EXPOSED This is how Israel controls your media EVERYONE SHOULD SEE THIS

SIBEL EDMONDS: THE TRAITORS AMONG US

SIBEL EDMONDS: THE TRAITORS AMONG US
Thursday, February 18th, 2010

SIBEL EDMONDS HAS NAMED NAMES. WHY ISN’T THE MEDIA REPORTING THE STORY?

by Brad Friedman
for HUSTLER MAGAZINE – March 2010

SIBEL EDMONDS, a former FBI translator, claims that the following government officials have committed what amount to acts of treason. They are lawmakers Dennis Hastert, Bob Livingston, Dan Burton, Roy Blunt, Stephen Solarz and Tom Lantos, as well as at least three members of George W. Bush’s inner circle: Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz and Marc Grossman. But is Sibel Edmonds credible?

“Absolutely, she’s credible,” Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) told CBS’s 60 Minutes when he was asked about her in 2002. “The reason I feel she’s very credible is because people within the FBI have corroborated a lot of her story.” Edmonds’s remarkable allegations of bribery, blackmail, infiltration of the U.S. government and the theft of nuclear secrets by foreign allies and enemies alike rocked the Bush Administration. In fact, Bush and company actually prevented Edmonds from telling the American people what she knew—up until now.

John M. Cole, an 18-year veteran of the FBI’s Counterintelligence and Counterespionage departments, revealed the panic of upper-echelon officials when Edmonds originally started talking back in 2002. “Well, the Bureau is gonna have to try to work something out with Sibel,” Cole said an FBI executive assistant told him at the time, “because they don’t want this to go out and become public.”

But they couldn’t “work something out with Sibel” because, it seems, she wasn’t looking to make a deal. Edmonds says she was looking to expose what she believed to be the ugly truth about the infiltration of the U.S. government by foreign spies. They were enabled, Edmonds claimed, by high-ranking U.S. officials and insider moles planted at nuclear weapons facilities around the nation.

“Everybody at headquarters level at the Bureau knew what she was saying was extremely accurate,” Cole said recently. “They were trying to figure out ways of keeping this whole thing quiet because they didn’t want Sibel to come out.”

Her under-oath testimony for the Ohio Election Commission, given in a recent videotaped deposition, is both shocking and horrifying. (Edmonds was the star witness for Congressional candidate David Krikorian in connection with a formal complaint initiated by Representative Jean Schmidt [R-Ohio]. Challenging her in 2008, a Krikorian flyer had accused Schmidt of accepting “blood money” from Turkish interests to help block a House bill recognizing Turkey’s genocide of Armenians in 1915.) The deposition was allowed to proceed by the Obama Administration, which chose not to invoke the draconian and little-known “State Secrets Privilege” to gag her, as the previous administration had done, twice.

Edmonds testified that Congressman Dennis Hastert (R-Illinois), a former Speaker of the House, was involved in “several categories” of corruption on behalf of Turkish agents, according to information she claims to have heard while translating and analyzing FBI counterintelligence wiretaps recorded from 1996 through 2002. She mentioned his “acceptance of large sums of bribery in forms of cash or laundered cash” coupled with the ability “to do certain favors…make certain things happen for… [the] Turkish government’s interest.”

Edmonds also alleged, on the public record, Hastert’s use of a “townhouse that was not his residence for certain not very morally accepted activities” and said that “foreign entities knew about this. In fact, they sometimes participated in some of those…activities in that particular townhouse.”

The allegations against Hastert include accepting some half-million dollars in bribes. While several FBI sources have corroborated Edmonds’s account, the best Hastert’s attorneys could do was offer a nondenial denial to the charges. But the proof, as they say, may be in the post-Congressional pudding. As Edmonds had predicted years earlier, Hastert—who left Congress in 2007—now makes $35,000 a month lobbying his old colleagues as a registered foreign agent for the Turkish government.

Former Congressman Bob Livingston (RLouisiana), who was set to become Speaker prior to Hastert until evidence of a sexual affair was revealed by Larry Flynt, was described in Edmonds’s deposition as having participated in “not very legal activities on behalf of foreign interests” before leaving office in 1999. Afterward, she said, Livingston acted “as a conduit to…further foreign interests, both overtly and covertly,” and also became both a lobbyist and “an operative” representing Turkish interests.

According to Edmonds, Representative Roy Blunt (R-Missouri)—likely to run for a U.S. Senate seat in 2010—was “the recipient of both legally and illegally raised…campaign donations from…Turkish entities.” Edmonds also claimed that hard-right Representative Dan Burton (R-Indiana), who was instrumental in the impeachment of President Bill Clinton, carried out “extremely illegal activities” and covert operations that were “against the United States citizens” and “against the United States’ interests.”

Edmonds named allegedly traitorous Democrats too. She said that former New York Congressman Stephen Solarz, now also a lobbyist, “acted as conduit to deliver or launder contributions and other bribe[s, including blackmail] to certain members of Congress.” And, according to Edmonds, the late Congressman Tom Lantos (D-California) was said to have been involved in “not only…bribe[ry], but also…disclosing [the] highest level protected U.S. intelligence and weapons technology information both to Israel and to Turkey [and] other very serious criminal conduct.”

The most overtly salacious of the allegations involved Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-Illinois), who is “married with…grown children, but she is bisexual,” according to Edmonds. The FBI whistleblower described how Schakowsky was “hooked” by Turkish agents into having a lesbian “sexual relationship with one of their spies,” and “the entire episodes of their sexual conduct was being filmed because the entire house…was bugged…to be used for certain things that they wanted to request.”

Edmonds noted, however, that she didn’t “know if she [Schakowsky] did anything illegal afterwards” since Edmonds was fired by the FBI before learning what came of that particular setup. The Turks, she said, intended to get at Schakowsky’s husband, lobbyist Robert Creamer, who in April 2006 began serving five months in prison (and 11 months of house arrest) for check-kiting and failing to collect withholding tax.

Schakowsky’s office has vehemently denied the allegations. As head of the U.S. House Intelligence Committee’s Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation, Schakowsky might be expected to hold hearings on any of the former FBI employee’s revelations but she has not. She has also refused Edmonds’s challenge to take a polygraph test and has not yet sued her for libel, as the whistleblower has challenged her to do.

Edmonds’s most disturbing allegations, however, may be against high-ranking appointed officials in the Bush Administration. Elaborating on testimony she laid out in her sworn deposition, Edmonds told American Conservative magazine’s Phil Giraldi—a 17-year CIA counterterrorism officer—very specific details of alleged traitorous schemes perpetrated by top State and Defense Department officials. As already noted, these included Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz and, perhaps most notably, former Deputy Undersecretary of State Marc Grossman, the third-highest-ranking official in the Bush State Department.

Edmonds said that Feith and Wolfowitz were involved in plans to break Iraq into U.S. and British protectorates months prior to 9/11. She also claimed that the duo shared information with Grossman on how to blackmail various officials and that Grossman had accepted cash to help procure and sell nuclear weapons technology to Israel and Turkey—and, from there, on to the foreign black market. There the technology would be purchased by the highest bidder, such as Pakistan, Iran, Libya, North Korea or possibly even al-Qaeda.

Additionally, Edmonds claimed that Grossman, the U.S. Ambassador to Turkey before taking his State Department post, had tipped off Turkish diplomats to the true identity of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson’s front company, Brewster Jennings & Associates, a full three years prior to their being publicly outed by columnist Robert Novak. That in itself, according to George H.W. Bush, would be an act of treason carried out by “the most insidious of traitors.”

Former CIA counterterrorism officer Giraldi summed up Edmonds’s disclosures to me in blunt terms: “This was a massive coordinated espionage effort directed against United States nuclear secrets engineered by foreign agents who successfully corrupted senior government officials and legislators in our Congress. It’s that simple.”

According to a declassified version of a 2005 Department of Justice Inspector General’s report, Sibel Edmonds’s allegations are “credible,” “serious” and “warrant a thorough and careful review by the FBI.”
Perhaps more damningly, the FBI’s John Cole recently confirmed a key element of Edmonds’s claims when he revealed the existence of “the FBI’s decade-long investigation” of the State Department’s Grossman. Edmonds claimed that Grossman was perhaps the top U.S. ringleader for the entire foreign espionage scheme. The probe, Cole added, “ultimately was buried and covered up.”

Cole, who now works as an intelligence contractor for the Air Force, not only finds Edmonds “very credible,” but also confirms the “ongoing and detailed effort by Turkey to develop influence in the United States” through a number of illegal means.

“Turkish individuals would ask for favors—ya know, ‘You help me out, and I’ll help you out’—and basically what would happen is the elected official would either receive money or some kind of gift,” Cole explained. “Or, if it was a government employee, I’ve seen it where after they retired, they get these very lucrative positions with a Turkish company, or whatever the country may be.”

As noted, Hastert now works for Turkey, and Grossman now works for a Turkish company and as a lobbyist—no doubt raking in a pretty penny from both. Hastert and Grossman repeatedly ignored requests to comment on these charges.

The mainstream U.S. media, however, apparently remain uninterested in investigating any of it. Not even after Cole himself called for a “Special Counsel” to investigate and prosecute. So what the hell is going on here?
Giraldi believes that, as with companies such as AIG and GM becoming “too big to fail,” the size and success of this massive national security espionage scandal has simply become too big to bust.

He told me, “You have to look at Marc Grossman being part of a much bigger operation in terms of the Israelis and the Turks obtaining influence over our legislators and over a number of senior government officials at the Pentagon and State Department. Because this thing was so big, and it affected both Democrats and Republicans, I think the U.S. government is terrified of opening up this Pandora’s box.”

Giraldi added, “The people in Congress and in the Justice Department who should be investigating this…and also in the media—because the media is tied hand and foot to government—this is all part of one big, you know, conspiracy, if you want to look at it this way. And, essentially, this is a story that they don’t want to get out.”

So why, exactly, isn’t the media covering Sibel Edmonds, whom the ACLU once described as “the most gagged person in the history of the U.S.,” now that she is finally able to tell her story? It’s a story, after all, that the legendary 1970s whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg has deemed “far more explosive than the Pentagon Papers.”

“If we had an effective mainstream media that was going after this story, that would make it come out,” Giraldi noted. “But we don’t have an effective media.” He then pointed out one more reason for the media’s reluctance to dig into this story: “According to Sibel, Grossman actually bragged that he would get from the Turks the information that they wanted to appear in an article. He would write it up, and he would fax it over to the New York Times, and they would print it just as he had written it under somebody else’s byline.”

Guess we won’t expect any coverage of this scandal from the New York Times, “the paper of record,” any time soon. And if a story isn’t covered by the Times, and thereafter picked up by everybody else, did it really happen? Given the complicity of the media with regard to Sibel Edmonds, it would appear the government never even needed to invoke the “State Secrets Privilege” in the first place.

As of this writing, HUSTLER stands to be the largest, most “corporate” U.S. outlet in which these startling, now-public, on-the-record disclosures have been reported. The moral: Pull off a large enough crime, and it becomes too big to do anything about.

Tiger By The Tail

The "Distraction Media" finally got their bloody wedge issue; Tiger Woods' infidelities.

I know more about Tiger's whores than I need to.

Tiger Woods has been recast as O.J. Simpson for this decade. His marriage has been laid bare for the last couple of weeks, and I'm appalled that Americans are falling for this obvious bit of scumbaggery. There are real issues of import; why does anyone care about this?

Let's boil this down to its basic element: here's a news story about a celebrity who cheated.

How is this news in this day and age?

Tiger - here's my appeal to you - don't fucking kill yourself; don't go off the deep end. This is not the end of your world; it is the end of everyone thinking that you were some sort of infallible icon...after all your accolades, you're just a man.

Deal with it.

I have a lovely girl, and I'll never cheat on her. I can say that absolutely, without reservation. Tiger should have been aware that these women were after his celebrity, not his person. Trust me...if I ever get famous or rich, I'll pay a bodyguard to fuck every groupie coming my way...he'll promise them that they'll get a piece of me, after he gets a slice...then, throw them bitches out on their asses!

What...are they going to say anything to anyone? "I tried to bang Lion Steel, but his bodyguard screwed me and threw my whore ass out?"

Hmm...actually, that might make great copy at the Post.

Oh...and a cautionary note to Elin...they will turn on you like sharks to chum...so don't think your peccadilloes aren't in the public domain...just wait until they get tired of you.

So...to add: Accenture (formerly Arthur Andersen...oh - did everyone forget?) is right to drop Woods from their advertising...Bernie Madoff is a much better figurehead. Imagine the balls of the scumbags who, along with Enron, dry ass-raped California for electricity.

Yes, that's right - Enron's former accountants don't think that Tiger Woods is a good spokesman.

The "Get Smart" School Of Journalism

I'm calling "shenanigans" on the boy-in-wayward-balloon story yesterday - there was some scumbaggery afoot that WE THE PEOPLE were not made aware by our "liberal media". One only wonders what that could be...

I'll give an example:

"TWA Flight 800 Breaks Apart In Midair; Cause Unknown"

So...over 200 eyewitnesses notice an object approaching the doomed aircraft before the catastrophic event.

"Would you believe the 'streak' that you all thought you saw was actually the plane itself breaking apart in midair from the fuel igniting itself?"

"No? Would you believe that all of you were DRUNK?"

I just heard on 1010WINS this morning, at 6:32 AM, that "the balloon incident was NOT A HOAX"...and the check is in the mail...and I promise not to do that thing in your mouth...OOPS!

Update: On Larry King Live (hosted by Wolf Blitzer), the child admitted to the story being a hoax, his parents are noted for having been contestants on various "reality TV" shows, notably the wife-swapping show. The mind reels...


Let's try this again:

"WTC Brought Down By Impacts From Passenger Jets And Fires From Jet Fuel"

Then a peer-reviewed report is published which not only refutes the possibility that airplanes could damage a substructure which withstands hurricane-force winds daily, can survive multiple strikes from wayward planes (rated to be at least equal to the impacts realized by WTC Buildings 1 & 2); nor could open-air fires have affected the viability of the steel comprising the substructure of the building, but that materials used in controlled demolition were found in the dust from the "collapse" of said buildings, not to mention that a THIRD BUILDING "collapsed" that day, that was not directly impacted by much of anything, and did not experience huge fires.

"Would you believe a microwave set to 999 minutes with a soda can?"

"No?"

"Would you believe THERMAL EXPANSION?"

"Tough crowd!"
____________________________

I have two words for you, dear readers: Hiram Monserrate.

Okay...actually, it should include one more word - SCUMBAG.

I'll have to wait until I run by the actual testimony...but...how does a glass go from being whole in your hand to being broken against your girlfriend's face...UNLESS YOU BROKE IT FIRST, SCUMBAG?

The Blinders Are Coming Off, Part Two

Ry correctly titled this posting Obama = Bush's Third Term.

There have been a number of questionable moves in both directions by the Anointed One, our Commander-In-Chief, Barack Hussein Obama. In one instance, he has continued the policies of the Monkey King himself, George Walker Bush, the former pResident. His Chief Of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, is the son of a terrorist and possess dual loyalties...and no man can serve two masters equally. We do know that he enlisted in the Army...in Israel. I guess we can all tell where those loyalties truly lie.

On the other hand, he has given lip service in regards to being even-handed in his dealings with the Middle East, especially given our uneven dealing with most of the denizens of the Middle East. The speech in Cairo was very promising, but unfortunately, people are still dying by the bushelfuls, because Obama keeps on signing those checks. That is the only way to force an end to the mounting scumbaggery occurring in the Middle East.

Obama seems to be whining about the level and method of coverage in this day and age; he should know better. He would be better off imploring the news organizations to throw off their obedience collars and return to being watchdogs for WE THE PEOPLE and against the corporations.

I'm actually interested in what's going to happen this afternoon between Obama and current New York State Governor David Paterson, what with the rumors going around that he has asked that Paterson not run in 2010. As of 5:00 PM EST, Paterson has not deferred to Obama's judgement.

Let's see what occurs.

The Blinders Are Coming Off

Happy Monday, dear readers! It looks as if the blinders are coming off of the world's collective eyes:

UK trade unions overwhelmingly pass boycott vote on Israel:

Press release, Palestine Solidarity Campaign, 17 September 2009

In a landmark decision, Britain's trade unions have voted
overwhelmingly to commit to build a mass boycott movement,
disinvestment and sanctions on Israel for a negotiated settlement based
on justice for Palestinians.

The motion was passed at the 2009 TUC Annual Congress in Liverpool
today (17 September), by unions representing 6.5 million workers across
the UK

The curtain is falling away from the pristine image of Israel as "the only democracy in the Middle East". Check out the links below, and tell me that Israel is taking the high road in all manners of diplomacy:

http://patriotroom.com/article/help-israel-by-hacking-hamas-websites

http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2009/01/pro-israeli-pseudo-cyber-warriors-want.html

http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5638

http://www.jihadpress.com/2009/01/help-israel-win-trojan/

In other news...check out this asshattery by Telegraph "reporter" Michael Deacon. Boy...those kneepads might be in need of changing...as is your jism-catcher. Actually, one poster impressed me with his analysis, and I'm going to repost it here, attributing full credit to said poster. Nick2k9, take it away:

Michael Deacon, you are a fool. Just another big headed, ill informed journalist out of his depth.

It’s clear from this pathetic article that not only are you earning above your talent with a job at The Telegraph, with your lackluster writing skills. But you haven’t properly looked into 9/11 at all.

Foolishly lumping in not only all 9/11 theories but doing the cliche’ turd-move of attaching a genuinely ridiculous theory (the moon fakery) to the mention of 9/11 theories to try and automatically make the very suggestion absurd. Very poor.

The theory that all three buildings were brought down by controlled demolition is in no way confused and the evidence is overwhealming. Why don’t you take your head out of your ass and go take a look at AE911Truth.org.

The official site of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth. Now over 800 building professionals and scientists who all universally agree that all three WTC buildings came down by controlled demolition.

All the evidence is nicely comprised and compiled in American convinience-stylee so your minute brain should have no problem gobbling it up. But I’ll also lay out just a little bit of it here.

First - Three buildings fell.
Not only did a freak occurance happen on 9/11 but three freak occurances happened on 9/11. No high-rise building EVER (that’s right Michael… EVER) has fell from fire damage yet on 9/11 three of the most solidly comprised constructs in New York collapsed head to toe.

Note the sub-heading, three buildings. Why are most people under the impression that only the Towers fell? Because after day one major news outlets worldwide were told not to show footage of WTC 7 collapsing for unknown reasons.

But a very probable reason is because it was not hit by a plane and every journalist with half a brain was not only commenting on how the collapse looked very very similar to a controlled demolition, almost identical some said but that it wasn’t hit by a plane. They were questioning it. The words explosion and demolition were used… A lot.

Seems very clear it was too obvious a demolition, nobody seriously thought that building came down from such absolutely minimal fire damage from excess debri off the Towers which were about an American football yard away from WTC 7.

Second - Molten iron.
Okay, office fires don’t half have the temperature required to melt steel which is exactly what happened on 9/11. In fact, the steel wasn’t just melted it was turned into Molten Iron.

Molten Iron is the by-product of high-temperature explosions, normally only found in? That’s right Mike, controlled demoltions.

There is absolutely NO WAY even with jet fuel, that the fire alone created molten iron. Pools of molten iron running through the streets reported by hundreds of eye-witnesses including fireman, policeman, by-standers and survivors. Also, lots of pictorial evidence.

What normally happens after a disaster, especially of such a gigantic scale? Every inch of anything in site is examined. Yet on 9/11 the Bush Administration IMMEDIATELY shipped off nearly every scrap of steel left in the debri. Hmm, why’s that.

Thirdly - Nano-thermite in the dust.
Nano-thermite Michael, is an extremely sophisticated, extremely violent, carefully made element than is used to literally cut through steel like a hot butter through knife.

It’s created in defense labs and used by the military. The chances of Al-Queda not only having access to this material or being able to make it in the caves of Afghanistan or get this, plant it throughout the steel constructs of all three buildings are not only unlikely… It’s actually laughable to suggest.

But isit laughable to suggest the Government could do this. Absolutely not in fact it’s pretty much the only theory that fits. The FACT is, we know nano-thermite which still hasn’t been officially accounted for WAS in those buildings.

We have the absolute 100% chemical evidence to prove this. Hundreds of independent and high-profile social engineers that have examined the dust and the steel have all found and confirmed it’s existence and we also have video evidence of hot lava molten iron (by product of thermite) running all over the place. Even video evidence of it running down the building right before it collapses.

So this. We know. What we do not know as fact is who put it there. But who had access to the buildings? The Government. Who else? Nobody.

And - One more - Symmetrical near free-fall collapses.
This Mike, defies physics.
Not only did three high-rise steel constructs collapse from minimal fire damage on 9/11. A first in history. But all three collapsed an an absolutely indentical fashion to a controlled demolition. Which is comprised of these features:

> Near free-fall speed. This happens in demolitions as they’re taking out the columns AS the building is collapsing so that the falling building meets no resistance. You don’t get EXACT free-fall speed because obviously there is still the explosions going off and slightly delayed collapsing. But near free-fall is exactly what happened on 9/11, with all three buildings.

> Mushroom clouds of smoke. This happens, obviously, because of the violent, hyper-reactive explosions going off so what you get is a huggge mushroom effect from the cumilative energy. Which is exactly what we saw.

> Outward ejection of building material. We can see from all of the video evidence, tons of steel being literally pulverized and shot feircly OUTWARD at measured speeds of up to 75mph. Normal collapses don’t produce enough energy to crush thousands of tons of steel into dust nevermind shoot it horizontally at high speeds. Explosives do though.

> Top structure failure. What you’ll typically see in a demolition is the top of the building slightly fall in on itself just before the building collapses. This is done so the building falls in on itself and doesn’t damage anything around it. And this is exactly what we see in the videos of all three collapses. Especially WTC 7, it’s very very clear indeed. I’m surprised an apparently intelligent man such as yourself doesn’t at least find it ‘odd’ that all three buildings fell neatly in on themselves from top to bottom in seconds and damaged nothing around them. Despite very random, minimal fire damage.

The symmetrical collapses are the true smoking gun though. Notice on one of the Towers, a plane hits the one side of the tower. So this is non-symmetrical damage yet seconds later, the top collapses inwards and we see a very fast SYMMETRICAL collapse. Then the building proceeds very quickly to meet the ground.

If these were normal collapses, even if part of the buildings collapse inwards, you would see resistance. These collapses saw NO resistance. They fell at near free-fall speed. The only way that can happen is if you take the columns out as the building is coming down. That’s how you get the increased speed of the collapse to make a nice neat little pile of rubble at the end of it.

–

All of this is just the icing on the cake.

So lets look at what we have here. We have LOTS and LOTS of evidence which 100% supports the controlled demolition theory. Visual collapses mimmicing the very nature to a tee, increased collapse speeds, mushroom clouds of smoke, rumbling grounds pre-collapse, eye-witness and SURVIVOR testimony of explosion-like gun-banging going around the towers as it’s coming down and of course, the smoking gun - Chemical proof of nano-thermite, an explosive used by the military, found in the dust and steel of all three buildings.

I’d say that’s pretty focused, unconfused, non-nutty, factually driven, logical evidence.

And I’m assuming you believe the official account? So what evidence do we have for that… Hmm… Erm… You may have to help me here. Oh yeah, some fuzzy CCTV footage that the victim’s families had to take the FBI to court over to get hold of which vaguely shows some foreign men boarding some planes. This is apparently proof the hijackers got onboard that day. And… Some PERFECTLY in tact passports found conviniently in the aftermath rubble.

So the attacks killed 2.6k people, destroyed two jumbo-jets, brought down three gigantic, steel-constructed buildings and pulverized every thing in them… Yet left some paper / cardboard passports in perfect harmony? Okay yeah, I can see that must be convincing for you.

I think we need to re-point the camera with 9/11 and see who the real fools are. I have lots and lots of facts and proof supporting my theory, I don’t need to resort to belittling people to reinforce my few, I can shit evidence out all day. Where as you believe 19 amateur terrorist pilots with knives and boxcutters hijacked four planes and successfully hit 75% of their targets killing 2.6k American citizens with no military interference what so ever. Because they were told to stand down… Which was apparently over confusion as they just happened to be training that very day for? The event of planes crashing into high-rise buildings. Convinient indeed.

Sure, I’m the nutty, confused one. Maybe you’ll wake up and think for yourself one day instead of being spoon-fed your life by people around you and believing everything you hear on TV. Don’t insult my intelligence by stereotyping me when you haven’t even looked into the matter objectively. You fucking moron.

Stick to writing film reviews because your debate skills lack one key aspect. Logic

Well said.

Considering all of the postings that I have done on the subject, you'd think that I would've committed a similar posting...but I have to admit this: my blood boils at the thought of the constant scumbaggery that has taken place in America since 1913, and what we're experiencing now is a direct result of said scumbaggery. That being said, when I'm writing about the events of September 11th, 2001, I see RED.

Clear Channel Reports $3.7 Billion Quarterly Loss

Clear Channel is feeling the burn.

CC Media Holdings Inc. and Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc. both reported sizable decreases in revenue for the second quarter as advertising sales continued to decline.

CC Media Holdings (OTC BB: CCMO) — which owns San Antonio, Texas-based Clear Channel Communications Inc. — reported a net loss of $3.7 billion on $1.4 billion in revenue for the second quarter.

This compares with net income of $282.3 million on $1.8 billion in revenue for the same period a year ago. Revenue was down 21 percent between the two quarters.

During the quarter, the company performed an interim impairment test on goodwill and its indefinite-lived intangible assets as a result of the current global economic downturn. That led to the company recording a non-cash asset impairment charge of $4 billion and, ultimately, the quarterly net loss of $3.7 billion.

Clear Channel Communications owns a network of radio stations. More than a dozen are based in the Tampa Bay area, including WFLA-AM, known as Fox Newsradio 970; WFLZ-FM; WDDV-AM and WXTB-FM, known as 98 Rock.

Clear Channel Outdoor (NYSE: CCO), the world’s largest outdoor advertising company, reported a net loss of $689.1 million, or $1.94 a share, on revenue of $692.1 million for the second quarter. This compares with net income of $80.3 million, or 23 cents a share, on $914.8 million in revenue for the same period a year ago.

The outdoor advertising company’s revenue declined 24 percent between the two quarters as ad sales continued to be impacted by the global economic downturn.

Clear Channel Outdoor also performed an interim impairment test on goodwill and its indefinite-lived intangible assets, which resulted in a non-cash impairment charge of $812.4 million.

This is what's going to happen to every scumbag media outlet that refuses to tell the truth to WE THE PEOPLE.

Jesse "Mind And Body" Ventura pants Another Distraction Media Whore

WTC7 and the British Brainwashing Conspiracy - thanks to Debunking the Debunkers

See Debunking the Debunkers for some more fun.

I just convinced someone of the outrageousness of the claims that "nothing untoward" happened during the events on September 11th, 2001. Just read this entry from ActivistNYC from September 27, 2007.

I don't know what else I need to say to you, dear readers...the BBC and CNN both reported WTC collapsed nearly half an hour before it actually did collapse; there are reports of a simultaneous countdown concurrent with the collapse; many arms of our "Distraction Media" decided not even to report that there were actually THREE collapses that occurred...I simply ask this...DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH, and take the time to watch the video uncritically. Watch it more than once...but on the second watch...take the time to think about the questions posed that challenge the "official" explanations offered for the occurrences.

Did Barry Jennings LIE when he stated that he saw "dead bodies" within WTC7?

Who gave CNN and the BBC the press release that stated that WTC7 had collapsed almost a half an hour before it actually did? And why didn't the BBC explain that there had been an error?

Why did the BBC claim that it LOST THE MOST IMPORTANT FOOTAGE IN THE LAST DECADE? And why, when it was found last year, was it attributed to an IMPOSSIBLE FILING ERROR?!?

There are plenty more questions...but I'll leave you with this - the footage of the events of September 11th, 2001, when it was "recovered", was said to been have MISFILED in the archives for September 11th, 2002.

Let me say it once again...SEPTEMBER 11th, 2002.

An ARCHIVE THAT HADN'T BEEN CREATED AS OF YET.

See you soon, dear readers.

Found this, thanks to WRH:

The N3twork

CounterKnowledge is KAPUT!

Hmmm....not sure as to why, but it looks like my "pals" at CounterKnowledge have gone the way of the dodo...I wonder...what could have caused them not to renew their domain?

The text you will receive upon attempting to access the link:

The domain counterknowledge.com has expired. If you owned this domain, please contact your domain registration service provider for further assistance. If you need help identifying your service provider, visit http://domainhelp.tucows.com.

Here was an answer to the so-called "15 Questions Posed To Truthers" (not my words, but I get bleary-eyed whenever I think about these events, and the fact that there are DULLARDS who believe in the "official" narrative, while conversely stating that there IS NO OFFICIAL NARRATIVE):

I'm not going to do it, but open you mind a bit and look at the mess the world is in. New oil Pipeline(s) in Afghanistan, Opium production and exportation reaching new highs, genocide of a million in Irak, the police state, world bank and military industrial complex taking over nations, the billions in no bids contracts. If you believe the people responsible for this mess (and making billions - stealing trillions - cheating election - promoting torture of kids - not following your constitution, etc.) when they tell you a dozen Muslim hi-jackers with box cutters brought down 3 buildings with 2 planes because they "hate our freedom" then it's quite evident you do not have the required discernment to listen to the facts.

Could it be because of this broadcast:


What?

Open-air fires CAN'T melt steel?

Buildings will NOT pancake within their own footprints naturally?

Why didn't our corporate media organizations tell us this SEVEN BLOODY YEARS AGO?!?

I didn't read this in the newspapers!

I didn't see this on TV (until this CBS broadcast)!

Well, dear readers...that was because our DISTRACTION MEDIA was in cahoots with the scumbags who perpetrated this FRAUD ATTACK upon the American populace.

In no way, can I say conclusively who was behind the attacks, but I can illustrate to you who aided and abetted them in their efforts to bamboozle WE THE PEOPLE.

Get on the horn and contact CBS staff and congratulate them for being the first media organization to actually admit that the story alleged by the governmental agencies at that time were all COMPLETE GARBAGE.

Let us see what occurs next.

By the way...Ronald...are you aware that some doop is ruining your name on the "internets"?


Update: As of 3/5/2009, the doopfest seems to have returned.

Why Exactly Are Newspapers Failing?

This post was prompted by the following headline - Taxing ISPs To Prop Up Failing Newspapers?

Why exactly are the newspapers failing? Maybe they should try TELLING THE TRUTH to WE THE PEOPLE for a change.

Their poor sales have EVERYTHING to do with our "watchdogs" becoming stenographers for the scumbags occupying our government.

For example:

The retail stores are decrying "low sales" this holiday season...but can they not make a correlation between job losses and people making more prudent decisions with their remaining monies? There seems to be a disconnect here, but let's go to a more cogent example.

Georgia attacks Russia...yet, our news organizations report EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE - and are caught when interviewing a 12-year old girl rescued by the Russian troops.

Here's another:

Israel was engaged in a cease-fire with HAMAS. The truce was broken by Israel, yet all that has been report in the "mainstream" media is that HAMAS broke the cease-fire!

This is just ridiculous.

Is there any reason to support a business that DOES NOT HAVE YOUR BEST INTEREST AT HEART?

I believe the PEOPLE have spoken.

In other news...it looks like the 51st State's main mouthpiece is in FULL LIE MODE...but luckily, my bud Ryan Dawson put his boot to the lying throat of the ADL.

Let's chat a bit about the Bernard Madoff scandal. This is an example of why our current laws simply DO NOT WORK.

If a man robs someone of their available funds, and is arrested, he can be guaranteed to enjoy a stay in the prison system and suffer a loss of his ill-gotten gains.

If a man robs people of exhorbitant funds, and is caught, they can be guaranteed that they will be placed in a minimum-security facility, and fined for a fraction of their ill-gotten gains.

Bernard Madoff has been placed on house arrest, and must wear an ankle bracelet. Considering he has access to whatever is within his domicile, and seems to be actively flouting his bail agreements, don't you see that the "punishment" afforded this individual absolutely does NOT serve as a deterrent?

What is the downside to ripping off people en masse?


If you ask me...there is NONE.

Twelve Editorial Staff Rules for the Great International Media When the News is from the Middle East

Link to article:

1) In the Middle East it is always the Arabs who attack first and always Israel that is defending themselves. This defense is called a reprisal.

BREAKING NEWS
Israel launches massive military operation against Gaza Strip
America chooses its future
Russia to retrieve its status of world's strongest superpower

Astounding photos of planes overcoming sound barrier
More...

2) The Arabs, Palestinian or Lebanese have no right to kill civilians. That is called “terrorism.”

3) Israel has the right to kill civilians. That is called “legitimate defense.”

4) When Israel kills civilians en masse, the western powers claim that it is more measured. This is called “reaction of the international community.”

5) The Palestinians and the Lebanese have no right to capture soldiers of Israel inside military installations with sentries and combat posts. This is called, “Kidnapping of defenseless people.”

6) Israel has the right to kidnap anytime and anywhere as many Lebanese and Palestinians as they want. Currently there are more than 10 thousand, 300 of whom are children and a thousand are women. No proof of guilt is needed. Israel has the right to keep kidnapped prisoners indefinitely, even if they are authorities democratically elected by the Palestinians. This is called "terrorist prisoners.”

7) When the word Hezbollah is mentioned, it is compulsory in the same sentence to contain the words “supported and financed by Syria and by Iran.”

8) When you mention "Israel" it is forbidden to make any mention of the words "supported and financed by the U.S." This may give the impression that the conflict is uneven and that Israel’s existence is not in danger.

9) When referring to Israel, expressions that are prohibited: "Occupied Territories," "UN resolutions," "Violations of human rights" or "Geneva Convention.”

10) Both the Palestinians and the Lebanese are always “cowardly,” they are hidden among the civilian population, which does not want them. If they sleep in their homes, with their families, that gives them the name of “cowards.“ Israel has a right to destroy with bombs and missiles the neighborhoods where they are sleeping. This is called a “precision surgical action.”

11) The Israelis speak better English, French, Spanish or Portuguese than the Arabs. Therefore they and those who support them must be interviewed more and have more opportunities than the Arabs to explain the present Rules of the Editorial Staff (from 1 to 10) to the general public. That is called “journalistic neutrality.”

12) All those who are not in accordance with the Rules of Writing above are "highly dangerous anti-Semitic terrorists."

(Text French, anonymous, sent by a reader of the Carta Maior blog)

All italics courtesy of hANOVER fIST...it's time for a rant:

How long will the world stand mute upon the many infractions committed by the regime occupying the West Bank and Gaza?

There were leaflets imploring civilians to go to the U.N. schools if they feared for their lives...AND THEN THE SCHOOLS WERE TARGETED?!?

Hear this, Tzipi Livni, Ehud Barak, Ehud Olmert, and any others in regards to this attack - you are pieces of SUB-HUMAN GARBAGE. Under no circumstances do you have any justification to commit these crimes against humanity.

None.

Incidentally, I saw that the New York Post printed that Jonathan Pollard wrote in on his own behalf for a pardon.

Pollard...do all of us AMERICANS a favor and KILL YOURSELF. It is too bad that a cockroach cannot stomp itself, but you should do your best to stop polluting the air with your vile breath. You committed TREASON against our nation, and you should have been hung in front of the White House, as a deterrent to all who would act against our beautiful nation.

In my opinion, this is why our representatives are all (with the very notable exception of Cynthia McKinney, Ron Paul, Bill Richardson and Dennis Kucinich - thank you, all!) WHORES for Israel, complete with garter belts and crotchless underwear.

You should all run for the Knesset - why are you occupying OUR government?!?

We The People deserve representation that thinks of America FIRST, SECOND and LAST - Israel, regardless of what some may think, is NOT the 51st state.

Oh...I figured I'd add this to the posting:

American / Isreali Dual Citizens in the American Government

Attorney General - Michael Mukasey
Head of Homeland Security - Michael Chertoff
Chairman Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board - Richard Perle
Deputy Defense Secretary (Former) - Paul Wolfowitz
Under Secretary of Defense - Douglas Feith
National Security Council Advisor - Elliott Abrams
Vice President Dick Cheney’s Chief of Staff (Former) - “Scooter” Libby
White House Deputy Chief of Staff - Joshua Bolten
Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs - Marc Grossman
Director of Policy Planning at the State Department - Richard Haass
U.S. Trade Representative (Cabinet-level Position) - Robert Zoellick
Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board - James Schlesinger
UN Representative (Former) - John Bolton
Under Secretary for Arms Control - David Wurmser
Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board - Eliot Cohen
Senior Advisor to the President - Steve Goldsmith
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary - Christopher Gersten
Assistant Secretary of State - Lincoln Bloomfield
Deputy Assistant to the President - Jay Lefkowitz
White House Political Director - Ken Melman
National Security Study Group - Edward Luttwak
Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board - Kenneth Adelman
Defense Intelligence Agency Analyst (Former) - Lawrence (Larry) Franklin
National Security Council Advisor - Robert Satloff
President Export-Import Bank U.S. - Mel Sembler
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Administration for Children and Families - Christopher Gersten
Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Public Affairs
- Mark Weinberger
White House Speechwriter - David Frum
White House Spokesman (Former) - Ari Fleischer
Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board - Henry Kissinger
Deputy Secretary of Commerce - Samuel Bodman
Under Secretary of State for Management - Bonnie Cohen
Director of Foreign Service Institute - Ruth Davis

List courtesy of LeisureGuy.

William Cooper Predicts The Events Of September 11th, 2001 In June of 2001

George Galloway Punks A Tard.

Just beautiful...imagine...if we had a real watchdog media, instead of our Distraction Media, what we could do...and maybe that's the whole point.

The Anthrax Shenanigans continue...

I just had an epiphany:

So...the reason given for the lackluster response to the events of September 11th, 2001, is that there was a "drill" in place that simulated the actual terror event?

Doesn't that mean that OUR ADMINISTRATION FAILED UTTERLY TO PROTECT OUR NATION?

This wasn't a dry run; there must have been practice drills leading up to this...AND THEY FAILED!!!

Come on...wouldn't uo FIRE these incompentents? Yet, many of them were PROMOTED.

As far as the Anthrax false-flag...they can't place Dr. Bruce E. Ivins at the Urban Moving Systems facitily in Weehauken, NJ...but they can place Lt. Col. Philip Zack...

First…let’s address the issue of Alex Jones and Keith Olbermann not naming the actual perpetrator of the anthrax false-flag attack - Lt. Col. Philip Zack (a complaint from a fellow commenter on Prison Planet):

Alex and Keith would be subjected to a SHITSTORM the likes of which you have never witnessed.

You know how Alex states how he doesn’t want us, the truth-tellers of the events of September 11th, 2001 (and beyond), wasting time and postings defending him? He also doesn’t want us parroting him word-for-word; what I suggest is becoming your own authority on one aspect.

Don’t know anything about aeronautics? Don’t talk about the plane impacts.

Never delved into seismology? Don’t mention the building collapses.

Talk about what you know.

Don’t try to prove every instance...once you have mentioned a subject that you can speak authoritatively on, most 9/11 Deniers will just attempt to speak of another aspect, one that you may not have information on.

Tell them that you have not studied that aspect. If they are honest and just want information, the will simply accede to your honesty, and you can get on to something else.

However…if they start pouting the company line, inquire of them as to is the information they are imparting theirs, or something that they’re simply parroting so that they can “win” the argument. If they admit to as much, ask them to simply do some research. If they do not...stop wasting your time. They’d rather participate in the genocide of others, rather than admitting that they are dupes.

Alex and Keith are being faulted for not yelling his name from the rafters…but placed in their positions, I wouldn’t either. It’s not important if they say it - IT’S IMPORTANT IF YOU SAY IT.

ABC News LIED about the anthrax having originated from Iraq...repeatedly. When people are walking up and down the streets of America, angry that Lt. Col. Philip Zack is being protected against the will of WE THE PEOPLE, that’s when Alex and Keith can talk about it. When his name is on the lips of every thinking American, the tide of injustice will no longer flow freely.

Remember…we live in a planet without supermen…YOU have to be the one willing to do what’s necessary.

I would implore you to write to MSNBC, and give kudos not only to Keith and the staff at COUNTDOWN, but to congratulate them on their anthrax coverage, stating that you didn’t believe that the recently-expired scientist had anything to do with the false-flag event, and that you hope that the y continue to search for the real perpetrator.

Maybe then, you could mention that there’s a person of interest who has not been mentioned. See if they know to whom you’re referring.

But let me reiterate: Lt. Col. Philip Zack is provably the ONLY individual with the three items most associated with culpability:
Motive, Means and Opportunity.

Motive: He is a piece of Zionist garbage who attack a fellow Middle Eastern colleague with hateful speech, actions and displays.

Means: Unlike the recently deceased Bruce Ivins, he worked with the specific anthrax used in the attack.

Opportunity: He was fired in 1991 for the aforementioned attacks against colleagues, but in January of 1992, he was allowed access into the Fort Detrick bio-weapons lab by Dr. Marian Rippy.

The obfuscation provided by Dr. Barbara Rosenberg only served to keep the investigation directed away from Zack and onto Dr. Hatfill - but Hatfill wasn’t about to be anyone’s bitch, and fought against the false charges vigorously. As you can see, he knew, as a patriot, the fate that befalls the compliant.

I don’t purport to know Dr. Ivins’ mental processes, but he may have been of the mind to think,”Well, I didn’t do anything wrong…so I’ll just let them run roughshod over my life, and when they figure out that I’m innocent, well...all’s well that ends well.”

Well…how did that end?

The mental midgets who tell you to accept erosion of our rights and that “if you have nothing to hide, what’s the harm?”; tell them about Dr. Bruce E. Ivins.

He didn’t have anything to hide; yet, he’s dead.

To finish off this rant, I’ve figured out that the Reagan quote was incomplete…here’s the complete version: “The scariest words in the English language is “I’m from the government and here to help myself to the fruits of your labors - just bend over, and it’ll sting less…”

Update: confirmation that the anthrax scare was a total psy-op can be found here.

Who is Chuck Baldwin?

Will we see Chuck Baldwin engaged in the primary debates? I'd bet against that...it sounds like he would upset the balancing trick the Distraction Media has in the faces of WE THE PEOPLE.

RADAR Magazine - The Last Roundup

Christopher Ketcham has written an article for RADAR Magazine that, frankly, should be front-page news in our daily tabloids, rather than the useless pap our Distraction Media provides to us daily.

The question he poses in this article is thus: "Is the government compiling a secret list of citizens to detain under martial law?"

Along with this beautiful but disturbing piece, I would like to once again
present to you an interview Christopher Ketcham had with Scott Horton on this very subject and the very pointed topic of Continuity Of Government.

You know what goes great with this posting?

A dash of Deek Jackson...


RADAR Magazine is offering to you, dear readers, a RISK-FREE ISSUE! Such a deal!

Christopher Ketcham is a freelance reporter and writer for many venues including Antiwar.com, Harper’s, GQ, The Nation, Salon, Mother Jones, Men’s Journal, Good Magazine, Radar, and National Geographic. In 2002, he was selected as a Livingston Awards finalist for his Salon.com coverage of the 9/11 attacks in New York.

Oooh - I've been called an anti-Semite! Oh, Dear! Oh, Get Outta Here!

Yes...someone was actually dopey enough to swing that old canard my way...

The problem is...my ENTIRE LIFE has indicated that I harbor NO SUCH SENTIMENTS.

I could name the people in my life who clearly belong to the Jewish faith, people I am proud to call my friends, but I wouldn't want them to have to explain the information presented herein on this site to the thick-headed dullards who would presume to fling insults haphazardly like chimpanzees in cages flinging butt mud.

I am interested in EXACTLY ONE THING: bringing the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA back to its former glory; restoring the Republic for WE THE PEOPLE.

Because of the machinations of the stupid, small-minded GLOBALISTS, our ENTIRE WORLD is in danger.

Their sycophants believe that they will reap some benefits denied to all others...IDIOTS - hasn't history, TIME AND TIME AGAIN, illustrated that you are NOTHING but USEFUL IDIOTS, to be DISCARDED as soon as your "usefulness" has come to an end?

Voodoo economics...yeah, THAT CRAP WORKED.

"The market will regulate itself"...sure...NO ONE WILL GAME THE SYSTEM.

Are we going to wise up and STOP MAKING INFERIOR FUEL OUT OF OUR FOODSTUFFS?

Are we going to DEMAND that GE/GM Foods are BANNED? There is an Executive Order issued by George Herbert Walker Bush that states, "GM Foods are exactly the same as naturally-formed foods."

Well...if that IS true...WHAT THE HELL DO THEY HAVE A PATENT ON?!? Of course, it's NOT - it flies against common sense that GE/GM Foods can be the "same" as natural foods. I believe that these GE/GM scientists FAILED basic chemistry, because the sum of all parts DO NOT EQUAL their separate components.

These idiots obviously did not test for EVERY adverse reaction from splicing genes - why are the soybeans in Brazil causing LESIONS on the legs and feet of people MERELY CROSSING THROUGH THEM?

Does THAT sound like something you want on the INSIDE of your body?

We cannot allow the world to be sold away for thirty pieces.

So, please understand, dear readers...NOTHING I have said denotes any hatred for any group of people...I HATE the SCUMBAGS who are ransoming our lives, our families and our planet for PROFIT.

You are FOOLS.

And when the world begets too many fools, nature ALWAYS provides a FOOLKILLER.


This posting is dedicated to Steve Gerber, creator of the Foolkiller, Howard The Duck and many other creations.

Update: Speaking of comics and stuff...did you see The Dark Knight? I actually saw it TWICE.

9/11 Coincidences (Part Eight) UPDATE

Oh, dear...it looks as if the dam is fit to burst, eh, dear readers?

The scuttlebutt on this video is that it's being removed faster than Jenna Bush's underwear at a frat house (I was gonna say Lindsey Lohan, but I LOVE that girl...and I don't like our scumbag lapdog media trying to portray her in a similar light as our recently-married cum-dumpster...oh...THAT'S gonna leave a mark!); but this should convince even the retarded among us that the three buildings that "failed", "blew up", "came down", whatever bloody euphemism one wishes to use, WERE BROUGHT DOWN BY CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

PERIOD.

In case the video is "Orwellized" as in the Bill O'Reilly Inside Edition Rant, please find it here - 9-11 Coincidences (Part Eight) UPDATE.

From a previous rant:

As far as the buildings...how does one reconcile the actual physics and chemistry involved? And those are my weakest science subjects!

I wonder if people realize that they paid to hear Rudolph Giuliani lie to them for over six years? Maybe that's why his campaign went into the shitter! Ha ha, scumbag!

You see, for me, it's a matter of these fucking retards lying to my face about what occurred - the whole story is a farce from beginning to end.

Some idiot ex-CIA guy is actually the leader of some rebel force that is so fearsome, they named themselves after a toilet - this guy is also on a dialysis machine, yet is able to elude any and all forces sent to detain him! Wow! Colonel Kurtz's got nothing on this guy!

Now...he informs the Israelis, and they are able to send out a warning...how nice.

Meanwhile, back in NYC, it's a crystal-clear day...four planes take off from Logan Airport...security managed by an Israeli firm...hey...did they get that warning, too?

Willie Brown knows not to fly.

The Senate is on Cipro.

Salman Rushdie is barred from flying.

First plane impacts with WTC2 - The Monkey King states that he saw the first impact as it occurred...imagine that.

There are Israelis doing the frickin' Riverdance all over the city. Some are so excited, they left their businesses in the WTC buildings! Some, days earlier.

White vans with "non-Arab Middle Easterners" pop up like Sir Charge in that not-so-great Whack-A-Octogenarian commercial (the first Sir Charge commercial was genius...but they "jumped the shark" on the concept already). Ooohh...the bomb-sniffing dogs are going wild! Too bad that they had been removed from the WTC complex in the weeks before the infamous "event".

Binyamin Netanyahu realizes, "Hey - this is frickin' great - now the whole damn world will stop criticizing us on our "appropriation" of Palestine...eh...what? No, schmuck, I meant Jerusalem!"

Another plane...er...where's our air defense?

Richard B. "Skeletor" Cheney: "Hey...just for laughs, let's have a commercial plane totally violate the air space of the NERVE CENTER OF THE UNITED STATES' DEFENSE DEPARTMENT!!! Then let's hide all of the video! The CT's will be eating their own feces trying to figure out what happened!"

Oh, crap! You mean the frickin' passengers got into the cockpit and saw that NO ONE'S FLYING THE DAMN PLANE?!? Shite! SHOOT THAT FUCKER DOWN! And get Ted Olson's wife to do a reading for us...you have that voice-morphing software ready to go? Let's start with this Mark Bingham guy..."

Hey...bonanza! Not only did we happen to pop the trunk of the guy who took the terrorists to the airport; we got two, count 'em, TWO, passports! Geez, I need a suit made out of this stuff.

Folks...I could rant on and on...but it's annoying, I'm sure, to constantly listen to someone sound so bloody self-righteous all the time, yes? I believe that this is the main problem facing the various September 11th Truth Factions. You see...right-wing radio shows conduct what they call "drive-by" broadcasts, saying whatever crap they can make up at the time, then having sycophants to cement said issue in the "minds" of the dittoheads/Factor fans, etc; while left-wing broadcasters heap boring-ass fact after boring-ass fact onerously one after another, until even the most die-hard truth-seeker is dulled into a coma.

Well...my case is a bit different than most.

I DON'T LIKE BEING LIED TO BY IDIOTS.

And understand this: anyone who thought that after watching those damned buildings come down in the fashion that they did, that they were felled by AIRPLANES...ahh...you really are a complete dullard. You DESERVE to be euthanized, sterilized, and relegated to being a "useless eater", and you should consider yourself a complete waste of oxygen.

That's all for now.

UPDATE: Senator Ted Kennedy is relaxing in a hospital after reports that he was suffering from seizures...so, I'm watching CNN, and of course, the candidates are taking this opportunity to give their well wishes to their fellow senator...but I was INCENSED to see Shillary STANDING IN FRONT OF MAKER'S MARK WHISKEY BARRELS AS SHE GAVE HER "BEST WISHES"!

One might think that it was a nice thing to do, considering if one knows anything about Senator Edward Kennedy, he likes his booze (much as a certain political upstart does, as well), but I consider it a subconscious dig at her fellow senator. If anyone has a screenshot, please send it my way...I need a new wallpaper for my iBook.

Senator Kennedy, I hope to see you in a new man-tailored shirt soon, er ah...