to prosecute at request of the Jews --- Philosophical objections to historical narratives --- Jews reject Rachel Corrie donation --- Acknowledgements and the current situation.

Herrn Claude
Konrad-Adenauer-Str. 20
60313 Frankfurt am Main

Geschäftszeichen: 6111 Js 228014/08
Bearbeiter: OSta Claude

20. Juli 2008

Dear Senior State Attorney, Herrn Claude

I thank you most kindly for your considered and edifying reply, following that of State Attorney Frau Niesen, in regard to a polite theological question I asked the ZJD (Central Council of Jews in Germany) some months ago, and for this I am most appreciative.

However, I still take umbrage at the ZJD’s claim that my question was motivated by “Volksverhetzung” -- “Incitement of the masses (ostensibly against other races or ethnic groups)” -- and I ask myself why they have not apologised to me.

I know that you are sufficiently conversant with these matters, but I still feel impelled to set the record straight. I simply posited an enquiry regarding biblical interpretation and mentioned a number of genealogical facts that are permissible to utter, even in Germany. The well-known truism that the six million number is based on a Kabbalistic numerological interpretation of Leviticus, Chapter 25, Verse 10 was confirmed and established by learned Rabbis throughout the centuries, including Rabbi Moshe ben Maimon (Maimonides) and, most recently, by the religious Israel historian and Haaretz journalist Tom Segev.

“And thou shalt sanctify the fiftieth year, and shalt proclaim remission to all the inhabitants of thy land: for it is the year of jubilee. Every man shall return to his possession, and every one shall go back to his former family.” -- Lev. 25:10

The Hebrew version:

Please note that the Hebrew rendition is not accurately transcribed in European translations, nor is it is published as such in the form given in the Torah of the laity and would rarely be written as such even in the Priestly Torah. Other renditions can be found in various versions of the Remez and the Sod, both works of which deal with hidden and esoteric meanings. However, notice the markings above and below each letter.

To the casual reader who does not understand Hebrew beyond its fundamentals, or the way in which reversals and simple annotations by Rabbis on just one single letter can change the entire structure and meaning of a sentence, this verse in the Remez or Sod makes very little sense. However, the symbolic calibration of this line in many Kabbalistic versions of the Torah written in Hebrew does in fact change the entire sense of the sentence to one that states: “The return to the land will not occur until the Lord has been offered a holocaust [burnt offering] of six million”. (The wording differs in some versions of the Remez and Sod, although not in the Midrash.) It is, of course a contrivance by deft of hand.

Every Jew who has had an intensive education in the Torah, Talmud and Kabbalah knows this. My Jewish friends at school knew this. My religious teacher knew this (and, by the way, I was top of my class in Religious Instruction). However, neither Frau Knobloch nor Herr Kramer of the ZJD seem to be in any way aware of this well-known theological fact, which concerns me deeply because, being Jews, they should be in a position to know. Why didn’t they simply write to me and say, “Sorry, Mike. We just have no idea. Why not teach us?”

When I humbly ask someone a straightforward question, I do not expect him or her to call out the National Guard and convene a meeting of the United Nations Security Council. I simply expect a reply. That is the English way; and contempt for my English education, English cultural mores, English sceptical empiricism, and English sense of fair play is something that can be construed as a form of racism. Perhaps Frau Knobloch and Herr Kramer bear some kind of animosity toward English people. What other reason could there be?

To have originally accused me of the same (incitement toward hatred of a particular race or ethnic group) appears to be premised on their belief that I despise every member of their race, the Kazaks.

Not only is this not true on the face of it -- I have friends from all ethnic and racial commonalities -- it is intellectually impossible to hate an entire race or ethnic group. The concept of “group hatred” does not exist in traditional western jurisprudence, which has always sought remedies for violation of personal rights by treating plaintiffs and defendants as individuals. In most pre-EU nations (and still today in the United States) this was the basis of tort (civil) and non-tort (private) law. (I was also second in my class in Law, by the way).

The reason for this was, sensibly, quite simple. It is philosophically and psychologically impossible for a human being to hate an entire kindred. One may be given to articulate such sentiments, whether jokingly, in a moment of peer-group camaraderie, or as a generalisation intended to make a simple point, but the human psyche is so neurologically configured that it can only hold feelings of detestation against an individual, and, even here, not against the individual as a whole, but only an aspect or a trait of that individual’s personality. This was ably demonstrated by the psychologist Wilhelm Reich, famous for his prize-winning study “The Mass Psychology of Fascism”. No modern psychologist would ever testify that it is within the scope of the human psyche to bear unremittingly the emotional burden of hatred for an entire race.

It is quite common these days to hear people say, “I hate Turks,” yet most, if not all, of them have Turkish friends and dine with them in Turkish cafes. I, for instance, dislike fruit, vegetables and grains because I have a digestive intolerance to cellulose, lactose and gluten, but I love strawberries, which I can eat on occasion. Therefore, it cannot really be said that I ‘hate’ all fruit, and I am certainly not given to verbally insulting apples and oranges or physically abusing cartons of milk whenever I visit the supermarket.

The concept of Volksverhetzung was introduced into Soviet law by Lenin in the early stages of the Bolshevik-Zionist revolution owing to widespread resentment among the Russian people of the large number of Zionist-Jews who ran the Politburo and headed the dreaded secret police, the Cheka. It is therefore born of a communist mindset and is completely alien to the idea of a modern “Rechtsstaat” (a state governed by the Rule of Law). I was also the top of my class in history, incidentally.

Laws against ‘incitement and group or race hatred’ are therefore laws premised on the Bolshevik organisation of the state on the basis of a hive mentality and have no place in a modern, liberal democracy, or even our current "Scheindemokratie" (illusory democracy).

These laws, as you know, were designed to reinforce a particular narrative which requires the support of statutes (statutorily enforced history), which must be seen in the perspective of solicitation to perjury for those born after these events were reported to have taken place.


No policeman would ever ask someone born in 1959 to stand in the dock before a judge and swear on the Bible that he had witnessed a crime that allegedly took place twenty years before he was born. Such a policemen would surely find himself charged with corruption and the witness would be incarcerated for perjury.

Indeed, anyone who forces another person to affirm an alleged crime he has not personally witnessed is guilty of incitement to bear false witness, which is a felonious violation of both German law, the law of Moses and the Law of God Almighty, Jesus Christ. (Aufwiegelung zur Meineid, Aufwiegelung zur Gotteslästerung.)

One of my earliest memories was as a child watching the ceremonial funeral of the war criminal Winston Churchill on black and white television. I’m almost sure I can say that he did indeed live and die, but I cannot prove it, for I never met the man, nor did I attend his last rites at his bedside. In my mind he is simply a story, a picture book narrative of a man who played (or may have played) a role in the affairs of the world. I’m inclined to believe that Churchill existed because the laws of cause and effect indicate that he is one of the many dots that connect us to our present time.

I was born on 20 December 1959, but probably only became intellectually aware of the world around me in a way I could commit to memory and analytical comprehension at some point between 1961 and 1962. Therefore, everything that “happened” in the world before 1962 is not true for me. It didn’t “happen”. It represents nothing more than second-hand or third-party information transmitted by other people whom I am told to “trust” or by the electronic media, history books and newspapers fashioned by those who may sometimes try to be objective, but either make mistakes or are subject to controllers whose aim is to propagate a slanted version of reported “events”.

However, I can prove that I was the 1973 and 1974 champion in the 800 and 1600-metre inter-school South Fylde Olympics, because I was a witness to my own victory, have personal experiential memories of the event and the gold medals to prove it. It may not be true for you and you don’t have to believe me (I won’t sue you or send you to prison), but I was there, crossed the line and wrote an additional line in my own personal history book.

Ever since the dawn of Sumerian civilisation, history books have been re-written countless times to include new information or exclude details that were proven false and based on fantastically colourful myths. My Grammar School history teacher was an honorary professor of Oxford University who taught me that, in contrast to mathematics, history is a ‘moveable feast’, meaning that it is always subject to review depending upon the emergence of new data that comes to light. History is a work in progress, and it is a book that will remain eternally under the editor’s lamp.

We now know that Christopher Columbus was not the first European to set foot on North American soil. We know that William Wallace never personally met Robert the Bruce. We now know, by the CIA’s own recent admission, that the ‘Bay of Tonkin’ incident never happened. We now know that Marie Antoinette was falsely attributed by Rousseau to have said, “Let them eat cake.” She never said it.

We now know that Sir Walter Raleigh did not introduce potatoes to England (they originated in Italy). We now know that Nero did not play the fiddle as Rome burned, for the fiddle was invented 1,600 years later. We now know that the Dutchman Abel Tasman discovered Australia, not Captain Cook. We now know that America gained her independence on 3 September 1783, not on 4 July 1776. We now know that Peyton Randolph was the first president of the United States, not George Washington. We now know that the ancient Gaels of Ireland developed Sanskrit and a prototype of the Hebrew language.

We now know, thanks to DNA scientists, that the Palestinians were the original Children of Israel and never left the Land of their Fathers. We now know that, for all but a minority of the Palestinian Sephardim, the “Diaspora” is largely a myth created by a people who originated north of Kazakhstan, converted to Judaism centuries later and then migrated to Eastern Europe.

We now know that the world is not flat.

Why do we now know all these things? Because men and women asked questions. Incredible, isn’t it?

In England, children are taught: Believe nothing you hear, only half of what you read and question everything. This is life-saving, good old fashioned British advice, and I observe it daily. It is an integral part of my cultural upbringing and is as essential to my being as the very heart that pumps blood through my veins.

To recapitulate: No matter what “happened” before the development of my intellectual facilities in 1962, it didn’t happen. The “world” for me did not exist before 20 December 1959, and it did not become “real” to me until some point in 1962. From my perspective, all events prior to 1962 do not constitute history, simply stories told to me by strangers with unknown motives. Novels and poetry. A fantasy matrix of moving pictures and scripted political drama. The Twilight Zone of a world in which video killed the radio star. Bubbles in my bathtub.

In a society where intellectual and historical enquiry is punishable by law, it cannot be said that we are living in either a democracy or a Rechtsstaat. It is a selective oligarchy that ring-fences individuals into preferential and non-preferential groups by means of social engineering and is therefore, as was the case with the USSR and other Bolshevik regimes, a dysfunctional administrative entity that will eventually implode under the pressure of its own internal contradictions.

As you are aware:

“It remains the case that the German Reich [established in 1871] survived the collapse of 1945 and did not cease to exist, neither through capitulation nor the exercise of foreign power in Germany on the part of the allies; it possesses today, as it always has, legal and judicial sovereignty. The BRD (Federal Republic of Germany) is not the legal successor of the German Reich.”

- Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court), 31 July 1973 (Urteile 2 Bvl.6/56; 2 BvF 1/73; 2 BvR 373/83; BVGE 2,266 (277); 3, 288 (319ff; 5.85) 126; 6, 309, 336 und 363).

I understand that jurists are under enormous pressure to square this impossible circle so that it does not become known that the European Union, by virtue of every treaty signed by the unconstitutional BRD, is an illegal political construct. When the people of Germany, Britain, Ireland, Austria, Poland, Italy, France and all other members of the European Soviet of Zionist States became fully conversant with the truth, there will follow a period of upheaval in Europe and a return to natural nation-state democracy. I guarantee it. Because I'm the messenger.

However, following the reinstitution of the German Reich in the coming years, whereupon civil servants will be required to reapply for their positions, please be assured, that since you and State Attorney Niesen have handled my case with a measurable degree of equanimity, I shall ensure that the newly-empowered authorities will receive from me personal letters of commendation that speak very highly of you.

In addition to my work as a creative writer and editor, I work very hard for Germany by helping to promote the export of German goods by means of brochure journalism. Sadly, although you have rejected the Jews' charges against me and left me free to explore this beautiful country at will, I am now giving some thought to leaving Germany once I can afford resettlement outside of the European Soviet Union because I cannot live in a state that tells me what I can and cannot think and say, for such prohibitions actually make me feel physically sick to the bottom of my stomach.

You cannot imagine how sad this makes me feel, for I truly love this country and the German people, all of whom have been betrayed by oafishly incompetent, self-serving politicians who should be stacking shelves in supermarkets and greedy, money-grubbing lobbyists in Berlin.

It also angers and grieves me that the ZJD, in common with the Israeli government and their other sister agencies, have refused to meet the donation for personal damages amounting to 10,000 euros to the Rachel Corrie Fund. I encourage you to learn more about this heroic, beautiful and intelligent young American woman, whose life was wilfully and maliciously crushed out of her by an Israeli bulldozer as she attempted to prevent the destruction of the homes and lives of Palestinian farmers (the genetic descendants of the Children of Israel).

Despite all the contention of the past few months, I thank you and State Attorney Frau Niesen for your intuitive understanding of equitable justice and sense of fair play.

May you walk in peace with God Almighty, Jesus Christ.

Yours faithfully

Michael James


Letter from the Senior State Attorney to Michael James

Staatsanwaltschaft b. d. LG – 60256 Frankfurt am Main
Geschäftszeichen: 6111 Js 228014/08
Bearbeiter: OSta Claude
Durchwahl: 60 78
Fax: 6285

Konrad-Adenauer- Str. 20
60313 Frankfurt am Main
Telefon: (069) 1367 – 01
Telefax: (069) 1367 – 2100

Auf die Strafanazeige

des Michael James in Friedrichsdorf vom 13.6.2008

gegen Verantwortliche des Zentralrats der Juden in Deutschland

wegen Vorwurfs der Volksverhetzung pp

wird die Einleitung eines Ermittlungsverfahrens abgelehnt (§ 152 Absatz 2 i. V. m. § 170 Absatz 2 der Strafprozessordnung).


Aus der Strafanzeige ergeben sich keine zureichenden tatsächlichen Anhaltspunkte für eine Straftat.

Die Angezeigten haben den Anzeigeerstatter -- völlig zu recht -- wegen Verdachts der Volksverhetzung angezeigt (6111 Js 222524/08). Seine offenbar damit zusammenhängende Strafanzeige enthält nichts, was einen Anfangsverdacht für ein strafbares Verhalten der Angezeigten begründen könnte,



GESTEMPELT / Beglaubigt / Laudage / Justizangestellte


Acknowledgements and the current situation:

Let me first apologise to all my readers who have sent me heaps of supportive e-mail and letters by permission of my online editors. I have spent the best part of the last three weeks immersed in German law books and am concurrently suffering from a form of gastric influenza in addition to a prolonged bout of CFS. I have not forgotten you. You are MY PEOPLE.

My very special thanks go out to Ingrid Zundel who not only sent me a very generous “Nachschub” with which to nourish my ailing constitution, but also Ernst’s latest book recounting his ordeal in Mannheim (“Setting the Record Straight”) and an excellent DVD (“The Ernst Zundel Saga”), both of which I must eventually stow away in a safe place lest the authorities decide to raid my apartment for forbidden literature. Ingrid was also kind enough to give me a special write-up in her newsletters. I would also like to take this opportunity to tell Ingrid that I shall complete the assignment given to me once I have cleared my present backlog and regained a modicum of health, although some special ‘advice’ will follow per e-mail (the @bellsouth address bounces my mails, by the way). Please be patient, Ingrid. I love you.

Ronnie Lambert, a fellow Geordie and superb musician and singer for the band “Busker”, was also kind enough to send me a CD of his latest album “Geordieland”. This is what I call real music, straight from the heart, real and raw like you’ve never heard before. Ronnie suffers from crippling pain owing to his past work as a man who made a real contribution to society by helping to build homes. Please visit his website and order the best music you’ll ever hear this side of the Great Wall of China. I’ll be writing to you shortly, Ronnie. May God bless you.

I must also extend my appreciation to Fredrick Töben from the Adelaide Institute in Australia, who phoned me twice with messages of support and e-mailed me some extra courage. I am also the lucky recipient of a wealth of newsletters and updates he sent me, kindly mentioning my efforts and mobilising moral support.

As ever, my soul brother, Holger Haffke, of was there as the Good Samaritan to carry some of the weight of my heaviest downers, and my Christian Orthodox friend Brother Nathanael Kapner took a massive hit on his phone bill by phoning me thrice from New York to tell me that he was praying for me and that we would defeat Satanic Zionism with the power of the Cross.

So where do I go from here? First I must rest a while and clear my desk to pay the bills. Then I will pick another fight with the Dark Powers of International Zionism, perhaps more wisely and with a better game plan in mind.

As for leaving Germany, I have agonized over this option for the best part of two years. But there is something that keeps me here.

Over the last 16 years I have seen the German people slowly lose their sense of purpose, their courage, their pride and their dignity. I have watched these descendants of the fearsome Teutonic warriors who once scattered entire legions of the Roman Empire and defended the gates of Europe against a formidable Mongol invasion shrug their shoulders in nonchalant resignation with the passage of every nation-destroying statute and anti-German ordinance handed down by the parasitic Zionist elites in Berlin.

Most of them have lost the will to fight. But I haven’t, and I never will. I shall show them once more how to fight, and how to win. For I am reminded of an old paraphrased Jewish proverb:

"If not me, then who? If not now, then when?"

Michael James, an Englishman, is a former freelance journalist resident in Germany since 1992 with additional long-haul stays in East Africa, Poland and Switzerland.

So...I can't stand green beans and peas...but I love green-leaf lettuce, zucchini, spinach, does my not liking green beans and peas make me a GREEN VEGETABLE HATER?

I think not.

This posting by Michael James has led me to proclaim that the label of ANTISEMITE should not be used, as the label cannot possibly exist in reality.

I'm willing to discuss this...but at this point, I hereby OUTLAW the use of this term.

Here's some more info on the illustrious Michael James.

The IRS vs. Robert Kahre

Headline Legal News: The Law Office of William A. Cohan is featured in an exciting, exclusive, in-depth and inside interview, discussing the case of Robert Kahre. Informally called the Kahre case -- after the primary defendant, business owner Robert Kahre, who paid workers in gold and silver coins -- the trial relied heavily on evidence gathered in a controversial armed raid in May 2003 on several of Kahre's local business places. The raid entailed keeping more than 20 workers handcuffed, in 106-degree heat without shade or water while agents collected records and equipment, which Kahre described in this interview with great detail. The trial resulted in zero convictions on 161 charges faced by nine defendants, a major win for William Cohan and Robert Kahre.

William A. Cohan has litigated in federal trial and appeals courts throughout the United States for the last 30 years. He has obtained more acquittals in criminal tax cases than any attorney practicing in the United States over the last 30 years (including 2 cases involving more than $10 million), secured several multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements for plaintiffs, and successfully defended against several multi-million dollar civil claims and forfeitures. The other twenty-five percent of his cases involve business disputes between individuals and non-governmental entities: he defends individuals, corporations, trusts, LLP's, LLC's, and partnerships in controversies concerning real estate, securities, business acquisitions, employment, banking and insurance. One essential element in William's success over the last 30 years is and always has been investigating and discovering the larger context of a case.

You can contact William A. Cohan at 858-832-1632

William...I plan to send business your way...

Monday, July 21, 2008

The Bohemian Grove - dedicated to Alex Jones

Dear readers...I present to you: The Bohemian Grove

Alex Jones and InfoWars have obtained a listing of the 2008 participants - why don't you take a look at who will be attending...

Sunday, July 20, 2008

RADAR Magazine - The Last Roundup

Christopher Ketcham has written an article for RADAR Magazine that, frankly, should be front-page news in our daily tabloids, rather than the useless pap our Distraction Media provides to us daily.

The question he poses in this article is thus: "Is the government compiling a secret list of citizens to detain under martial law?"

Along with this beautiful but disturbing piece, I would like to once again
present to you an interview Christopher Ketcham had with Scott Horton on this very subject and the very pointed topic of Continuity Of Government.

You know what goes great with this posting?

A dash of Deek Jackson...

RADAR Magazine is offering to you, dear readers, a RISK-FREE ISSUE! Such a deal!

Christopher Ketcham is a freelance reporter and writer for many venues including, Harper’s, GQ, The Nation, Salon, Mother Jones, Men’s Journal, Good Magazine, Radar, and National Geographic. In 2002, he was selected as a Livingston Awards finalist for his coverage of the 9/11 attacks in New York.

Friday, July 18, 2008

Phil Gramm LOVES Soft Porn...He Loves It So Much, He Made Some!

Yes...thanks to Keith Olbermann's COUNTDOWN, I was able to learn that Phil Gramm, "Songbird" McCain's financial advisor, and the fellow who thinks that WE THE PEOPLE are IMAGINING the current financial crisis occurring in the United States of America, directed two soft-core porn movies. an appreciator of the female form, I haven't ANY problem whatsoever with pornography purely as an art form...but then again, I'm not one of those "holier-than-THOU" types. Phil Gramm, however, thinks himself above the common flock, so let's remind him of his clay webbed feet, shall we?

Update: What a weenie - he resigned.

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Sen. Karen Johnson's floor speech about 9/11 (East Valley Tribune)

Sen. Karen Johnson's floor speech about 9/11

9/11 Floor Speech



Members -- I would like to introduce a very special guest who has been joined today by several of his closest friends. Up in the gallery, we have many of the members of the Phoenix 9/11 Truth group – people who are asking for a new, independent investigation of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. In particular, I would like to introduce to you a VERY courageous man named Blair Gadsby. I’m going to ask the folks with Blair to help him to stand as I tell you a little about him. Blair is very weak because he has been fasting for more than two weeks to try to bring attention to the cause of 9/11 Truth. This is the 16th day that Blair has gone without food and spent his day outside the office of U.S. Senator John McCain pleading with the senator to take a look at new evidence in the 9/11 crimes. We have one man who is sacrificing his own personal needs and desires to stand boldly pleading for the world to take notice, to question, to research and not place their lives into the hands of media sound-bites, - to think for themselves, consciously and critically. Blair is an educator and to me this is what the great educators do. Thousands of people all over the country and actually around the world have been watching on the internet as this Hunger Strike progresses here in Phoenix. I want Blair to know that I am his biggest fan and that good people everywhere admire him for his courage and determine. Please give a warm welcome to Blair Gadsby and the Phoenix 9/11 Truth movement. (STOP)


(FLOOR SPEECH) Last month, I started speaking publicly regarding my concerns about the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, which brought down the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, as well as Building 7. If you’ve watched the media coverage since I first began to speak out, you know how vicious and irrational it has been toward me. The media have worked hard to try to make it seem silly to even question the 9/11 Commission Report, even though some of its own authors have done so, including both of the Commission Co-Chairmen – Mr. Hamilton and Keane.

Actually, the 9/11 Commission Report represents just one theory – the theory that fire and the damage from the airplane impacts brought down the three buildings. This theory explains none of the features of the destruction that we all witnessed that day and which we can still observe on hundreds of videos. It explains nothing about how in four out of four cases, no hijacking code was transmitted by the hijacked airliners, and in four of four cases, no fighter jets managed to get alongside any of the hijacked airliners. The military officers who lied to Congress about their failure to protect America would have been referred for prosecution by some of the 9/11 Commissioners, but those Commissioners were told that they did not have that authority. The events of that day were a heinous crime against our nation and our citizens, and the sense of justice that exists in each one of us demands to know what really happened and how all the perpetrators will be caught and punished. The speculation and theorizing won’t end until a thorough, transparent investigation, free of conflicts of interest, takes place.

Among the many theories that you can find on the Internet is one that rises above all the rest. It is rock-solid, confirmed by hard evidence, and supported by hundreds of scholars, architects, engineers and other professionals who have the education, training, and expertise to know what they’re talking about. This is the theory that explosive demolitions brought down the Twin Towers and Building 7. I’ve placed a handout on each of your desks which has a photo of one of the towers as it begins to collapse. I’d like you to take a look at that photo, if you will. Notice in the picture that you see steel beams being flung outward from the building, and great huge clouds of dust that is actually pulverized concrete. A building that falls down, doesn’t pulverize itself into dust as it drops. Imagine dropping a chunk of concrete 30 feet or more. Is it going to fall apart into dust? No. Yet, the concrete in the towers was blasted into powder that covered all of Manhattan. You can see that powder already being formed long before that upper section has fallen more than a few floors. As you look at that photo, ask yourself, “Is this a picture of a building collapsing or is this a picture of a building exploding?” Does a building that collapses have the ability to fling its own steel beams sideways up to 600 feet? Does a building that is just starting to collapse blast its contents outwards in a massive cloud of dust? What do you see in that photo? I see an explosion. And so do millions of other people who are demanding a real investigation.

More important than simply looking at a photo -- engineers, architects, and scientists have evaluated the rubble at Ground Zero and other aspects of the buildings ,and they have found evidence of at least 15 different characteristics of explosion. These 15 characteristics are listed on the handout as well.

Despite the media’s outragious attacks on my sanity, intelligence, and patriotism, the emails and phone calls to my office have been 95 percent supportive of my request for a new investigation. I’ve been amazed, really, to see just how overwhelmingly the public rejects the official reports, not only of the 9/11 Commission but also those by FEMA and NIST (National Institute of Science and Technology). I assumed that expressing skepticism about the official story of 9/11 would be a punishing issue for an elected official, but I’m finding that it’s quite the opposite. The public wants its leaders to stand up and be counted when it appears that something is wrong. "The truth will set you free." Blair Gadsby and my guests today want the the truth about 9/11. The American PEOPLE want the truth about 9/11 – they want a new investigation, and so do I.

I have provided each of you with a DVD entitled, "Improbable Collapse." I’m hopeful that you will watch it with an open mind and that you’ll also study some of the wonderful, well-researched articles on the internet. I’ve included a list of the most credible websites with your handout.

You don’t have to embrace every theory about 9/11. Indeed, there are some that should be soundly rejected. But if you believe, as these scientists, architects and engineers do, that the buildings were brought down by explosive demolition – then you must also agree that we need a new investigation. I have no preconceived notions about who did it and I am not pointing the finger of blame at anyone. But I do think that the worst attack on U.S. soil in American history deserves the best investigation possible, AND THAT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN UNTIL PEOPLE LIKE US BEGIN TO SPEAK OUT. The families of the nearly three thousand people who died on Sept. 11 – and the families of those who have been poisoned and died from the toxic residue that hung in the air for weeks afterward during the clean-up operation -- deserve to know what killed their loved ones. If anyone else was involved in the planning and implementation of the attacks, then they need to be brought to justice. I ask you to study the material I have given you and then join me in the call for a new investigation.

Thank you, Mr. President.

Oooh, look - controlled demolitions!

Isn't this ENTRAPMENT?

I was listening to 1010WINS this morning...and I overheard a news item regarding the "scandal" ensuing between Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and a businessman, Morris Talansky (just found out that he is a rabbi, as well).

The terms of the investigation are that monies were offered to Olmert, who then uses them for lavish items and purchases.


Were these funds solicited...and if not, why were they offered?

IMHO...these funds were offered to set up Olmert to be entrapped - there doesn't seem to be any other reason for the existence of the funds.


According to The "Dancing" Israelis on 9/11:







The "Dancing" Israelis on September 11th, 2001 - hear it for yourselves...

Could it be...MOving SyStems incorporAteD?

Isn't that special...

Found something interesting...never heard of the Curse Of Ham.

The Judaic Role In The Black Slave Trade

IDF Shoots Blindfolded, Handcuffed Palestinian (I don't make 'em...I only post 'em)