Thursday, May 29, 2008

Oh, Happy Day...

US and European debt markets flash new warning signals

Bear Stearns has gone the way of the dodo...I knew a fine fellow who once worked at that institution. Hopefully he's found other employment.

Let's see...what's next?

Bush mounted dishonest campaign to sell Iraq invasion, says ex-White House spokesman

Hey, look - he didn't LIE, right? He just, well, you know, kinda "mounted a dishonest campaign". See? No harm, no foul...

So far, as expected...but here's the one that churns my intestines to riot:

Pelosi Reacts to McClellan: ''I Totally Agree'' it's rant time!

Bloody hell! Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi AGREES?!? What a novelty...I guess this means that impeachment proceedings will proceed, yes?

Let's make sure she knows that we are watching her every move now in this regard:

Washington, D.C. Office: 235 Cannon HOB - Washington, DC 20515 - (202) 225-4965, 202) 225-0100

District Office: 450 Golden Gate Ave. - 14th Floor - San Francisco, CA 94102 - (415) 556-4862
Email: [Constituent mail] | [non-Constituent mail]

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Another dig at the Peak Oil nitwits...

Okay...let's nail this carcass to the cemetery, where it belongs.

Oil is NOT a "fossil fuel". That indicates that oil ONLY comes from the remains of prehistoric flora and fauna, primarily dinosaur fossils.

Well, as a dinosaur enthusiast (I don't purport to be a paleontologist, but I am aware of Dr. Louis S. B. Leakey...yes, I know my paleontologists), I am aware that the remains of dinosaurs have been found in above ground, naturally-formed how come we can't just take a straw and suck out some of that "Black Gold"?


Do a search for Eugene Island + oil. the verbiage/text a little dry? Just go here: Oil Doesn’t Come from Squashed Ferns and Fish?

Read that link, as well as David McGowan's many discussions and rants on "Peak Oil" at his page...for your ease, I will link to those postings below:

Newsletter #52 - Cop vs. CIA
Newsletter #53 - More Cop vs. CIA
Newsletter #54 - More Cop vs. CIA - Ruppert Responds
Newsletter #55 - Who Is Behind The Peak Oil Scare?
Newsletter #56 - The Debate Continues (by Proxy)
Newsletter #57 (Untitled)
Newsletter #59 - Oil News Briefs
Newsletter #64 - Whoa, Dude! Are We Peaking Yet?
Newsletter #66 - When Peak Oil Met the West Nile Virus
Newsletter #70 - Beware the Peak Oil Agenda
Newsletter #71 - Belated Election Commentary ... and More Stuff to Piss Off the Peak Oil Crowd
Newsletter #73 - Katrina, Eugenics and "Peak Oil", Part 1
Newsletter #74 - Katrina, Eugenics and "Peak Oil", Part 2
Newsletter #82 - Assorted Weirdness (mention of Peak Oil and Eugenics in last paragraph)
Newsletter #83 - Oh, Mikey...You Gotta Lotta `Splainin' To Do!
Newsletter #84 - Mike Ruppert's Harrowing and Heroic, etc.

And last, but not least, Newsletter #92 - National Treasure - Book Of Secrets (Behind The Scenes)...this link doesn't really have much to do with the above agenda, but it does have a creditable analysis of the current candidates for the highest office in the land. Good stuff.

Please understand - I've done due diligence on this issue. I had not even heard of Thomas Gold previous to my discovery of the true origin of oil. He is considered a plagiarist by many of the scientists who conducted the original research.

Please read The "Abiotic Oil" Controversy.

Now, having said all I advocationg that we don't need to find and/or utilize alternate energy sources? Hardly. Oil / gas seems to be the best resources to use in industry and transportation. What I am advocating is that we begin to use other sources of energy for our personal / home use.

Solar panels are now performing better than ever before.

Windmills are a great source of natural, non-wasteful energy.

Sugar cane...ahhh...if I'd only tried a bit harder to set up some sort of importing for this resource...I have had plans to import sugar cane and to produce cane sugar for mass consumption. Cane sugar, if I recall correctly, is a natural sugar that is readily metabolized by the human body, without the deadly payload of the sugar substitutes, and minus the empty carbohydrates of granulated sugar.

Guess what?

It turns out that the waste products from sugar cane can be manufactured into a form of ethanol that is SEVEN TIMES MORE POTENT THAN CORN ETHANOL!

Imagine that.

Now, you're probably wondering why I'm giving out such a lucrative's why:

I don't have the requisite capital available to begin such a venture; however, I know that there are some out there who DO.

Here's my challenge to you:

Are you willing to improve the Human Condition?
Do you want to be known as a Hero of Humanity?
Do you want to make money hand over fist?
And...more importantly - do you wish to put a stop to those greedy corporations who are gaming the system by stifling all alternative energy research?

Well...this is how you do it.

Thanks, schmuck!

The image above is of someone who is in the unenviable situation of having to say goodbye to a family member...the second time for the LAST TIME.

That family should receive any and all proceeds from Scott McClellan's "limited hangout" tome, directly implicating the Bush Administration as to LYING TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC IN ORDER TO ENGAGE IN A CONFLICT AGAINST A SOVEREIGN NATION.


What are you going to do about it?

What happens when it is YOU in the picture, saying goodbye to your loved ones for the last time?

Update: Even the pardoned Irving "Scooter" Libby is giving up Georgie-Boy like a prison bitch:
Some commentary and videos: thanks to V for Vote Ron Paul *READY*!

We will see the forest for the trees. All of our self-help books would disappear, all of our therapy sessions and pill popping habits will go bye bye. Why? Because the way we live is the cause of our depression..
What are the ONLY things that matter right now?

Gay marriage doesn't matter...racism doesn't matter...Obama or Hilary don't matter...job security doesn't matter...your clothes don't matter....the music you listen to doesn't matter...your grades don't matter...feminism doesn't matter...public education doesn't matter (because we are only teaching kids how to be good employees) fucked up you got last night doesn't matter...none of these things matter..

The global temperature is rising, our landfills are filling rapidly, land is disappearing, resources are dissipating, oil costs are at record high, asthma is on the rise, pollution is rampant, cancer is on the rise, the endangered species list is longer than the death toll in Iraq..need I say more? But hey...who needs all this bad news?

We have to get serious in order to fix the mess we made, or else why have children? So they can clean up our mess? I wanna have fun, but fun that doesn't require watching celebrities fuck up their lives. Fun that doesn't require getting wasted. I want to be able to walk in Yosemite without treading on private or state-owned property. Find more places that are free besides the public library..

Wonder why our favorite national drug is alcohol? Could it be because alcohol makes us so talkative and "fun", so loose and fancy free? Have you been to a party w/o alcohol? We don't know how to talk to each other, in most cases another person might as well be an alien. We are used to our jobs setting the stage for interaction. Fake, surface value conversations. "How are you today?" "Well the truth is, I can't stand it when you ask me that question because you don't really want to know, you are hiding behind civilized etiquette, and your politeness is insulting." Imagine that..

So let's talk solutions. What if we all took Timothy Leary's advice? Turn in, tune it, and drop out? But we did it without all the fucking LSD lol? Revolution is not drugs, stupid hippies. What if we decided to stop participating in corporate fun? What if we made our own fun? What if we threw pies in each other's faces just for the hell of it? What if we stopped being passive observers in the spectacle? What if we stopped paying for fun and experience? Stopped going to bars for our fun?What if we stopped ignoring the truth, because we want to be young and have fun? What if we decided to stop passing the buck to the next generation? What if we started a whole new world? Where no one suffered at the expense of someone else? What if we stopped worshipping celebrities? What if we shrugged our shoulders at Britney Spears or Lindsay Lohen's last shennanigan? What if we stopped caring about what they say we should care about? What if we started being honest? "How are you today?" ""Well I'm depressed, I feel like my life has no meaning." Then we could begin to help each other. What if we stopped taking their pills? Stopped drowning our fear of death and being "ugly" by getting fucked up every weekend? What if we took that extreme leap of faith and trusted each other? What if we began to question the very premises that make our culture operate? What if we stopped caring about name brand clothes? Stopped frequenting their malls for stuff we don't need. What if we just walked away? Then what? Fuck..I'm willing to find out..

Let's take that magic away from money. Let's swipe our cards less and less. Let's grow our own food. Let's make hitchhiking safe again. Let's stop worrying about things that don't matter. Let's stop listening to authority figures that claim that they know what's best for our lives. Let's tell them to fuck off...with a smile =o)..

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Is Ehud Olmert Actually A REAL FRIEND of the United States?

I gotta say...I think that Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is actually a stealth agent for the United States - here's why:

- He admitted that Israel actually possesses nuclear weapons; this was also independently verified by former President Jimmy Carter.

- He understands that Israel cannot keep the land that was obtained through conquest during the Six-Day War.

Maybe that's why there have been charges manufactured against him - Ariel "The Butcher" Sharon orchestrated a campaign of mass murder in Jenin, yet he was able to rule undeterred.

One can only hope...

September 11th - Cover For A COUP D'ETAT?

Well...despite the fact that I pontificate on a number of subjects, the main focus of this page is outlining the changes to our society, our environment and our way of life since the coming and going of the storied event in question. Understand this, dear readers: EVERYTHING HAS A REASON. I was speaking to some buds of mine over the weekend and we were discussing the idea of COINCIDENCES.

There really is no such thing.

Everything that happens, happens because some inducement was made; whether naturally, or by dint of some other action, things occur because they were induced to occur. reading this piece from OP-ED News, 9/11: Cover-up for a Coup D'Etat, I wish to caution those who see the erosion of many of our civil liberties as a COINCIDENCE, to pull your heads out of the sandbox they're playing in and join the rest of us thinking, breathing, LIVING human beings and STAND UP FOR THE RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY OUR FOREFATHERS.

Let's bring up an interesting point here, now that people are all aghast from Shillary's comments on Friday...I'd really like some discussion of this:

Black people were being hosed down like dirty sidewalks for years...and then, all of a sudden, someone shoots Martin Luther King, Jr., and his "killer" is given a 99-year sentence.

Can I be the ONLY INDIVIDUAL who finds this to be...WEIRD?!?

"Niggers" were hanging like pinatas all over the South...and no one really batted an what made this particular "nigger" so different?

I'm using that vulgarity to illustrate my earlier point: do you think that it was a COINCIDENCE that in the years of outrage against Black men, this one was actually afforded some modicum of "justice"? Why did he rate?

This was an obfuscation - in 1999, it was proven that a REAL CONSPIRACY existed in the murder of MLK, so his murder just HAPPENED to correspond with the first-ever (to my knowledge - please update me, if you've any info) conviction of a non-Black individual in the murder of a Black man.

I hope you get my point.

Now...back to Shillary...I was listening to Bill O'Reilly today, and amazingly, he was holding Shillary's feet to the fire over her commentary; in fact, he took it a step further and played a news clip I've not heard elsewhere. He had played a clip from Ray Larson, Grand Dragon of the KKK, where he practically guarantees that a "Southerner" will assassinate Presidential Candidate Barack Obama, should he gain the nomination.

Considering how there was a "security lapse" during one of his campaign rallies, where agents were instructed to "stop their search for guns" should be cause for concern...

...or do you think that was a COINCIDENCE?

I'm sure it was a COINCIDENCE that Deborah Jeane Palfrey "committed suicide" when she had everything to live for, and not once had exhibited any such ideas about ending her life prematurely...

By the way...I sent a note to Senator Edward "Ted" Kennedy:

Good evening, Senator Kennedy - I am pulling for you to recover. In doing so, I wish to caution you not to opt for the chemo/radiation treatment, as it will only be a VERY short-term solution, and in the long run, will affect your body in unforeseen ways. You should instead opt for an alternative, proven treatment - please read the information at the link below:

Pot Shrinks Tumors; Government Knew in '74

I was sickened at what happened to your family, and even more incensed by the "comment" by Presidential Candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton. Unfortunately, I do NOT believe that they were just an "unfortunate set of words"; rather, she is calling for the idiots that inhabit our great country to openly assassinate a candidate for President, simply because she was not "given" the nomination.

She doesn't deserve it.

The mere fact that her campaign is $30 MILLION DOLLARS in the hole is irrefutable proof that she is not fit to manage the finances of our great nation...and I'm sure that you agree.

Once again, I hope that you opt for the solution that actually works, and will have you back in the Senate doing what you do best: enacting the will of the People.

My wishes are with you.

Sunday, May 25, 2008

What did she say?!?

I will say what no one else is willing to say...

Hillary has invoked the "Lone Nut Assassin" option should she fail to become the Democratic nominee.

Barack Obama...I don't know if you or anyone in your campaign has read this page...but understand this: if you have Hillary Rodham Clinton on as your running mate...what happened to Ronald Reagan will look like guys playing pattycake.

From WRH's letters page: Speculation wreaking havoc on food prices

Oh, Howard Stern's a gatekeeper? Geez...

Subject: Why We are Opposed to "the War on Terror"

Q: Why am I and many veterans, active duty, and National Guard men and women opposed to the war in Iraq?

A: Here are 10 reasons we oppose this war:

1. The Iraq war is based on lies and deception.

The Bush Administration planned for an attack against Iraq before September 11th, 2001. They used the false pretense of an imminent nuclear, chemical and biological weapons threat to deceive Congress into rationalizing this unnecessary conflict. They hide our casualties of war by banning the filming of our fallen's caskets when they arrive home, and when they refuse to allow the media into Walter Reed Hospital and other Veterans Administration facilities which are overflowing with maimed and traumatized veterans.

For further reading: Bush War Timeline

2. The Iraq war violates international law.

The United States assaulted and occupied Iraq without the consent of the UN Security Council. In doing so they violated the same body of laws they accused Iraq of breaching.

For further reading:
Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Vol. 1 - Charter of the International Military Tribunal
West Point Grads Against The War

3. Corporate profiteering is driving the war in Iraq.

From privately contracted soldiers and linguists to no-bid reconstruction contracts and multinational oil negotiations, those who benefit the most in this conflict are those who suffer the least. The United States has chosen a path that directly contradicts President Eisenhower's farewell warning regarding the military industrial complex. As long as those in power are not held accountable, they will continue...
For further reading:
Advocates of War Now Profit From Iraq's Reconstruction
Windfalls of War

4. Overwhelming civilian casualties are a daily occurrence in Iraq.

Despite attempts in training and technological sophistication, large-scale civilian death is both a direct and indirect result of United States aggression in Iraq. Even the most conservative estimates of Iraqi civilian deaths number over 100,000. Currently over 100 civilians die every day in Baghdad alone.

For further reading:
No More Victims
100,000 Iraqi Civilians Dead - Cites Study
THE REACH OF WAR: CASUALTIES; Number of Civilian Deaths Highest in July, Iraqis Say

5. Soldiers have the right to refuse illegal war.

All in service to this country swear an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. However, they are prosecuted if they object to serve in a war they see as illegal under our Constitution. As such, our brothers and sisters are paying the price for political incompetence, forced to fight in a war instead of having been sufficiently trained to carry out the task of nation-building.

For further reading:
(All of the above links have either had content deleted or pages made unavailable)

6. Service members are facing serious health consequences due to our Government's negligence.

Many of our troops have already been deployed to Iraq for two, three, and even four tours of duty averaging eleven months each. Combat stress, exhaustion, and bearing witness to the horrors of war contribute to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), a serious set of symptoms that can lead to depression, illness, violent behavior, and even suicide. Additionally, depleted uranium, Lariam, insufficient body armor and infectious diseases are just a few of the health risks which accompany an immorally planned and incompetently executed war. Finally, upon a soldier's release, the Veterans Administration is far too under-funded to fully deal with the magnitude of veterans in need.

For further reading:
National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Vets for Vets

7. The war in Iraq is tearing our families apart.

The use of stop-loss on active duty troops and the unnecessarily lengthy and repeat active tours by Guard and Reserve troops place enough strain on our military families, even without being forced to sacrifice their loved ones for this ongoing political experiment in the Middle East.

For further reading:
Stop Loss Continues

8. The Iraq war is robbing us of funding sorely needed here at home.

$5.8 billion per month is spent on a war which could have aided the victims of Hurricane Katrina, gone to impoverished schools, the construction of hospitals and health care systems, tax cut initiatives, and a host of domestic programs that have all been gutted in the wake of the war in Iraq.

For further reading:
The Cost of War

9. The war dehumanizes Iraqis and denies them their right to self-determination.

Iraqis are subjected to humiliating and violent checkpoints, searches and home raids on a daily basis. The current Iraqi government is in place solely because of the U.S. military occupation. The Iraqi government doesn’t have the popular support of the Iraqi people, nor does it have power or authority. For many Iraqis the current government is seen as a puppet regime for the U.S. occupation. It is undemocratic and in violation of Iraq’s own right to self-governance.

For further reading:

10. Our military is being exhausted by repeated deployments, involuntary extensions, and activations of the Reserve and National Guard.

The majority of troops in Iraq right now are there for at least their second tour. Deployments to Iraq are becoming longer and many of our service members are facing involuntary extensions and recalls to active duty. Longstanding policies to limit the duration and frequency of deployments for our part-time National Guard troops are now being overturned to allow for repeated, back-to-back tours in Iraq. These repeated, extended combat tours are taking a huge toll on our troops, their families, and their communities.

For further reading:
4,000+ Soldiers Dead, 10,000+ Wounded/Maimed

This information was initially provided by Radical Truth from MySpace:

Q: Why do Iraq Veterans Against the War call for the immediate withdrawal from Iraq?

A: There are several reasons why immediate withdrawal is the critical first step toward solving the problems in Iraq.

1. The reasons and rationale given for the invasion were fraudulent.

There were no Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq during the time of the invasion according to US officials and former chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix. The idea that Al Qeada and the 9/11 terrorist attacks were connected to Saddam Hussein and the Baath party were proven false in the 9/11 Commission Report. Members of the Bush Administration have admitted that they “misspoke” in the run up to the war. [hANOVER fIST adds: it has also been proven beyond all prevarication that al-Qaeda never existed as a true terrorist regime...of course, some people really hate the U.S. now...!]

2. The presence of the US military is not preventing sectarian violence.

The US occupation of Iraq has proven to be unable to prevent sectarian violence and halt an escalation towards a civil war. Despite having an average of 140,000 troops in country since the occupation began, internal violence and attacks against civilians and Iraqi security forces have been on a steady incline.

3. The occupation is a primary motivation for the insurgency and global religious extremism.

The insurgency can be broken down into many individually named factions with various goals, beliefs, and techniques. However, our membership of veterans believe that the occupation of Iraq is the primary thing encouraging the insurgency and giving it legitimacy in the eyes of many Iraqis. Likewise, other people of the Islamic faith are encouraged to resist America ’s policies internationally based on how they perceive our military operations in the Middle East.

4. We can no longer afford to fight this war of choice.

The financial burden is destroying our domestic programs that could be used to protect us from natural disasters, provide medical programs, or help improve education. We are jeopardizing the US economy and putting strains on the budgets of important government agencies like the Veterans Affairs Department.

5. National security is compromised.

Funds that could be used to protect our ports and transportation are being stripped away while our National Guard units are on constant deployments instead of being used to protect and defend us here at home.

6. The world is becoming more dangerous.

International terrorist attacks have increased and it has become more dangerous for Americans to travel abroad. Approval for US policy has decreased and the dislike of Americans has increased.

7. Our national “moral authority” is being undermined.

The US has lost credibility to much of the world as the defender of liberty and freedom and our national identity is eroding. We can no longer deploy our armed forces for peace keeping measures with the good faith of the international community. We need to regain the respect and faith of the global community. This begins by withdrawing our troops from Iraq and helping the Iraqi people rebuild their country and society.

8. The majority of American citizens, Iraqi citizens and US military would like to see an immediate end to the war in Iraq.

If we are truly a democracy and we aim to create a democracy in Iraq our leaders will represent the will of the citizens and lead according to their wishes.

9. The military is broken.

We are abusing the small population of armed service members with multiple deployments while using inadequate vehicles and equipment. Less than one half of a percent of the American population is serving in the active armed forces, which is the least amount in the last century. Only 25% of the troops in Iraq are there for their first tour, while 50% are there on their second tour, and the remaining 25% are there three times or more. We continue to involuntarily extend soldiers with Stop-Loss, recall them repeatedly for additional service using the Individual Ready Reserve, and send soldiers with diagnosed medical problems into combat.

There's something about a certain cephalopod that comes to mind...

Friday, May 23, 2008

MONSANTO vs. Shmeiser or Stealing America...One Farm at a Time

Monsanto vs Schmeiser - The Classic David vs Goliath Struggle.....

Percy Schmeiser has been fighting the evil corporation Monsanto for over 9 years.

Once again, we have an instance of cross-pollinization, whereupon Monsanto deems YOUR crops THEIRS, by dint of having DNA from their plants mixed in with regular, non-GM/GE crops from local farmers' farms. They have succeeded in appropriating said crops from farmers, using their impressive legal teams to deal decisive victories against individuals whose only crime was letting nature take its course.

Not Percy Schmeiser.

I believe that there is a way to determine that his plants are NOT derived from MONSANTO-maligned seeds; rather, if he would be willing to have his crops examined, a pattern of cross-pollinization could be established. Please refer to my earlier posting [MONSANTO Must Go!] and watch the movie within the posting. As a scientist, it was clear to me that the DNA manipulators have no control whatsoever of where the changes in their GM/GE plants' DNA will occur. MONSANTO plants grow directly from their seeds should exhibit different characteristics than cross-pollinated plants. With this information, Percy Schmeiser should be able to establish the true business model of MONSANTO, which in my opinion, is to REPLACE ALL NATURAL CROPS WITH THEIR OWN, AND ASSUME CONTROL OF THE MOST ESSENTIAL RESOURCE ON THE PLANET - OUR FOOD.

Update: It looks as if MONSANTO is trying to "Orwellize" this story - go to this link and see the video that they removed from the internet.

Also, Greenpeace has been covering the story.

Another important fact to consider: GM/GE seeds do not produce the same crop yield as naturally-occurring crops.

Thursday, May 22, 2008

The Black Panther Coloring Book

May I present to you...COINTELPRO's greatest achievement: The Black Panther Coloring Book

I present to you...Brian Springer's SPIN:

Let's tie this into our national debate here:

Working classes are less intelligent, says evolution expert

Published Date: 22 May 2008

WORKING-CLASS students have lower IQs than those from wealthier backgrounds and should not be expected to win places at top universities, an academic has claimed.
Bruce Charlton, an evolutionary psychiatrist at Newcastle University, has written a paper asserting the reason why fewer students from poor families are admitted to Oxford or Cambridge is not because of social prejudice, but lack of ability.

He ADVERTISEMENTsuggests that low numbers of working-class students at elite universities is the "natural outcome" of "substantial" IQ differences between classes.

He told The Scotsman yesterday, in an interview conducted by e-mail at his insistence: "Poor people have lower average IQ than wealthier people... and this means that a much smaller percentage of working-class people than professional-class people will be able to reach the normal entrance requirements of the most selective universities."

Dr Charlton said the average child from the highest social class is up to 30 times more likely to qualify for admission to a highly selective university than the average child from the lowest social class.

His claims could trigger an outcry similar to that faced by the Nobel prize-winning geneticist James Watson, who was forced to apologise after claiming that African and Caribbean workers were "demonstrably less able" than white ones.

However, Dr Charlton argues it is precisely the fear of creating controversy that prevents other academics taking the same line.

He said: "That is why such obvious scientific truths have not so far been stated clearly, or have actually been denied.

"(This theory is] accepted among those who know and understand the research."

He goes on to question the government's drive to get more students from poor backgrounds into top universities.

"The UK government has spent a great deal of time and effort in asserting that universities, especially Oxford and Cambridge, are unfairly excluding people from low social-class backgrounds and privileging those from higher social classes. Yet in all this debate, a simple and vital fact has been missed: higher social classes have a significantly higher average IQ than lower social classes."

Ministers insist the debate should be focused on helping young people realise their potential. Bill Rammell, Westminster's higher education minister, said: "These arguments have a definite tone of 'people should know their place'.

"There are young people with talent, ability and the potential to benefit from higher education who do not currently do so. That should concern us all."

Sally Hunt, general-secretary of the University and College Union, warned: "It should come as little surprise that people who enjoy a more privileged upbringing have a better start in life."


IQ, OR intelligence quotient, measures the ability to perform abstract reasoning and speed of learning.

But a debate rages over whether IQ tests are completely accurate and if their results are a reliable indicator of somebody's true level of intelligence.

Although tests may assess analytical and verbal aptitude well, they are not an accurate test of creativity, practical knowledge and other skills involved in problem-solving.

Many see IQ tests as an assessment of an individual's problem-solving ability, rather than general intelligence.

Others argue that they just show how good the individual is at IQ tests, especially during childhood.

Now...not to blow my own horn, but I've been registered at a respectable 138 - I attended a public school from kindergarten through sixth grade; I then attended a specialized junior high school for seventh and eighth grade (I met in eighth grade on of the best teachers I've had the pleasure of learning from - thanks, Jerry!); I then took (on a whim) the Specialized High School exam (I'm not crowing, but I was in the middle of a class, and an advisor interrupted the class so that I could take the exam - I didn't study for it...and I made it into one of the schools).

So, the point for all of that back-slapping is this: the schools in and of themselves have NOTHING to do with learning - schools are merely a venue for the learning experience. I am a voracious reader; when I was younger, I had read every encyclopedia in my domicile (World Book and another - I'll get back to you on that...); in between stickball and football and baseball games with my friends, I would read.

I loved reading - reading was my escape from the confines of the physical world. A few things have supplanted reading in certain aspects, but by and large, to this day, nothing's better than a good old book to me.

In my opinion, this smacks of the Bell Curve propaganda - and now, I'm going to make an observation...

The drug laws were not intended to save the "children" from the vagaries of drug abuse; rather, I believe the laws were enacted to save "rich, idle layabouts" from drug overdoses. Now, I know...that was a heck of a tangent to take, but here's the thread - working class kids have to WORK to earn funds to keep themselves in food and entertainment; not so for our more affluent kids; and many of these affluent kids have the "entitlement mentality"; in other words, they haven't any patience - everything must be theirs for the taking, and everything must happen immediately, and YOU and I (the non-affluent) MUST MAKE IT SO.

Now, let's be clear - if you've earned the money you and your family enjoy...well, that's all that need be said! It's your money! I'm not a communist, because we, as a society, do not perform equal shares of work, and that mandates that everyone can get the same compensation for their contributions. That being said, while listening to CNN, twenty years ago, our CEOs were being paid twenty times the amounts being paid to the blue-collar workers, relatively.

They are now being compensated at a rate FOUR HUNDRED TIMES what those same workers are getting; now, in other countries, the CEOs were making around ten times the amount of their employees...and according to the report, that hasn't changed much.

So...the offspring of these individuals wouldn't seem to have too mush in terms of having idle monies to use on whatever comes to mind. Well, remember the crop of movies back in the eighties and nineties?


I can go on and on, but the point is...idle hands are the Devil's playground. And rich hands with no effort expended to obtain said riches are idle, indeed. be rich and to do something worthwhile...

I mention John Taylor Gatto here in this rant, because he will most likely second most of the ideas put forth in this posting - don't take my word for it...look him up, and understand his ideas in regards to education.

I'll leave you with one last observation: have you noticed which kids have won national spelling bees in the last few years?

To Serve and Protect?

Oh, dear...Have our Law Enforcement Officers (LEOs) gone off the deep end? Is this now policy to NOT DO THEIR BLOODY JOBS?!?

Read on, dear readers...

911 Operator Resigns In Face Of Criticism

Posted: Feb 11, 2008 08:06 PM EST

The 911 dispatcher who took the frantic call from kidnap victim Adrian Jaimes' sister last week -- and was criticized for his curt manner with the child -- resigned his job on Monday.

Dispatcher Victor Cervantes was a 22-year veteran of the job. Zuleima Jaimes, 10, called 911 and spoke with Cervantes after her brother, Adrian Jaimes, was snatched out of the family car.

Police Chief Art Acevedo expressed concerns with the way Cervantes dealt with Zuleima on the phone when he briefed the media on the Amber Alert to find Adrian Jaimes.

Here is a partial transcript of what was said between Cervantes and Jaimes:

Jaimes: "We were going to school and a man opened the door and took my brother."

Cervantes: "He took your brother?"

Jaimes: "Yes."

Cervantes: "Let me talk to someone else, I can't understand what you're saying. Who took him, that's what I want to know."

Jaimes: "I don't know. They just took him."

Cervantes: "Quit crying, because I can't understand you. The more you cry, the less I hear what you're saying."

"It was time for him to move on and that he realized he did not come across as very professional or very sympathetic," said Assistant Police Chief Leo Enriquez of Cervantes.

Enriquez said Cervantes had done his job by dispatching a patrol unit to the scene while talking to the 10-year-old, but he added the victim had already been traumatized and did not deserve to be spoken to in that manner.

"We are going to look at the training that the dispatchers receive and see if we can upgrade that a little bit," Enriquez said.

Enriquez said he believed Cervantes had been reprimanded in the past for his job performance.

Okay...story number two:

911 Operator Errors During Double Murder Call

There's a new investigation connected to a double murder that took place in South Bexar County Sunday night, and a 911 dispatcher is at the center of it.

The Bexar County Sheriff's Department is questioning how the dispatcher handled the first calls for help from the scene of the murder. Administrators said it appears the dispatcher didn't follow procedures while handling the call.

News 4 obtained a copy of the 911 tape. The first 911 call from a bloody murder scene in Von Ormy lasted 6 minutes and and 45 seconds. Investigators said the dispatcher got the address wrong, among other things.

Dispatcher: "Bexar County Sheriff's Office."

Caller: "Yes ma'am, we need a police officer and ambulance out here to 14081 IH 35 South #3."

Dispatcher: "140-what, sir?"

Caller: "081 IH-35 South."

The 911 call for help came from a man at the Las Penitas Mobile Home Park, who described himself as the manager's son. The man told the dispatcher the home of Jose and Esmeralda Herrera was a bloody scene.

Caller: "I think these two people, they were murdered. I don't know if they are dead or not."

Dispatcher: "Okay, sir. Hold on. You need to calm down a bit. Okay?"

The man had already given the dispatcher the couple's address twice, but a 1 minute and 22 seconds into the call...

Dispatcher: "What's the address again?"

Caller: "It's 14081 IH-35 South #3."

It was the 3rd time the dispatcher was heard asking for the address of the Herrera's, who had both been stabbed with a hunting knife more than 25 times.

Dispatcher: "Just hang on with me. Don't hang up. Okay?"

Soon after a minute of dead air, the dispatcher tells the South Bexar County caller, she needs to call a city dispatcher for help. The dispatcher then rings the San Antonio emergency system.

S.A. Dispatcher: "San Antonio Police. Can I help you?"

Bexar Co. Dispatcher: "I have a caller on the line whose address is 4081 IH 35 South Apartment 3."

S.A. Dispatcher: "4081? That's not even a correct address."

Bexar Co. Dispatcher: "That's the address he gave me. 4081."

S.A. Dispatcher: "Is he on the line?"

Bexar Co. Dispatcher: "I'll put him on the line."

S.A. Dispatcher: "Thank you."

Bexar County investigators told News 4 they are disturbed about how the dispatcher handled the call.

Administrators said the 911 dispatcher sent emergency crews to the wrong address and was too slow and incorrect in gathering information from the caller.

"Quite frankly we were all a little disturbed on the response of that call. We can't tolerate that. It's very important when we get the call. We have to get the response to the people, to the public as soon as possible," said Chief Ronald Bennett of the Bexar County Sheriff's Department.

Bexar County investigators want to get the dispatcher's side of the incident. Chief Bennett told News 4 the operator will be interviewed by her supervisors as soon as she reports to work Tuesday night.

Other Dispatchers Disciplined
This is not the first time a dispatcher has been in trouble for not doing his or her job. The Trouble Shooters investigated disciplined dispatchers, and what they found was also disturbing.

The Trouble Shooters reviewed disciplinary records for dispatcher from several 911 call centers in our area. Incidents including dispatchers not sending an officer to an emergency call, a dispatcher falling asleep on duty, and another hanging up on someone to take a personal call.

But probably the most alarming case involved a home invasion with children home alone. That dispatcher told the officer it was a low priority call, and it took over an hour for them to arrive. The kids' mother was angry at the slow response.

"Apparently to them it wasn't important. It wasn't their kids," said the mom. "If you kids are alone, someone is breaking in and they're inside and the police cannot respond to that as an emergency. What is considered an emergency?"

That mom believed the dispatcher should have been fired. But the dispatcher is still handling 9-1-1 calls. Her punishment was a written reprimand.

If you have a problem with a dispatcher, you should put your complaint in writing to their supervisor.

Story number three:

911 Operators Refused Aid to Woman Left to Die
Posted on Friday, November 02 @ 19:23:28 PDT

LOS ANGELES — New 911 tapes released Tuesday reveal that dispatchers refused to send help to a woman ignored by hospital staff as she lay dying on the floor of a Los Angeles emergency room.

Edith Isabel Rodriguez, 43, died after dispatchers on two 911 calls refused to contact paramedics or an ambulance to send her to another facility, the Los Angeles Times reported Tuesday. The second dispatcher went so far as to argue with the caller over whether it was a real emergency.

Rodriguez died of a perforated bowel on May 9 at Martin Luther King Jr.-Harbor Hospital. Her death was ruled accidental by the Los Angeles County coroner's office.

In the calls — posted after they were released by the county Sheriff's Department under the newspaper's California Public Records Act request — callers plead for help for the woman left bleeding from the mouth and writhing in pain for 45 minutes on the hospital's floor.

"I'm in the emergency room. My wife is dying and the nurses don't want to help her out," he said in Spanish through an interpreter.

"What's wrong with her?" a dispatcher asked.

"She's vomiting blood," Prado said.

"OK, and why aren't they helping her?" the dispatcher asked.

"They're watching her there and they're not doing anything. They're just watching her," Prado said.

The dispatcher told the man to contact a doctor and then said paramedics won't pick up his wife because she already was in a hospital. Later, she told Prado to contact county police officers at a security desk.

Experts have said Rodriguez could have survived had she been treated early enough. The head of the county's Department of Health Services, which oversees the facility, has called her death "inexcusable."

A second 911 call was placed eight minutes later by a woman bystander who requested that an ambulance be sent to take Rodriguez to some other hospital for care.

"She's definitely sick and there's a guy that's ignoring her," the woman told a different dispatcher.

During the brief call, the dispatcher argued with the woman over whether there really was an emergency.

"I cannot do anything for you for the quality of the hospital. ... It is not an emergency. It is not an emergency, ma'am," he said.

"You're not here to see how they're treating her," the woman replied.
The dispatcher refused to call paramedics and told the woman that she should contact hospital supervisors "and let them know" if she is unhappy.

"May God strike you, too, for acting the way you just acted," the woman said finally.

"No, negative ma'am, you're the one," he said.

"What's real confusing … was that she was at a medical facility," Sheriff's Capt. Steven M. Roller, who is in charge of the Century Station, which handled the calls, told the Times. "That poses some real quandaries."

Roller told the Times that the second dispatcher's tone was inappropriate.

"As a station commander, I don't like any of my employees getting rude or nasty with any caller, regardless, and in that particular case, obviously, the employee's conduct could have been better," Roller said, telling the Times the employee received written "counseling."

Martin Luther King Jr.-Harbor Hospital formerly was known as Martin Luther King Jr./Drew Medical Center. The name was changed as part of a reorganization after years of problems including patient deaths blamed on sloppy nursing care and hospital mismanagement that has threatened its federal funding. the story that begat this posting:

911 dispatcher gets pink slip after cursing caller

NASHVILLE, Tennessee (AP) -- A Nashville, Tennessee, 911 operator has been fired after he was recorded saying that he didn't "give a s---" about what happened to a woman who had just called to report her ex-boyfriend was threatening her.

Emergency Communications Center spokeswoman Amanda Sluss said Wednesday that Frank Roth was in training during the February incident and was fired a month later.

Roth made the comments after promising police would arrive soon for a woman who called saying her ex-boyfriend held her at knifepoint and later was threatening her.

After hanging up with her but while still being recorded, he said, "I really don't give a s--- what happens to you."

Sluss says the incident is not reflective of how 911 operators treat callers and that "a series of errors" led to the delay in response to Sheila Jones.

"Certainly this particular caller didn't receive the service she deserved," Sluss said. "This is not indicative of how our employees treat citizens. It's not something that should have been said. It's not what we train our employees to do."

It took police three hours to reach the scene after the first call.

Nashville TV station WTVF first reported the story after one of its reporters obtained the 911 recording.

Will you all agree with me that this is a very disturbing trend?

This is why the Second Amendment is important. Remember that...

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Pot Shrinks Tumors; Government Knew in '74

By Raymond Cushing, AlterNet

The term medical marijuana took on dramatic new meaning in February, 2000 when researchers in Madrid announced they had destroyed incurable brain tumors in rats by injecting them with THC, the active ingredient in cannabis-

The Madrid study marks only the second time that THC has been administered to tumor-bearing animals; the first was a Virginia investigation 26 years ago- In both studies, the THC shrank or destroyed tumors in a majority of the test subjects-

Most Americans don't know anything about the Madrid discovery- Virtually no major U-S- newspapers carried the story, which ran only once on the AP and UPI news wires, on Feb- 29, 2000-

The ominous part is that this isn't the first time scientists have discovered that THC shrinks tumors- In 1974 researchers at the Medical College of Virginia, who had been funded by the National Institute of Health to find evidence that marijuana damages the immune system, found instead that THC slowed the growth of three kinds of cancer in mice -- lung and breast cancer, and a virus-induced leukemia-

The DEA quickly shut down the Virginia study and all further cannabis/tumor research, according to Jack Herer, who reports on the events in his book, "The Emperor Wears No Clothes-" In 1976 President Gerald Ford put an end to all public cannabis research and granted exclusive research rights to major pharmaceutical companies, who set out -- unsuccessfully -- to develop synthetic forms of THC that would deliver all the medical benefits without the "high-"

The Madrid researchers reported in the March issue of "Nature Medicine" that they injected the brains of 45 rats with cancer cells, producing tumors whose presence they confirmed through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)- On the 12th day they injected 15 of the rats with THC and 15 with Win-55,212-2 a synthetic compound similar to THC- "All the rats left untreated uniformly died 12-18 days after glioma (brain cancer) cell inoculation --- Cannabinoid (THC)-treated rats survived significantly longer than control rats- THC administration was ineffective in three rats, which died by days 16-18- Nine of the THC-treated rats surpassed the time of death of untreated rats, and survived up to 19-35 days- Moreover, the tumor was completely eradicated in three of the treated rats-" The rats treated with Win-55,212-2 showed similar results-

The Spanish researchers, led by Dr- Manuel Guzman of Complutense University, also irrigated healthy rats' brains with large doses of THC for seven days, to test for harmful biochemical or neurological effects- They found none-

"Careful MRI analysis of all those tumor-free rats showed no sign of damage related to necrosis, edema, infection or trauma --- We also examined other potential side effects of cannabinoid administration- In both tumor-free and tumor-bearing rats, cannabinoid administration induced no substantial change in behavioral parameters such as motor coordination or physical activity- Food and water intake as well as body weight gain were unaffected during and after cannabinoid delivery- Likewise, the general hematological profiles of cannabinoid-treated rats were normal- Thus, neither biochemical parameters nor markers of tissue damage changed substantially during the 7-day delivery period or for at least 2 months after cannabinoid treatment ended-"

Guzman's investigation is the only time since the 1974 Virginia study that THC has been administered to live tumor-bearing animals- (The Spanish researchers cite a 1998 study in which cannabinoids inhibited breast cancer cell proliferation, but that was a "petri dish" experiment that didn't involve live subjects-)

In an email interview for this story, the Madrid researcher said he had heard of the Virginia study, but had never been able to locate literature on it- Hence, the Nature Medicine article characterizes the new study as the first on tumor-laden animals and doesn't cite the 1974 Virginia investigation-

"I am aware of the existence of that research- In fact I have attempted many times to obtain the journal article on the original investigation by these people, but it has proven impossible-" Guzman said-

In 1983 the Reagan/Bush Administration tried to persuade American universities and researchers to destroy all 1966-76 cannabis research work, including compendiums in libraries, reports Jack Herer, who states, "We know that large amounts of information have since disappeared-"

Guzman provided the title of the work -- "Antineoplastic activity of cannabinoids," an article in a 1975 Journal of the National Cancer Institute -- and this writer obtained a copy at the University of California medical school library in Davis and faxed it to Madrid-

The summary of the Virginia study begins, "Lewis lung adenocarcinoma growth was retarded by the oral administration of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabinol (CBN)" -- two types of cannabinoids, a family of active components in marijuana- "Mice treated for 20 consecutive days with THC and CBN had reduced primary tumor size-"

The 1975 journal article doesn't mention breast cancer tumors, which featured in the only newspaper story ever to appear about the 1974 study -- in the Local section of the Washington Post on August 18, 1974-

Under the headline, "Cancer Curb Is Studied," it read in part:

"The active chemical agent in marijuana curbs the growth of three kinds of cancer in mice and may also suppress the immunity reaction that causes rejection of organ transplants, a Medical College of Virginia team has discovered-" The researchers "found that THC slowed the growth of lung cancers, breast cancers and a virus-induced leukemia in laboratory mice, and prolonged their lives by as much as 36 percent-"

Guzman, writing from Madrid, was eloquent in his response after this writer faxed him the clipping from the Washington Post of a quarter century ago-

In translation, he wrote:

"It is extremely interesting to me, the hope that the project seemed to awaken at that moment, and the sad evolution of events during the years following the discovery, until now we once again draw back the veil‚ over the anti-tumoral power of THC, twenty-five years later- Unfortunately, the world bumps along between such moments of hope and long periods of intellectual castration-"

News coverage of the Madrid discovery has been virtually nonexistent in this country- The news broke quietly on Feb- 29, 2000 with a story that ran once on the UPI wire about the Nature Medicine article- This writer stumbled on it through a link that appeared briefly on the Drudge Report web page- The New York Times, Washington Post and Los Angeles Times all ignored the story, even though its newsworthiness is indisputable: a benign substance occurring in nature destroys deadly brain tumors-

Raymond Cushing is a journalist, musician and filmmaker- This article was named by Project Censored as a "Top Censored Story of 2000-"

Bulletin from MySpace (thanks, fellows!)

Pot Shrinks Tumors; Government Knew in '74

Okay...a video that is pretty much right to the point (be warned - language is QUITE direct):

My bud convinced me that this video isn't over the edge...but if you want something more elegant, H.L. Mencken said it best:

"It is one of my firmest and most sacred beliefs... that the government of the United States, in both its legislative and its executive arm, is ignorant, incompetent, corrupt, and disgusting... that the administration of justice in the Republic is stupid, dishonest, and against all reason and equity... that the foreign policy of the United States, its habitual manner of dealing with other nations, whether friend or foe, is hypocritical, disingenuous, knavish, and dishonorable... that the American people, taking one with another, constitute the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages."

Some quick headlines and ranting:

Heart expaerts warn that tasers are deadly - now tell me something I DIDN'T know...

Lou Pearlman, creator (?) of boy bands The Backstreet Boys and N'Sync Sentenced to 25 Years for Scam - yeah...the scam not withstanding...he should be put in the stocks for unleashing that crapfest upon our senses.

Last but not least: Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse Than Nuclear Weapons - oh, that first picture is gruesome...I have NOTHING FUNNY to say here...

I found a great link at CannabisNews:

Iran/Contra was all about two things:

1. Getting the Black population addicted to the new wonder drug, CRACK - this was created by the CIA, FBI and other agencies (I'd appreciate some verification - any takers?); in order to destabilize the Black communities who were coming to awareness of the similarities with every other community coming of age in America. The agencies were successful with the Black Panther Coloring Book and smears against celebrities such as Jean Seberg; the next step was to divide and conquer...but how to do so? Cocaine was entirely too expensive, and freebasing was considered too a cheap, addicting smokable form was created, and introduced into the Black communities - goodbye, Black Panthers! Who has money for causes when they're chasing that "hit"?

2. The "War On Drugs" is a complete oxymoron, like "military intelligence". Kevin Ives and Don Henry were murdered by the operators of the Mena Drug Ring, overseen at one point by the then-governor of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton. When the operation was discovered, the boys were murdered, and their murders were covered up by coroners and officials stating that the kids were playing on train tracks and had gone to sleep, which led to them being run over by a train. The operation was then moved to Afghanistan, where our soldiers are putting their lives on the line for the next crop of opium and heroin.

The War On Drugs is actually the War Against AMERICANS.

Sign the petition at Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth - I did.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

George W Bush Authorized 911 Attacks Says Government Insider!

Keep in mind when reading this, that the man being interviewed is no two-bit internet conspiracy buff (not unlike your dear muckraker).

Stanley Hilton was a senior advisor to Sen Bob Dole (R) and has personally known Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz for decades. This courageous man has risked his professional reputation, and possibly his life, to get this information out to people.

The following is from his latest visit to Alex Jones' radio show.

Forwarded with Compliments of Free Voice of America (FVOA): Accurate News and Interesting Commentary for Amerika's Huddled Masses Yearning to Breathe Free.

Note: All honor to Stanley Hilton for risking his life so that we may know the truth of 9/11.

The Bush Junta Unmasked

"This (9/11) was all planned. This was a government-ordered operation. Bush personally signed the order. He personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty of treason and mass murder." -- Stanley Hilton

Alex Jones interview of Stanley Hilton, attorney for 911 Taxpayers' lawsuit - Alex Jones Radio Show - September 10, 2004 [Transcription by 'RatCat']

AJ: He is back with us. He is former Bob Dole's chief of staff, very successful counselor, lawyer. He represents hundreds of the victims families of 9/11. He is suing Bush for involvement in 9/11. Now a major Zogby poll out - half of New Yorkers think the government was involved in 9/11. And joining us for the next 35 minutes, into the next hour, is Stanley Hilton. Stanley, it's great to have you on with us.

SH: Glad to be on.

AJ: We'll have to recap this when we start the next hour, but just in a nutshell, you have a lawsuit going, you've deposed a lot of military officers. You know the truth of 9/11. Just in a nutshell, what is your case alleging?

SH: Our case is alleging that Bush and his puppets Rice and Cheney and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so forth, Tenet, were all involved not only in aiding and abetting and allowing 9/11 to happen but in actually ordering it to happen. Bush personally ordered it to happen. We have some very incriminating documents as well as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the Middle East. I also wanted to point out that, just quickly, I went to school with some of these neocons. At the University of Chicago, in the late 60s with Wolfowitz and Feith and several of the others and so I know these people personally. And we used to talk about this stuff all of the time. And I did my senior thesis on this very subject - how to turn the U.S. into a presidential dictatorship by manufacturing a bogus Pearl Harbor event. So, technically this has been in the planning at least 35 years.

AJ: That's right. They were all Straussian followers of a Nazi-like professor. And now they are setting it up here in America. Stanley, I know you deposed a lot of people and you've got your $7 million dollar lawsuit with hundreds of the victim's families involved.

SH: $7 billion, $7 billion

AJ: Yeah, 7 billion. Can you go over some of the new and incriminating evidence you've got of them ordering the attack?

SH: Yes, let me just say that this is a taxpayers' class action lawsuit as well as a suit on behalf of the families and the basic three arguments are they violated the Constitution by ordering this event. And secondly that they [garbled] fraudulent Federal Claims Act, Title 31 of the U.S. Code in which Bush presented false and fraudulent evidence to Congress to get the Iraq war authorization. And, of course, he related it to 9/11 and claimed that Saddam was involved with that, and all these lies.

AJ: Tell you what, stay there. Stanley, we've got to break. Let's come back and get into the evidence.


AJ: All right my friends, second hour, September 10th, 2004, the anniversary of the globalist attack coming up tomorrow. It's an amazing individual we have on the line. Bob Dole's former chief of staff, political scientist, a lawyer, he went to school with Rumsfeld and others, he wrote his thesis about how to turn America into a dictatorship using a fake Pearl Harbor attack. He's suing the U.S. government for carrying out 9/11. He has hundreds of the victims' families signing onto it - it's a $7 billion lawsuit. And he is Stanley Hilton. I know that a lot of stations just joined us in Los Angeles and Rhode Island and Missouri and Florida and all over. Please sir, recap what you were just stating and then let's get into the new evidence. And then we'll get into why you are being harassed by the FBI, as other FBI people are being harassed who have been blowing the whistle on this. So, this is really getting serious. Stanley, tell us all about it.

SH: Yeah, we are suing Bush, Condoleezza Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Mueller, etc. for complicity in personally not only allowing 9/11 to happen but in ordering it. The hijackers we retained and we had a witness who is married to one of them. The hijackers were U.S. undercover agents. They were double agents, paid by the FBI and the CIA to spy on Arab groups in this country. They were controlled. Their landlord was an FBI informant in San Diego and other places. And this was a direct, covert operation ordered, personally ordered by George W. Bush. Personally ordered. We have incriminating evidence, documents as well as witnesses, to this effect. It's not just incompetence - in spite of the fact that he is incompetent. The fact is he personally ordered this, knew about it. He, at one point, there were rehearsals of this. The reason why he appeared to be uninterested and nonchalant on September 11th - when those videos showed that Andrew Card whispered in his ear the [garbled] words about this he listened to kids reading the pet goat story, is that he thought this was another rehearsal. These people had dress-rehearsed this many times. He had seen simulated videos of this. In fact, he even made a Freudian slip a few months later at a California press conference when he said he had, quote, "seen on television the first plane attack the first tower." And that could not be possible because there was no video. What it was was the simulated video that he had gone over. So this was a personally government-ordered thing. We are suing them under the Constitution for violating Americans' rights, as well as under the federal Fraudulent Claims Act, for presenting a fraudulent claim to Congress to justify the bogus Iraq boondoggle war, for political gains. And also, under the RICO statute, under the Racketeering Corrupt Organization Act, for being a corrupt entity. And I've been harassed personally by the chief judge of the federal court who is instructing me personally to drop this suit, threatened to kick me off the court, after 30 years on the court. I've been harassed by the FBI. My staff has been harassed and threatened. My office has been broken into and this is the kind of government we are dealing with.

AJ: Absolutely and now it has come out - five separate drills of flying hijacked jets into buildings that morning - which you told us about before it even broke in the Associated Press. They were trying to get out ahead of you. You talked about how you interviewed military people who were told it was a drill that morning. Then to get out ahead of that, the news finally reported on it. Now, we've learned that all these operations - I want to get into that, I want to talk about the new incriminating evidence of ordering it and how they had drilled on this, how Cheney was in the bunker controlling this. That has even come out in the mainstream news but they won't release the details of that, Stanley. But what type of FBI harassment are you going through?

SH: First of all, my office was burglarized in San Francisco several months ago. Files were gone through and some files were seized - particularly the ones dealing with the lady that was married to one of the hijackers. Fortunately, I had spare copies in a hidden place so nothing disappeared permanently. But more significantly, FBI agents have been harassing one of my staff members and threatening them with vague but frightening threats of indicting them. And it's just total harassment. They have planted a spy, an undercover agent, in my organization, as we just recently discovered. In other words, these are Nazi Germany tactics. This is the kind of government you have in this country. This is what Bush is all about.

AJ: Stay there, Stanley, Bob Dole's former chief of staff. We'll come back after this quick break. Please stay with us.


AJ: All right, eight minutes, 25 seconds into the second hour. Stanley Hilton, political scientist, lawyer, Bob Dole's former chief of staff, is suing the government for 7 billion dollars for carrying out 9/11 and for racketeering. And he joins us now. During the break, I first really did the big interview with Stanley Hilton after I saw him attacked on Fox News. And that interview got massive attention. And then he kind of went underground for a while because a judge, we're going to talk about that, ordered him to not do any more interviews. And now he's back doing interviews. He's had his office broken into, FBI threats and harassment. Bottom line, he has deposed military individuals, wives of hijackers, you name it, it was a government operation. It has even come out in mainstream news, a piece here, a piece there. They had drills on 9/11, that's why NORAD stood down. Cheney was in control of the whole thing. Stanley Hilton has now gotten documents about how Bush ordered the whole operation. And I'll tell you right now, his life is in danger, folks. And he's got so much courage. He went to school with these neocons at the University of Chicago. He wrote his thesis on how the government could use terrorist attacks to set up martial law. He is the man for the time and folks wondered why he disappeared for a while and just did his lawsuit and wasn't doing interviews, it was because he was ordered to. Stanley, can you get into that for us?

SH: I did an interview with you, Alex, back in March of 2003, about a year and a half ago, and literally two weeks after that, I was contacted by the emissary of the chief judge of the federal court where I have the lawsuit. And I was warned not to publicize it but to keep it quiet and threatened with discipline. And it remained quiet until a couple of months ago and then I got on the air on some programs and some publicity and July 1st, I was threatened directly by the chief judge here, threatened with court discipline. This particular judge has been circulating communiqués to the other federal judges seeking anything negative she can get against me to try and discipline me after I've been on the court here for 30 years with no disciplinary problems at all. This is suddenly happening. And her assistants who are on the committee of the court met with me on July 1st in Palo Alto, California, and threatened me directly. They handed me a copy of the lawsuit and said that the judge wants me to dismiss this. What's this? She doesn't like the content of it. This is politically incorrect. This is outside the norm. I said I represented more than 400 plaintiffs, how am I going to dismiss this case? And they threatened me directly and they said, "the next time you'll be disciplined." And also they've threatened me not to go public, etc. And this is just outrageous.

AJ: It's all color of law. No direct orders, just all in your face.

SH: They sent a letter out, and of course they deny it's because of the political content of the suit but they told me directly on the phone that it is because of this suit and this judge is very, very angry, apparently has been in contact with Ashcroft's Justice Department. I got a call from Ashcroft's Justice Department a few months ago about this, demanding that I drop the suit, threatening sanctions and all kinds of things. I refused to drop it.

AJ: Now let's go back over, you had them break into your office, harassment. Let's go over that in detail.

SH: My office was broken into about 6 months ago. The file cabinets - it was obvious they had been rifled through. Files were stolen. Files dealing with this particular case and particularly with the documents I had regarding the fact that the - some of these hijackers, at least some of them were on the payroll of the U.S. government as undercover FBI, CIA, double agents. They are spying on Arab groups in the U.S. And, in effect, all this led up to the effect that al Qaeda is a creation of the George Bush administration, basically. That the entity that he called al Qaeda is directly linked to George Bush. And all this stuff was stolen. Fortunately, I had copies. But this was just part of the harassment. The FBI has also been harassing some of my assistants and has planted a spy in our midst. And it is just outrageous that these Nazi tactics are being used - and the obstruction of justice, these people are criminals. And that's what's happening under the tremendous pressure here to just drop it. Or to shut up now and just go away.

AJ: Now, let's talk about what they want you to drop. Let's talk about, without giving names, the people you deposed, what really happened, the picture you've got. You said earlier that Bush ordered this, they were simulating this which they now admit there were simulations on that morning. Let's go over what they don't want you to talk about, Stanley.

SH: We have evidence both documentary as well as witness sworn statements from undercover former FBI agents, FBI informants, etc., that other officials in the Pentagon and the military and the Air Force that deal with the fact that there were many drills, many rehearsals for 9/11 before it happened. Bush had seen this simulated on TV many times. He blurted this out at a press conference in California a few months after 9/11 where he said he had, quote, seen the first plane hit the first building on the video. And that's not possible because there was no official video of that. There was one of the second plane not the first one. He had seen the first one. We do have some incriminating documents that Bush personally ordered 9/11 events. It was well planned. A FEMA official has admitted on tape that he was there the night before - September 10th, that is

AJ: And now Mayor Giuliani, a few months ago in the 911 Commission, admitted that - Tripod II. They had their whole command post already moved out of Building 7. Now, this is very, very important. This is a key area of this whole event. You said months before it came out on the CIA's own website and the Associated Press, you said I deposed people. They said there were drills that morning and exactly what happened, happening - that was the smoke-screen for the stand-down. And then to get out ahead of it, the CIA comes out and said yeah we were running a drill that morning. Now, we've learned that five, possibly six, were confirmed. Five of these - one drill with the exact same thing happening that actually happened, at the exact same time in the morning. That's why NORAD stood down with 24 different blips on the screen. You've said this. You brought this up first. Now, I know you can't get too much into detail but can you tell us how you learned of this?

SH: I have interviewed individuals in NORAD and the Air Force. I personally toured NORAD many years ago around the time that I worked for Dole. I'm very familiar with the operations at Cheyenne Mountain at Colorado Springs, where NORAD is. Individuals that work in NORAD as well as the Air Force have stated this, off the record, but the point is, yes, this was not just five drills but at least 35 drills over at least two months before September 11th. Everything was planned, the exact location

AJ: But five drills that day.

SH: That day, that day, and Bush thought it was a drill. That's the only explanation for why he appeared nonchalant

AJ: We also had NORAD officers and civilian air traffic controllers going, "Is this part of the exercise? Is this a drill?"

SH: Yes.

AJ: On the tapes and in TV interviews, they thought it was, quote, a drill.

SH: That's right. That's exactly what I said long before it became public. I've known about this since earlier in March of '03, as I stated before. This was all planned. This was a government-ordered operation. Bush personally signed the order. He personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty of treason and mass murder. And now, obstruction of justice by attempting to use a federal judge and FBI agents to inhibit a legitimate civil lawsuit in this country, in federal court. Even a chief judge in this court tried to harass and threaten me personally for representing legitimate plaintiffs. And they got Clinton for allegedly lying under oath about Paula Jones and now - look what's happening now. And Ken Starr used to be across from me in Duke Law School in the early `70s and it´s interesting that he got away with trying to get Clinton impeached, so we have a far worse criminal sitting in the oval office today - somebody guilty of mass murder as well as obstruction of justice.

AJ: Well, I mean look, they say they never heard of a plan to fly planes into buildings - said it all over television - Rice, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft. And then we find out they were running all these drills that morning. Even if they weren't involved, that proves they were liars about ever hearing of such a plan.

SH: Well, I'm trying to take their depositions - I've been trying to take their depositions for months. They've been trying to object to it. They will have to admit they were either lying then or now. It's clearly perjury either way. They are liars and perjurers; that's what they are. These are the people that we have running this government and, of course, they knew about it. How are they going to claim now that they didn't know about these drills? Their idea is that nobody knew anything. It's the old know-nothing mentality. And how anybody considers this believable is beyond me.

AJ: All right, now people ask how could a huge organization, how could the AWACs, how could the military let this happen; whereas before, if your Cessna got off course for five minutes, they would launch F-16s on you. It's real simple. It's what Stanley Hilton said here a year and a half ago. It's what came out in the news after that. The military, good people, were told this was all a drill. And it was not a drill. And ABC News admits that Cheney was in control of [?] out of the White House [?] and that he ordered the military to quote "do something." Our inside sources from Hilton and others say it was a stand down and they admit they will not release that under national security. Stanley?

SH: Well they are going to admit it, they're going to release it in the court case because if you demand it under subpoena powers and they must release it. And part of our lawsuit is brought in the name of the U.S. because under the federal fraudulent [Claims Act], we accuse the Bush Administration of presenting a fraudulent claim to Congress. And under the statutes of Title 31 of the U.S. code, they must release this information. That's why they are trying to threaten me, harass me, invade my office, steal my files, commit blatant obstruction of justice and other crimes to try and prevent a legitimate civil suit from exposing these criminals and their acts of treason and mass murder.

AJ: I think you need to publicly tell folks that you are not planning suicide. Would you like to tell folks that?

SH: (laughs) I'm not planning suicide. I've got family and I'm not planning that but I don't like the threats I'm under - but I can tell you this, it's taking a toll emotionally on me and my staff. And particularly, when you get a threat from the chief judge of your own court.

AJ: Why have you decided to go public again after a year of being under the radar? SH: Because the more and more evidence that I've been adducing over a year and a half has made it so obvious to me that this was now without any doubt a government operation and that it amounts to the biggest act of treason and mass murder in American history. I mean George Bush makes Benedict Arnold look like a patriot. He makes Benedict Arnold look like George Washington. I mean that's what we have - a criminal and a traitor sitting in the White House pretending he's a patriot, wrapping himself in the flag. And it's pretty disgusting because the other side of the so-called opposition, the Kerry camp is just saying nothing because they're afraid to speak.

AJ: Stay right there. We'll be right back.


AJ: Stanley Hilton will be with us for another 15 or 16 minutes. Then he's got to go into court. Bob Dole's former chief of staff, political scientist, lawyer, represents 400 plus plaintiffs - most of them victims of 9/11. When I was in New York last week, everybody I was talking to, I mean 90 plus percent of them at ground zero - "I had family, I worked in the buildings, my son's a Navy Seal - he called the night before and said don't go to work." You know, all of this, and then now they never had any idea - and it turns out they had all these drills - and one drill of hijacked jets flying into the World Trade Center and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning. That morning - come on people! And Stanley Hilton brought all this out on this show before it was in the mainstream news. And I was talking to him during the break. I mean, the harassment, the moles, the threatening of his staff, the judge threatening him. Stanley, let's get specifically into the documents that you have now got that they have now been robbing you for, that you luckily, thank God had copies. Specifically, Bush ordering this. Can you get into that for us - ordering 9/11? SH: National Security Council classified documents which [garbled] and it's was part of a series of documents that were involved with the drill documents. This was all planned - they had it on videotape. These planes were controlled by remote control, as I stated previously a year and a half ago, there's a system called Cyclops. There is a computer chip in the nose of the plane and it enables the ground control, the military ground control, to disable the pilot's control of the plane and to control it and to fly it directly into those towers. That's what happened. It's also a technology used on what's called the Global Hawk, which is an aircraft drone - a remote- controlled aircraft. And they were doing it. We are talking about National Security Council classified documents that clearly indicated that [garbled] had a green light to order this to go and this is no drill. These drills that were running were clearly a dress rehearsal and this was a government operation. You wonder why these people are trying to threaten people and trying to intimidate people who have written this suit, I guess if you murdered 3000 of your own citizens, in conjunction with the corrupt Royal family of Saudi Arabia as Bush did. And if you then waste billions more on a worthless garbage war in Iraq, I guess you've got something to worry about and you want to threaten people to prevent it from coming out.

AJ: I mean let's look at this. Not only are there dress rehearsals, they are smoke screens so the good military stands down and doesn't know what's happening. But it's now coming out, even in mainstream news, that yes these drills were going on. Yes, and some of these drills, quote, passenger-type jets were under remote control - this is decades old technology. In 1958, NORAD was [ ] old jets and using them for target practice. Decades ago they flew jumbo jets from LA to Sidney Australia. So since that's going on, everybody knows that. And it's the same MO. Just like the first World Trade Center [bombing] where they get two retarded men who followed this blind sheik who had a tiny mosque above a pizza parlor. And they set them up as the patsies. Then the FBI cooks the bomb, trains the drivers. This informant goes, "You're not going to bomb the building? They go "Yeah, we're letting it go forward." He tapes them to protect themselves. The two retarded gentlemen, thank God, didn't park it up against the column, as the FBI instructed them to do, so it didn't bring down the tower - because you have to be right up against the column. That doesn't happen. Yet, it's the same thing with 9/11. You've got these CIA agents, these Arabs, who were trained at U.S. military bases, Pensacola Naval Air Station - mainstream media, out creating their legends for this background. They're on board the aircraft. My military sources say nerve gas kills everybody on board the plane - nerve gas packets. Then they fly the planes into buildings. From your inside sources, is that accurate?

SH: It's one of the things that we are looking into - that nerve gas or something else disabled people. It's possible. I can't say for sure to be honest with you

AJ: All you know is they were government agents and they were on board and the planes were remote controlled.

SH: Yeah, it was basically a smokescreen. I mean, the events of the hijackings, how someone snuck in those cutters, it was a plant. It was like a classic decoy. I've got some military background. And it's called decoy. It's a decoy operation. You make the people focus on the decoy to avoid looking at the real criminals. So they are focusing on these so-called nineteen hijackers and saying, "Oh, it must have been these Arabs. When, in fact, the guilty person is at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue - sitting in the oval office. That's the guilty person. That's the one who authorized it. There is only one man who could have authorized this operation and that's Bush. And anyone at NORAD will tell you as I have been told personally at NORAD in the war control room, there is only one man who has the power to do this kind of thing and that's Bush. Even though many believe he's a puppet. And I think in many ways he is. The fact of the matter is where was [ ] Cheney, Rumsfeld and these other traitors. The fact is Bush personally ordered and he's guilty and liable and he's going to be re-elected apparently because the media's asleep and [garbled] for Bush. AJ: Well, the media is owned by the same military industrial complex that carried out the attacks.

SH: Yeah, the media is only interested in maintaining the official government fantasy that this was a little lone Arab. These Arabs couldn't even steer that plane down a runway.

AJ: Stay there Stanley, final segment coming up.


AJ: Mr. Hilton, when you talk to these FBI agents, when you talk to these military men and women, what's their attitude? They've got to be pretty freaked out to have the big picture and know what actually happened on 9/11.

SH: Yes, you know it's like clouds just before a thunderstorm in the sense that they are sort of pregnant with rage. They are just enraged at the criminal politicians who have perverted and misused the government to murder its own citizens and pursue these dubious political ends. And many of them, in increasing numbers, are willing to talk and will talk under subpoena - but only under subpoena because the official party line of the government is shut up and don't talk to the trial lawyer. But more and more, they are very outraged that part of the government has done this to its own people, to its own people. I mean you have to go back to Stalin to see something - not even Hitler did this to his own people. You have to look at Stalin who murdered the Kulaks, the Russians for his own dubious gains. Also we've got - we have a Stalinist mentality in this country. And, if these people pose as patriots and wrap themselves in the flag, it's disgusting. I wanted also to point out that the Japanese television network, Asahi, is going to be airing a special on primetime tomorrow, on September 11th. They interviewed me for eight hours a couple of weeks ago. I'll be on that. I wish - of course, the America media don't care so they are not going to care. But in Japan, people are very serious in interviewing me and others. And we have a website now, called, if more people are interested: But the other thing, I just wanted to say that if anything happens to me - and I don't know why - because I'm being threatened here now. And it seems you can't bring a case in this country anymore against criminals in power without being threatened. And this is how they operate. The stakes are pretty high when you've got a world historical level of treason and fraud by this government against it's own people. I guess this is what you have to expect.

AJ: Stanley, the globalists, the new world order crowd, definitely intend to carry out more terror attacks. I know they would have carried out more attacks if we wouldn't have done what we've been up to, if you wouldn't have been out there boldly speaking out and many others. And then their electronic Berlin wall has a bunch of cracks in it now. Thanks to good people like yourself and many others who are speaking out and telling the truth. But do you think that they may carry out what they've been hyping - a suitcase nuke attack, a biological release to try to smokescreen all of this? I know it's a catch 22, you've got to expose the murderers. We've got to get the word out on this but some government people that I've talk to say, "Yeah, but if you do that, they are going to go even more hard core and must totally try to take over." But I say regardless, they are already doing that. So what do you say to that?

SH: Well, yeah, I think they have an agenda. They have contingency plans. I think they are laying low now because there are an increasing number of people, like myself, who are openly challenging them and accusing them of criminal conduct. I think they would have done it again if we had not spoken up. I think they're planning, what they would like to do is silence any dissenters. That's why we are trying to get the Patriot Act declared unconstitutional in this lawsuit also.

AJ: Let's talk about polls. In the beginning a patriot is a scarce man, hated and feared, but in time when his cause succeeds, the timid join him, because then it costs nothing to be a patriot. You are one of those guys who hit the barbwire for us, or figuratively jumped on the hand grenade for America. But when you've got a Zogby poll, who is highly respected, half of New Yorkers believe that the government was involved. When you have a Canadian poll, 63% on average believe that the U.S. government was involved. And some groups, as high as 76% in polls believe the government was involved. European polls, two- thirds show the same thing. We have German defense ministers and technology ministers and another member of their government now, three of them going public, known conservatives, and progressives. You have an environment minister, Michael Meacher, saying that if they didn't do it, they sure as hell knew what was going on. Look, if anybody who is a thinking person looks at the evidence, their official story is impossible. Then you investigate and they are involved in it. Comments to this massive awakening and what's happening.

SH: Well, I think that's why they want the Patriot Act to suppress political dissent. They have to, they're anticipating, they are not dumb individuals. I know these people personally, Wolfowitz. These are criminal individuals but they are smart and so they anticipated political dissent. And that's why, like the Nazis, their forebears, and their blood brothers, the Nazis and the Stalinists, they're all for political repression. Every corrupt and criminal government has done this - they suppress their own people: Nazi Germany, Communist Russia, Mao Tse-Tung, that's why we have the Patriot Act. So it's hand in hand. They had it planned to go right up to September 11th, this was all part of the plan. You have to do it. It was part of my senior thesis. You must follow through the terrorists attacks with a political suppression mechanism in the law. And that's why they want Patriot I and Patriot II and their plans are to continue launching more terrorist attacks to justify even more repression. The goal is to make this a one party dictatorship in this country, to pursue their dubious ends with their blood brothers like the Saudi Royal family. And also, historical blood brothers, such as the Nazi Germany and the Communist Russian. That's the goal

AJ: You've got to go in just a minute or two. But I wanted to also tell you about New York. Sound cannons that are used in Iraq, they're against us. Men in black ski masks. 41,000 police, accredited media being arrested randomly. Children being arrested, people in wheelchairs, 2000 plus people put in a camp with barbwire fences inside with no bathrooms. You had to have permission to go to the porta-potties. Police screaming at you. It had nothing to do with terrorism. They are openly setting the precedent for martial law.

SH: Well, that's right, the word terrorist is now being overly broad and overly defined [garbled] and also, you know, it's like the word communist was used for anything during the McCarthy witch hunt. And anybody can be called a terrorist by Bush's definition. But the irony is that the number one terrorist in the world is living at the White House at the oval office today. That's the real irony. For sheer hypocrisy, I think he deserves the world prize and ought to be in the Ripley book, Believe It or Not, and the Guinness book of world records for sheer brazen chicanery and fraud.

AJ: Let me ask you a question on this because this is the experience that I had. Watching television, watching the killers, watching those that are guilty, stand up there as our saviors is incredibly painful. It's like watching Ted Bundy being the judge at his own trial. I mean it is just painful to know who these people are. To see them putting America in a shredder. Now we are going to have forced psychological testing of every American, forced drugging, you know Pan-American unions, I mean it's just all happening, it's in our face, Stanley.

SH: Yeah, it's very disturbing and as one who has studied the theory and concept of dictatorships, I personally interviewed Albert Speer, who was Hitler's armaments minister. I interviewed him in 1981 in Munich. And I've studied the psychology and history of totalitarianism and there is no question that it's very frightening. And it has, today, with high technology, albeit for the first time in history, the chance of having a world empire dominated by corrupt, technologically oriented government - an elite government. And they've got now what people like Napoleon and Hitler didn't have, which is the technological means to dominate not only their own country but others - the world.

AJ: The answer is to expose them as the terrorists, to show how PNAC [Project for the New American Century] said we need helpful Pearl Harbor events, to show how Northwoods called for the exact 9/11-style attacks, to show their own plans. And to force people to face this horror. What are they going to do in a year or two when 80% of us, not half of us, know the truth?

SH: Well, that's why they want repression and, then again, the ancient old diversion, launch another terrorist attack to get people to pitch it away. I mean who knows what they'll do next. I mean their capacity for ingenious creation of these events is sort of unraveled. I mean there is no limit. My guess is they are going to try another stunt - maybe a stunt just before the election to justify getting Bush reelected. Although it seems like he is running against a straw man or a ghost right now, anyway. But, my guess is they'll try some other tactic to get people's attention away from 9/11 if it gets to be too much attention. What you really want is for the public to just lose interest because the public - and it's like remember the Alamo, you know, people don't forget things like that. To me it's like the Alamo, remember 9/11, that ought to be the slogan for this outrageous act of treason. That's what it is. It's not...

AJ: We are at a crossroads, I don't think they anticipated this much resistance, Stanley.

SH: Yeah, I hope they are truly wrong and as incompetent as they are corrupt and guilty. That means their incompetence is exceeded only by their corruption and their guilt. And eventually, if enough people are going to get outraged enough, these people in the bureaucracy and in the civil service and our military, and eventually we can get people under subpoena these individuals will be exposed.

AJ: Stanley, their whole operation hinges on us being naïve and not recognizing evil. This is what they got with Hitler and others. People couldn't recognize evil so they continued to repeat succumbing to it. We are recognizing it this time. We are putting our lives, our treasure, our future on the line for freedom because we cannot let these blood-thirsty control freak terrorists capture us and use us and turn us into the empire and have a draft and use us as their slaves to invade the planet. And that's their PNAC plan. Stanley Hilton, I know you've got to get to court. God bless you. I want to thank you for being here with us today. Can we get you back on next week?

SH: Sure, just give me a call.

AJ: God bless you my friend. Any closing comments?

SH: My closing comments would be, I think people ought to just think about the consequence of having someone like Bush in the White House and the danger for the future that these sorts of individuals pose. This is not just a historical event of the past. This is part of the plan and the camera is still rolling. They have an agenda. These individuals are extremely dangerous. They are armed and dangerous. They pose a clear and dangerous threat to every freedom-loving person not only American but in the whole world.

AJ: You are absolutely right Stanley Hilton. They have captured the government. They have not captured the peoples' minds and they are counting on us not facing up to it.

SH: And they are counting on the repressive Patriot Act and threats and chief judges and FBI agents threatening people who are exposing them. That's what they are counting on.

AJ: But you're not backing down are you, my friend.

SH: No, I'm not

AJ: Well, we all stand with you, my brother, and God bless you.

SH: All right. Thank you.

To hear Alex's interview with Stanley Hilton - or download directly from this link

It seems that the Idiots-That-Be are attempting to "Orwellize" this story - you will find it here printed in its idiots need to do better than that to beat the Main Man!