Let Not The Enriching Of The Unjust Continue

One of the responses to the letter proffered to Australia PM Kevin Rudd from Lord Chirstopher Monckton was so awesome, I would be remiss in not reprinting it here:

Gail Combs (15:24:56) :

JonesII (08:19:21) :

“The UN climate change convention will be just one of the many legally binding conventions already approved and accepted, and currently being operational, which have the common objective of establishing a new world government.
From the World Health Organization to the International Court of Justice, etc.
It is too late by now.

Reply:
No it is not. The Pseudo-socialists have worked long and hard here in the USA to convince people that once a treaty is signed it is legally binding and there is no way out. Bull poo.

“This [Supreme] Court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the Constitution over a treaty.” – Reid v. Covert, October 1956, 354 U.S. 1, at pg 17.

The Reid Court (U.S. Supreme Court) held in their Opinion that,
“… No agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on the Congress, or any other branch of government, which is free from the restraints of the Constitution. Article VI, the Supremacy clause of the Constitution declares, “This Constitution and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all the Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land…’

“There is nothing in this language which intimates that treaties and laws enacted pursuant to them do not have to comply with the provisions of the Constitution nor is there anything in the debates which accompanied the drafting and ratification which even suggest such a result…

“It would be manifestly contrary to the objectives of those who created the Constitution, as well as those who were responsible for the Bill of Rights – let alone alien to our entire constitutional history and tradition – to construe Article VI as permitting the United States to exercise power UNDER an international agreement, without observing constitutional prohibitions. (See: Elliot’s Debates 1836 ed. – pgs 500-519).
“In effect, such construction would permit amendment of that document in a manner not sanctioned by Article V. The prohibitions of the Constitution were designed to apply to all branches of the National Government and they cannot be nullified by the Executive or by the Executive and Senate combined.”

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/staterights/treaties.htm
also states “A treaty can be nullified by a statute passed by the U.S. Congress (or by a sovereign State or States if Congress refuses to do so), when the State deems a treaty the performance of a treaty is self-destructive. The law of self-preservation overrules the law of obligation in others….”

We in the USA can undo all the damage done by treaties such as NAFTA and WTO...If we can find some politicians with the backbone to stand up to the international corporations and bankers who run the world. Whether the damage done in the EU can be undone is another question since I do not understand the ins and outs of the politics over there but again the key is real honest and intelligent leadership which unfortunately ins in very short supply throughout the world.

As John Sherman said in referring to the National Banking Act:
“The few who could understand the system will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favours, that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of the people mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests.”

That was a mouthful, yes? Well...here's the news, dear readers - WE THE PEOPLE have, unbeknownst to ourselves, allowed scumbaggery to be the norm when it comes to government policy. Our Constitution does not allow for unconstitutional laws to be passed; and yet, we have allowed for our disenfranchisement to be written into our laws.

That is a bunch of crap.

We need to remove any and all politicians who do not perform the will of WE THE PEOPLE FIRST, SECOND and LAST. There is no bloody reason to accept any less.

Christopher Dodd and Byron Dorgan have made announcements indicating that they will end their terms in public office...but where are they going? Something tells me that Chris will be joining Goldman Sachs, since one of his last acts was to ensure that those unproductive scumbags got BONUSES FOR DOING A BAD JOB.

When you enable scumbags, this is the result to you and I.